Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines
- Autores
- Romero, Lílian Mónica; Osorio Grisales, Jaiver; Reta, Mario Roberto
- Año de publicación
- 2010
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- We compared the recently developed surfactant-based extraction with sodium bis-[2-ethylhexyl]-sulphosuccinate (AOT) in heptane (the phase-transfer method) and the well established methodology with poly(oxyethylene)-7,5-(p-tert-octylphenyl) ether (Triton X-114; the cloud-point technique) to extract and preconcentrate biogenic amines. Both procedures were optimized and applied to the extrac-tion of biogenic amines from a beer sample. In order to improve the degree and monitoring of the extraction otherwise achieved with underivatized amines, the fluorescent reagent dansyl chloride was used. Since the different procedures described in the literature are not in agreement, we optimized the derivatization reaction. Accordingly a systematic investigation of the experimental variables, one by one, yielded the following optimum conditions: dansyl chloride, 5mg/mL; 27 ◦C; reaction time, 25min; pH, 10.35 at ionic strength, 0.7mol/L. Both surfactant-based extraction procedures are simple and sensitive, but the use of AOT instead of Triton X-114 offers certain advantages. Detection limits of between 0.03 and 0.8 pmol injected were obtained when AOT was used, whose range is similar to or better than the other published techniques; while the corresponding values for Triton X-114 were between 0.2 and 1.2 pmol injected. The phase-transfer extraction is faster than the cloud-pointmethod, and no heating is required. For both approaches, the recovery was very high for all the amines studied and the reproducibility quite good for almost all. Upon comparison of calibration curves in pure water with those in the presence of samples, matrix effects were detected.
Fil: Romero, Lílian Mónica. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina
Fil: Osorio Grisales, Jaiver. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Reta, Mario Roberto. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina - Materia
-
surfactant-based extractions
biogenic amines
cloud-point extraction - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242916
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_6e057f2a3cace4085834cecbd1e41c70 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242916 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic aminesRomero, Lílian MónicaOsorio Grisales, JaiverReta, Mario Robertosurfactant-based extractionsbiogenic aminescloud-point extractionhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We compared the recently developed surfactant-based extraction with sodium bis-[2-ethylhexyl]-sulphosuccinate (AOT) in heptane (the phase-transfer method) and the well established methodology with poly(oxyethylene)-7,5-(p-tert-octylphenyl) ether (Triton X-114; the cloud-point technique) to extract and preconcentrate biogenic amines. Both procedures were optimized and applied to the extrac-tion of biogenic amines from a beer sample. In order to improve the degree and monitoring of the extraction otherwise achieved with underivatized amines, the fluorescent reagent dansyl chloride was used. Since the different procedures described in the literature are not in agreement, we optimized the derivatization reaction. Accordingly a systematic investigation of the experimental variables, one by one, yielded the following optimum conditions: dansyl chloride, 5mg/mL; 27 ◦C; reaction time, 25min; pH, 10.35 at ionic strength, 0.7mol/L. Both surfactant-based extraction procedures are simple and sensitive, but the use of AOT instead of Triton X-114 offers certain advantages. Detection limits of between 0.03 and 0.8 pmol injected were obtained when AOT was used, whose range is similar to or better than the other published techniques; while the corresponding values for Triton X-114 were between 0.2 and 1.2 pmol injected. The phase-transfer extraction is faster than the cloud-pointmethod, and no heating is required. For both approaches, the recovery was very high for all the amines studied and the reproducibility quite good for almost all. Upon comparison of calibration curves in pure water with those in the presence of samples, matrix effects were detected.Fil: Romero, Lílian Mónica. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; ArgentinaFil: Osorio Grisales, Jaiver. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Reta, Mario Roberto. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaElsevier Science2010-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/242916Romero, Lílian Mónica; Osorio Grisales, Jaiver; Reta, Mario Roberto; Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines; Elsevier Science; Talanta; 81; 4-5; 6-2010; 1431-14370039-9140CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003991401000158Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.02.043info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:59:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242916instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:59:07.607CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines |
title |
Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines Romero, Lílian Mónica surfactant-based extractions biogenic amines cloud-point extraction |
title_short |
Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines |
title_full |
Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines |
title_sort |
Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Romero, Lílian Mónica Osorio Grisales, Jaiver Reta, Mario Roberto |
author |
Romero, Lílian Mónica |
author_facet |
Romero, Lílian Mónica Osorio Grisales, Jaiver Reta, Mario Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Osorio Grisales, Jaiver Reta, Mario Roberto |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
surfactant-based extractions biogenic amines cloud-point extraction |
topic |
surfactant-based extractions biogenic amines cloud-point extraction |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
We compared the recently developed surfactant-based extraction with sodium bis-[2-ethylhexyl]-sulphosuccinate (AOT) in heptane (the phase-transfer method) and the well established methodology with poly(oxyethylene)-7,5-(p-tert-octylphenyl) ether (Triton X-114; the cloud-point technique) to extract and preconcentrate biogenic amines. Both procedures were optimized and applied to the extrac-tion of biogenic amines from a beer sample. In order to improve the degree and monitoring of the extraction otherwise achieved with underivatized amines, the fluorescent reagent dansyl chloride was used. Since the different procedures described in the literature are not in agreement, we optimized the derivatization reaction. Accordingly a systematic investigation of the experimental variables, one by one, yielded the following optimum conditions: dansyl chloride, 5mg/mL; 27 ◦C; reaction time, 25min; pH, 10.35 at ionic strength, 0.7mol/L. Both surfactant-based extraction procedures are simple and sensitive, but the use of AOT instead of Triton X-114 offers certain advantages. Detection limits of between 0.03 and 0.8 pmol injected were obtained when AOT was used, whose range is similar to or better than the other published techniques; while the corresponding values for Triton X-114 were between 0.2 and 1.2 pmol injected. The phase-transfer extraction is faster than the cloud-pointmethod, and no heating is required. For both approaches, the recovery was very high for all the amines studied and the reproducibility quite good for almost all. Upon comparison of calibration curves in pure water with those in the presence of samples, matrix effects were detected. Fil: Romero, Lílian Mónica. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina Fil: Osorio Grisales, Jaiver. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina Fil: Reta, Mario Roberto. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina |
description |
We compared the recently developed surfactant-based extraction with sodium bis-[2-ethylhexyl]-sulphosuccinate (AOT) in heptane (the phase-transfer method) and the well established methodology with poly(oxyethylene)-7,5-(p-tert-octylphenyl) ether (Triton X-114; the cloud-point technique) to extract and preconcentrate biogenic amines. Both procedures were optimized and applied to the extrac-tion of biogenic amines from a beer sample. In order to improve the degree and monitoring of the extraction otherwise achieved with underivatized amines, the fluorescent reagent dansyl chloride was used. Since the different procedures described in the literature are not in agreement, we optimized the derivatization reaction. Accordingly a systematic investigation of the experimental variables, one by one, yielded the following optimum conditions: dansyl chloride, 5mg/mL; 27 ◦C; reaction time, 25min; pH, 10.35 at ionic strength, 0.7mol/L. Both surfactant-based extraction procedures are simple and sensitive, but the use of AOT instead of Triton X-114 offers certain advantages. Detection limits of between 0.03 and 0.8 pmol injected were obtained when AOT was used, whose range is similar to or better than the other published techniques; while the corresponding values for Triton X-114 were between 0.2 and 1.2 pmol injected. The phase-transfer extraction is faster than the cloud-pointmethod, and no heating is required. For both approaches, the recovery was very high for all the amines studied and the reproducibility quite good for almost all. Upon comparison of calibration curves in pure water with those in the presence of samples, matrix effects were detected. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242916 Romero, Lílian Mónica; Osorio Grisales, Jaiver; Reta, Mario Roberto; Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines; Elsevier Science; Talanta; 81; 4-5; 6-2010; 1431-1437 0039-9140 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242916 |
identifier_str_mv |
Romero, Lílian Mónica; Osorio Grisales, Jaiver; Reta, Mario Roberto; Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines; Elsevier Science; Talanta; 81; 4-5; 6-2010; 1431-1437 0039-9140 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003991401000158X info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.02.043 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269562383368192 |
score |
13.13397 |