Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines

Autores
Romero, Lílian Mónica; Osorio Grisales, Jaiver; Reta, Mario Roberto
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We compared the recently developed surfactant-based extraction with sodium bis-[2-ethylhexyl]-sulphosuccinate (AOT) in heptane (the phase-transfer method) and the well established methodology with poly(oxyethylene)-7,5-(p-tert-octylphenyl) ether (Triton X-114; the cloud-point technique) to extract and preconcentrate biogenic amines. Both procedures were optimized and applied to the extrac-tion of biogenic amines from a beer sample. In order to improve the degree and monitoring of the extraction otherwise achieved with underivatized amines, the fluorescent reagent dansyl chloride was used. Since the different procedures described in the literature are not in agreement, we optimized the derivatization reaction. Accordingly a systematic investigation of the experimental variables, one by one, yielded the following optimum conditions: dansyl chloride, 5mg/mL; 27 ◦C; reaction time, 25min; pH, 10.35 at ionic strength, 0.7mol/L. Both surfactant-based extraction procedures are simple and sensitive, but the use of AOT instead of Triton X-114 offers certain advantages. Detection limits of between 0.03 and 0.8 pmol injected were obtained when AOT was used, whose range is similar to or better than the other published techniques; while the corresponding values for Triton X-114 were between 0.2 and 1.2 pmol injected. The phase-transfer extraction is faster than the cloud-pointmethod, and no heating is required. For both approaches, the recovery was very high for all the amines studied and the reproducibility quite good for almost all. Upon comparison of calibration curves in pure water with those in the presence of samples, matrix effects were detected.
Fil: Romero, Lílian Mónica. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina
Fil: Osorio Grisales, Jaiver. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Reta, Mario Roberto. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Materia
surfactant-based extractions
biogenic amines
cloud-point extraction
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242916

id CONICETDig_6e057f2a3cace4085834cecbd1e41c70
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242916
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic aminesRomero, Lílian MónicaOsorio Grisales, JaiverReta, Mario Robertosurfactant-based extractionsbiogenic aminescloud-point extractionhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We compared the recently developed surfactant-based extraction with sodium bis-[2-ethylhexyl]-sulphosuccinate (AOT) in heptane (the phase-transfer method) and the well established methodology with poly(oxyethylene)-7,5-(p-tert-octylphenyl) ether (Triton X-114; the cloud-point technique) to extract and preconcentrate biogenic amines. Both procedures were optimized and applied to the extrac-tion of biogenic amines from a beer sample. In order to improve the degree and monitoring of the extraction otherwise achieved with underivatized amines, the fluorescent reagent dansyl chloride was used. Since the different procedures described in the literature are not in agreement, we optimized the derivatization reaction. Accordingly a systematic investigation of the experimental variables, one by one, yielded the following optimum conditions: dansyl chloride, 5mg/mL; 27 ◦C; reaction time, 25min; pH, 10.35 at ionic strength, 0.7mol/L. Both surfactant-based extraction procedures are simple and sensitive, but the use of AOT instead of Triton X-114 offers certain advantages. Detection limits of between 0.03 and 0.8 pmol injected were obtained when AOT was used, whose range is similar to or better than the other published techniques; while the corresponding values for Triton X-114 were between 0.2 and 1.2 pmol injected. The phase-transfer extraction is faster than the cloud-pointmethod, and no heating is required. For both approaches, the recovery was very high for all the amines studied and the reproducibility quite good for almost all. Upon comparison of calibration curves in pure water with those in the presence of samples, matrix effects were detected.Fil: Romero, Lílian Mónica. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; ArgentinaFil: Osorio Grisales, Jaiver. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Reta, Mario Roberto. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaElsevier Science2010-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/242916Romero, Lílian Mónica; Osorio Grisales, Jaiver; Reta, Mario Roberto; Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines; Elsevier Science; Talanta; 81; 4-5; 6-2010; 1431-14370039-9140CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003991401000158Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.02.043info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:59:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242916instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:59:07.607CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines
title Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines
spellingShingle Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines
Romero, Lílian Mónica
surfactant-based extractions
biogenic amines
cloud-point extraction
title_short Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines
title_full Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines
title_fullStr Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines
title_sort Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Romero, Lílian Mónica
Osorio Grisales, Jaiver
Reta, Mario Roberto
author Romero, Lílian Mónica
author_facet Romero, Lílian Mónica
Osorio Grisales, Jaiver
Reta, Mario Roberto
author_role author
author2 Osorio Grisales, Jaiver
Reta, Mario Roberto
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv surfactant-based extractions
biogenic amines
cloud-point extraction
topic surfactant-based extractions
biogenic amines
cloud-point extraction
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We compared the recently developed surfactant-based extraction with sodium bis-[2-ethylhexyl]-sulphosuccinate (AOT) in heptane (the phase-transfer method) and the well established methodology with poly(oxyethylene)-7,5-(p-tert-octylphenyl) ether (Triton X-114; the cloud-point technique) to extract and preconcentrate biogenic amines. Both procedures were optimized and applied to the extrac-tion of biogenic amines from a beer sample. In order to improve the degree and monitoring of the extraction otherwise achieved with underivatized amines, the fluorescent reagent dansyl chloride was used. Since the different procedures described in the literature are not in agreement, we optimized the derivatization reaction. Accordingly a systematic investigation of the experimental variables, one by one, yielded the following optimum conditions: dansyl chloride, 5mg/mL; 27 ◦C; reaction time, 25min; pH, 10.35 at ionic strength, 0.7mol/L. Both surfactant-based extraction procedures are simple and sensitive, but the use of AOT instead of Triton X-114 offers certain advantages. Detection limits of between 0.03 and 0.8 pmol injected were obtained when AOT was used, whose range is similar to or better than the other published techniques; while the corresponding values for Triton X-114 were between 0.2 and 1.2 pmol injected. The phase-transfer extraction is faster than the cloud-pointmethod, and no heating is required. For both approaches, the recovery was very high for all the amines studied and the reproducibility quite good for almost all. Upon comparison of calibration curves in pure water with those in the presence of samples, matrix effects were detected.
Fil: Romero, Lílian Mónica. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina
Fil: Osorio Grisales, Jaiver. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Reta, Mario Roberto. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
description We compared the recently developed surfactant-based extraction with sodium bis-[2-ethylhexyl]-sulphosuccinate (AOT) in heptane (the phase-transfer method) and the well established methodology with poly(oxyethylene)-7,5-(p-tert-octylphenyl) ether (Triton X-114; the cloud-point technique) to extract and preconcentrate biogenic amines. Both procedures were optimized and applied to the extrac-tion of biogenic amines from a beer sample. In order to improve the degree and monitoring of the extraction otherwise achieved with underivatized amines, the fluorescent reagent dansyl chloride was used. Since the different procedures described in the literature are not in agreement, we optimized the derivatization reaction. Accordingly a systematic investigation of the experimental variables, one by one, yielded the following optimum conditions: dansyl chloride, 5mg/mL; 27 ◦C; reaction time, 25min; pH, 10.35 at ionic strength, 0.7mol/L. Both surfactant-based extraction procedures are simple and sensitive, but the use of AOT instead of Triton X-114 offers certain advantages. Detection limits of between 0.03 and 0.8 pmol injected were obtained when AOT was used, whose range is similar to or better than the other published techniques; while the corresponding values for Triton X-114 were between 0.2 and 1.2 pmol injected. The phase-transfer extraction is faster than the cloud-pointmethod, and no heating is required. For both approaches, the recovery was very high for all the amines studied and the reproducibility quite good for almost all. Upon comparison of calibration curves in pure water with those in the presence of samples, matrix effects were detected.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242916
Romero, Lílian Mónica; Osorio Grisales, Jaiver; Reta, Mario Roberto; Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines; Elsevier Science; Talanta; 81; 4-5; 6-2010; 1431-1437
0039-9140
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242916
identifier_str_mv Romero, Lílian Mónica; Osorio Grisales, Jaiver; Reta, Mario Roberto; Comparison between phase-transfer and cloud-point methodologies for the micellar extraction of biogenic amines; Elsevier Science; Talanta; 81; 4-5; 6-2010; 1431-1437
0039-9140
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003991401000158X
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.02.043
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269562383368192
score 13.13397