Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil

Autores
Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac; Mamone, Miguel Ignacio
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
What is the role of presidents in the politics of distribution in developing democracies? To what extent do other political actors, such as legislators and governors, influence federal distribution? This paper studies the main factors that affect distributive politics in Argentina and Brazil, two highly unequal presidential federations in Latin America. The focus is on funds with high redistributive impact and over which the central government has large discretion: those for public infrastructure. Using original data on federal infrastructure spending for the 24 provinces in Argentina and the 27 states in Brazil for the period 1999-2011, we show that the distribution of infrastructure funds is fundamentally determined by executive politics. Despite this, our empirical findings indicate there is large variation between the two cases in the relevance of the partisan links between presidents and governors and the influence of congress and its committees. Furthermore, we observe that elections are not relevant in explaining distribution in either of the two cases and that presidents are mostly motivated by political considerations and that programmatic factors, such as equity and efficiency criteria, play a secondary role, especially in Argentina. We discuss some possible reasons for these results and their implications for the broader comparative debate on distributive politics.
Fil: Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Escuela de Política y Gobierno; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Políticas y de la Comunicación. Instituto de Ciencias Políticas; Argentina
Fil: Mamone, Miguel Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Políticas y de la Comunicación. Instituto de Ciencias Políticas; Argentina
Materia
FEDERALISMO
DECENTRALIZACION
GASTO PUBLICO
ECONOMIA POLITICA
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/111636
Acceder
id CONICETDig_6ccfe043ef5cb972f23e3a85808b8524
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/111636
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and BrazilGonzalez, Lucas IsaacMamone, Miguel IgnacioFEDERALISMODECENTRALIZACIONGASTO PUBLICOECONOMIA POLITICAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5What is the role of presidents in the politics of distribution in developing democracies? To what extent do other political actors, such as legislators and governors, influence federal distribution? This paper studies the main factors that affect distributive politics in Argentina and Brazil, two highly unequal presidential federations in Latin America. The focus is on funds with high redistributive impact and over which the central government has large discretion: those for public infrastructure. Using original data on federal infrastructure spending for the 24 provinces in Argentina and the 27 states in Brazil for the period 1999-2011, we show that the distribution of infrastructure funds is fundamentally determined by executive politics. Despite this, our empirical findings indicate there is large variation between the two cases in the relevance of the partisan links between presidents and governors and the influence of congress and its committees. Furthermore, we observe that elections are not relevant in explaining distribution in either of the two cases and that presidents are mostly motivated by political considerations and that programmatic factors, such as equity and efficiency criteria, play a secondary role, especially in Argentina. We discuss some possible reasons for these results and their implications for the broader comparative debate on distributive politics.Fil: Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Escuela de Política y Gobierno; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Políticas y de la Comunicación. Instituto de Ciencias Políticas; ArgentinaFil: Mamone, Miguel Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Políticas y de la Comunicación. Instituto de Ciencias Políticas; ArgentinaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2015-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/111636Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac; Mamone, Miguel Ignacio; Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Revista Iberoamericana de Estudos Legislativos; 4; 1; 5-2015; 17-322179-8419CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/riel/article/view/49203info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12660/riel.v4.n1.2015.49203info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:21:17Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/111636instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:21:17.653CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil
title Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil
spellingShingle Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil
Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac
FEDERALISMO
DECENTRALIZACION
GASTO PUBLICO
ECONOMIA POLITICA
title_short Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil
title_full Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil
title_fullStr Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil
title_sort Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac
Mamone, Miguel Ignacio
author Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac
author_facet Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac
Mamone, Miguel Ignacio
author_role author
author2 Mamone, Miguel Ignacio
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv FEDERALISMO
DECENTRALIZACION
GASTO PUBLICO
ECONOMIA POLITICA
topic FEDERALISMO
DECENTRALIZACION
GASTO PUBLICO
ECONOMIA POLITICA
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv What is the role of presidents in the politics of distribution in developing democracies? To what extent do other political actors, such as legislators and governors, influence federal distribution? This paper studies the main factors that affect distributive politics in Argentina and Brazil, two highly unequal presidential federations in Latin America. The focus is on funds with high redistributive impact and over which the central government has large discretion: those for public infrastructure. Using original data on federal infrastructure spending for the 24 provinces in Argentina and the 27 states in Brazil for the period 1999-2011, we show that the distribution of infrastructure funds is fundamentally determined by executive politics. Despite this, our empirical findings indicate there is large variation between the two cases in the relevance of the partisan links between presidents and governors and the influence of congress and its committees. Furthermore, we observe that elections are not relevant in explaining distribution in either of the two cases and that presidents are mostly motivated by political considerations and that programmatic factors, such as equity and efficiency criteria, play a secondary role, especially in Argentina. We discuss some possible reasons for these results and their implications for the broader comparative debate on distributive politics.
Fil: Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Escuela de Política y Gobierno; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Políticas y de la Comunicación. Instituto de Ciencias Políticas; Argentina
Fil: Mamone, Miguel Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Políticas y de la Comunicación. Instituto de Ciencias Políticas; Argentina
description What is the role of presidents in the politics of distribution in developing democracies? To what extent do other political actors, such as legislators and governors, influence federal distribution? This paper studies the main factors that affect distributive politics in Argentina and Brazil, two highly unequal presidential federations in Latin America. The focus is on funds with high redistributive impact and over which the central government has large discretion: those for public infrastructure. Using original data on federal infrastructure spending for the 24 provinces in Argentina and the 27 states in Brazil for the period 1999-2011, we show that the distribution of infrastructure funds is fundamentally determined by executive politics. Despite this, our empirical findings indicate there is large variation between the two cases in the relevance of the partisan links between presidents and governors and the influence of congress and its committees. Furthermore, we observe that elections are not relevant in explaining distribution in either of the two cases and that presidents are mostly motivated by political considerations and that programmatic factors, such as equity and efficiency criteria, play a secondary role, especially in Argentina. We discuss some possible reasons for these results and their implications for the broader comparative debate on distributive politics.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/111636
Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac; Mamone, Miguel Ignacio; Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Revista Iberoamericana de Estudos Legislativos; 4; 1; 5-2015; 17-32
2179-8419
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/111636
identifier_str_mv Gonzalez, Lucas Isaac; Mamone, Miguel Ignacio; Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Revista Iberoamericana de Estudos Legislativos; 4; 1; 5-2015; 17-32
2179-8419
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/riel/article/view/49203
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12660/riel.v4.n1.2015.49203
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083361666236416
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares