Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications

Autores
Serrano, Manuel Francisco
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper offers a decolonial critique of the official justifications for the Conquest of the Desert (1878–1885), through which the Argentine state violently occupied Indigenous territories in the Pampas and Patagonia. Applying a hermeneutics of suspicion, it examines legal acts, state correspondence, and academic discourse to uncover the ideological foundations of the civilising and defensive narratives. The analysis shows that these justifications were rooted not in legitimate self-defence but in colonial and racialised assumptions that dehumanised Indigenous peoples and excluded them from legal protection. The study argues that the violence was a structural manifestation of a colonial order, masquerading as national progress. By exposing these ideological underpinnings, the paper challenges dominant historical narratives and calls for a critical rethinking of the Conquest’s legacy.
Fil: Serrano, Manuel Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias Humanas y Sociales;
Materia
CONQUEST OF THE DESERT
HISTORICAL INJUSTICE
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
COLONIALITY OF POWER
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/280403

id CONICETDig_6ca7f60248b8692f2be07b3a32785d64
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/280403
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official JustificationsSerrano, Manuel FranciscoCONQUEST OF THE DESERTHISTORICAL INJUSTICEINDIGENOUS PEOPLECOLONIALITY OF POWERhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This paper offers a decolonial critique of the official justifications for the Conquest of the Desert (1878–1885), through which the Argentine state violently occupied Indigenous territories in the Pampas and Patagonia. Applying a hermeneutics of suspicion, it examines legal acts, state correspondence, and academic discourse to uncover the ideological foundations of the civilising and defensive narratives. The analysis shows that these justifications were rooted not in legitimate self-defence but in colonial and racialised assumptions that dehumanised Indigenous peoples and excluded them from legal protection. The study argues that the violence was a structural manifestation of a colonial order, masquerading as national progress. By exposing these ideological underpinnings, the paper challenges dominant historical narratives and calls for a critical rethinking of the Conquest’s legacy.Fil: Serrano, Manuel Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias Humanas y Sociales;Universidad de Aarhus2025-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/280403Serrano, Manuel Francisco; Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications; Universidad de Aarhus; Diálogos Latinoamericanos; 34; 12-2025; 1-171600-01102246-8609CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://tidsskrift.dk/dialogos/article/view/152900info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-26T10:33:24Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/280403instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-26 10:33:25.225CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications
title Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications
spellingShingle Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications
Serrano, Manuel Francisco
CONQUEST OF THE DESERT
HISTORICAL INJUSTICE
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
COLONIALITY OF POWER
title_short Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications
title_full Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications
title_fullStr Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications
title_full_unstemmed Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications
title_sort Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Serrano, Manuel Francisco
author Serrano, Manuel Francisco
author_facet Serrano, Manuel Francisco
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CONQUEST OF THE DESERT
HISTORICAL INJUSTICE
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
COLONIALITY OF POWER
topic CONQUEST OF THE DESERT
HISTORICAL INJUSTICE
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
COLONIALITY OF POWER
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper offers a decolonial critique of the official justifications for the Conquest of the Desert (1878–1885), through which the Argentine state violently occupied Indigenous territories in the Pampas and Patagonia. Applying a hermeneutics of suspicion, it examines legal acts, state correspondence, and academic discourse to uncover the ideological foundations of the civilising and defensive narratives. The analysis shows that these justifications were rooted not in legitimate self-defence but in colonial and racialised assumptions that dehumanised Indigenous peoples and excluded them from legal protection. The study argues that the violence was a structural manifestation of a colonial order, masquerading as national progress. By exposing these ideological underpinnings, the paper challenges dominant historical narratives and calls for a critical rethinking of the Conquest’s legacy.
Fil: Serrano, Manuel Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias Humanas y Sociales;
description This paper offers a decolonial critique of the official justifications for the Conquest of the Desert (1878–1885), through which the Argentine state violently occupied Indigenous territories in the Pampas and Patagonia. Applying a hermeneutics of suspicion, it examines legal acts, state correspondence, and academic discourse to uncover the ideological foundations of the civilising and defensive narratives. The analysis shows that these justifications were rooted not in legitimate self-defence but in colonial and racialised assumptions that dehumanised Indigenous peoples and excluded them from legal protection. The study argues that the violence was a structural manifestation of a colonial order, masquerading as national progress. By exposing these ideological underpinnings, the paper challenges dominant historical narratives and calls for a critical rethinking of the Conquest’s legacy.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/280403
Serrano, Manuel Francisco; Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications; Universidad de Aarhus; Diálogos Latinoamericanos; 34; 12-2025; 1-17
1600-0110
2246-8609
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/280403
identifier_str_mv Serrano, Manuel Francisco; Decolonial Responses to the Conquest of the Desert: Challenging Official Justifications; Universidad de Aarhus; Diálogos Latinoamericanos; 34; 12-2025; 1-17
1600-0110
2246-8609
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://tidsskrift.dk/dialogos/article/view/152900
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Aarhus
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Aarhus
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1858306184381988864
score 12.665996