Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane
- Autores
- Aparicio, Juan Daniel; Garcia Velasco, Nerea; Urionabarrenetxea, Erik; Soto, Manu; Álvarez, Analía; Polti, Marta Alejandra
- Año de publicación
- 2019
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Bioremediation using actinobacterium consortia proved to be a promising alternative for the purification of co-contaminated environments. In this sense, the quadruple consortium composed of Streptomyces sp. M7, MC1, A5, and Amycolatopsis tucumanensis AB0 has been able to remove significant levels of Cr(VI) and lindane from anthropogenically contaminated soils. However, the effectiveness of the bioremediation process could not be evaluated only by analytical monitoring, which is complex mainly due to the characteristics of the matrix, producing non-quantitative analyte recoveries, or interferences in the detection stage and quantification. However, the effectiveness of the bioremediation process cannot be evaluated only through analytical monitoring, which is complex due mainly to the characteristics of the matrix, to the recoveries of non-quantitative analytes or to interferences in the detection and quantification stage. For this reason, it is essential to have tools of ecological relevance to assess the biological impact of pollutants on the environment. In this context, the objective of this work was to establish the appropriate bioassays to evaluate the effectiveness of a bioremediation process of co-contaminated soils. For this, five model species were studied: four plant species (Lactuca sativa, Raphanus sativus, Lycopersicon esculentum, and Zea mays) and one animal species (Eisenia fetida). On plant species, the biomarkers evaluated were inhibition of germination (IG) and the length of hypocotyls/steam and radicles/roots of the seedling. While on E. fetida, mortality (M), weight lost, coelomocyte concentration and cell viability were tested. These bioindicators and the battery of biomarkers quantified in them showed a different level of sensitivity, from maximum to minimum: E. fetida > L. esculentum > L. sativa > R. sativus ≫> Z. mays. Therefore, E. fetida and L. esculentum and their respective biomarkers were selected to evaluate the effectiveness of the bioremediation process due to the capability of assessing the effect on the flora and the fauna of the soil, respectively. The joint application of these bioindicators in a field scale bioremediation process is a feasible tool to demonstrate the recovery of the quality and health of the soil.
Fil: Aparicio, Juan Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina
Fil: Garcia Velasco, Nerea. Universidad del País Vasco; España
Fil: Urionabarrenetxea, Erik. Universidad del País Vasco; España
Fil: Soto, Manu. Universidad del País Vasco; España
Fil: Álvarez, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina
Fil: Polti, Marta Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina - Materia
-
ACTINOBACTERIA
BIOINDICATORS
BIOMARKERS
BIOREMEDIATION
CO-CONTAMINATED SOIL - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92017
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_69443799861fa6cbcdf97122f8698336 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92017 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindaneAparicio, Juan DanielGarcia Velasco, NereaUrionabarrenetxea, ErikSoto, ManuÁlvarez, AnalíaPolti, Marta AlejandraACTINOBACTERIABIOINDICATORSBIOMARKERSBIOREMEDIATIONCO-CONTAMINATED SOILhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.8https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2Bioremediation using actinobacterium consortia proved to be a promising alternative for the purification of co-contaminated environments. In this sense, the quadruple consortium composed of Streptomyces sp. M7, MC1, A5, and Amycolatopsis tucumanensis AB0 has been able to remove significant levels of Cr(VI) and lindane from anthropogenically contaminated soils. However, the effectiveness of the bioremediation process could not be evaluated only by analytical monitoring, which is complex mainly due to the characteristics of the matrix, producing non-quantitative analyte recoveries, or interferences in the detection stage and quantification. However, the effectiveness of the bioremediation process cannot be evaluated only through analytical monitoring, which is complex due mainly to the characteristics of the matrix, to the recoveries of non-quantitative analytes or to interferences in the detection and quantification stage. For this reason, it is essential to have tools of ecological relevance to assess the biological impact of pollutants on the environment. In this context, the objective of this work was to establish the appropriate bioassays to evaluate the effectiveness of a bioremediation process of co-contaminated soils. For this, five model species were studied: four plant species (Lactuca sativa, Raphanus sativus, Lycopersicon esculentum, and Zea mays) and one animal species (Eisenia fetida). On plant species, the biomarkers evaluated were inhibition of germination (IG) and the length of hypocotyls/steam and radicles/roots of the seedling. While on E. fetida, mortality (M), weight lost, coelomocyte concentration and cell viability were tested. These bioindicators and the battery of biomarkers quantified in them showed a different level of sensitivity, from maximum to minimum: E. fetida > L. esculentum > L. sativa > R. sativus ≫> Z. mays. Therefore, E. fetida and L. esculentum and their respective biomarkers were selected to evaluate the effectiveness of the bioremediation process due to the capability of assessing the effect on the flora and the fauna of the soil, respectively. The joint application of these bioindicators in a field scale bioremediation process is a feasible tool to demonstrate the recovery of the quality and health of the soil.Fil: Aparicio, Juan Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; ArgentinaFil: Garcia Velasco, Nerea. Universidad del País Vasco; EspañaFil: Urionabarrenetxea, Erik. Universidad del País Vasco; EspañaFil: Soto, Manu. Universidad del País Vasco; EspañaFil: Álvarez, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; ArgentinaFil: Polti, Marta Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; ArgentinaAcademic Press Inc Elsevier Science2019-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/92017Aparicio, Juan Daniel; Garcia Velasco, Nerea; Urionabarrenetxea, Erik; Soto, Manu; Álvarez, Analía; et al.; Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane; Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science; Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety; 181; 10-2019; 255-2630147-6513CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651319306578?via%3Dihubinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.06.019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:59:41Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92017instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:59:41.865CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane |
title |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane Aparicio, Juan Daniel ACTINOBACTERIA BIOINDICATORS BIOMARKERS BIOREMEDIATION CO-CONTAMINATED SOIL |
title_short |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane |
title_full |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Aparicio, Juan Daniel Garcia Velasco, Nerea Urionabarrenetxea, Erik Soto, Manu Álvarez, Analía Polti, Marta Alejandra |
author |
Aparicio, Juan Daniel |
author_facet |
Aparicio, Juan Daniel Garcia Velasco, Nerea Urionabarrenetxea, Erik Soto, Manu Álvarez, Analía Polti, Marta Alejandra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Garcia Velasco, Nerea Urionabarrenetxea, Erik Soto, Manu Álvarez, Analía Polti, Marta Alejandra |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ACTINOBACTERIA BIOINDICATORS BIOMARKERS BIOREMEDIATION CO-CONTAMINATED SOIL |
topic |
ACTINOBACTERIA BIOINDICATORS BIOMARKERS BIOREMEDIATION CO-CONTAMINATED SOIL |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.8 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Bioremediation using actinobacterium consortia proved to be a promising alternative for the purification of co-contaminated environments. In this sense, the quadruple consortium composed of Streptomyces sp. M7, MC1, A5, and Amycolatopsis tucumanensis AB0 has been able to remove significant levels of Cr(VI) and lindane from anthropogenically contaminated soils. However, the effectiveness of the bioremediation process could not be evaluated only by analytical monitoring, which is complex mainly due to the characteristics of the matrix, producing non-quantitative analyte recoveries, or interferences in the detection stage and quantification. However, the effectiveness of the bioremediation process cannot be evaluated only through analytical monitoring, which is complex due mainly to the characteristics of the matrix, to the recoveries of non-quantitative analytes or to interferences in the detection and quantification stage. For this reason, it is essential to have tools of ecological relevance to assess the biological impact of pollutants on the environment. In this context, the objective of this work was to establish the appropriate bioassays to evaluate the effectiveness of a bioremediation process of co-contaminated soils. For this, five model species were studied: four plant species (Lactuca sativa, Raphanus sativus, Lycopersicon esculentum, and Zea mays) and one animal species (Eisenia fetida). On plant species, the biomarkers evaluated were inhibition of germination (IG) and the length of hypocotyls/steam and radicles/roots of the seedling. While on E. fetida, mortality (M), weight lost, coelomocyte concentration and cell viability were tested. These bioindicators and the battery of biomarkers quantified in them showed a different level of sensitivity, from maximum to minimum: E. fetida > L. esculentum > L. sativa > R. sativus ≫> Z. mays. Therefore, E. fetida and L. esculentum and their respective biomarkers were selected to evaluate the effectiveness of the bioremediation process due to the capability of assessing the effect on the flora and the fauna of the soil, respectively. The joint application of these bioindicators in a field scale bioremediation process is a feasible tool to demonstrate the recovery of the quality and health of the soil. Fil: Aparicio, Juan Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina Fil: Garcia Velasco, Nerea. Universidad del País Vasco; España Fil: Urionabarrenetxea, Erik. Universidad del País Vasco; España Fil: Soto, Manu. Universidad del País Vasco; España Fil: Álvarez, Analía. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina Fil: Polti, Marta Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina |
description |
Bioremediation using actinobacterium consortia proved to be a promising alternative for the purification of co-contaminated environments. In this sense, the quadruple consortium composed of Streptomyces sp. M7, MC1, A5, and Amycolatopsis tucumanensis AB0 has been able to remove significant levels of Cr(VI) and lindane from anthropogenically contaminated soils. However, the effectiveness of the bioremediation process could not be evaluated only by analytical monitoring, which is complex mainly due to the characteristics of the matrix, producing non-quantitative analyte recoveries, or interferences in the detection stage and quantification. However, the effectiveness of the bioremediation process cannot be evaluated only through analytical monitoring, which is complex due mainly to the characteristics of the matrix, to the recoveries of non-quantitative analytes or to interferences in the detection and quantification stage. For this reason, it is essential to have tools of ecological relevance to assess the biological impact of pollutants on the environment. In this context, the objective of this work was to establish the appropriate bioassays to evaluate the effectiveness of a bioremediation process of co-contaminated soils. For this, five model species were studied: four plant species (Lactuca sativa, Raphanus sativus, Lycopersicon esculentum, and Zea mays) and one animal species (Eisenia fetida). On plant species, the biomarkers evaluated were inhibition of germination (IG) and the length of hypocotyls/steam and radicles/roots of the seedling. While on E. fetida, mortality (M), weight lost, coelomocyte concentration and cell viability were tested. These bioindicators and the battery of biomarkers quantified in them showed a different level of sensitivity, from maximum to minimum: E. fetida > L. esculentum > L. sativa > R. sativus ≫> Z. mays. Therefore, E. fetida and L. esculentum and their respective biomarkers were selected to evaluate the effectiveness of the bioremediation process due to the capability of assessing the effect on the flora and the fauna of the soil, respectively. The joint application of these bioindicators in a field scale bioremediation process is a feasible tool to demonstrate the recovery of the quality and health of the soil. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/92017 Aparicio, Juan Daniel; Garcia Velasco, Nerea; Urionabarrenetxea, Erik; Soto, Manu; Álvarez, Analía; et al.; Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane; Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science; Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety; 181; 10-2019; 255-263 0147-6513 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/92017 |
identifier_str_mv |
Aparicio, Juan Daniel; Garcia Velasco, Nerea; Urionabarrenetxea, Erik; Soto, Manu; Álvarez, Analía; et al.; Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bioremediation process in experimental soils polluted with chromium and lindane; Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science; Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety; 181; 10-2019; 255-263 0147-6513 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651319306578?via%3Dihub info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.06.019 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613769269870592 |
score |
13.070432 |