Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study

Autores
Carranza, Cecilia Soledad; Aluffi, Melisa Egle; Benito, Nicolas; Magnoli, Karen; de Gerónimo, Eduardo; Aparicio, Virginia Carolina; Barberis, Carla Lorena; Magnoli, Carina Elizabeth
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Several studies, have reported that glyphosate-based herbicides persist in the soil and are transported into other environmental matrices. This study evaluated the ability of Aspergillus oryzae AM2 and Mucor circinelloides 166 to remove glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid from agricultural soil under field conditions. The strains are native to Argentinean agricultural soils, and they were assessed separately and in combination in 2 m × 1 m subplots. A completely randomized block design was used (5 treatments with 6 replicates each). The soil was sprayed with a commercial glyphosate-based herbicide formulation (3 kg ha-1) and inoculated with spores and/or conidial suspensions. Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid were measured at the beginning of the assay and at the end (150 days) by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography. In all the treatments, residual glyphosate levels were significantly lower at the end than at the start. The most significant removal percentages (p < 0.001) were 97%, obtained with A. oryzae AM2 (10exp6 conidia/mL-1), and 93%, obtained with the combination of M. circinelloides 166 (10exp6 spores mL-1) and A. oryzae AM2 (10 exp3 conidia mL-1). Aminomethylphosphonic acid decreased significantly (by 32%) in the uninoculated control. The same two treatments that were the most effective at removing glyphosate were the only ones in which the decrease in aminomethylphosphonic acid was higher than in the control (over 70%). This is the first study to demonstrate that these fungal strains can remove glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid under field conditions. Thus, they could be good candidates for the remediation of herbicide-polluted sites.
Fil: Carranza, Cecilia Soledad. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Aluffi, Melisa Egle. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Benito, Nicolas. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Magnoli, Karen. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: de Gerónimo, Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Aparicio, Virginia Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Barberis, Carla Lorena. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Magnoli, Carina Elizabeth. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Materia
ASPERGILLUS ORYZAE
MUCOR CIRCINELLOIDES
ORGANOPHOSPHATE HERBICIDES
TOLERANT STRAINS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso embargado
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/243126
Acceder
id CONICETDig_64fa7fc8a410557f76bfbd464995d37c
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/243126
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field studyCarranza, Cecilia SoledadAluffi, Melisa EgleBenito, NicolasMagnoli, Karende Gerónimo, EduardoAparicio, Virginia CarolinaBarberis, Carla LorenaMagnoli, Carina ElizabethASPERGILLUS ORYZAEMUCOR CIRCINELLOIDESORGANOPHOSPHATE HERBICIDESTOLERANT STRAINShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Several studies, have reported that glyphosate-based herbicides persist in the soil and are transported into other environmental matrices. This study evaluated the ability of Aspergillus oryzae AM2 and Mucor circinelloides 166 to remove glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid from agricultural soil under field conditions. The strains are native to Argentinean agricultural soils, and they were assessed separately and in combination in 2 m × 1 m subplots. A completely randomized block design was used (5 treatments with 6 replicates each). The soil was sprayed with a commercial glyphosate-based herbicide formulation (3 kg ha-1) and inoculated with spores and/or conidial suspensions. Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid were measured at the beginning of the assay and at the end (150 days) by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography. In all the treatments, residual glyphosate levels were significantly lower at the end than at the start. The most significant removal percentages (p < 0.001) were 97%, obtained with A. oryzae AM2 (10exp6 conidia/mL-1), and 93%, obtained with the combination of M. circinelloides 166 (10exp6 spores mL-1) and A. oryzae AM2 (10 exp3 conidia mL-1). Aminomethylphosphonic acid decreased significantly (by 32%) in the uninoculated control. The same two treatments that were the most effective at removing glyphosate were the only ones in which the decrease in aminomethylphosphonic acid was higher than in the control (over 70%). This is the first study to demonstrate that these fungal strains can remove glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid under field conditions. Thus, they could be good candidates for the remediation of herbicide-polluted sites.Fil: Carranza, Cecilia Soledad. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; ArgentinaFil: Aluffi, Melisa Egle. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; ArgentinaFil: Benito, Nicolas. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; ArgentinaFil: Magnoli, Karen. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; ArgentinaFil: de Gerónimo, Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Aparicio, Virginia Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; ArgentinaFil: Barberis, Carla Lorena. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; ArgentinaFil: Magnoli, Carina Elizabeth. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; ArgentinaCtr Environment & Energy Research & Studies2024-07-01info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2025-02-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/243126Carranza, Cecilia Soledad; Aluffi, Melisa Egle; Benito, Nicolas; Magnoli, Karen; de Gerónimo, Eduardo; et al.; Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study; Ctr Environment & Energy Research & Studies; International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology; 1-7-2024; 1-101735-1472CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13762-024-05809-zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s13762-024-05809-zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:41Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/243126instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:41.47CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study
title Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study
spellingShingle Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study
Carranza, Cecilia Soledad
ASPERGILLUS ORYZAE
MUCOR CIRCINELLOIDES
ORGANOPHOSPHATE HERBICIDES
TOLERANT STRAINS
title_short Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study
title_full Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study
title_fullStr Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study
title_full_unstemmed Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study
title_sort Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Carranza, Cecilia Soledad
Aluffi, Melisa Egle
Benito, Nicolas
Magnoli, Karen
de Gerónimo, Eduardo
Aparicio, Virginia Carolina
Barberis, Carla Lorena
Magnoli, Carina Elizabeth
author Carranza, Cecilia Soledad
author_facet Carranza, Cecilia Soledad
Aluffi, Melisa Egle
Benito, Nicolas
Magnoli, Karen
de Gerónimo, Eduardo
Aparicio, Virginia Carolina
Barberis, Carla Lorena
Magnoli, Carina Elizabeth
author_role author
author2 Aluffi, Melisa Egle
Benito, Nicolas
Magnoli, Karen
de Gerónimo, Eduardo
Aparicio, Virginia Carolina
Barberis, Carla Lorena
Magnoli, Carina Elizabeth
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ASPERGILLUS ORYZAE
MUCOR CIRCINELLOIDES
ORGANOPHOSPHATE HERBICIDES
TOLERANT STRAINS
topic ASPERGILLUS ORYZAE
MUCOR CIRCINELLOIDES
ORGANOPHOSPHATE HERBICIDES
TOLERANT STRAINS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Several studies, have reported that glyphosate-based herbicides persist in the soil and are transported into other environmental matrices. This study evaluated the ability of Aspergillus oryzae AM2 and Mucor circinelloides 166 to remove glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid from agricultural soil under field conditions. The strains are native to Argentinean agricultural soils, and they were assessed separately and in combination in 2 m × 1 m subplots. A completely randomized block design was used (5 treatments with 6 replicates each). The soil was sprayed with a commercial glyphosate-based herbicide formulation (3 kg ha-1) and inoculated with spores and/or conidial suspensions. Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid were measured at the beginning of the assay and at the end (150 days) by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography. In all the treatments, residual glyphosate levels were significantly lower at the end than at the start. The most significant removal percentages (p < 0.001) were 97%, obtained with A. oryzae AM2 (10exp6 conidia/mL-1), and 93%, obtained with the combination of M. circinelloides 166 (10exp6 spores mL-1) and A. oryzae AM2 (10 exp3 conidia mL-1). Aminomethylphosphonic acid decreased significantly (by 32%) in the uninoculated control. The same two treatments that were the most effective at removing glyphosate were the only ones in which the decrease in aminomethylphosphonic acid was higher than in the control (over 70%). This is the first study to demonstrate that these fungal strains can remove glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid under field conditions. Thus, they could be good candidates for the remediation of herbicide-polluted sites.
Fil: Carranza, Cecilia Soledad. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Aluffi, Melisa Egle. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Benito, Nicolas. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Magnoli, Karen. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: de Gerónimo, Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Aparicio, Virginia Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Barberis, Carla Lorena. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Magnoli, Carina Elizabeth. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
description Several studies, have reported that glyphosate-based herbicides persist in the soil and are transported into other environmental matrices. This study evaluated the ability of Aspergillus oryzae AM2 and Mucor circinelloides 166 to remove glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid from agricultural soil under field conditions. The strains are native to Argentinean agricultural soils, and they were assessed separately and in combination in 2 m × 1 m subplots. A completely randomized block design was used (5 treatments with 6 replicates each). The soil was sprayed with a commercial glyphosate-based herbicide formulation (3 kg ha-1) and inoculated with spores and/or conidial suspensions. Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid were measured at the beginning of the assay and at the end (150 days) by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography. In all the treatments, residual glyphosate levels were significantly lower at the end than at the start. The most significant removal percentages (p < 0.001) were 97%, obtained with A. oryzae AM2 (10exp6 conidia/mL-1), and 93%, obtained with the combination of M. circinelloides 166 (10exp6 spores mL-1) and A. oryzae AM2 (10 exp3 conidia mL-1). Aminomethylphosphonic acid decreased significantly (by 32%) in the uninoculated control. The same two treatments that were the most effective at removing glyphosate were the only ones in which the decrease in aminomethylphosphonic acid was higher than in the control (over 70%). This is the first study to demonstrate that these fungal strains can remove glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid under field conditions. Thus, they could be good candidates for the remediation of herbicide-polluted sites.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-01
info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2025-02-26
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/243126
Carranza, Cecilia Soledad; Aluffi, Melisa Egle; Benito, Nicolas; Magnoli, Karen; de Gerónimo, Eduardo; et al.; Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study; Ctr Environment & Energy Research & Studies; International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology; 1-7-2024; 1-10
1735-1472
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/243126
identifier_str_mv Carranza, Cecilia Soledad; Aluffi, Melisa Egle; Benito, Nicolas; Magnoli, Karen; de Gerónimo, Eduardo; et al.; Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid removal by fungal strains native to pesticide-exposed agricultural soil: a field study; Ctr Environment & Energy Research & Studies; International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology; 1-7-2024; 1-10
1735-1472
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13762-024-05809-z
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s13762-024-05809-z
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ctr Environment & Energy Research & Studies
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ctr Environment & Energy Research & Studies
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269110988177408
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares