Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point
- Autores
- Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto; Scardino, Valeria
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Machine learning (ML) models to predict the toxicity of small molecules have garnered great attention and have become widely used in recent years. Computational toxicity prediction is particularly advantageous in the early stages of drug discovery in order to filter out molecules with high probability of failing in clinical trials. This has been helped by the increase in the number of large toxicology databases available. However, being an area of recent application, a greater understanding of the scope and applicability of ML methods is still necessary. There are various kinds of toxic end points that have been predicted in silico. Acute oral toxicity, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, mutagenicity, and the 12 Tox21 data end points are among the most commonly investigated. Machine learning methods exhibit different performances on different data sets due to dissimilar complexity, class distributions, or chemical space covered, which makes it hard to compare the performance of algorithms over different toxic end points. The general pipeline to predict toxicity using ML has already been analyzed in various reviews. In this contribution, we focus on the recent progress in the area and the outstanding challenges, making a detailed description of the state-of-the-art models implemented for each toxic end point. The type of molecular representation, the algorithm, and the evaluation metric used in each research work are explained and analyzed. A detailed description of end points that are usually predicted, their clinical relevance, the available databases, and the challenges they bring to the field are also highlighted.
Fil: Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto. Universidad Austral. Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional; Argentina
Fil: Scardino, Valeria. Universidad Austral; Argentina - Materia
-
Toxicology
Machine Learning - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/213156
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_63ae9b2dceeddfe52735f2bbc57fa181 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/213156 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End PointCavasotto, Claudio NorbertoScardino, ValeriaToxicologyMachine Learninghttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Machine learning (ML) models to predict the toxicity of small molecules have garnered great attention and have become widely used in recent years. Computational toxicity prediction is particularly advantageous in the early stages of drug discovery in order to filter out molecules with high probability of failing in clinical trials. This has been helped by the increase in the number of large toxicology databases available. However, being an area of recent application, a greater understanding of the scope and applicability of ML methods is still necessary. There are various kinds of toxic end points that have been predicted in silico. Acute oral toxicity, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, mutagenicity, and the 12 Tox21 data end points are among the most commonly investigated. Machine learning methods exhibit different performances on different data sets due to dissimilar complexity, class distributions, or chemical space covered, which makes it hard to compare the performance of algorithms over different toxic end points. The general pipeline to predict toxicity using ML has already been analyzed in various reviews. In this contribution, we focus on the recent progress in the area and the outstanding challenges, making a detailed description of the state-of-the-art models implemented for each toxic end point. The type of molecular representation, the algorithm, and the evaluation metric used in each research work are explained and analyzed. A detailed description of end points that are usually predicted, their clinical relevance, the available databases, and the challenges they bring to the field are also highlighted.Fil: Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto. Universidad Austral. Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional; ArgentinaFil: Scardino, Valeria. Universidad Austral; ArgentinaAmerican Chemical Society2022-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/213156Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto; Scardino, Valeria; Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point; American Chemical Society; ACS Omega; 7; 51; 12-2022; 47536-475462470-13432470-1343CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c05693info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c05693info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:03:48Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/213156instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:03:48.522CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point |
title |
Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point |
spellingShingle |
Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto Toxicology Machine Learning |
title_short |
Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point |
title_full |
Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point |
title_fullStr |
Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point |
title_full_unstemmed |
Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point |
title_sort |
Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto Scardino, Valeria |
author |
Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto |
author_facet |
Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto Scardino, Valeria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Scardino, Valeria |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Toxicology Machine Learning |
topic |
Toxicology Machine Learning |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Machine learning (ML) models to predict the toxicity of small molecules have garnered great attention and have become widely used in recent years. Computational toxicity prediction is particularly advantageous in the early stages of drug discovery in order to filter out molecules with high probability of failing in clinical trials. This has been helped by the increase in the number of large toxicology databases available. However, being an area of recent application, a greater understanding of the scope and applicability of ML methods is still necessary. There are various kinds of toxic end points that have been predicted in silico. Acute oral toxicity, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, mutagenicity, and the 12 Tox21 data end points are among the most commonly investigated. Machine learning methods exhibit different performances on different data sets due to dissimilar complexity, class distributions, or chemical space covered, which makes it hard to compare the performance of algorithms over different toxic end points. The general pipeline to predict toxicity using ML has already been analyzed in various reviews. In this contribution, we focus on the recent progress in the area and the outstanding challenges, making a detailed description of the state-of-the-art models implemented for each toxic end point. The type of molecular representation, the algorithm, and the evaluation metric used in each research work are explained and analyzed. A detailed description of end points that are usually predicted, their clinical relevance, the available databases, and the challenges they bring to the field are also highlighted. Fil: Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto. Universidad Austral. Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional; Argentina Fil: Scardino, Valeria. Universidad Austral; Argentina |
description |
Machine learning (ML) models to predict the toxicity of small molecules have garnered great attention and have become widely used in recent years. Computational toxicity prediction is particularly advantageous in the early stages of drug discovery in order to filter out molecules with high probability of failing in clinical trials. This has been helped by the increase in the number of large toxicology databases available. However, being an area of recent application, a greater understanding of the scope and applicability of ML methods is still necessary. There are various kinds of toxic end points that have been predicted in silico. Acute oral toxicity, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, mutagenicity, and the 12 Tox21 data end points are among the most commonly investigated. Machine learning methods exhibit different performances on different data sets due to dissimilar complexity, class distributions, or chemical space covered, which makes it hard to compare the performance of algorithms over different toxic end points. The general pipeline to predict toxicity using ML has already been analyzed in various reviews. In this contribution, we focus on the recent progress in the area and the outstanding challenges, making a detailed description of the state-of-the-art models implemented for each toxic end point. The type of molecular representation, the algorithm, and the evaluation metric used in each research work are explained and analyzed. A detailed description of end points that are usually predicted, their clinical relevance, the available databases, and the challenges they bring to the field are also highlighted. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/213156 Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto; Scardino, Valeria; Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point; American Chemical Society; ACS Omega; 7; 51; 12-2022; 47536-47546 2470-1343 2470-1343 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/213156 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cavasotto, Claudio Norberto; Scardino, Valeria; Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point; American Chemical Society; ACS Omega; 7; 51; 12-2022; 47536-47546 2470-1343 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c05693 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c05693 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Chemical Society |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Chemical Society |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613858481668096 |
score |
13.069144 |