Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks

Autores
de Angelo, Carlos Daniel; Paviolo, Agustin Javier; Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) are the largest felids of the American Continent and live in sympatry along most of their distribution. Their tracks are frequently used for research and management purposes, but tracks are difficult to distinguish from each other and can be confused with those of big canids. We used tracks from pumas, jaguars, large dogs, and maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus) to evaluate traditional qualitative and quantitative identification methods and to elaborate multivariate methods to differentiate big canids versus big felids and puma versus jaguar tracks (n=167 tracks from 18 zoos). We tested accuracy of qualitative classification through an identification exercise with field-experienced volunteers. Qualitative methods were useful but there was high variability in accuracy of track identification. Most of the traditional quantitative methods showed an elevated percentage of misclassified tracks (≥20). We used stepwise discriminant function analysis to develop 3 discriminant models: 1 for big canid versus big felid track identification and 2 alternative models for jaguar versus puma track differentiation using 1) best discriminant variables, and 2) size-independent variables. These models had high classification performance, with <10 of error in the validation procedures. We used simpler discriminant models in the elaboration of identification keys to facilitate track classification process. We developed an accurate method for track identification, capable of distinguishing between big felids (puma and jaguar) and large canids (dog and maned wolf) tracks and between jaguar and puma tracks. Application of our method will allow a more reliable use of tracks in puma and jaguar research and it will help managers using tracks as indicators of these felids' presence for conservation or management purposes.
Fil: de Angelo, Carlos Daniel. Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste; Argentina
Fil: Paviolo, Agustin Javier. Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste; Argentina
Fil: Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago. Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste; Argentina
Materia
CANIDS
DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION ANALYSIS
IDENTIFICATION KEYS
JAGUAR
PANTHERA ONCA
PUMA
PUMA CONCOLOR
TRACK DIFFERENTIATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/216109

id CONICETDig_61a93aaf2f0912daa98e512101c45352
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/216109
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracksde Angelo, Carlos DanielPaviolo, Agustin JavierDi Bitetti, Mario SantiagoCANIDSDISCRIMINANT FUNCTION ANALYSISIDENTIFICATION KEYSJAGUARPANTHERA ONCAPUMAPUMA CONCOLORTRACK DIFFERENTIATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) are the largest felids of the American Continent and live in sympatry along most of their distribution. Their tracks are frequently used for research and management purposes, but tracks are difficult to distinguish from each other and can be confused with those of big canids. We used tracks from pumas, jaguars, large dogs, and maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus) to evaluate traditional qualitative and quantitative identification methods and to elaborate multivariate methods to differentiate big canids versus big felids and puma versus jaguar tracks (n=167 tracks from 18 zoos). We tested accuracy of qualitative classification through an identification exercise with field-experienced volunteers. Qualitative methods were useful but there was high variability in accuracy of track identification. Most of the traditional quantitative methods showed an elevated percentage of misclassified tracks (≥20). We used stepwise discriminant function analysis to develop 3 discriminant models: 1 for big canid versus big felid track identification and 2 alternative models for jaguar versus puma track differentiation using 1) best discriminant variables, and 2) size-independent variables. These models had high classification performance, with <10 of error in the validation procedures. We used simpler discriminant models in the elaboration of identification keys to facilitate track classification process. We developed an accurate method for track identification, capable of distinguishing between big felids (puma and jaguar) and large canids (dog and maned wolf) tracks and between jaguar and puma tracks. Application of our method will allow a more reliable use of tracks in puma and jaguar research and it will help managers using tracks as indicators of these felids' presence for conservation or management purposes.Fil: de Angelo, Carlos Daniel. Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste; ArgentinaFil: Paviolo, Agustin Javier. Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste; ArgentinaFil: Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago. Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste; ArgentinaWildlife Society2010-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/216109de Angelo, Carlos Daniel; Paviolo, Agustin Javier; Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago; Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks; Wildlife Society; Journal of Wildlife Management; 74; 5; 5-2010; 1141-11510022-541XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bioone.org/journals/journal-of-wildlife-management/volume-74/issue-5/2009-293/Traditional-Versus-Multivariate-Methods-for-Identifying-Jaguar-Puma-and-Large/10.2193/2009-293.shortinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2193/2009-293info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:12:28Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/216109instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:12:29.214CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks
title Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks
spellingShingle Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks
de Angelo, Carlos Daniel
CANIDS
DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION ANALYSIS
IDENTIFICATION KEYS
JAGUAR
PANTHERA ONCA
PUMA
PUMA CONCOLOR
TRACK DIFFERENTIATION
title_short Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks
title_full Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks
title_fullStr Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks
title_full_unstemmed Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks
title_sort Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv de Angelo, Carlos Daniel
Paviolo, Agustin Javier
Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago
author de Angelo, Carlos Daniel
author_facet de Angelo, Carlos Daniel
Paviolo, Agustin Javier
Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago
author_role author
author2 Paviolo, Agustin Javier
Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CANIDS
DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION ANALYSIS
IDENTIFICATION KEYS
JAGUAR
PANTHERA ONCA
PUMA
PUMA CONCOLOR
TRACK DIFFERENTIATION
topic CANIDS
DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION ANALYSIS
IDENTIFICATION KEYS
JAGUAR
PANTHERA ONCA
PUMA
PUMA CONCOLOR
TRACK DIFFERENTIATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) are the largest felids of the American Continent and live in sympatry along most of their distribution. Their tracks are frequently used for research and management purposes, but tracks are difficult to distinguish from each other and can be confused with those of big canids. We used tracks from pumas, jaguars, large dogs, and maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus) to evaluate traditional qualitative and quantitative identification methods and to elaborate multivariate methods to differentiate big canids versus big felids and puma versus jaguar tracks (n=167 tracks from 18 zoos). We tested accuracy of qualitative classification through an identification exercise with field-experienced volunteers. Qualitative methods were useful but there was high variability in accuracy of track identification. Most of the traditional quantitative methods showed an elevated percentage of misclassified tracks (≥20). We used stepwise discriminant function analysis to develop 3 discriminant models: 1 for big canid versus big felid track identification and 2 alternative models for jaguar versus puma track differentiation using 1) best discriminant variables, and 2) size-independent variables. These models had high classification performance, with <10 of error in the validation procedures. We used simpler discriminant models in the elaboration of identification keys to facilitate track classification process. We developed an accurate method for track identification, capable of distinguishing between big felids (puma and jaguar) and large canids (dog and maned wolf) tracks and between jaguar and puma tracks. Application of our method will allow a more reliable use of tracks in puma and jaguar research and it will help managers using tracks as indicators of these felids' presence for conservation or management purposes.
Fil: de Angelo, Carlos Daniel. Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste; Argentina
Fil: Paviolo, Agustin Javier. Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste; Argentina
Fil: Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago. Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste; Argentina
description The jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) are the largest felids of the American Continent and live in sympatry along most of their distribution. Their tracks are frequently used for research and management purposes, but tracks are difficult to distinguish from each other and can be confused with those of big canids. We used tracks from pumas, jaguars, large dogs, and maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus) to evaluate traditional qualitative and quantitative identification methods and to elaborate multivariate methods to differentiate big canids versus big felids and puma versus jaguar tracks (n=167 tracks from 18 zoos). We tested accuracy of qualitative classification through an identification exercise with field-experienced volunteers. Qualitative methods were useful but there was high variability in accuracy of track identification. Most of the traditional quantitative methods showed an elevated percentage of misclassified tracks (≥20). We used stepwise discriminant function analysis to develop 3 discriminant models: 1 for big canid versus big felid track identification and 2 alternative models for jaguar versus puma track differentiation using 1) best discriminant variables, and 2) size-independent variables. These models had high classification performance, with <10 of error in the validation procedures. We used simpler discriminant models in the elaboration of identification keys to facilitate track classification process. We developed an accurate method for track identification, capable of distinguishing between big felids (puma and jaguar) and large canids (dog and maned wolf) tracks and between jaguar and puma tracks. Application of our method will allow a more reliable use of tracks in puma and jaguar research and it will help managers using tracks as indicators of these felids' presence for conservation or management purposes.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/216109
de Angelo, Carlos Daniel; Paviolo, Agustin Javier; Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago; Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks; Wildlife Society; Journal of Wildlife Management; 74; 5; 5-2010; 1141-1151
0022-541X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/216109
identifier_str_mv de Angelo, Carlos Daniel; Paviolo, Agustin Javier; Di Bitetti, Mario Santiago; Traditional versus multivariate methods for identifying jaguar, puma, and large canid tracks; Wildlife Society; Journal of Wildlife Management; 74; 5; 5-2010; 1141-1151
0022-541X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bioone.org/journals/journal-of-wildlife-management/volume-74/issue-5/2009-293/Traditional-Versus-Multivariate-Methods-for-Identifying-Jaguar-Puma-and-Large/10.2193/2009-293.short
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2193/2009-293
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wildlife Society
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wildlife Society
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980651231346688
score 12.993085