Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias

Autores
Schroyens, Natalie; Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca; Van Den Noortgate, Wim; Beckers, Tom; Luyten, Laura
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Research on memory reconsolidation has been booming in the last two decades, with numerous high-impact publications reporting promising amnestic interventions in rodents and humans. However, our own recently-published failed replication attempts of reactivation-dependent amnesia for fear memories in rats suggest that such amnestic effects are not always readily found and that they depend on subtle and possibly uncontrollable parameters. The discrepancy between our observations and published studies in rodents suggests that the literature in this field might be biased. The aim of the current study was to gauge the presence of publication bias in a well-delineated part of the reconsolidation literature. To this end, we performed a systematic review of the literature on reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents, followed by a statistical assessment of publication bias in this sample. In addition, relevant researchers were contacted for unpublished results, which were included in the current analyses. The obtained results support the presence of publication bias, suggesting that the literature provides an overly optimistic overall estimate of the size and reproducibility of amnestic effects. Reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents is thus less robust than what is projected by the literature. The moderate success of clinical studies may be in line with this conclusion, rather than reflecting translational issues. For the field to evolve, replication and non-biased publication of obtained results are essential. A set of tools that can create opportunities to increase transparency, reproducibility and credibility of research findings is provided.
Fil: Schroyens, Natalie. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica
Fil: Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra; Argentina. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica
Fil: Van Den Noortgate, Wim. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica
Fil: Beckers, Tom. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica
Fil: Luyten, Laura. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica
Materia
AMNESIA
CONTEXTUAL FEAR MEMORY
PHARMACOLOGY
PUBLICATION BIAS
RECONSOLIDATION
RODENTS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/140274

id CONICETDig_60a55c6a2fc50f9c8ed28f05a1815a87
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/140274
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication BiasSchroyens, NatalieSigwald D'alesio, Eric LucaVan Den Noortgate, WimBeckers, TomLuyten, LauraAMNESIACONTEXTUAL FEAR MEMORYPHARMACOLOGYPUBLICATION BIASRECONSOLIDATIONRODENTShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Research on memory reconsolidation has been booming in the last two decades, with numerous high-impact publications reporting promising amnestic interventions in rodents and humans. However, our own recently-published failed replication attempts of reactivation-dependent amnesia for fear memories in rats suggest that such amnestic effects are not always readily found and that they depend on subtle and possibly uncontrollable parameters. The discrepancy between our observations and published studies in rodents suggests that the literature in this field might be biased. The aim of the current study was to gauge the presence of publication bias in a well-delineated part of the reconsolidation literature. To this end, we performed a systematic review of the literature on reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents, followed by a statistical assessment of publication bias in this sample. In addition, relevant researchers were contacted for unpublished results, which were included in the current analyses. The obtained results support the presence of publication bias, suggesting that the literature provides an overly optimistic overall estimate of the size and reproducibility of amnestic effects. Reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents is thus less robust than what is projected by the literature. The moderate success of clinical studies may be in line with this conclusion, rather than reflecting translational issues. For the field to evolve, replication and non-biased publication of obtained results are essential. A set of tools that can create opportunities to increase transparency, reproducibility and credibility of research findings is provided.Fil: Schroyens, Natalie. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; BélgicaFil: Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra; Argentina. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; BélgicaFil: Van Den Noortgate, Wim. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; BélgicaFil: Beckers, Tom. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; BélgicaFil: Luyten, Laura. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; BélgicaSociety for Neuroscience2020-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/140274Schroyens, Natalie; Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca; Van Den Noortgate, Wim; Beckers, Tom; Luyten, Laura; Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias; Society for Neuroscience; eNeuro; 8; 1; 12-2020; 1-162373-2822CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1523/ENEURO.0108-20.2020info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.eneuro.org/content/8/1/ENEURO.0108-20.2020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:49:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/140274instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:49:48.253CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias
title Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias
spellingShingle Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias
Schroyens, Natalie
AMNESIA
CONTEXTUAL FEAR MEMORY
PHARMACOLOGY
PUBLICATION BIAS
RECONSOLIDATION
RODENTS
title_short Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias
title_full Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias
title_fullStr Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias
title_full_unstemmed Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias
title_sort Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Schroyens, Natalie
Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca
Van Den Noortgate, Wim
Beckers, Tom
Luyten, Laura
author Schroyens, Natalie
author_facet Schroyens, Natalie
Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca
Van Den Noortgate, Wim
Beckers, Tom
Luyten, Laura
author_role author
author2 Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca
Van Den Noortgate, Wim
Beckers, Tom
Luyten, Laura
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv AMNESIA
CONTEXTUAL FEAR MEMORY
PHARMACOLOGY
PUBLICATION BIAS
RECONSOLIDATION
RODENTS
topic AMNESIA
CONTEXTUAL FEAR MEMORY
PHARMACOLOGY
PUBLICATION BIAS
RECONSOLIDATION
RODENTS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Research on memory reconsolidation has been booming in the last two decades, with numerous high-impact publications reporting promising amnestic interventions in rodents and humans. However, our own recently-published failed replication attempts of reactivation-dependent amnesia for fear memories in rats suggest that such amnestic effects are not always readily found and that they depend on subtle and possibly uncontrollable parameters. The discrepancy between our observations and published studies in rodents suggests that the literature in this field might be biased. The aim of the current study was to gauge the presence of publication bias in a well-delineated part of the reconsolidation literature. To this end, we performed a systematic review of the literature on reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents, followed by a statistical assessment of publication bias in this sample. In addition, relevant researchers were contacted for unpublished results, which were included in the current analyses. The obtained results support the presence of publication bias, suggesting that the literature provides an overly optimistic overall estimate of the size and reproducibility of amnestic effects. Reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents is thus less robust than what is projected by the literature. The moderate success of clinical studies may be in line with this conclusion, rather than reflecting translational issues. For the field to evolve, replication and non-biased publication of obtained results are essential. A set of tools that can create opportunities to increase transparency, reproducibility and credibility of research findings is provided.
Fil: Schroyens, Natalie. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica
Fil: Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra; Argentina. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica
Fil: Van Den Noortgate, Wim. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica
Fil: Beckers, Tom. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica
Fil: Luyten, Laura. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica
description Research on memory reconsolidation has been booming in the last two decades, with numerous high-impact publications reporting promising amnestic interventions in rodents and humans. However, our own recently-published failed replication attempts of reactivation-dependent amnesia for fear memories in rats suggest that such amnestic effects are not always readily found and that they depend on subtle and possibly uncontrollable parameters. The discrepancy between our observations and published studies in rodents suggests that the literature in this field might be biased. The aim of the current study was to gauge the presence of publication bias in a well-delineated part of the reconsolidation literature. To this end, we performed a systematic review of the literature on reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents, followed by a statistical assessment of publication bias in this sample. In addition, relevant researchers were contacted for unpublished results, which were included in the current analyses. The obtained results support the presence of publication bias, suggesting that the literature provides an overly optimistic overall estimate of the size and reproducibility of amnestic effects. Reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents is thus less robust than what is projected by the literature. The moderate success of clinical studies may be in line with this conclusion, rather than reflecting translational issues. For the field to evolve, replication and non-biased publication of obtained results are essential. A set of tools that can create opportunities to increase transparency, reproducibility and credibility of research findings is provided.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/140274
Schroyens, Natalie; Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca; Van Den Noortgate, Wim; Beckers, Tom; Luyten, Laura; Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias; Society for Neuroscience; eNeuro; 8; 1; 12-2020; 1-16
2373-2822
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/140274
identifier_str_mv Schroyens, Natalie; Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca; Van Den Noortgate, Wim; Beckers, Tom; Luyten, Laura; Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias; Society for Neuroscience; eNeuro; 8; 1; 12-2020; 1-16
2373-2822
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1523/ENEURO.0108-20.2020
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.eneuro.org/content/8/1/ENEURO.0108-20.2020
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Society for Neuroscience
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Society for Neuroscience
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268995244261376
score 13.13397