Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias
- Autores
- Schroyens, Natalie; Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca; Van Den Noortgate, Wim; Beckers, Tom; Luyten, Laura
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Research on memory reconsolidation has been booming in the last two decades, with numerous high-impact publications reporting promising amnestic interventions in rodents and humans. However, our own recently-published failed replication attempts of reactivation-dependent amnesia for fear memories in rats suggest that such amnestic effects are not always readily found and that they depend on subtle and possibly uncontrollable parameters. The discrepancy between our observations and published studies in rodents suggests that the literature in this field might be biased. The aim of the current study was to gauge the presence of publication bias in a well-delineated part of the reconsolidation literature. To this end, we performed a systematic review of the literature on reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents, followed by a statistical assessment of publication bias in this sample. In addition, relevant researchers were contacted for unpublished results, which were included in the current analyses. The obtained results support the presence of publication bias, suggesting that the literature provides an overly optimistic overall estimate of the size and reproducibility of amnestic effects. Reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents is thus less robust than what is projected by the literature. The moderate success of clinical studies may be in line with this conclusion, rather than reflecting translational issues. For the field to evolve, replication and non-biased publication of obtained results are essential. A set of tools that can create opportunities to increase transparency, reproducibility and credibility of research findings is provided.
Fil: Schroyens, Natalie. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica
Fil: Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra; Argentina. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica
Fil: Van Den Noortgate, Wim. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica
Fil: Beckers, Tom. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica
Fil: Luyten, Laura. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica - Materia
-
AMNESIA
CONTEXTUAL FEAR MEMORY
PHARMACOLOGY
PUBLICATION BIAS
RECONSOLIDATION
RODENTS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/140274
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_60a55c6a2fc50f9c8ed28f05a1815a87 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/140274 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication BiasSchroyens, NatalieSigwald D'alesio, Eric LucaVan Den Noortgate, WimBeckers, TomLuyten, LauraAMNESIACONTEXTUAL FEAR MEMORYPHARMACOLOGYPUBLICATION BIASRECONSOLIDATIONRODENTShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Research on memory reconsolidation has been booming in the last two decades, with numerous high-impact publications reporting promising amnestic interventions in rodents and humans. However, our own recently-published failed replication attempts of reactivation-dependent amnesia for fear memories in rats suggest that such amnestic effects are not always readily found and that they depend on subtle and possibly uncontrollable parameters. The discrepancy between our observations and published studies in rodents suggests that the literature in this field might be biased. The aim of the current study was to gauge the presence of publication bias in a well-delineated part of the reconsolidation literature. To this end, we performed a systematic review of the literature on reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents, followed by a statistical assessment of publication bias in this sample. In addition, relevant researchers were contacted for unpublished results, which were included in the current analyses. The obtained results support the presence of publication bias, suggesting that the literature provides an overly optimistic overall estimate of the size and reproducibility of amnestic effects. Reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents is thus less robust than what is projected by the literature. The moderate success of clinical studies may be in line with this conclusion, rather than reflecting translational issues. For the field to evolve, replication and non-biased publication of obtained results are essential. A set of tools that can create opportunities to increase transparency, reproducibility and credibility of research findings is provided.Fil: Schroyens, Natalie. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; BélgicaFil: Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra; Argentina. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; BélgicaFil: Van Den Noortgate, Wim. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; BélgicaFil: Beckers, Tom. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; BélgicaFil: Luyten, Laura. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; BélgicaSociety for Neuroscience2020-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/140274Schroyens, Natalie; Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca; Van Den Noortgate, Wim; Beckers, Tom; Luyten, Laura; Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias; Society for Neuroscience; eNeuro; 8; 1; 12-2020; 1-162373-2822CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1523/ENEURO.0108-20.2020info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.eneuro.org/content/8/1/ENEURO.0108-20.2020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:49:47Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/140274instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:49:48.253CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias |
title |
Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias |
spellingShingle |
Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias Schroyens, Natalie AMNESIA CONTEXTUAL FEAR MEMORY PHARMACOLOGY PUBLICATION BIAS RECONSOLIDATION RODENTS |
title_short |
Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias |
title_full |
Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias |
title_fullStr |
Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias |
title_sort |
Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Schroyens, Natalie Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca Van Den Noortgate, Wim Beckers, Tom Luyten, Laura |
author |
Schroyens, Natalie |
author_facet |
Schroyens, Natalie Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca Van Den Noortgate, Wim Beckers, Tom Luyten, Laura |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca Van Den Noortgate, Wim Beckers, Tom Luyten, Laura |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
AMNESIA CONTEXTUAL FEAR MEMORY PHARMACOLOGY PUBLICATION BIAS RECONSOLIDATION RODENTS |
topic |
AMNESIA CONTEXTUAL FEAR MEMORY PHARMACOLOGY PUBLICATION BIAS RECONSOLIDATION RODENTS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Research on memory reconsolidation has been booming in the last two decades, with numerous high-impact publications reporting promising amnestic interventions in rodents and humans. However, our own recently-published failed replication attempts of reactivation-dependent amnesia for fear memories in rats suggest that such amnestic effects are not always readily found and that they depend on subtle and possibly uncontrollable parameters. The discrepancy between our observations and published studies in rodents suggests that the literature in this field might be biased. The aim of the current study was to gauge the presence of publication bias in a well-delineated part of the reconsolidation literature. To this end, we performed a systematic review of the literature on reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents, followed by a statistical assessment of publication bias in this sample. In addition, relevant researchers were contacted for unpublished results, which were included in the current analyses. The obtained results support the presence of publication bias, suggesting that the literature provides an overly optimistic overall estimate of the size and reproducibility of amnestic effects. Reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents is thus less robust than what is projected by the literature. The moderate success of clinical studies may be in line with this conclusion, rather than reflecting translational issues. For the field to evolve, replication and non-biased publication of obtained results are essential. A set of tools that can create opportunities to increase transparency, reproducibility and credibility of research findings is provided. Fil: Schroyens, Natalie. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica Fil: Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra; Argentina. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica Fil: Van Den Noortgate, Wim. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica Fil: Beckers, Tom. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica Fil: Luyten, Laura. Leuven Brain Institute; Bélgica. Katholikie Universiteit Leuven; Bélgica |
description |
Research on memory reconsolidation has been booming in the last two decades, with numerous high-impact publications reporting promising amnestic interventions in rodents and humans. However, our own recently-published failed replication attempts of reactivation-dependent amnesia for fear memories in rats suggest that such amnestic effects are not always readily found and that they depend on subtle and possibly uncontrollable parameters. The discrepancy between our observations and published studies in rodents suggests that the literature in this field might be biased. The aim of the current study was to gauge the presence of publication bias in a well-delineated part of the reconsolidation literature. To this end, we performed a systematic review of the literature on reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents, followed by a statistical assessment of publication bias in this sample. In addition, relevant researchers were contacted for unpublished results, which were included in the current analyses. The obtained results support the presence of publication bias, suggesting that the literature provides an overly optimistic overall estimate of the size and reproducibility of amnestic effects. Reactivation-dependent amnesia for contextual fear memories in rodents is thus less robust than what is projected by the literature. The moderate success of clinical studies may be in line with this conclusion, rather than reflecting translational issues. For the field to evolve, replication and non-biased publication of obtained results are essential. A set of tools that can create opportunities to increase transparency, reproducibility and credibility of research findings is provided. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/140274 Schroyens, Natalie; Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca; Van Den Noortgate, Wim; Beckers, Tom; Luyten, Laura; Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias; Society for Neuroscience; eNeuro; 8; 1; 12-2020; 1-16 2373-2822 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/140274 |
identifier_str_mv |
Schroyens, Natalie; Sigwald D'alesio, Eric Luca; Van Den Noortgate, Wim; Beckers, Tom; Luyten, Laura; Reactivation-Dependent Amnesia for Contextual Fear Memories: Evidence for Publication Bias; Society for Neuroscience; eNeuro; 8; 1; 12-2020; 1-16 2373-2822 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1523/ENEURO.0108-20.2020 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.eneuro.org/content/8/1/ENEURO.0108-20.2020 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Society for Neuroscience |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Society for Neuroscience |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842268995244261376 |
score |
13.13397 |