El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo

Autores
Castaño, Sergio Raul
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This article deals, first of all, with the analysis ofthe notion of common good and political common good,as it is proposed by John Finnis in Natural Law and NaturalRights. Then, in a second moment, the paper aims tocontrast this conception with the doctrine held by Aquinasand some outstanding contemporary Thomists, until1980.The scientific-philosophical question about the systematicvalidity, «in the things themselves» (Husserl), that it is possibleto recognize both one and the other, remains opento debate.
This article deals, first of all, with the analysis of the notion of common good and political common good, as it is proposed by John Finnis in Natural Law and Natu- ral Rights. Then, in a second moment, the paper aims to contrast this conception with the doctrine held by Aqui- nas and some outstanding contemporary Thomists, until 1980. The scientific-philosophical question about the systematic validity, «in the things themselves» (Husserl), that it is pos- sible to recognize both one and the other, remains open to debate
Fil: Castaño, Sergio Raul. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina. Universidad de la Fraternidad de Agrupaciones "santo Tomas de Aquino". Facultad de Ciencias Juridicas y Sociales.; Argentina
Materia
POLITICAL COMMON GOOD
FINNIS
AQUINAS
THOMISM
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/145041
Acceder
id CONICETDig_584d1944f7035daf1013d130a95d2b20
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/145041
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismoThe political common good in Natural Law and Natural Rights in doctrinal comparison with ThomismCastaño, Sergio RaulPOLITICAL COMMON GOODFINNISAQUINASTHOMISMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This article deals, first of all, with the analysis ofthe notion of common good and political common good,as it is proposed by John Finnis in Natural Law and NaturalRights. Then, in a second moment, the paper aims tocontrast this conception with the doctrine held by Aquinasand some outstanding contemporary Thomists, until1980.The scientific-philosophical question about the systematicvalidity, «in the things themselves» (Husserl), that it is possibleto recognize both one and the other, remains opento debate.This article deals, first of all, with the analysis of the notion of common good and political common good, as it is proposed by John Finnis in Natural Law and Natu- ral Rights. Then, in a second moment, the paper aims to contrast this conception with the doctrine held by Aqui- nas and some outstanding contemporary Thomists, until 1980. The scientific-philosophical question about the systematic validity, «in the things themselves» (Husserl), that it is pos- sible to recognize both one and the other, remains open to debateFil: Castaño, Sergio Raul. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina. Universidad de la Fraternidad de Agrupaciones "santo Tomas de Aquino". Facultad de Ciencias Juridicas y Sociales.; ArgentinaEUNSA2020-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/145041Castaño, Sergio Raul; El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo; EUNSA; Persona y Derecho; 12-2020; 611-6352254-6243CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/persona-y-derecho/article/download/40525/34903/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.15581/011.83.011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:36:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/145041instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:36:38.281CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo
The political common good in Natural Law and Natural Rights in doctrinal comparison with Thomism
title El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo
spellingShingle El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo
Castaño, Sergio Raul
POLITICAL COMMON GOOD
FINNIS
AQUINAS
THOMISM
title_short El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo
title_full El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo
title_fullStr El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo
title_full_unstemmed El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo
title_sort El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Castaño, Sergio Raul
author Castaño, Sergio Raul
author_facet Castaño, Sergio Raul
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv POLITICAL COMMON GOOD
FINNIS
AQUINAS
THOMISM
topic POLITICAL COMMON GOOD
FINNIS
AQUINAS
THOMISM
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article deals, first of all, with the analysis ofthe notion of common good and political common good,as it is proposed by John Finnis in Natural Law and NaturalRights. Then, in a second moment, the paper aims tocontrast this conception with the doctrine held by Aquinasand some outstanding contemporary Thomists, until1980.The scientific-philosophical question about the systematicvalidity, «in the things themselves» (Husserl), that it is possibleto recognize both one and the other, remains opento debate.
This article deals, first of all, with the analysis of the notion of common good and political common good, as it is proposed by John Finnis in Natural Law and Natu- ral Rights. Then, in a second moment, the paper aims to contrast this conception with the doctrine held by Aqui- nas and some outstanding contemporary Thomists, until 1980. The scientific-philosophical question about the systematic validity, «in the things themselves» (Husserl), that it is pos- sible to recognize both one and the other, remains open to debate
Fil: Castaño, Sergio Raul. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina. Universidad de la Fraternidad de Agrupaciones "santo Tomas de Aquino". Facultad de Ciencias Juridicas y Sociales.; Argentina
description This article deals, first of all, with the analysis ofthe notion of common good and political common good,as it is proposed by John Finnis in Natural Law and NaturalRights. Then, in a second moment, the paper aims tocontrast this conception with the doctrine held by Aquinasand some outstanding contemporary Thomists, until1980.The scientific-philosophical question about the systematicvalidity, «in the things themselves» (Husserl), that it is possibleto recognize both one and the other, remains opento debate.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/145041
Castaño, Sergio Raul; El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo; EUNSA; Persona y Derecho; 12-2020; 611-635
2254-6243
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/145041
identifier_str_mv Castaño, Sergio Raul; El bien común político en «Natural Law and Natural Rights» en cotejo doctrinal con el tomismo; EUNSA; Persona y Derecho; 12-2020; 611-635
2254-6243
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/persona-y-derecho/article/download/40525/34903/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.15581/011.83.011
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EUNSA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EUNSA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082833024548864
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares