Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria

Autores
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this work, we develop a game-theoretic framework in which pro and con arguments are put forward. This framework intends to capture winning strategies for different defense criteria. In turn, each possible extension semantics satisfies a particular defense criterion. To ensure that only semantics satisfying given criteria are obtained, protocols for playing have to be defined, being the ensuing winning strategies full characterizations of the corresponding criteria. Admissibility and strong admissibility are two of those criteria proposed in the literature for the evaluation of extension semantics; here, we also introduce two weaker criteria, pairwise and weak cogency, for the evaluation of non-admissible semantics, and we define specific game protocolscapturing them.
Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Tohmé, Fernando Abel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina
Materia
ARGUMENTATIONFRAMEWORKS
ARGUMENTATIONGAMES
DEFENSE CRITERIA
EXTENSION SEMANTICS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/198266
Acceder
id CONICETDig_549e171661d09fab4d103d7036766d30
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/198266
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteriaBodanza, Gustavo AdrianTohmé, Fernando AbelSimari, Guillermo RicardoARGUMENTATIONFRAMEWORKSARGUMENTATIONGAMESDEFENSE CRITERIAEXTENSION SEMANTICShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1In this work, we develop a game-theoretic framework in which pro and con arguments are put forward. This framework intends to capture winning strategies for different defense criteria. In turn, each possible extension semantics satisfies a particular defense criterion. To ensure that only semantics satisfying given criteria are obtained, protocols for playing have to be defined, being the ensuing winning strategies full characterizations of the corresponding criteria. Admissibility and strong admissibility are two of those criteria proposed in the literature for the evaluation of extension semantics; here, we also introduce two weaker criteria, pairwise and weak cogency, for the evaluation of non-admissible semantics, and we define specific game protocolscapturing them.Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; ArgentinaFil: Tohmé, Fernando Abel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; ArgentinaFil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; ArgentinaIOS Press2012-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/198266Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria; IOS Press; Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; 245; 1; 10-2012; 153-1640922-6389CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/computational-models-of-argument-4info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-153info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:34:37Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/198266instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:34:37.463CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria
title Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria
spellingShingle Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
ARGUMENTATIONFRAMEWORKS
ARGUMENTATIONGAMES
DEFENSE CRITERIA
EXTENSION SEMANTICS
title_short Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria
title_full Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria
title_fullStr Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria
title_full_unstemmed Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria
title_sort Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
Tohmé, Fernando Abel
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
author_facet Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
Tohmé, Fernando Abel
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Tohmé, Fernando Abel
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ARGUMENTATIONFRAMEWORKS
ARGUMENTATIONGAMES
DEFENSE CRITERIA
EXTENSION SEMANTICS
topic ARGUMENTATIONFRAMEWORKS
ARGUMENTATIONGAMES
DEFENSE CRITERIA
EXTENSION SEMANTICS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this work, we develop a game-theoretic framework in which pro and con arguments are put forward. This framework intends to capture winning strategies for different defense criteria. In turn, each possible extension semantics satisfies a particular defense criterion. To ensure that only semantics satisfying given criteria are obtained, protocols for playing have to be defined, being the ensuing winning strategies full characterizations of the corresponding criteria. Admissibility and strong admissibility are two of those criteria proposed in the literature for the evaluation of extension semantics; here, we also introduce two weaker criteria, pairwise and weak cogency, for the evaluation of non-admissible semantics, and we define specific game protocolscapturing them.
Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Tohmé, Fernando Abel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; Argentina
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de Ingeniería Química; Argentina
description In this work, we develop a game-theoretic framework in which pro and con arguments are put forward. This framework intends to capture winning strategies for different defense criteria. In turn, each possible extension semantics satisfies a particular defense criterion. To ensure that only semantics satisfying given criteria are obtained, protocols for playing have to be defined, being the ensuing winning strategies full characterizations of the corresponding criteria. Admissibility and strong admissibility are two of those criteria proposed in the literature for the evaluation of extension semantics; here, we also introduce two weaker criteria, pairwise and weak cogency, for the evaluation of non-admissible semantics, and we define specific game protocolscapturing them.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/198266
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria; IOS Press; Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; 245; 1; 10-2012; 153-164
0922-6389
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/198266
identifier_str_mv Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria; IOS Press; Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; 245; 1; 10-2012; 153-164
0922-6389
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/computational-models-of-argument-4
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-153
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IOS Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IOS Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613072331735040
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares