Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations

Autores
Fernandez Dols, José Miguel; Aguilar, Pilar; Campo, Silvia; Vallacher, Robin R.; Janowsky, Alisha; Rabbia, Hugo Hernán; Brussino, Silvina Alejandra; Lerner, Melvin J.
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The failure to recognize the influence of two distinct forms of moral norms can lead to the misattribution of moral behavior to egoistic motives. This is illustrated in the research of Batson and his colleagues (e.g., Batson, Kobrynowicz, Dinnerstein, Kampf, & Wilson, 1997). They reported the appearance of moral failure and hypocrisy motivation in several experiments employing essentially the same "zero-sum" experimental situation. They cited as evidence the discrepancy between participants' apparently self-serving private acts and their subsequent public ratings of the morality of what they had done as well as their recognition of the "most" moral way to behave. The research reported here supported an alternative explanation that located the experimenter's implicit and explicit instructions as the source of the discrepancy between the participants' private acts and their public ratings. The findings confirmed the hypothesis that Batson and his colleagues had not merely made moral norms "salient". They had actually presented their participants with contradictory "demands": explicitly inviting them to meet the norm of justified self-interest in private but then give public lip-service to the experimenter's instructions as to a supererogatory way to behave. When either of the demands was removed, the "hypocrisy" no longer occurred.
Fil: Fernandez Dols, José Miguel. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología; España
Fil: Aguilar, Pilar. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología; España
Fil: Campo, Silvia. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología; España
Fil: Vallacher, Robin R.. Florida Atlantic University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Janowsky, Alisha. University of Central Florida; Estados Unidos
Fil: Rabbia, Hugo Hernán. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología. Laboratorio de Psicología Cognitiva; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Brussino, Silvina Alejandra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología. Laboratorio de Psicología Cognitiva; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Lerner, Melvin J.. No especifíca;
Materia
JUSTIFIED SELF-INTEREST
MORAL HYPOCRISY
MORALITY
NORMATIVE CONFLICT
SELF-INTEREST
SOCIAL JUSTICE
SOCIAL NORMS
SUPEREROGATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/130473

id CONICETDig_4d1ec6c4fd4926b7c0cb0a7260e7f97e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/130473
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situationsFernandez Dols, José MiguelAguilar, PilarCampo, SilviaVallacher, Robin R.Janowsky, AlishaRabbia, Hugo HernánBrussino, Silvina AlejandraLerner, Melvin J.JUSTIFIED SELF-INTERESTMORAL HYPOCRISYMORALITYNORMATIVE CONFLICTSELF-INTERESTSOCIAL JUSTICESOCIAL NORMSSUPEREROGATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The failure to recognize the influence of two distinct forms of moral norms can lead to the misattribution of moral behavior to egoistic motives. This is illustrated in the research of Batson and his colleagues (e.g., Batson, Kobrynowicz, Dinnerstein, Kampf, & Wilson, 1997). They reported the appearance of moral failure and hypocrisy motivation in several experiments employing essentially the same "zero-sum" experimental situation. They cited as evidence the discrepancy between participants' apparently self-serving private acts and their subsequent public ratings of the morality of what they had done as well as their recognition of the "most" moral way to behave. The research reported here supported an alternative explanation that located the experimenter's implicit and explicit instructions as the source of the discrepancy between the participants' private acts and their public ratings. The findings confirmed the hypothesis that Batson and his colleagues had not merely made moral norms "salient". They had actually presented their participants with contradictory "demands": explicitly inviting them to meet the norm of justified self-interest in private but then give public lip-service to the experimenter's instructions as to a supererogatory way to behave. When either of the demands was removed, the "hypocrisy" no longer occurred.Fil: Fernandez Dols, José Miguel. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología; EspañaFil: Aguilar, Pilar. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología; EspañaFil: Campo, Silvia. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología; EspañaFil: Vallacher, Robin R.. Florida Atlantic University; Estados UnidosFil: Janowsky, Alisha. University of Central Florida; Estados UnidosFil: Rabbia, Hugo Hernán. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología. Laboratorio de Psicología Cognitiva; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Brussino, Silvina Alejandra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología. Laboratorio de Psicología Cognitiva; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Lerner, Melvin J.. No especifíca;Elsevier Inc2010-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/130473Fernandez Dols, José Miguel; Aguilar, Pilar; Campo, Silvia; Vallacher, Robin R.; Janowsky, Alisha; et al.; Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations; Elsevier Inc; Journal of Experimental Social Psychology; 46; 3; 5-2010; 525-5300022-10311096-0465CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103110000272info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:07:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/130473instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:07:59.346CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations
title Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations
spellingShingle Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations
Fernandez Dols, José Miguel
JUSTIFIED SELF-INTEREST
MORAL HYPOCRISY
MORALITY
NORMATIVE CONFLICT
SELF-INTEREST
SOCIAL JUSTICE
SOCIAL NORMS
SUPEREROGATION
title_short Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations
title_full Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations
title_fullStr Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations
title_full_unstemmed Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations
title_sort Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fernandez Dols, José Miguel
Aguilar, Pilar
Campo, Silvia
Vallacher, Robin R.
Janowsky, Alisha
Rabbia, Hugo Hernán
Brussino, Silvina Alejandra
Lerner, Melvin J.
author Fernandez Dols, José Miguel
author_facet Fernandez Dols, José Miguel
Aguilar, Pilar
Campo, Silvia
Vallacher, Robin R.
Janowsky, Alisha
Rabbia, Hugo Hernán
Brussino, Silvina Alejandra
Lerner, Melvin J.
author_role author
author2 Aguilar, Pilar
Campo, Silvia
Vallacher, Robin R.
Janowsky, Alisha
Rabbia, Hugo Hernán
Brussino, Silvina Alejandra
Lerner, Melvin J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv JUSTIFIED SELF-INTEREST
MORAL HYPOCRISY
MORALITY
NORMATIVE CONFLICT
SELF-INTEREST
SOCIAL JUSTICE
SOCIAL NORMS
SUPEREROGATION
topic JUSTIFIED SELF-INTEREST
MORAL HYPOCRISY
MORALITY
NORMATIVE CONFLICT
SELF-INTEREST
SOCIAL JUSTICE
SOCIAL NORMS
SUPEREROGATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The failure to recognize the influence of two distinct forms of moral norms can lead to the misattribution of moral behavior to egoistic motives. This is illustrated in the research of Batson and his colleagues (e.g., Batson, Kobrynowicz, Dinnerstein, Kampf, & Wilson, 1997). They reported the appearance of moral failure and hypocrisy motivation in several experiments employing essentially the same "zero-sum" experimental situation. They cited as evidence the discrepancy between participants' apparently self-serving private acts and their subsequent public ratings of the morality of what they had done as well as their recognition of the "most" moral way to behave. The research reported here supported an alternative explanation that located the experimenter's implicit and explicit instructions as the source of the discrepancy between the participants' private acts and their public ratings. The findings confirmed the hypothesis that Batson and his colleagues had not merely made moral norms "salient". They had actually presented their participants with contradictory "demands": explicitly inviting them to meet the norm of justified self-interest in private but then give public lip-service to the experimenter's instructions as to a supererogatory way to behave. When either of the demands was removed, the "hypocrisy" no longer occurred.
Fil: Fernandez Dols, José Miguel. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología; España
Fil: Aguilar, Pilar. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología; España
Fil: Campo, Silvia. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Psicología; España
Fil: Vallacher, Robin R.. Florida Atlantic University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Janowsky, Alisha. University of Central Florida; Estados Unidos
Fil: Rabbia, Hugo Hernán. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología. Laboratorio de Psicología Cognitiva; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Brussino, Silvina Alejandra. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología. Laboratorio de Psicología Cognitiva; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Lerner, Melvin J.. No especifíca;
description The failure to recognize the influence of two distinct forms of moral norms can lead to the misattribution of moral behavior to egoistic motives. This is illustrated in the research of Batson and his colleagues (e.g., Batson, Kobrynowicz, Dinnerstein, Kampf, & Wilson, 1997). They reported the appearance of moral failure and hypocrisy motivation in several experiments employing essentially the same "zero-sum" experimental situation. They cited as evidence the discrepancy between participants' apparently self-serving private acts and their subsequent public ratings of the morality of what they had done as well as their recognition of the "most" moral way to behave. The research reported here supported an alternative explanation that located the experimenter's implicit and explicit instructions as the source of the discrepancy between the participants' private acts and their public ratings. The findings confirmed the hypothesis that Batson and his colleagues had not merely made moral norms "salient". They had actually presented their participants with contradictory "demands": explicitly inviting them to meet the norm of justified self-interest in private but then give public lip-service to the experimenter's instructions as to a supererogatory way to behave. When either of the demands was removed, the "hypocrisy" no longer occurred.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/130473
Fernandez Dols, José Miguel; Aguilar, Pilar; Campo, Silvia; Vallacher, Robin R.; Janowsky, Alisha; et al.; Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations; Elsevier Inc; Journal of Experimental Social Psychology; 46; 3; 5-2010; 525-530
0022-1031
1096-0465
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/130473
identifier_str_mv Fernandez Dols, José Miguel; Aguilar, Pilar; Campo, Silvia; Vallacher, Robin R.; Janowsky, Alisha; et al.; Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations; Elsevier Inc; Journal of Experimental Social Psychology; 46; 3; 5-2010; 525-530
0022-1031
1096-0465
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103110000272
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.001
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613945235603456
score 13.070432