Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management

Autores
Estevez, Rodrigo A.; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Pizarro, J. Cristobal; Burgman, Mark A.
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Decision makers and researchers recognize the need to effectively confront the social dimensions and conflicts inherent to invasive species research and management. Yet, despite numerous contentious situations that have arisen, no systematic evaluation of the literature has examined the commonalities in the patterns and types of these emergent social issues. Using social and ecological keywords, we reviewed trends in the social dimensions of invasive species research and management and the sources and potential solutions to problems and conflicts that arise around invasive species. We integrated components of cognitive hierarchy theory and risk perceptions theory to provide a conceptual framework to identify, distinguish, and provide understanding of the driving factors underlying disputes associated with invasive species. In the ISI Web of Science database, we found 15,915 peer-reviewed publications on biological invasions, 124 of which included social dimensions of this phenomenon. Of these 124, 28 studies described specific contentious situations. Social approaches to biological invasions have emerged largely in the last decade and have focused on both environmental social sciences and resource management. Despite being distributed in a range of journals, these 124 articles were concentrated mostly in ecology and conservation-oriented outlets. We found that conflicts surrounding invasive species arose based largely on differences in value systems and to a lesser extent stakeholder and decision maker?s risk perceptions. To confront or avoid such situations, we suggest integrating the plurality of environmental values into invasive species research and management via structured decision making techniques, which enhance effective risk communication that promotes trust and confidence between stakeholders and decision makers.
Fil: Estevez, Rodrigo A.. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. University of Melbourne. School of Botany. Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis; Australia
Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina
Fil: Pizarro, J. Cristobal. University Of Waterloo; Canadá
Fil: Burgman, Mark A.. University of Melbourne. School of Botany. Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis; Australia
Materia
Biological Invasions
Cognitive Hierarchy Theory
Publication Trernds
Risk Theory
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5565

id CONICETDig_48fd3e684b6773788a9e99aa88a6997f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5565
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species managementEstevez, Rodrigo A.Anderson, Christopher BrianPizarro, J. CristobalBurgman, Mark A.Biological InvasionsCognitive Hierarchy TheoryPublication TrerndsRisk Theoryhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Decision makers and researchers recognize the need to effectively confront the social dimensions and conflicts inherent to invasive species research and management. Yet, despite numerous contentious situations that have arisen, no systematic evaluation of the literature has examined the commonalities in the patterns and types of these emergent social issues. Using social and ecological keywords, we reviewed trends in the social dimensions of invasive species research and management and the sources and potential solutions to problems and conflicts that arise around invasive species. We integrated components of cognitive hierarchy theory and risk perceptions theory to provide a conceptual framework to identify, distinguish, and provide understanding of the driving factors underlying disputes associated with invasive species. In the ISI Web of Science database, we found 15,915 peer-reviewed publications on biological invasions, 124 of which included social dimensions of this phenomenon. Of these 124, 28 studies described specific contentious situations. Social approaches to biological invasions have emerged largely in the last decade and have focused on both environmental social sciences and resource management. Despite being distributed in a range of journals, these 124 articles were concentrated mostly in ecology and conservation-oriented outlets. We found that conflicts surrounding invasive species arose based largely on differences in value systems and to a lesser extent stakeholder and decision maker?s risk perceptions. To confront or avoid such situations, we suggest integrating the plurality of environmental values into invasive species research and management via structured decision making techniques, which enhance effective risk communication that promotes trust and confidence between stakeholders and decision makers.Fil: Estevez, Rodrigo A.. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. University of Melbourne. School of Botany. Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis; AustraliaFil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; ArgentinaFil: Pizarro, J. Cristobal. University Of Waterloo; CanadáFil: Burgman, Mark A.. University of Melbourne. School of Botany. Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis; AustraliaWiley2015-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/5565Estevez, Rodrigo A.; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Pizarro, J. Cristobal; Burgman, Mark A.; Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management; Wiley; Conservation Biology; 29; 1; 2-2015; 19-300888-8892enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12359/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/cobi.12359info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:37:53Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5565instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:37:53.804CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management
title Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management
spellingShingle Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management
Estevez, Rodrigo A.
Biological Invasions
Cognitive Hierarchy Theory
Publication Trernds
Risk Theory
title_short Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management
title_full Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management
title_fullStr Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management
title_full_unstemmed Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management
title_sort Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Estevez, Rodrigo A.
Anderson, Christopher Brian
Pizarro, J. Cristobal
Burgman, Mark A.
author Estevez, Rodrigo A.
author_facet Estevez, Rodrigo A.
Anderson, Christopher Brian
Pizarro, J. Cristobal
Burgman, Mark A.
author_role author
author2 Anderson, Christopher Brian
Pizarro, J. Cristobal
Burgman, Mark A.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biological Invasions
Cognitive Hierarchy Theory
Publication Trernds
Risk Theory
topic Biological Invasions
Cognitive Hierarchy Theory
Publication Trernds
Risk Theory
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Decision makers and researchers recognize the need to effectively confront the social dimensions and conflicts inherent to invasive species research and management. Yet, despite numerous contentious situations that have arisen, no systematic evaluation of the literature has examined the commonalities in the patterns and types of these emergent social issues. Using social and ecological keywords, we reviewed trends in the social dimensions of invasive species research and management and the sources and potential solutions to problems and conflicts that arise around invasive species. We integrated components of cognitive hierarchy theory and risk perceptions theory to provide a conceptual framework to identify, distinguish, and provide understanding of the driving factors underlying disputes associated with invasive species. In the ISI Web of Science database, we found 15,915 peer-reviewed publications on biological invasions, 124 of which included social dimensions of this phenomenon. Of these 124, 28 studies described specific contentious situations. Social approaches to biological invasions have emerged largely in the last decade and have focused on both environmental social sciences and resource management. Despite being distributed in a range of journals, these 124 articles were concentrated mostly in ecology and conservation-oriented outlets. We found that conflicts surrounding invasive species arose based largely on differences in value systems and to a lesser extent stakeholder and decision maker?s risk perceptions. To confront or avoid such situations, we suggest integrating the plurality of environmental values into invasive species research and management via structured decision making techniques, which enhance effective risk communication that promotes trust and confidence between stakeholders and decision makers.
Fil: Estevez, Rodrigo A.. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. University of Melbourne. School of Botany. Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis; Australia
Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina
Fil: Pizarro, J. Cristobal. University Of Waterloo; Canadá
Fil: Burgman, Mark A.. University of Melbourne. School of Botany. Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis; Australia
description Decision makers and researchers recognize the need to effectively confront the social dimensions and conflicts inherent to invasive species research and management. Yet, despite numerous contentious situations that have arisen, no systematic evaluation of the literature has examined the commonalities in the patterns and types of these emergent social issues. Using social and ecological keywords, we reviewed trends in the social dimensions of invasive species research and management and the sources and potential solutions to problems and conflicts that arise around invasive species. We integrated components of cognitive hierarchy theory and risk perceptions theory to provide a conceptual framework to identify, distinguish, and provide understanding of the driving factors underlying disputes associated with invasive species. In the ISI Web of Science database, we found 15,915 peer-reviewed publications on biological invasions, 124 of which included social dimensions of this phenomenon. Of these 124, 28 studies described specific contentious situations. Social approaches to biological invasions have emerged largely in the last decade and have focused on both environmental social sciences and resource management. Despite being distributed in a range of journals, these 124 articles were concentrated mostly in ecology and conservation-oriented outlets. We found that conflicts surrounding invasive species arose based largely on differences in value systems and to a lesser extent stakeholder and decision maker?s risk perceptions. To confront or avoid such situations, we suggest integrating the plurality of environmental values into invasive species research and management via structured decision making techniques, which enhance effective risk communication that promotes trust and confidence between stakeholders and decision makers.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/5565
Estevez, Rodrigo A.; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Pizarro, J. Cristobal; Burgman, Mark A.; Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management; Wiley; Conservation Biology; 29; 1; 2-2015; 19-30
0888-8892
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/5565
identifier_str_mv Estevez, Rodrigo A.; Anderson, Christopher Brian; Pizarro, J. Cristobal; Burgman, Mark A.; Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management; Wiley; Conservation Biology; 29; 1; 2-2015; 19-30
0888-8892
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12359/abstract
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/cobi.12359
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614400217972736
score 13.070432