Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers

Autores
Zmener, Osvaldo; Pameijer, Cornelis H.; Kokubu, Gabriel A.; Grana, Daniel Rodolfo
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Introduction: An evaluation was made of the connective tissue reaction in rats after subcutaneous implantation of methacrylate resin-based sealers (EndoREZ [Ultradent Products, Inc, South Jordan, UT] with a polymerization accelerator and RealSeal [Sybron Dental Specialties, Orange, CA]) and Pulp Canal Sealer (Sybron Dental Specialties), a zinc oxide and eugenol-based sealer used as the control. Methods: Silicone tubes containing the test materials were implanted in 24 Wistar rats. Solid silicone rods of the same size served as the negative controls. After 10, 30, and 90 days, the animals (n = 8 per period) were euthanized and the implants with surrounding tissues dissected and processed for routine histological evaluation. A four-category evaluation system was used to measure and record the microscopic observations according to the thickness of a fibrous capsule, the vascular changes, and the various types of inflammatory cells. Results: Initially, a severe inflammatory reaction was observed of the soft tissues in direct contact with both EndoREZ/Accelerator and Real Seal. The severity decreased over time and was resolved at the end of the experiment. Pulp Canal Sealer showed a severe tissue reaction for all observation periods. The negative controls showed an initial mild to moderate inflammatory reaction. After 30 days, healthy fibrous connective tissue was observed, which increased over time. After 10 days, no statistically significant differences between the experimental groups were observed. After 90 days, EndoREZ and RealSeal were statistically significantly less toxic than Pulp Canal Sealer (p > 0.05). Conclusions: After 90 days, both methacrylate resinbased sealers were considered biologically acceptable when implanted in subcutaneous connective tissues of the rat. Pulp Canal Sealer remained toxic for the duration of the study.
Fil: Zmener, Osvaldo. Universidad del Salvador; Argentina
Fil: Pameijer, Cornelis H.. University of Connecticut; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kokubu, Gabriel A.. Universidad del Salvador; Argentina
Fil: Grana, Daniel Rodolfo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas; Argentina. Universidad del Salvador; Argentina
Materia
Biocompatibility
Endodontics
Methacrylate-Based Sealers
Tissue Response
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/67578

id CONICETDig_4044a1da8dd4c7debc1a0c05c09ef759
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/67578
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol SealersZmener, OsvaldoPameijer, Cornelis H.Kokubu, Gabriel A.Grana, Daniel RodolfoBiocompatibilityEndodonticsMethacrylate-Based SealersTissue Responsehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Introduction: An evaluation was made of the connective tissue reaction in rats after subcutaneous implantation of methacrylate resin-based sealers (EndoREZ [Ultradent Products, Inc, South Jordan, UT] with a polymerization accelerator and RealSeal [Sybron Dental Specialties, Orange, CA]) and Pulp Canal Sealer (Sybron Dental Specialties), a zinc oxide and eugenol-based sealer used as the control. Methods: Silicone tubes containing the test materials were implanted in 24 Wistar rats. Solid silicone rods of the same size served as the negative controls. After 10, 30, and 90 days, the animals (n = 8 per period) were euthanized and the implants with surrounding tissues dissected and processed for routine histological evaluation. A four-category evaluation system was used to measure and record the microscopic observations according to the thickness of a fibrous capsule, the vascular changes, and the various types of inflammatory cells. Results: Initially, a severe inflammatory reaction was observed of the soft tissues in direct contact with both EndoREZ/Accelerator and Real Seal. The severity decreased over time and was resolved at the end of the experiment. Pulp Canal Sealer showed a severe tissue reaction for all observation periods. The negative controls showed an initial mild to moderate inflammatory reaction. After 30 days, healthy fibrous connective tissue was observed, which increased over time. After 10 days, no statistically significant differences between the experimental groups were observed. After 90 days, EndoREZ and RealSeal were statistically significantly less toxic than Pulp Canal Sealer (p > 0.05). Conclusions: After 90 days, both methacrylate resinbased sealers were considered biologically acceptable when implanted in subcutaneous connective tissues of the rat. Pulp Canal Sealer remained toxic for the duration of the study.Fil: Zmener, Osvaldo. Universidad del Salvador; ArgentinaFil: Pameijer, Cornelis H.. University of Connecticut; Estados UnidosFil: Kokubu, Gabriel A.. Universidad del Salvador; ArgentinaFil: Grana, Daniel Rodolfo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas; Argentina. Universidad del Salvador; ArgentinaElsevier Science Inc2010-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/67578Zmener, Osvaldo; Pameijer, Cornelis H.; Kokubu, Gabriel A.; Grana, Daniel Rodolfo; Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers; Elsevier Science Inc; Journal Of Endodontics; 36; 9; 9-2010; 1574-15790099-2399CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239910005224info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:17:40Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/67578instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:17:41.436CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers
title Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers
spellingShingle Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers
Zmener, Osvaldo
Biocompatibility
Endodontics
Methacrylate-Based Sealers
Tissue Response
title_short Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers
title_full Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers
title_fullStr Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers
title_full_unstemmed Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers
title_sort Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zmener, Osvaldo
Pameijer, Cornelis H.
Kokubu, Gabriel A.
Grana, Daniel Rodolfo
author Zmener, Osvaldo
author_facet Zmener, Osvaldo
Pameijer, Cornelis H.
Kokubu, Gabriel A.
Grana, Daniel Rodolfo
author_role author
author2 Pameijer, Cornelis H.
Kokubu, Gabriel A.
Grana, Daniel Rodolfo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biocompatibility
Endodontics
Methacrylate-Based Sealers
Tissue Response
topic Biocompatibility
Endodontics
Methacrylate-Based Sealers
Tissue Response
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Introduction: An evaluation was made of the connective tissue reaction in rats after subcutaneous implantation of methacrylate resin-based sealers (EndoREZ [Ultradent Products, Inc, South Jordan, UT] with a polymerization accelerator and RealSeal [Sybron Dental Specialties, Orange, CA]) and Pulp Canal Sealer (Sybron Dental Specialties), a zinc oxide and eugenol-based sealer used as the control. Methods: Silicone tubes containing the test materials were implanted in 24 Wistar rats. Solid silicone rods of the same size served as the negative controls. After 10, 30, and 90 days, the animals (n = 8 per period) were euthanized and the implants with surrounding tissues dissected and processed for routine histological evaluation. A four-category evaluation system was used to measure and record the microscopic observations according to the thickness of a fibrous capsule, the vascular changes, and the various types of inflammatory cells. Results: Initially, a severe inflammatory reaction was observed of the soft tissues in direct contact with both EndoREZ/Accelerator and Real Seal. The severity decreased over time and was resolved at the end of the experiment. Pulp Canal Sealer showed a severe tissue reaction for all observation periods. The negative controls showed an initial mild to moderate inflammatory reaction. After 30 days, healthy fibrous connective tissue was observed, which increased over time. After 10 days, no statistically significant differences between the experimental groups were observed. After 90 days, EndoREZ and RealSeal were statistically significantly less toxic than Pulp Canal Sealer (p > 0.05). Conclusions: After 90 days, both methacrylate resinbased sealers were considered biologically acceptable when implanted in subcutaneous connective tissues of the rat. Pulp Canal Sealer remained toxic for the duration of the study.
Fil: Zmener, Osvaldo. Universidad del Salvador; Argentina
Fil: Pameijer, Cornelis H.. University of Connecticut; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kokubu, Gabriel A.. Universidad del Salvador; Argentina
Fil: Grana, Daniel Rodolfo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas; Argentina. Universidad del Salvador; Argentina
description Introduction: An evaluation was made of the connective tissue reaction in rats after subcutaneous implantation of methacrylate resin-based sealers (EndoREZ [Ultradent Products, Inc, South Jordan, UT] with a polymerization accelerator and RealSeal [Sybron Dental Specialties, Orange, CA]) and Pulp Canal Sealer (Sybron Dental Specialties), a zinc oxide and eugenol-based sealer used as the control. Methods: Silicone tubes containing the test materials were implanted in 24 Wistar rats. Solid silicone rods of the same size served as the negative controls. After 10, 30, and 90 days, the animals (n = 8 per period) were euthanized and the implants with surrounding tissues dissected and processed for routine histological evaluation. A four-category evaluation system was used to measure and record the microscopic observations according to the thickness of a fibrous capsule, the vascular changes, and the various types of inflammatory cells. Results: Initially, a severe inflammatory reaction was observed of the soft tissues in direct contact with both EndoREZ/Accelerator and Real Seal. The severity decreased over time and was resolved at the end of the experiment. Pulp Canal Sealer showed a severe tissue reaction for all observation periods. The negative controls showed an initial mild to moderate inflammatory reaction. After 30 days, healthy fibrous connective tissue was observed, which increased over time. After 10 days, no statistically significant differences between the experimental groups were observed. After 90 days, EndoREZ and RealSeal were statistically significantly less toxic than Pulp Canal Sealer (p > 0.05). Conclusions: After 90 days, both methacrylate resinbased sealers were considered biologically acceptable when implanted in subcutaneous connective tissues of the rat. Pulp Canal Sealer remained toxic for the duration of the study.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/67578
Zmener, Osvaldo; Pameijer, Cornelis H.; Kokubu, Gabriel A.; Grana, Daniel Rodolfo; Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers; Elsevier Science Inc; Journal Of Endodontics; 36; 9; 9-2010; 1574-1579
0099-2399
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/67578
identifier_str_mv Zmener, Osvaldo; Pameijer, Cornelis H.; Kokubu, Gabriel A.; Grana, Daniel Rodolfo; Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to Methacrylate Resin–based and Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Sealers; Elsevier Science Inc; Journal Of Endodontics; 36; 9; 9-2010; 1574-1579
0099-2399
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239910005224
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.019
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614131746865152
score 13.070432