Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies

Autores
Bastos, Leonardo M.; Carciochi, Walter Daniel; Lollato, Romulo P.; Jaenisch, Brent R.; Rezende, Caio R.; Schwalbert, Rai; Vara Prasad, P.V.; Zhang, Guorong; Fritz, Allan K.; Foster, Chris; Wright, Yancy; Young, Steven; Bradley, Pauley; Ciampitti, Ignacio Antonio
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield response to plant density is inconsistent, and the mechanisms driving this response are unclear. A better understanding of the factors governing this relationship could improve plant density recommendations according to specific environmental and genetics characteristics. Therefore, the aims of this paper were to: i) execute a synthesis-analysis of existing literature related to yield-plant density relationship to provide an indication of the need for different agronomic optimum plant density (AOPD) in different yield environments (YEs), and ii) explore a data set of field research studies conducted in Kansas (USA) on yield response to plant density to determine the AOPD at different YEs, evaluate the effect of tillering potential (TP) on the AOPD, and explain changes in AOPD via variations in wheat yield components. Major findings of this study are: i) the synthesis-analysis portrayed new insights of differences in AOPD at varying YEs, reducing the AOPD as the attainable yield increases (with AOPD moving from 397 pl m-2 for the low YE to 191 pl m-2 for the high YE); ii) the field dataset confirmed the trend observed in the synthesis-analysis but expanded on the physiological mechanisms underpinning the yield response to plant density for wheat, mainly highlighting the following points: a) high TP reduces the AOPD mainly in high and low YEs, b) at canopy-scale, both final number of heads and kernels per square meter were the main factors improving yield response to plant density under high TP, c) under varying YEs, at per-plant-scale, a compensation between heads per plant and kernels per head was the main factor contributing to yield with different TP.
Fil: Bastos, Leonardo M.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Carciochi, Walter Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lollato, Romulo P.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jaenisch, Brent R.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Rezende, Caio R.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Schwalbert, Rai. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Vara Prasad, P.V.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Zhang, Guorong. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fritz, Allan K.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Foster, Chris. John Deer; Estados Unidos
Fil: Wright, Yancy. John Deer; Estados Unidos
Fil: Young, Steven. John Deer; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bradley, Pauley. John Deer; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ciampitti, Ignacio Antonio. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Materia
SYNTHESIS-ANALYSIS
TILLERING POTENTIAL
WHEAT
YIELD COMPONENTS
YIELD ENVIRONMENT
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/174631
Acceder
id CONICETDig_3e9882eb7f30eb139e0c4cb708bbe23b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/174631
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field StudiesBastos, Leonardo M.Carciochi, Walter DanielLollato, Romulo P.Jaenisch, Brent R.Rezende, Caio R.Schwalbert, RaiVara Prasad, P.V.Zhang, GuorongFritz, Allan K.Foster, ChrisWright, YancyYoung, StevenBradley, PauleyCiampitti, Ignacio AntonioSYNTHESIS-ANALYSISTILLERING POTENTIALWHEATYIELD COMPONENTSYIELD ENVIRONMENThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield response to plant density is inconsistent, and the mechanisms driving this response are unclear. A better understanding of the factors governing this relationship could improve plant density recommendations according to specific environmental and genetics characteristics. Therefore, the aims of this paper were to: i) execute a synthesis-analysis of existing literature related to yield-plant density relationship to provide an indication of the need for different agronomic optimum plant density (AOPD) in different yield environments (YEs), and ii) explore a data set of field research studies conducted in Kansas (USA) on yield response to plant density to determine the AOPD at different YEs, evaluate the effect of tillering potential (TP) on the AOPD, and explain changes in AOPD via variations in wheat yield components. Major findings of this study are: i) the synthesis-analysis portrayed new insights of differences in AOPD at varying YEs, reducing the AOPD as the attainable yield increases (with AOPD moving from 397 pl m-2 for the low YE to 191 pl m-2 for the high YE); ii) the field dataset confirmed the trend observed in the synthesis-analysis but expanded on the physiological mechanisms underpinning the yield response to plant density for wheat, mainly highlighting the following points: a) high TP reduces the AOPD mainly in high and low YEs, b) at canopy-scale, both final number of heads and kernels per square meter were the main factors improving yield response to plant density under high TP, c) under varying YEs, at per-plant-scale, a compensation between heads per plant and kernels per head was the main factor contributing to yield with different TP.Fil: Bastos, Leonardo M.. Kansas State University; Estados UnidosFil: Carciochi, Walter Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina. Kansas State University; Estados UnidosFil: Lollato, Romulo P.. Kansas State University; Estados UnidosFil: Jaenisch, Brent R.. Kansas State University; Estados UnidosFil: Rezende, Caio R.. Kansas State University; Estados UnidosFil: Schwalbert, Rai. Kansas State University; Estados UnidosFil: Vara Prasad, P.V.. Kansas State University; Estados UnidosFil: Zhang, Guorong. Kansas State University; Estados UnidosFil: Fritz, Allan K.. Kansas State University; Estados UnidosFil: Foster, Chris. John Deer; Estados UnidosFil: Wright, Yancy. John Deer; Estados UnidosFil: Young, Steven. John Deer; Estados UnidosFil: Bradley, Pauley. John Deer; Estados UnidosFil: Ciampitti, Ignacio Antonio. Kansas State University; Estados UnidosFrontiers Media2020-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/174631Bastos, Leonardo M.; Carciochi, Walter Daniel; Lollato, Romulo P.; Jaenisch, Brent R.; Rezende, Caio R.; et al.; Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Plant Science; 11; 54; 3-2020; 1-171664-462XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2020.00054/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpls.2020.00054info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:05:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/174631instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:05:26.124CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies
title Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies
spellingShingle Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies
Bastos, Leonardo M.
SYNTHESIS-ANALYSIS
TILLERING POTENTIAL
WHEAT
YIELD COMPONENTS
YIELD ENVIRONMENT
title_short Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies
title_full Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies
title_fullStr Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies
title_full_unstemmed Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies
title_sort Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bastos, Leonardo M.
Carciochi, Walter Daniel
Lollato, Romulo P.
Jaenisch, Brent R.
Rezende, Caio R.
Schwalbert, Rai
Vara Prasad, P.V.
Zhang, Guorong
Fritz, Allan K.
Foster, Chris
Wright, Yancy
Young, Steven
Bradley, Pauley
Ciampitti, Ignacio Antonio
author Bastos, Leonardo M.
author_facet Bastos, Leonardo M.
Carciochi, Walter Daniel
Lollato, Romulo P.
Jaenisch, Brent R.
Rezende, Caio R.
Schwalbert, Rai
Vara Prasad, P.V.
Zhang, Guorong
Fritz, Allan K.
Foster, Chris
Wright, Yancy
Young, Steven
Bradley, Pauley
Ciampitti, Ignacio Antonio
author_role author
author2 Carciochi, Walter Daniel
Lollato, Romulo P.
Jaenisch, Brent R.
Rezende, Caio R.
Schwalbert, Rai
Vara Prasad, P.V.
Zhang, Guorong
Fritz, Allan K.
Foster, Chris
Wright, Yancy
Young, Steven
Bradley, Pauley
Ciampitti, Ignacio Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SYNTHESIS-ANALYSIS
TILLERING POTENTIAL
WHEAT
YIELD COMPONENTS
YIELD ENVIRONMENT
topic SYNTHESIS-ANALYSIS
TILLERING POTENTIAL
WHEAT
YIELD COMPONENTS
YIELD ENVIRONMENT
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield response to plant density is inconsistent, and the mechanisms driving this response are unclear. A better understanding of the factors governing this relationship could improve plant density recommendations according to specific environmental and genetics characteristics. Therefore, the aims of this paper were to: i) execute a synthesis-analysis of existing literature related to yield-plant density relationship to provide an indication of the need for different agronomic optimum plant density (AOPD) in different yield environments (YEs), and ii) explore a data set of field research studies conducted in Kansas (USA) on yield response to plant density to determine the AOPD at different YEs, evaluate the effect of tillering potential (TP) on the AOPD, and explain changes in AOPD via variations in wheat yield components. Major findings of this study are: i) the synthesis-analysis portrayed new insights of differences in AOPD at varying YEs, reducing the AOPD as the attainable yield increases (with AOPD moving from 397 pl m-2 for the low YE to 191 pl m-2 for the high YE); ii) the field dataset confirmed the trend observed in the synthesis-analysis but expanded on the physiological mechanisms underpinning the yield response to plant density for wheat, mainly highlighting the following points: a) high TP reduces the AOPD mainly in high and low YEs, b) at canopy-scale, both final number of heads and kernels per square meter were the main factors improving yield response to plant density under high TP, c) under varying YEs, at per-plant-scale, a compensation between heads per plant and kernels per head was the main factor contributing to yield with different TP.
Fil: Bastos, Leonardo M.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Carciochi, Walter Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lollato, Romulo P.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jaenisch, Brent R.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Rezende, Caio R.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Schwalbert, Rai. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Vara Prasad, P.V.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Zhang, Guorong. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fritz, Allan K.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Foster, Chris. John Deer; Estados Unidos
Fil: Wright, Yancy. John Deer; Estados Unidos
Fil: Young, Steven. John Deer; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bradley, Pauley. John Deer; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ciampitti, Ignacio Antonio. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
description Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield response to plant density is inconsistent, and the mechanisms driving this response are unclear. A better understanding of the factors governing this relationship could improve plant density recommendations according to specific environmental and genetics characteristics. Therefore, the aims of this paper were to: i) execute a synthesis-analysis of existing literature related to yield-plant density relationship to provide an indication of the need for different agronomic optimum plant density (AOPD) in different yield environments (YEs), and ii) explore a data set of field research studies conducted in Kansas (USA) on yield response to plant density to determine the AOPD at different YEs, evaluate the effect of tillering potential (TP) on the AOPD, and explain changes in AOPD via variations in wheat yield components. Major findings of this study are: i) the synthesis-analysis portrayed new insights of differences in AOPD at varying YEs, reducing the AOPD as the attainable yield increases (with AOPD moving from 397 pl m-2 for the low YE to 191 pl m-2 for the high YE); ii) the field dataset confirmed the trend observed in the synthesis-analysis but expanded on the physiological mechanisms underpinning the yield response to plant density for wheat, mainly highlighting the following points: a) high TP reduces the AOPD mainly in high and low YEs, b) at canopy-scale, both final number of heads and kernels per square meter were the main factors improving yield response to plant density under high TP, c) under varying YEs, at per-plant-scale, a compensation between heads per plant and kernels per head was the main factor contributing to yield with different TP.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/174631
Bastos, Leonardo M.; Carciochi, Walter Daniel; Lollato, Romulo P.; Jaenisch, Brent R.; Rezende, Caio R.; et al.; Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Plant Science; 11; 54; 3-2020; 1-17
1664-462X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/174631
identifier_str_mv Bastos, Leonardo M.; Carciochi, Walter Daniel; Lollato, Romulo P.; Jaenisch, Brent R.; Rezende, Caio R.; et al.; Winter Wheat Yield Response to Plant Density as a Function of Yield Environment and Tillering Potential: A Review and Field Studies; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Plant Science; 11; 54; 3-2020; 1-17
1664-462X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2020.00054/full
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpls.2020.00054
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083196604645376
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares