Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study

Autores
Alvarez Prado, Santiago; Gallardo, Jose M.; Kruk, Betina Claudia; Miralles, Daniel Julio
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Grain yield variations in bread wheat and two-row barley are better explained by changes in grain number (GN) than mean grain weight. However, the strategies for building GN are different in both species because in two-row barley the variations in GN are more frequently related to the number of spikes m−2, due to its higher tillering capacity than wheat, whereas in bread wheat both grain number spike−1 and the number of spikes m−2 contribute to the establishment of GN. The higher tillering capacity and leaf area index at the beginning of the crop cycle in two-row barley allows a higher radiation accumulation than in bread wheat. We hypothesize that the higher early vigor of two-row barley, associated with its greater leaf area exposure relative to wheat, represents an initial advantage that is capitalized at the end of the cycle as higher biomass accumulation driven by a larger GN and consequently higher grain yield. The main objective of this work was to compare different physiological traits of bread wheat and two-row barley growing together under different temperature and radiation conditions. We evaluated two genotypes of each species, with similar phenology, growing under four different environments without water or nutritional deficiencies. Numerical yield components, biomass, radiation interception and harvest index were measured. Despite no differences being observed between genotypes of bread wheat and two-row barley in terms of total grain yield and total grain number when exposed to different environments, each species had a different strategy for establishing the final yield. Although two-row barley showed initial advantages in radiation interception, bread wheat genotypes accumulated more intercepted photosynthetic active radiation (iPAR) and used it in a more efficient way than two-row barley, thus allowing a higher biomass accumulation. Both species showed a reduction in grain weight due to increases in mean night and high temperatures. Grain weight reductions were higher in bread wheat than in two-row barley, and were directly associated with shortening of the duration of grain filling without consequences for the grain-filling rate. This suggested a direct effect of temperature on grain development rather than a growth limitation due to a lack of source.
Fil: Alvarez Prado, Santiago. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina
Fil: Gallardo, Jose M.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina
Fil: Kruk, Betina Claudia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina
Fil: Miralles, Daniel Julio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
Materia
Biomass Accumulation
Environments
Night Temperature
Numerical Components
Yield Strategies
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56115

id CONICETDig_256bdc415cde3f68f9fb05eb97fa666f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56115
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative studyAlvarez Prado, SantiagoGallardo, Jose M.Kruk, Betina ClaudiaMiralles, Daniel JulioBiomass AccumulationEnvironmentsNight TemperatureNumerical ComponentsYield Strategieshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Grain yield variations in bread wheat and two-row barley are better explained by changes in grain number (GN) than mean grain weight. However, the strategies for building GN are different in both species because in two-row barley the variations in GN are more frequently related to the number of spikes m−2, due to its higher tillering capacity than wheat, whereas in bread wheat both grain number spike−1 and the number of spikes m−2 contribute to the establishment of GN. The higher tillering capacity and leaf area index at the beginning of the crop cycle in two-row barley allows a higher radiation accumulation than in bread wheat. We hypothesize that the higher early vigor of two-row barley, associated with its greater leaf area exposure relative to wheat, represents an initial advantage that is capitalized at the end of the cycle as higher biomass accumulation driven by a larger GN and consequently higher grain yield. The main objective of this work was to compare different physiological traits of bread wheat and two-row barley growing together under different temperature and radiation conditions. We evaluated two genotypes of each species, with similar phenology, growing under four different environments without water or nutritional deficiencies. Numerical yield components, biomass, radiation interception and harvest index were measured. Despite no differences being observed between genotypes of bread wheat and two-row barley in terms of total grain yield and total grain number when exposed to different environments, each species had a different strategy for establishing the final yield. Although two-row barley showed initial advantages in radiation interception, bread wheat genotypes accumulated more intercepted photosynthetic active radiation (iPAR) and used it in a more efficient way than two-row barley, thus allowing a higher biomass accumulation. Both species showed a reduction in grain weight due to increases in mean night and high temperatures. Grain weight reductions were higher in bread wheat than in two-row barley, and were directly associated with shortening of the duration of grain filling without consequences for the grain-filling rate. This suggested a direct effect of temperature on grain development rather than a growth limitation due to a lack of source.Fil: Alvarez Prado, Santiago. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; ArgentinaFil: Gallardo, Jose M.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; ArgentinaFil: Kruk, Betina Claudia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; ArgentinaFil: Miralles, Daniel Julio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; ArgentinaElsevier Science2017-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/56115Alvarez Prado, Santiago; Gallardo, Jose M.; Kruk, Betina Claudia; Miralles, Daniel Julio; Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 203; 3-2017; 94-1050378-4290CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429016308632info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:30:18Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56115instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:30:18.394CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study
title Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study
spellingShingle Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study
Alvarez Prado, Santiago
Biomass Accumulation
Environments
Night Temperature
Numerical Components
Yield Strategies
title_short Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study
title_full Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study
title_fullStr Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study
title_sort Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Alvarez Prado, Santiago
Gallardo, Jose M.
Kruk, Betina Claudia
Miralles, Daniel Julio
author Alvarez Prado, Santiago
author_facet Alvarez Prado, Santiago
Gallardo, Jose M.
Kruk, Betina Claudia
Miralles, Daniel Julio
author_role author
author2 Gallardo, Jose M.
Kruk, Betina Claudia
Miralles, Daniel Julio
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomass Accumulation
Environments
Night Temperature
Numerical Components
Yield Strategies
topic Biomass Accumulation
Environments
Night Temperature
Numerical Components
Yield Strategies
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Grain yield variations in bread wheat and two-row barley are better explained by changes in grain number (GN) than mean grain weight. However, the strategies for building GN are different in both species because in two-row barley the variations in GN are more frequently related to the number of spikes m−2, due to its higher tillering capacity than wheat, whereas in bread wheat both grain number spike−1 and the number of spikes m−2 contribute to the establishment of GN. The higher tillering capacity and leaf area index at the beginning of the crop cycle in two-row barley allows a higher radiation accumulation than in bread wheat. We hypothesize that the higher early vigor of two-row barley, associated with its greater leaf area exposure relative to wheat, represents an initial advantage that is capitalized at the end of the cycle as higher biomass accumulation driven by a larger GN and consequently higher grain yield. The main objective of this work was to compare different physiological traits of bread wheat and two-row barley growing together under different temperature and radiation conditions. We evaluated two genotypes of each species, with similar phenology, growing under four different environments without water or nutritional deficiencies. Numerical yield components, biomass, radiation interception and harvest index were measured. Despite no differences being observed between genotypes of bread wheat and two-row barley in terms of total grain yield and total grain number when exposed to different environments, each species had a different strategy for establishing the final yield. Although two-row barley showed initial advantages in radiation interception, bread wheat genotypes accumulated more intercepted photosynthetic active radiation (iPAR) and used it in a more efficient way than two-row barley, thus allowing a higher biomass accumulation. Both species showed a reduction in grain weight due to increases in mean night and high temperatures. Grain weight reductions were higher in bread wheat than in two-row barley, and were directly associated with shortening of the duration of grain filling without consequences for the grain-filling rate. This suggested a direct effect of temperature on grain development rather than a growth limitation due to a lack of source.
Fil: Alvarez Prado, Santiago. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina
Fil: Gallardo, Jose M.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina
Fil: Kruk, Betina Claudia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina
Fil: Miralles, Daniel Julio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
description Grain yield variations in bread wheat and two-row barley are better explained by changes in grain number (GN) than mean grain weight. However, the strategies for building GN are different in both species because in two-row barley the variations in GN are more frequently related to the number of spikes m−2, due to its higher tillering capacity than wheat, whereas in bread wheat both grain number spike−1 and the number of spikes m−2 contribute to the establishment of GN. The higher tillering capacity and leaf area index at the beginning of the crop cycle in two-row barley allows a higher radiation accumulation than in bread wheat. We hypothesize that the higher early vigor of two-row barley, associated with its greater leaf area exposure relative to wheat, represents an initial advantage that is capitalized at the end of the cycle as higher biomass accumulation driven by a larger GN and consequently higher grain yield. The main objective of this work was to compare different physiological traits of bread wheat and two-row barley growing together under different temperature and radiation conditions. We evaluated two genotypes of each species, with similar phenology, growing under four different environments without water or nutritional deficiencies. Numerical yield components, biomass, radiation interception and harvest index were measured. Despite no differences being observed between genotypes of bread wheat and two-row barley in terms of total grain yield and total grain number when exposed to different environments, each species had a different strategy for establishing the final yield. Although two-row barley showed initial advantages in radiation interception, bread wheat genotypes accumulated more intercepted photosynthetic active radiation (iPAR) and used it in a more efficient way than two-row barley, thus allowing a higher biomass accumulation. Both species showed a reduction in grain weight due to increases in mean night and high temperatures. Grain weight reductions were higher in bread wheat than in two-row barley, and were directly associated with shortening of the duration of grain filling without consequences for the grain-filling rate. This suggested a direct effect of temperature on grain development rather than a growth limitation due to a lack of source.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/56115
Alvarez Prado, Santiago; Gallardo, Jose M.; Kruk, Betina Claudia; Miralles, Daniel Julio; Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 203; 3-2017; 94-105
0378-4290
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/56115
identifier_str_mv Alvarez Prado, Santiago; Gallardo, Jose M.; Kruk, Betina Claudia; Miralles, Daniel Julio; Strategies for yield determination of bread wheat and two-row barley growing under different environments: A comparative study; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 203; 3-2017; 94-105
0378-4290
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429016308632
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.013
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082779110965248
score 13.22299