Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation

Autores
Venezia, Luciano Javier
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this paper, I will introduce the notions of crucial argument and crucial evidence in the philosophy of intellectual history (broadly construed, including the history of political thought). I will use these concepts and take sides in an important controversy in Hobbes studies, namely whether Hobbes holds a prudential or a deontological theory of contractual obligation. Though there is textual evidence for both readings, I will argue that there is especially relevant evidence – crucial evidence – for interpreting Hobbes’s account in a deontological fashion.
Fil: Venezia, Luciano Javier. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales; Francia
Materia
Underdetermination of Interpretation
Crucial Evidence
Hobbes
Contractual Obligation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/22793

id CONICETDig_3df0827d6ea1b0f7f769886bb549e06a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/22793
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligationVenezia, Luciano JavierUnderdetermination of InterpretationCrucial EvidenceHobbesContractual Obligationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In this paper, I will introduce the notions of crucial argument and crucial evidence in the philosophy of intellectual history (broadly construed, including the history of political thought). I will use these concepts and take sides in an important controversy in Hobbes studies, namely whether Hobbes holds a prudential or a deontological theory of contractual obligation. Though there is textual evidence for both readings, I will argue that there is especially relevant evidence – crucial evidence – for interpreting Hobbes’s account in a deontological fashion.Fil: Venezia, Luciano Javier. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales; FranciaBrill Academic Publishers2013-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/22793Venezia, Luciano Javier; Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation; Brill Academic Publishers; Journal of the Philosophy of History; 7; 1; 2-2013; 106-1351872-261XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/18722636-12341246info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/18722636-12341246info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:49:20Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/22793instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:49:20.733CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation
title Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation
spellingShingle Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation
Venezia, Luciano Javier
Underdetermination of Interpretation
Crucial Evidence
Hobbes
Contractual Obligation
title_short Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation
title_full Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation
title_fullStr Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation
title_full_unstemmed Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation
title_sort Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Venezia, Luciano Javier
author Venezia, Luciano Javier
author_facet Venezia, Luciano Javier
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Underdetermination of Interpretation
Crucial Evidence
Hobbes
Contractual Obligation
topic Underdetermination of Interpretation
Crucial Evidence
Hobbes
Contractual Obligation
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this paper, I will introduce the notions of crucial argument and crucial evidence in the philosophy of intellectual history (broadly construed, including the history of political thought). I will use these concepts and take sides in an important controversy in Hobbes studies, namely whether Hobbes holds a prudential or a deontological theory of contractual obligation. Though there is textual evidence for both readings, I will argue that there is especially relevant evidence – crucial evidence – for interpreting Hobbes’s account in a deontological fashion.
Fil: Venezia, Luciano Javier. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales; Francia
description In this paper, I will introduce the notions of crucial argument and crucial evidence in the philosophy of intellectual history (broadly construed, including the history of political thought). I will use these concepts and take sides in an important controversy in Hobbes studies, namely whether Hobbes holds a prudential or a deontological theory of contractual obligation. Though there is textual evidence for both readings, I will argue that there is especially relevant evidence – crucial evidence – for interpreting Hobbes’s account in a deontological fashion.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/22793
Venezia, Luciano Javier; Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation; Brill Academic Publishers; Journal of the Philosophy of History; 7; 1; 2-2013; 106-135
1872-261X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/22793
identifier_str_mv Venezia, Luciano Javier; Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation; Brill Academic Publishers; Journal of the Philosophy of History; 7; 1; 2-2013; 106-135
1872-261X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/18722636-12341246
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/18722636-12341246
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brill Academic Publishers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brill Academic Publishers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268968688025600
score 13.13397