Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón

Autores
Cairo, María Emilia
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the boni cives, as formulated by cicero in his speech "De haruspicum responso". From our viewpoint, both when he rejects Clodius´ accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the responsum, cicero poses a close correlation between knowledge about religio –how to behave according to mores maiorum, how to understand messages sent by the gods– and political auctoritas. By ascribing Clodius to the category of deteriores cives, due to the fact that he has violated every single religious norm, and that he conspires against harmony among the optimates, cicero excludes him from the group of boni cives. After a brief introduction that summarizes the reception of the speech and the context in which it was delivered, we present an analysis of the sourcesof religious authority and its connection to roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech. then, we turn to the definition of deteriores cives in order to observe how Cicero includes clodius under this designation. in the final section of the paper, some conclusions are advanced.
Fil: Cairo, María Emilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
Materia
Cicero
Haruspices
Religion
Clodius
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/59638

id CONICETDig_3da108103b53f31c3cc560d043e9175d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/59638
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de CicerónCairo, María EmiliaCiceroHaruspicesReligionClodiushttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the boni cives, as formulated by cicero in his speech "De haruspicum responso". From our viewpoint, both when he rejects Clodius´ accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the responsum, cicero poses a close correlation between knowledge about religio –how to behave according to mores maiorum, how to understand messages sent by the gods– and political auctoritas. By ascribing Clodius to the category of deteriores cives, due to the fact that he has violated every single religious norm, and that he conspires against harmony among the optimates, cicero excludes him from the group of boni cives. After a brief introduction that summarizes the reception of the speech and the context in which it was delivered, we present an analysis of the sourcesof religious authority and its connection to roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech. then, we turn to the definition of deteriores cives in order to observe how Cicero includes clodius under this designation. in the final section of the paper, some conclusions are advanced.Fil: Cairo, María Emilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales; ArgentinaMorcelliana2017-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/59638Cairo, María Emilia; Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón; Morcelliana; Maia; 69; 3; 12-2017; 486-5000025-0538CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.morcelliana.net/maia/3114-aavv-9788837230845.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:47:52Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/59638instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:47:52.913CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón
title Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón
spellingShingle Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón
Cairo, María Emilia
Cicero
Haruspices
Religion
Clodius
title_short Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón
title_full Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón
title_fullStr Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón
title_full_unstemmed Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón
title_sort Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cairo, María Emilia
author Cairo, María Emilia
author_facet Cairo, María Emilia
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cicero
Haruspices
Religion
Clodius
topic Cicero
Haruspices
Religion
Clodius
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the boni cives, as formulated by cicero in his speech "De haruspicum responso". From our viewpoint, both when he rejects Clodius´ accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the responsum, cicero poses a close correlation between knowledge about religio –how to behave according to mores maiorum, how to understand messages sent by the gods– and political auctoritas. By ascribing Clodius to the category of deteriores cives, due to the fact that he has violated every single religious norm, and that he conspires against harmony among the optimates, cicero excludes him from the group of boni cives. After a brief introduction that summarizes the reception of the speech and the context in which it was delivered, we present an analysis of the sourcesof religious authority and its connection to roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech. then, we turn to the definition of deteriores cives in order to observe how Cicero includes clodius under this designation. in the final section of the paper, some conclusions are advanced.
Fil: Cairo, María Emilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
description The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the boni cives, as formulated by cicero in his speech "De haruspicum responso". From our viewpoint, both when he rejects Clodius´ accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the responsum, cicero poses a close correlation between knowledge about religio –how to behave according to mores maiorum, how to understand messages sent by the gods– and political auctoritas. By ascribing Clodius to the category of deteriores cives, due to the fact that he has violated every single religious norm, and that he conspires against harmony among the optimates, cicero excludes him from the group of boni cives. After a brief introduction that summarizes the reception of the speech and the context in which it was delivered, we present an analysis of the sourcesof religious authority and its connection to roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech. then, we turn to the definition of deteriores cives in order to observe how Cicero includes clodius under this designation. in the final section of the paper, some conclusions are advanced.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/59638
Cairo, María Emilia; Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón; Morcelliana; Maia; 69; 3; 12-2017; 486-500
0025-0538
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/59638
identifier_str_mv Cairo, María Emilia; Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón; Morcelliana; Maia; 69; 3; 12-2017; 486-500
0025-0538
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.morcelliana.net/maia/3114-aavv-9788837230845.html
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Morcelliana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Morcelliana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268887645683712
score 13.13397