Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón
- Autores
- Cairo, María Emilia
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the boni cives, as formulated by cicero in his speech "De haruspicum responso". From our viewpoint, both when he rejects Clodius´ accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the responsum, cicero poses a close correlation between knowledge about religio –how to behave according to mores maiorum, how to understand messages sent by the gods– and political auctoritas. By ascribing Clodius to the category of deteriores cives, due to the fact that he has violated every single religious norm, and that he conspires against harmony among the optimates, cicero excludes him from the group of boni cives. After a brief introduction that summarizes the reception of the speech and the context in which it was delivered, we present an analysis of the sourcesof religious authority and its connection to roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech. then, we turn to the definition of deteriores cives in order to observe how Cicero includes clodius under this designation. in the final section of the paper, some conclusions are advanced.
Fil: Cairo, María Emilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales; Argentina - Materia
-
Cicero
Haruspices
Religion
Clodius - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/59638
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_3da108103b53f31c3cc560d043e9175d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/59638 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de CicerónCairo, María EmiliaCiceroHaruspicesReligionClodiushttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the boni cives, as formulated by cicero in his speech "De haruspicum responso". From our viewpoint, both when he rejects Clodius´ accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the responsum, cicero poses a close correlation between knowledge about religio –how to behave according to mores maiorum, how to understand messages sent by the gods– and political auctoritas. By ascribing Clodius to the category of deteriores cives, due to the fact that he has violated every single religious norm, and that he conspires against harmony among the optimates, cicero excludes him from the group of boni cives. After a brief introduction that summarizes the reception of the speech and the context in which it was delivered, we present an analysis of the sourcesof religious authority and its connection to roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech. then, we turn to the definition of deteriores cives in order to observe how Cicero includes clodius under this designation. in the final section of the paper, some conclusions are advanced.Fil: Cairo, María Emilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales; ArgentinaMorcelliana2017-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/59638Cairo, María Emilia; Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón; Morcelliana; Maia; 69; 3; 12-2017; 486-5000025-0538CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.morcelliana.net/maia/3114-aavv-9788837230845.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:47:52Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/59638instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:47:52.913CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón |
title |
Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón |
spellingShingle |
Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón Cairo, María Emilia Cicero Haruspices Religion Clodius |
title_short |
Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón |
title_full |
Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón |
title_fullStr |
Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón |
title_full_unstemmed |
Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón |
title_sort |
Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cairo, María Emilia |
author |
Cairo, María Emilia |
author_facet |
Cairo, María Emilia |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Cicero Haruspices Religion Clodius |
topic |
Cicero Haruspices Religion Clodius |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the boni cives, as formulated by cicero in his speech "De haruspicum responso". From our viewpoint, both when he rejects Clodius´ accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the responsum, cicero poses a close correlation between knowledge about religio –how to behave according to mores maiorum, how to understand messages sent by the gods– and political auctoritas. By ascribing Clodius to the category of deteriores cives, due to the fact that he has violated every single religious norm, and that he conspires against harmony among the optimates, cicero excludes him from the group of boni cives. After a brief introduction that summarizes the reception of the speech and the context in which it was delivered, we present an analysis of the sourcesof religious authority and its connection to roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech. then, we turn to the definition of deteriores cives in order to observe how Cicero includes clodius under this designation. in the final section of the paper, some conclusions are advanced. Fil: Cairo, María Emilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales; Argentina |
description |
The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the boni cives, as formulated by cicero in his speech "De haruspicum responso". From our viewpoint, both when he rejects Clodius´ accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the responsum, cicero poses a close correlation between knowledge about religio –how to behave according to mores maiorum, how to understand messages sent by the gods– and political auctoritas. By ascribing Clodius to the category of deteriores cives, due to the fact that he has violated every single religious norm, and that he conspires against harmony among the optimates, cicero excludes him from the group of boni cives. After a brief introduction that summarizes the reception of the speech and the context in which it was delivered, we present an analysis of the sourcesof religious authority and its connection to roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech. then, we turn to the definition of deteriores cives in order to observe how Cicero includes clodius under this designation. in the final section of the paper, some conclusions are advanced. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/59638 Cairo, María Emilia; Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón; Morcelliana; Maia; 69; 3; 12-2017; 486-500 0025-0538 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/59638 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cairo, María Emilia; Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en "De haruspicum responso" de Cicerón; Morcelliana; Maia; 69; 3; 12-2017; 486-500 0025-0538 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.morcelliana.net/maia/3114-aavv-9788837230845.html |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Morcelliana |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Morcelliana |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842268887645683712 |
score |
13.13397 |