Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en <i>De haruspicum responso</i> de Cicerón

Autores
Cairo, María Emilia
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the boni cives, as formulated by Cicero in his speech De haruspicum responso. We argue that, both when he rejects Clodius' accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the responsum, Cicero claims the correlation between knowledge of religio and political auctoritas. Then we turn to the definition of deteriores cives in order to observe how Cicero includes Clodius in this group, excluding him from the group of boni cives, because of his violation of every single religious norm and his conspi- ration against the harmony of the optimates. Finally, we present an analysis of the sources of religious authority and its connection to the Roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech.
Nuestra propuesta consiste en estudiar el modo en que Cicerón, tanto al refutar las acusaciones de Clodio como al presentar su propia lectura del responsum de los arúspices, plantea una estrecha correlación entre el saber religioso y la pertenencia a la categoría de los boni cives, lo cual le permite excluir a Clodio, relegándolo al grupo de los ciudadanos deteriores.
Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
Fuente
Memoria académica
Materia
Letras
Cicero
Haruspices
Religion
Clodius
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/88884

id SEDICI_8b18be8a1d36271ce5a1dff744bafb78
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/88884
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en <i>De haruspicum responso</i> de CicerónCairo, María EmiliaLetrasCiceroHaruspicesReligionClodiusThe aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the <i>boni cives</i>, as formulated by Cicero in his speech <i>De haruspicum responso</i>. We argue that, both when he rejects Clodius' accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the <i>responsum</i>, Cicero claims the correlation between knowledge of religio and political <i>auctoritas</i>. Then we turn to the definition of <i>deteriores cives</i> in order to observe how Cicero includes Clodius in this group, excluding him from the group of <i>boni cives</i>, because of his violation of every single religious norm and his conspi- ration against the harmony of the <i>optimates</i>. Finally, we present an analysis of the sources of religious authority and its connection to the Roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech.Nuestra propuesta consiste en estudiar el modo en que Cicerón, tanto al refutar las acusaciones de Clodio como al presentar su propia lectura del <i>responsum</i> de los arúspices, plantea una estrecha correlación entre el saber religioso y la pertenencia a la categoría de los <i>boni cives</i>, lo cual le permite excluir a Clodio, relegándolo al grupo de los ciudadanos <i>deteriores</i>.Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf486-500http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/88884<a href="http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar" target="_blank">Memoria académica</a>reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLPspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/library?a=d&c=arti&d=Jpr9282info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0025-0538info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-03T10:50:28Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/88884Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:50:28.855SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en <i>De haruspicum responso</i> de Cicerón
title Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en <i>De haruspicum responso</i> de Cicerón
spellingShingle Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en <i>De haruspicum responso</i> de Cicerón
Cairo, María Emilia
Letras
Cicero
Haruspices
Religion
Clodius
title_short Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en <i>De haruspicum responso</i> de Cicerón
title_full Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en <i>De haruspicum responso</i> de Cicerón
title_fullStr Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en <i>De haruspicum responso</i> de Cicerón
title_full_unstemmed Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en <i>De haruspicum responso</i> de Cicerón
title_sort Autoridad religiosa y autoridad política en <i>De haruspicum responso</i> de Cicerón
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cairo, María Emilia
author Cairo, María Emilia
author_facet Cairo, María Emilia
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Letras
Cicero
Haruspices
Religion
Clodius
topic Letras
Cicero
Haruspices
Religion
Clodius
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the <i>boni cives</i>, as formulated by Cicero in his speech <i>De haruspicum responso</i>. We argue that, both when he rejects Clodius' accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the <i>responsum</i>, Cicero claims the correlation between knowledge of religio and political <i>auctoritas</i>. Then we turn to the definition of <i>deteriores cives</i> in order to observe how Cicero includes Clodius in this group, excluding him from the group of <i>boni cives</i>, because of his violation of every single religious norm and his conspi- ration against the harmony of the <i>optimates</i>. Finally, we present an analysis of the sources of religious authority and its connection to the Roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech.
Nuestra propuesta consiste en estudiar el modo en que Cicerón, tanto al refutar las acusaciones de Clodio como al presentar su propia lectura del <i>responsum</i> de los arúspices, plantea una estrecha correlación entre el saber religioso y la pertenencia a la categoría de los <i>boni cives</i>, lo cual le permite excluir a Clodio, relegándolo al grupo de los ciudadanos <i>deteriores</i>.
Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
description The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between religious knowledge and belonging to the group of the <i>boni cives</i>, as formulated by Cicero in his speech <i>De haruspicum responso</i>. We argue that, both when he rejects Clodius' accusations and when he presents his own interpretation of the <i>responsum</i>, Cicero claims the correlation between knowledge of religio and political <i>auctoritas</i>. Then we turn to the definition of <i>deteriores cives</i> in order to observe how Cicero includes Clodius in this group, excluding him from the group of <i>boni cives</i>, because of his violation of every single religious norm and his conspi- ration against the harmony of the <i>optimates</i>. Finally, we present an analysis of the sources of religious authority and its connection to the Roman identity as presented in sections 18-19 of the speech.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/88884
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/88884
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/library?a=d&c=arti&d=Jpr9282
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0025-0538
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
486-500
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv <a href="http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar" target="_blank">Memoria académica</a>
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842260382740119552
score 13.13397