Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy
- Autores
- Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Meredith, Pamela; Schröder Pfeifer, Paul; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes; Schroeter, Corinna; Neubauer, Eva; Schiltenwolf, Marcus
- Año de publicación
- 2019
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Attachment theory provides a useful framework for understanding individual differences in
pain patients, especially with insecure attachment shown to be more prevalent in chronic pain patients compared to the general population. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of attachment-informed treatment approaches for this population. The present study compares outcomes from two different attachment-informed treatment modalities for clinicians, with outcomes from treatment as usual (TAU). In both intervention groups (IG1 and IG2), clinicians received bi-monthly training sessions on attachment. Additionally, clinicians in IG1 had access to the attachment diagnostics of their patients. All treatments lasted for four weeks and included a 6-month follow up. A total of 374 chronic pain patients were recruited to participate in this study (TAU = 159/IG1 = 163/IG2 = 52). Analyses were carried out using multilevel modeling with pain intensity as the outcome variable. Additionally, working alliance was tested as a mediator of treatment efficacy. The study was registered under the trial number DRKS00008715 on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). Findings show that while IG2 was efficient in enhancing treatment outcomes, IG1 did not outperform TAU. In IG2, working alliance was a mediator of outcome. Results of the present study indicate that attachment-informed treatment of chronic pain can enhance existing interdisciplinary pain therapies; however, caveats are discussed.
Fil: Pfeifer, Ann Christin. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Meredith, Pamela. University of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Schröder Pfeifer, Paul. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Ehrenthal, Johannes. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Schroeter, Corinna. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Neubauer, Eva. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Schiltenwolf, Marcus. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania - Materia
-
CHRONIC PAIN
ATTACHMENT THEORY
ATTACHMENT-INFORMED INTERVENTION - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121742
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_36c22e46da35932d45b6e7d6d594a9dd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121742 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain TherapyPfeifer, Ann ChristinMeredith, PamelaSchröder Pfeifer, PaulGómez Penedo, Juan MartínEhrenthal, JohannesSchroeter, CorinnaNeubauer, EvaSchiltenwolf, MarcusCHRONIC PAINATTACHMENT THEORYATTACHMENT-INFORMED INTERVENTIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Attachment theory provides a useful framework for understanding individual differences in<br />pain patients, especially with insecure attachment shown to be more prevalent in chronic pain patients compared to the general population. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of attachment-informed treatment approaches for this population. The present study compares outcomes from two different attachment-informed treatment modalities for clinicians, with outcomes from treatment as usual (TAU). In both intervention groups (IG1 and IG2), clinicians received bi-monthly training sessions on attachment. Additionally, clinicians in IG1 had access to the attachment diagnostics of their patients. All treatments lasted for four weeks and included a 6-month follow up. A total of 374 chronic pain patients were recruited to participate in this study (TAU = 159/IG1 = 163/IG2 = 52). Analyses were carried out using multilevel modeling with pain intensity as the outcome variable. Additionally, working alliance was tested as a mediator of treatment efficacy. The study was registered under the trial number DRKS00008715 on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). Findings show that while IG2 was efficient in enhancing treatment outcomes, IG1 did not outperform TAU. In IG2, working alliance was a mediator of outcome. Results of the present study indicate that attachment-informed treatment of chronic pain can enhance existing interdisciplinary pain therapies; however, caveats are discussed.Fil: Pfeifer, Ann Christin. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaFil: Meredith, Pamela. University of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Schröder Pfeifer, Paul. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaFil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Ehrenthal, Johannes. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaFil: Schroeter, Corinna. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaFil: Neubauer, Eva. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaFil: Schiltenwolf, Marcus. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaMolecular Diversity Preservation International2019-03-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/121742Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Meredith, Pamela; Schröder Pfeifer, Paul; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes; et al.; Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy; Molecular Diversity Preservation International; Journal of Clinical Medicine; 8; 3; 14-3-2019; 1-172077-0383CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/jcm8030364info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6463073/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:08Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121742instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:08.316CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy |
title |
Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy |
spellingShingle |
Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy Pfeifer, Ann Christin CHRONIC PAIN ATTACHMENT THEORY ATTACHMENT-INFORMED INTERVENTION |
title_short |
Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy |
title_full |
Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy |
title_sort |
Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pfeifer, Ann Christin Meredith, Pamela Schröder Pfeifer, Paul Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín Ehrenthal, Johannes Schroeter, Corinna Neubauer, Eva Schiltenwolf, Marcus |
author |
Pfeifer, Ann Christin |
author_facet |
Pfeifer, Ann Christin Meredith, Pamela Schröder Pfeifer, Paul Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín Ehrenthal, Johannes Schroeter, Corinna Neubauer, Eva Schiltenwolf, Marcus |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Meredith, Pamela Schröder Pfeifer, Paul Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín Ehrenthal, Johannes Schroeter, Corinna Neubauer, Eva Schiltenwolf, Marcus |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CHRONIC PAIN ATTACHMENT THEORY ATTACHMENT-INFORMED INTERVENTION |
topic |
CHRONIC PAIN ATTACHMENT THEORY ATTACHMENT-INFORMED INTERVENTION |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Attachment theory provides a useful framework for understanding individual differences in<br />pain patients, especially with insecure attachment shown to be more prevalent in chronic pain patients compared to the general population. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of attachment-informed treatment approaches for this population. The present study compares outcomes from two different attachment-informed treatment modalities for clinicians, with outcomes from treatment as usual (TAU). In both intervention groups (IG1 and IG2), clinicians received bi-monthly training sessions on attachment. Additionally, clinicians in IG1 had access to the attachment diagnostics of their patients. All treatments lasted for four weeks and included a 6-month follow up. A total of 374 chronic pain patients were recruited to participate in this study (TAU = 159/IG1 = 163/IG2 = 52). Analyses were carried out using multilevel modeling with pain intensity as the outcome variable. Additionally, working alliance was tested as a mediator of treatment efficacy. The study was registered under the trial number DRKS00008715 on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). Findings show that while IG2 was efficient in enhancing treatment outcomes, IG1 did not outperform TAU. In IG2, working alliance was a mediator of outcome. Results of the present study indicate that attachment-informed treatment of chronic pain can enhance existing interdisciplinary pain therapies; however, caveats are discussed. Fil: Pfeifer, Ann Christin. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania Fil: Meredith, Pamela. University of Queensland; Australia Fil: Schröder Pfeifer, Paul. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania Fil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Ehrenthal, Johannes. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania Fil: Schroeter, Corinna. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania Fil: Neubauer, Eva. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania Fil: Schiltenwolf, Marcus. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania |
description |
Attachment theory provides a useful framework for understanding individual differences in<br />pain patients, especially with insecure attachment shown to be more prevalent in chronic pain patients compared to the general population. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of attachment-informed treatment approaches for this population. The present study compares outcomes from two different attachment-informed treatment modalities for clinicians, with outcomes from treatment as usual (TAU). In both intervention groups (IG1 and IG2), clinicians received bi-monthly training sessions on attachment. Additionally, clinicians in IG1 had access to the attachment diagnostics of their patients. All treatments lasted for four weeks and included a 6-month follow up. A total of 374 chronic pain patients were recruited to participate in this study (TAU = 159/IG1 = 163/IG2 = 52). Analyses were carried out using multilevel modeling with pain intensity as the outcome variable. Additionally, working alliance was tested as a mediator of treatment efficacy. The study was registered under the trial number DRKS00008715 on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). Findings show that while IG2 was efficient in enhancing treatment outcomes, IG1 did not outperform TAU. In IG2, working alliance was a mediator of outcome. Results of the present study indicate that attachment-informed treatment of chronic pain can enhance existing interdisciplinary pain therapies; however, caveats are discussed. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-14 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121742 Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Meredith, Pamela; Schröder Pfeifer, Paul; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes; et al.; Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy; Molecular Diversity Preservation International; Journal of Clinical Medicine; 8; 3; 14-3-2019; 1-17 2077-0383 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121742 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Meredith, Pamela; Schröder Pfeifer, Paul; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes; et al.; Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy; Molecular Diversity Preservation International; Journal of Clinical Medicine; 8; 3; 14-3-2019; 1-17 2077-0383 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/jcm8030364 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6463073/ |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269075230687232 |
score |
12.885934 |