Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy

Autores
Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Meredith, Pamela; Schröder Pfeifer, Paul; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes; Schroeter, Corinna; Neubauer, Eva; Schiltenwolf, Marcus
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Attachment theory provides a useful framework for understanding individual differences in
pain patients, especially with insecure attachment shown to be more prevalent in chronic pain patients compared to the general population. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of attachment-informed treatment approaches for this population. The present study compares outcomes from two different attachment-informed treatment modalities for clinicians, with outcomes from treatment as usual (TAU). In both intervention groups (IG1 and IG2), clinicians received bi-monthly training sessions on attachment. Additionally, clinicians in IG1 had access to the attachment diagnostics of their patients. All treatments lasted for four weeks and included a 6-month follow up. A total of 374 chronic pain patients were recruited to participate in this study (TAU = 159/IG1 = 163/IG2 = 52). Analyses were carried out using multilevel modeling with pain intensity as the outcome variable. Additionally, working alliance was tested as a mediator of treatment efficacy. The study was registered under the trial number DRKS00008715 on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). Findings show that while IG2 was efficient in enhancing treatment outcomes, IG1 did not outperform TAU. In IG2, working alliance was a mediator of outcome. Results of the present study indicate that attachment-informed treatment of chronic pain can enhance existing interdisciplinary pain therapies; however, caveats are discussed.
Fil: Pfeifer, Ann Christin. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Meredith, Pamela. University of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Schröder Pfeifer, Paul. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Ehrenthal, Johannes. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Schroeter, Corinna. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Neubauer, Eva. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Schiltenwolf, Marcus. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Materia
CHRONIC PAIN
ATTACHMENT THEORY
ATTACHMENT-INFORMED INTERVENTION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121742

id CONICETDig_36c22e46da35932d45b6e7d6d594a9dd
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121742
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain TherapyPfeifer, Ann ChristinMeredith, PamelaSchröder Pfeifer, PaulGómez Penedo, Juan MartínEhrenthal, JohannesSchroeter, CorinnaNeubauer, EvaSchiltenwolf, MarcusCHRONIC PAINATTACHMENT THEORYATTACHMENT-INFORMED INTERVENTIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Attachment theory provides a useful framework for understanding individual differences in<br />pain patients, especially with insecure attachment shown to be more prevalent in chronic pain patients compared to the general population. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of attachment-informed treatment approaches for this population. The present study compares outcomes from two different attachment-informed treatment modalities for clinicians, with outcomes from treatment as usual (TAU). In both intervention groups (IG1 and IG2), clinicians received bi-monthly training sessions on attachment. Additionally, clinicians in IG1 had access to the attachment diagnostics of their patients. All treatments lasted for four weeks and included a 6-month follow up. A total of 374 chronic pain patients were recruited to participate in this study (TAU = 159/IG1 = 163/IG2 = 52). Analyses were carried out using multilevel modeling with pain intensity as the outcome variable. Additionally, working alliance was tested as a mediator of treatment efficacy. The study was registered under the trial number DRKS00008715 on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). Findings show that while IG2 was efficient in enhancing treatment outcomes, IG1 did not outperform TAU. In IG2, working alliance was a mediator of outcome. Results of the present study indicate that attachment-informed treatment of chronic pain can enhance existing interdisciplinary pain therapies; however, caveats are discussed.Fil: Pfeifer, Ann Christin. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaFil: Meredith, Pamela. University of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Schröder Pfeifer, Paul. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaFil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Ehrenthal, Johannes. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaFil: Schroeter, Corinna. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaFil: Neubauer, Eva. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaFil: Schiltenwolf, Marcus. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; AlemaniaMolecular Diversity Preservation International2019-03-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/121742Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Meredith, Pamela; Schröder Pfeifer, Paul; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes; et al.; Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy; Molecular Diversity Preservation International; Journal of Clinical Medicine; 8; 3; 14-3-2019; 1-172077-0383CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/jcm8030364info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6463073/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:08Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121742instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:08.316CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy
title Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy
spellingShingle Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy
Pfeifer, Ann Christin
CHRONIC PAIN
ATTACHMENT THEORY
ATTACHMENT-INFORMED INTERVENTION
title_short Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy
title_full Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy
title_fullStr Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy
title_sort Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pfeifer, Ann Christin
Meredith, Pamela
Schröder Pfeifer, Paul
Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín
Ehrenthal, Johannes
Schroeter, Corinna
Neubauer, Eva
Schiltenwolf, Marcus
author Pfeifer, Ann Christin
author_facet Pfeifer, Ann Christin
Meredith, Pamela
Schröder Pfeifer, Paul
Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín
Ehrenthal, Johannes
Schroeter, Corinna
Neubauer, Eva
Schiltenwolf, Marcus
author_role author
author2 Meredith, Pamela
Schröder Pfeifer, Paul
Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín
Ehrenthal, Johannes
Schroeter, Corinna
Neubauer, Eva
Schiltenwolf, Marcus
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CHRONIC PAIN
ATTACHMENT THEORY
ATTACHMENT-INFORMED INTERVENTION
topic CHRONIC PAIN
ATTACHMENT THEORY
ATTACHMENT-INFORMED INTERVENTION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Attachment theory provides a useful framework for understanding individual differences in<br />pain patients, especially with insecure attachment shown to be more prevalent in chronic pain patients compared to the general population. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of attachment-informed treatment approaches for this population. The present study compares outcomes from two different attachment-informed treatment modalities for clinicians, with outcomes from treatment as usual (TAU). In both intervention groups (IG1 and IG2), clinicians received bi-monthly training sessions on attachment. Additionally, clinicians in IG1 had access to the attachment diagnostics of their patients. All treatments lasted for four weeks and included a 6-month follow up. A total of 374 chronic pain patients were recruited to participate in this study (TAU = 159/IG1 = 163/IG2 = 52). Analyses were carried out using multilevel modeling with pain intensity as the outcome variable. Additionally, working alliance was tested as a mediator of treatment efficacy. The study was registered under the trial number DRKS00008715 on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). Findings show that while IG2 was efficient in enhancing treatment outcomes, IG1 did not outperform TAU. In IG2, working alliance was a mediator of outcome. Results of the present study indicate that attachment-informed treatment of chronic pain can enhance existing interdisciplinary pain therapies; however, caveats are discussed.
Fil: Pfeifer, Ann Christin. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Meredith, Pamela. University of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Schröder Pfeifer, Paul. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Ehrenthal, Johannes. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Schroeter, Corinna. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Neubauer, Eva. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
Fil: Schiltenwolf, Marcus. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg.; Alemania
description Attachment theory provides a useful framework for understanding individual differences in<br />pain patients, especially with insecure attachment shown to be more prevalent in chronic pain patients compared to the general population. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of attachment-informed treatment approaches for this population. The present study compares outcomes from two different attachment-informed treatment modalities for clinicians, with outcomes from treatment as usual (TAU). In both intervention groups (IG1 and IG2), clinicians received bi-monthly training sessions on attachment. Additionally, clinicians in IG1 had access to the attachment diagnostics of their patients. All treatments lasted for four weeks and included a 6-month follow up. A total of 374 chronic pain patients were recruited to participate in this study (TAU = 159/IG1 = 163/IG2 = 52). Analyses were carried out using multilevel modeling with pain intensity as the outcome variable. Additionally, working alliance was tested as a mediator of treatment efficacy. The study was registered under the trial number DRKS00008715 on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). Findings show that while IG2 was efficient in enhancing treatment outcomes, IG1 did not outperform TAU. In IG2, working alliance was a mediator of outcome. Results of the present study indicate that attachment-informed treatment of chronic pain can enhance existing interdisciplinary pain therapies; however, caveats are discussed.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121742
Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Meredith, Pamela; Schröder Pfeifer, Paul; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes; et al.; Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy; Molecular Diversity Preservation International; Journal of Clinical Medicine; 8; 3; 14-3-2019; 1-17
2077-0383
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121742
identifier_str_mv Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Meredith, Pamela; Schröder Pfeifer, Paul; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes; et al.; Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy; Molecular Diversity Preservation International; Journal of Clinical Medicine; 8; 3; 14-3-2019; 1-17
2077-0383
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/jcm8030364
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6463073/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Molecular Diversity Preservation International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Molecular Diversity Preservation International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269075230687232
score 12.885934