Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients

Autores
Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes C.; Neubauer, Eva; Amelung, Dorothee; Schroeter, Corinna; Schiltenwolf, Marcus
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: Insecure attachment patterns are related to the onset and development of chronic pain. However, it is less documented on how short-and long-term effects of pain therapy might differ with the attachment style in interaction with specific pain conditions. We therefore examined how two different groups of chronic pain patients differ in their treatment trajectories and in regard to attachment. Method: N=85/76/67 (T1/T2/T3) patients with medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain (UMP group) were compared to n=89/76/56 patients with joint pain from osteoarthritis (OA group), using multilevel modeling. UMP patients received a multimodal pain program, and OA patients received surgery. Pain intensity before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and at a 6 months follow-up (T3) was assessed by using a visual analog scale of pain. Results: Pain patients report a significant reduction in pain intensity upon the completion of the treatment compared to T1. Over the next 6 months, the pain intensity has further declined for patients with low attachment anxiety. In contrast, patients with highly anxious attachment report an increase in pain intensity. This main effect of anxious attachment on pain is significant when predicting changes both in acute treatment and during follow-up while controlling for group effect. In addition, there is also an interactive effect of group by avoidant attachment. In the UMP group, high scores in avoidant attachment were associated with the lower reduction in pain severity, while in the OA group, high scores in attachment avoidance were associated with a steeper reduction in pain severity. Conclusion: The results indicate that insecurely attached patients with pain symptoms only benefit from a multimodal pain therapy in limited ways in regard to posttreatment trajectories. Maintaining positive results over a period of 6 months is a challenge, compared with securely attached patients. Significance: The results of this study suggest the importance of direct and indirect mechanisms of attachment and its relevance for the management of pain experiences. Therefore, to include the individual attachment patterns in the treatment may be a promising way to enhance the treatment prospects.
Fil: Pfeifer, Ann Christin. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Fil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Ehrenthal, Johannes C.. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Fil: Neubauer, Eva. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Fil: Amelung, Dorothee. University of Surrey; Reino Unido
Fil: Schroeter, Corinna. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Fil: Schiltenwolf, Marcus. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Materia
ATTACHMENT THEORY
CHRONIC PAIN
MULTIMODAL TREATMENT
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/177479

id CONICETDig_608e0ef8d64203e72d3e1e2d214027b0
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/177479
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patientsPfeifer, Ann ChristinGómez Penedo, Juan MartínEhrenthal, Johannes C.Neubauer, EvaAmelung, DorotheeSchroeter, CorinnaSchiltenwolf, MarcusATTACHMENT THEORYCHRONIC PAINMULTIMODAL TREATMENThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Background: Insecure attachment patterns are related to the onset and development of chronic pain. However, it is less documented on how short-and long-term effects of pain therapy might differ with the attachment style in interaction with specific pain conditions. We therefore examined how two different groups of chronic pain patients differ in their treatment trajectories and in regard to attachment. Method: N=85/76/67 (T1/T2/T3) patients with medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain (UMP group) were compared to n=89/76/56 patients with joint pain from osteoarthritis (OA group), using multilevel modeling. UMP patients received a multimodal pain program, and OA patients received surgery. Pain intensity before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and at a 6 months follow-up (T3) was assessed by using a visual analog scale of pain. Results: Pain patients report a significant reduction in pain intensity upon the completion of the treatment compared to T1. Over the next 6 months, the pain intensity has further declined for patients with low attachment anxiety. In contrast, patients with highly anxious attachment report an increase in pain intensity. This main effect of anxious attachment on pain is significant when predicting changes both in acute treatment and during follow-up while controlling for group effect. In addition, there is also an interactive effect of group by avoidant attachment. In the UMP group, high scores in avoidant attachment were associated with the lower reduction in pain severity, while in the OA group, high scores in attachment avoidance were associated with a steeper reduction in pain severity. Conclusion: The results indicate that insecurely attached patients with pain symptoms only benefit from a multimodal pain therapy in limited ways in regard to posttreatment trajectories. Maintaining positive results over a period of 6 months is a challenge, compared with securely attached patients. Significance: The results of this study suggest the importance of direct and indirect mechanisms of attachment and its relevance for the management of pain experiences. Therefore, to include the individual attachment patterns in the treatment may be a promising way to enhance the treatment prospects.Fil: Pfeifer, Ann Christin. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; AlemaniaFil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Ehrenthal, Johannes C.. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; AlemaniaFil: Neubauer, Eva. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; AlemaniaFil: Amelung, Dorothee. University of Surrey; Reino UnidoFil: Schroeter, Corinna. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; AlemaniaFil: Schiltenwolf, Marcus. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; AlemaniaDove Press2018-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/177479Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes C.; Neubauer, Eva; Amelung, Dorothee; et al.; Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients; Dove Press; Journal of Pain Research; 11; 9-2018; 2653-26621178-7090CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2147/JPR.S165487info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:50:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/177479instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:50:25.884CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
spellingShingle Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
Pfeifer, Ann Christin
ATTACHMENT THEORY
CHRONIC PAIN
MULTIMODAL TREATMENT
title_short Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title_full Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title_fullStr Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title_full_unstemmed Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title_sort Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pfeifer, Ann Christin
Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín
Ehrenthal, Johannes C.
Neubauer, Eva
Amelung, Dorothee
Schroeter, Corinna
Schiltenwolf, Marcus
author Pfeifer, Ann Christin
author_facet Pfeifer, Ann Christin
Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín
Ehrenthal, Johannes C.
Neubauer, Eva
Amelung, Dorothee
Schroeter, Corinna
Schiltenwolf, Marcus
author_role author
author2 Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín
Ehrenthal, Johannes C.
Neubauer, Eva
Amelung, Dorothee
Schroeter, Corinna
Schiltenwolf, Marcus
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ATTACHMENT THEORY
CHRONIC PAIN
MULTIMODAL TREATMENT
topic ATTACHMENT THEORY
CHRONIC PAIN
MULTIMODAL TREATMENT
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: Insecure attachment patterns are related to the onset and development of chronic pain. However, it is less documented on how short-and long-term effects of pain therapy might differ with the attachment style in interaction with specific pain conditions. We therefore examined how two different groups of chronic pain patients differ in their treatment trajectories and in regard to attachment. Method: N=85/76/67 (T1/T2/T3) patients with medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain (UMP group) were compared to n=89/76/56 patients with joint pain from osteoarthritis (OA group), using multilevel modeling. UMP patients received a multimodal pain program, and OA patients received surgery. Pain intensity before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and at a 6 months follow-up (T3) was assessed by using a visual analog scale of pain. Results: Pain patients report a significant reduction in pain intensity upon the completion of the treatment compared to T1. Over the next 6 months, the pain intensity has further declined for patients with low attachment anxiety. In contrast, patients with highly anxious attachment report an increase in pain intensity. This main effect of anxious attachment on pain is significant when predicting changes both in acute treatment and during follow-up while controlling for group effect. In addition, there is also an interactive effect of group by avoidant attachment. In the UMP group, high scores in avoidant attachment were associated with the lower reduction in pain severity, while in the OA group, high scores in attachment avoidance were associated with a steeper reduction in pain severity. Conclusion: The results indicate that insecurely attached patients with pain symptoms only benefit from a multimodal pain therapy in limited ways in regard to posttreatment trajectories. Maintaining positive results over a period of 6 months is a challenge, compared with securely attached patients. Significance: The results of this study suggest the importance of direct and indirect mechanisms of attachment and its relevance for the management of pain experiences. Therefore, to include the individual attachment patterns in the treatment may be a promising way to enhance the treatment prospects.
Fil: Pfeifer, Ann Christin. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Fil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Ehrenthal, Johannes C.. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Fil: Neubauer, Eva. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Fil: Amelung, Dorothee. University of Surrey; Reino Unido
Fil: Schroeter, Corinna. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Fil: Schiltenwolf, Marcus. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
description Background: Insecure attachment patterns are related to the onset and development of chronic pain. However, it is less documented on how short-and long-term effects of pain therapy might differ with the attachment style in interaction with specific pain conditions. We therefore examined how two different groups of chronic pain patients differ in their treatment trajectories and in regard to attachment. Method: N=85/76/67 (T1/T2/T3) patients with medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain (UMP group) were compared to n=89/76/56 patients with joint pain from osteoarthritis (OA group), using multilevel modeling. UMP patients received a multimodal pain program, and OA patients received surgery. Pain intensity before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and at a 6 months follow-up (T3) was assessed by using a visual analog scale of pain. Results: Pain patients report a significant reduction in pain intensity upon the completion of the treatment compared to T1. Over the next 6 months, the pain intensity has further declined for patients with low attachment anxiety. In contrast, patients with highly anxious attachment report an increase in pain intensity. This main effect of anxious attachment on pain is significant when predicting changes both in acute treatment and during follow-up while controlling for group effect. In addition, there is also an interactive effect of group by avoidant attachment. In the UMP group, high scores in avoidant attachment were associated with the lower reduction in pain severity, while in the OA group, high scores in attachment avoidance were associated with a steeper reduction in pain severity. Conclusion: The results indicate that insecurely attached patients with pain symptoms only benefit from a multimodal pain therapy in limited ways in regard to posttreatment trajectories. Maintaining positive results over a period of 6 months is a challenge, compared with securely attached patients. Significance: The results of this study suggest the importance of direct and indirect mechanisms of attachment and its relevance for the management of pain experiences. Therefore, to include the individual attachment patterns in the treatment may be a promising way to enhance the treatment prospects.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/177479
Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes C.; Neubauer, Eva; Amelung, Dorothee; et al.; Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients; Dove Press; Journal of Pain Research; 11; 9-2018; 2653-2662
1178-7090
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/177479
identifier_str_mv Pfeifer, Ann Christin; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Ehrenthal, Johannes C.; Neubauer, Eva; Amelung, Dorothee; et al.; Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients; Dove Press; Journal of Pain Research; 11; 9-2018; 2653-2662
1178-7090
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2147/JPR.S165487
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dove Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dove Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083028722384896
score 13.22299