Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data

Autores
Cailleret, Maxime; Bigler, Christof; Bugmann, Harald; Camarero, Jesús; Čufar, Katarina; Davi, Hendrik; Mészáros, Ilona; Minunno, Francesco; Peltoniemi, Mikko; Robert, Elizabeth; Suarez, Maria Laura; Tognetti, Roberto; Martínez Vilalta, Jordi
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Tree mortality is a key process shaping forest dynamics. Thus, there is a growing need for indicators of the likelihood of tree death. During the last decades, an increasing number of tree-ring based studies have aimed to derive growth–mortality functions, mostly using logistic models. The results of these studies, however, are difficult to compare and synthesize due to the diversity of approaches used for the sampling strategy (number and characteristics of alive and death observations), the type of explanatory growth variables included (level, trend, etc.), and the length of the time window (number of years preceding the alive/death observation) that maximized the discrimination ability of each growth variable. We assess the implications of key methodological decisions when developing tree-ring based growth–mortality relationships using logistic mixed-effects regression models. As examples, we use published tree-ring datasets from Abies alba (13 different sites), Nothofagus dombeyi (one site), and Quercus petraea (one site). Our approach is based on a constant sampling size and aims at (1) assessing the dependency of growth–mortality relationships on the statistical sampling scheme used, (2) determining the type of explanatory growth variables that should be considered, and (3) identifying the best length of the time window used to calculate them. The performance of tree-ring-based mortality models was reasonably high for all three species (area under the receiving operator characteristics curve, AUC > 0.7). Growth level variables were the most important predictors of mortality probability for two species (A. alba, N. dombeyi), while growth-trend variables need to be considered for Q. petraea. In addition, the length of the time window used to calculate each growth variable was highly uncertain and depended on the sampling scheme, as some growth–mortality relationships varied with tree age. The present study accounts for the main sampling-related biases to determine reliable species-specific growth–mortality relationships. Our results highlight the importance of using a sampling strategy that is consistent with the research question. Moving towards a common methodology for developing reliable growth–mortality relationships is an important step towards improving our understanding of tree mortality across species and its representation in dynamic vegetation models
Fil: Cailleret, Maxime. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Bigler, Christof. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Bugmann, Harald. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Camarero, Jesús. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España
Fil: Čufar, Katarina. University of Ljubljana; Eslovenia
Fil: Davi, Hendrik. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Francia
Fil: Mészáros, Ilona. University of Debrecen. Faculty of Science and Technology. Department of Botany; Hungría
Fil: Minunno, Francesco. University of Helsinki; Finlandia
Fil: Peltoniemi, Mikko. Natural Resources Institute Finland; Finlandia
Fil: Robert, Elizabeth. Vrije Unviversiteit Brussel; Bélgica. Royal Museum for Central Africa. Laboratory of Wood Biology and Xylarium; Bélgica
Fil: Suarez, Maria Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Tognetti, Roberto. Università degli Studi del Molise; Italia
Fil: Martínez Vilalta, Jordi. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Centre de Recerca Ecológica I Aplicacions Forestals; España. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España
Materia
TREE MORTALITY
GROWTH
LOGISTIC MODEL
TREE RING
SAMPLING
SURVIVAL
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/104170

id CONICETDig_35e466dadf9714ba5ca5de941b42bd2c
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/104170
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width dataCailleret, MaximeBigler, ChristofBugmann, HaraldCamarero, JesúsČufar, KatarinaDavi, HendrikMészáros, IlonaMinunno, FrancescoPeltoniemi, MikkoRobert, ElizabethSuarez, Maria LauraTognetti, RobertoMartínez Vilalta, JordiTREE MORTALITYGROWTHLOGISTIC MODELTREE RINGSAMPLINGSURVIVALhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Tree mortality is a key process shaping forest dynamics. Thus, there is a growing need for indicators of the likelihood of tree death. During the last decades, an increasing number of tree-ring based studies have aimed to derive growth–mortality functions, mostly using logistic models. The results of these studies, however, are difficult to compare and synthesize due to the diversity of approaches used for the sampling strategy (number and characteristics of alive and death observations), the type of explanatory growth variables included (level, trend, etc.), and the length of the time window (number of years preceding the alive/death observation) that maximized the discrimination ability of each growth variable. We assess the implications of key methodological decisions when developing tree-ring based growth–mortality relationships using logistic mixed-effects regression models. As examples, we use published tree-ring datasets from Abies alba (13 different sites), Nothofagus dombeyi (one site), and Quercus petraea (one site). Our approach is based on a constant sampling size and aims at (1) assessing the dependency of growth–mortality relationships on the statistical sampling scheme used, (2) determining the type of explanatory growth variables that should be considered, and (3) identifying the best length of the time window used to calculate them. The performance of tree-ring-based mortality models was reasonably high for all three species (area under the receiving operator characteristics curve, AUC > 0.7). Growth level variables were the most important predictors of mortality probability for two species (A. alba, N. dombeyi), while growth-trend variables need to be considered for Q. petraea. In addition, the length of the time window used to calculate each growth variable was highly uncertain and depended on the sampling scheme, as some growth–mortality relationships varied with tree age. The present study accounts for the main sampling-related biases to determine reliable species-specific growth–mortality relationships. Our results highlight the importance of using a sampling strategy that is consistent with the research question. Moving towards a common methodology for developing reliable growth–mortality relationships is an important step towards improving our understanding of tree mortality across species and its representation in dynamic vegetation modelsFil: Cailleret, Maxime. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; SuizaFil: Bigler, Christof. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; SuizaFil: Bugmann, Harald. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; SuizaFil: Camarero, Jesús. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: Čufar, Katarina. University of Ljubljana; EsloveniaFil: Davi, Hendrik. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; FranciaFil: Mészáros, Ilona. University of Debrecen. Faculty of Science and Technology. Department of Botany; HungríaFil: Minunno, Francesco. University of Helsinki; FinlandiaFil: Peltoniemi, Mikko. Natural Resources Institute Finland; FinlandiaFil: Robert, Elizabeth. Vrije Unviversiteit Brussel; Bélgica. Royal Museum for Central Africa. Laboratory of Wood Biology and Xylarium; BélgicaFil: Suarez, Maria Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Tognetti, Roberto. Università degli Studi del Molise; ItaliaFil: Martínez Vilalta, Jordi. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Centre de Recerca Ecológica I Aplicacions Forestals; España. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; EspañaEcological Society of America2016-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/104170Cailleret, Maxime; Bigler, Christof; Bugmann, Harald; Camarero, Jesús; Čufar, Katarina; et al.; Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 26; 6; 9-2016; 1827-18411051-07611939-5582CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1890/15-1402.1info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/15-1402.1info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:33:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/104170instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:33:07.411CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data
title Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data
spellingShingle Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data
Cailleret, Maxime
TREE MORTALITY
GROWTH
LOGISTIC MODEL
TREE RING
SAMPLING
SURVIVAL
title_short Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data
title_full Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data
title_fullStr Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data
title_full_unstemmed Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data
title_sort Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cailleret, Maxime
Bigler, Christof
Bugmann, Harald
Camarero, Jesús
Čufar, Katarina
Davi, Hendrik
Mészáros, Ilona
Minunno, Francesco
Peltoniemi, Mikko
Robert, Elizabeth
Suarez, Maria Laura
Tognetti, Roberto
Martínez Vilalta, Jordi
author Cailleret, Maxime
author_facet Cailleret, Maxime
Bigler, Christof
Bugmann, Harald
Camarero, Jesús
Čufar, Katarina
Davi, Hendrik
Mészáros, Ilona
Minunno, Francesco
Peltoniemi, Mikko
Robert, Elizabeth
Suarez, Maria Laura
Tognetti, Roberto
Martínez Vilalta, Jordi
author_role author
author2 Bigler, Christof
Bugmann, Harald
Camarero, Jesús
Čufar, Katarina
Davi, Hendrik
Mészáros, Ilona
Minunno, Francesco
Peltoniemi, Mikko
Robert, Elizabeth
Suarez, Maria Laura
Tognetti, Roberto
Martínez Vilalta, Jordi
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv TREE MORTALITY
GROWTH
LOGISTIC MODEL
TREE RING
SAMPLING
SURVIVAL
topic TREE MORTALITY
GROWTH
LOGISTIC MODEL
TREE RING
SAMPLING
SURVIVAL
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Tree mortality is a key process shaping forest dynamics. Thus, there is a growing need for indicators of the likelihood of tree death. During the last decades, an increasing number of tree-ring based studies have aimed to derive growth–mortality functions, mostly using logistic models. The results of these studies, however, are difficult to compare and synthesize due to the diversity of approaches used for the sampling strategy (number and characteristics of alive and death observations), the type of explanatory growth variables included (level, trend, etc.), and the length of the time window (number of years preceding the alive/death observation) that maximized the discrimination ability of each growth variable. We assess the implications of key methodological decisions when developing tree-ring based growth–mortality relationships using logistic mixed-effects regression models. As examples, we use published tree-ring datasets from Abies alba (13 different sites), Nothofagus dombeyi (one site), and Quercus petraea (one site). Our approach is based on a constant sampling size and aims at (1) assessing the dependency of growth–mortality relationships on the statistical sampling scheme used, (2) determining the type of explanatory growth variables that should be considered, and (3) identifying the best length of the time window used to calculate them. The performance of tree-ring-based mortality models was reasonably high for all three species (area under the receiving operator characteristics curve, AUC > 0.7). Growth level variables were the most important predictors of mortality probability for two species (A. alba, N. dombeyi), while growth-trend variables need to be considered for Q. petraea. In addition, the length of the time window used to calculate each growth variable was highly uncertain and depended on the sampling scheme, as some growth–mortality relationships varied with tree age. The present study accounts for the main sampling-related biases to determine reliable species-specific growth–mortality relationships. Our results highlight the importance of using a sampling strategy that is consistent with the research question. Moving towards a common methodology for developing reliable growth–mortality relationships is an important step towards improving our understanding of tree mortality across species and its representation in dynamic vegetation models
Fil: Cailleret, Maxime. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Bigler, Christof. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Bugmann, Harald. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Camarero, Jesús. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España
Fil: Čufar, Katarina. University of Ljubljana; Eslovenia
Fil: Davi, Hendrik. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Francia
Fil: Mészáros, Ilona. University of Debrecen. Faculty of Science and Technology. Department of Botany; Hungría
Fil: Minunno, Francesco. University of Helsinki; Finlandia
Fil: Peltoniemi, Mikko. Natural Resources Institute Finland; Finlandia
Fil: Robert, Elizabeth. Vrije Unviversiteit Brussel; Bélgica. Royal Museum for Central Africa. Laboratory of Wood Biology and Xylarium; Bélgica
Fil: Suarez, Maria Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Tognetti, Roberto. Università degli Studi del Molise; Italia
Fil: Martínez Vilalta, Jordi. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Centre de Recerca Ecológica I Aplicacions Forestals; España. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España
description Tree mortality is a key process shaping forest dynamics. Thus, there is a growing need for indicators of the likelihood of tree death. During the last decades, an increasing number of tree-ring based studies have aimed to derive growth–mortality functions, mostly using logistic models. The results of these studies, however, are difficult to compare and synthesize due to the diversity of approaches used for the sampling strategy (number and characteristics of alive and death observations), the type of explanatory growth variables included (level, trend, etc.), and the length of the time window (number of years preceding the alive/death observation) that maximized the discrimination ability of each growth variable. We assess the implications of key methodological decisions when developing tree-ring based growth–mortality relationships using logistic mixed-effects regression models. As examples, we use published tree-ring datasets from Abies alba (13 different sites), Nothofagus dombeyi (one site), and Quercus petraea (one site). Our approach is based on a constant sampling size and aims at (1) assessing the dependency of growth–mortality relationships on the statistical sampling scheme used, (2) determining the type of explanatory growth variables that should be considered, and (3) identifying the best length of the time window used to calculate them. The performance of tree-ring-based mortality models was reasonably high for all three species (area under the receiving operator characteristics curve, AUC > 0.7). Growth level variables were the most important predictors of mortality probability for two species (A. alba, N. dombeyi), while growth-trend variables need to be considered for Q. petraea. In addition, the length of the time window used to calculate each growth variable was highly uncertain and depended on the sampling scheme, as some growth–mortality relationships varied with tree age. The present study accounts for the main sampling-related biases to determine reliable species-specific growth–mortality relationships. Our results highlight the importance of using a sampling strategy that is consistent with the research question. Moving towards a common methodology for developing reliable growth–mortality relationships is an important step towards improving our understanding of tree mortality across species and its representation in dynamic vegetation models
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/104170
Cailleret, Maxime; Bigler, Christof; Bugmann, Harald; Camarero, Jesús; Čufar, Katarina; et al.; Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 26; 6; 9-2016; 1827-1841
1051-0761
1939-5582
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/104170
identifier_str_mv Cailleret, Maxime; Bigler, Christof; Bugmann, Harald; Camarero, Jesús; Čufar, Katarina; et al.; Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 26; 6; 9-2016; 1827-1841
1051-0761
1939-5582
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1890/15-1402.1
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/15-1402.1
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ecological Society of America
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ecological Society of America
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613014987210752
score 13.069144