Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data
- Autores
- Cailleret, Maxime; Bigler, Christof; Bugmann, Harald; Camarero, Jesús; Čufar, Katarina; Davi, Hendrik; Mészáros, Ilona; Minunno, Francesco; Peltoniemi, Mikko; Robert, Elizabeth; Suarez, Maria Laura; Tognetti, Roberto; Martínez Vilalta, Jordi
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Tree mortality is a key process shaping forest dynamics. Thus, there is a growing need for indicators of the likelihood of tree death. During the last decades, an increasing number of tree-ring based studies have aimed to derive growth–mortality functions, mostly using logistic models. The results of these studies, however, are difficult to compare and synthesize due to the diversity of approaches used for the sampling strategy (number and characteristics of alive and death observations), the type of explanatory growth variables included (level, trend, etc.), and the length of the time window (number of years preceding the alive/death observation) that maximized the discrimination ability of each growth variable. We assess the implications of key methodological decisions when developing tree-ring based growth–mortality relationships using logistic mixed-effects regression models. As examples, we use published tree-ring datasets from Abies alba (13 different sites), Nothofagus dombeyi (one site), and Quercus petraea (one site). Our approach is based on a constant sampling size and aims at (1) assessing the dependency of growth–mortality relationships on the statistical sampling scheme used, (2) determining the type of explanatory growth variables that should be considered, and (3) identifying the best length of the time window used to calculate them. The performance of tree-ring-based mortality models was reasonably high for all three species (area under the receiving operator characteristics curve, AUC > 0.7). Growth level variables were the most important predictors of mortality probability for two species (A. alba, N. dombeyi), while growth-trend variables need to be considered for Q. petraea. In addition, the length of the time window used to calculate each growth variable was highly uncertain and depended on the sampling scheme, as some growth–mortality relationships varied with tree age. The present study accounts for the main sampling-related biases to determine reliable species-specific growth–mortality relationships. Our results highlight the importance of using a sampling strategy that is consistent with the research question. Moving towards a common methodology for developing reliable growth–mortality relationships is an important step towards improving our understanding of tree mortality across species and its representation in dynamic vegetation models
Fil: Cailleret, Maxime. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Bigler, Christof. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Bugmann, Harald. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Camarero, Jesús. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España
Fil: Čufar, Katarina. University of Ljubljana; Eslovenia
Fil: Davi, Hendrik. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Francia
Fil: Mészáros, Ilona. University of Debrecen. Faculty of Science and Technology. Department of Botany; Hungría
Fil: Minunno, Francesco. University of Helsinki; Finlandia
Fil: Peltoniemi, Mikko. Natural Resources Institute Finland; Finlandia
Fil: Robert, Elizabeth. Vrije Unviversiteit Brussel; Bélgica. Royal Museum for Central Africa. Laboratory of Wood Biology and Xylarium; Bélgica
Fil: Suarez, Maria Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Tognetti, Roberto. Università degli Studi del Molise; Italia
Fil: Martínez Vilalta, Jordi. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Centre de Recerca Ecológica I Aplicacions Forestals; España. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España - Materia
-
TREE MORTALITY
GROWTH
LOGISTIC MODEL
TREE RING
SAMPLING
SURVIVAL - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/104170
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_35e466dadf9714ba5ca5de941b42bd2c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/104170 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width dataCailleret, MaximeBigler, ChristofBugmann, HaraldCamarero, JesúsČufar, KatarinaDavi, HendrikMészáros, IlonaMinunno, FrancescoPeltoniemi, MikkoRobert, ElizabethSuarez, Maria LauraTognetti, RobertoMartínez Vilalta, JordiTREE MORTALITYGROWTHLOGISTIC MODELTREE RINGSAMPLINGSURVIVALhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Tree mortality is a key process shaping forest dynamics. Thus, there is a growing need for indicators of the likelihood of tree death. During the last decades, an increasing number of tree-ring based studies have aimed to derive growth–mortality functions, mostly using logistic models. The results of these studies, however, are difficult to compare and synthesize due to the diversity of approaches used for the sampling strategy (number and characteristics of alive and death observations), the type of explanatory growth variables included (level, trend, etc.), and the length of the time window (number of years preceding the alive/death observation) that maximized the discrimination ability of each growth variable. We assess the implications of key methodological decisions when developing tree-ring based growth–mortality relationships using logistic mixed-effects regression models. As examples, we use published tree-ring datasets from Abies alba (13 different sites), Nothofagus dombeyi (one site), and Quercus petraea (one site). Our approach is based on a constant sampling size and aims at (1) assessing the dependency of growth–mortality relationships on the statistical sampling scheme used, (2) determining the type of explanatory growth variables that should be considered, and (3) identifying the best length of the time window used to calculate them. The performance of tree-ring-based mortality models was reasonably high for all three species (area under the receiving operator characteristics curve, AUC > 0.7). Growth level variables were the most important predictors of mortality probability for two species (A. alba, N. dombeyi), while growth-trend variables need to be considered for Q. petraea. In addition, the length of the time window used to calculate each growth variable was highly uncertain and depended on the sampling scheme, as some growth–mortality relationships varied with tree age. The present study accounts for the main sampling-related biases to determine reliable species-specific growth–mortality relationships. Our results highlight the importance of using a sampling strategy that is consistent with the research question. Moving towards a common methodology for developing reliable growth–mortality relationships is an important step towards improving our understanding of tree mortality across species and its representation in dynamic vegetation modelsFil: Cailleret, Maxime. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; SuizaFil: Bigler, Christof. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; SuizaFil: Bugmann, Harald. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; SuizaFil: Camarero, Jesús. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: Čufar, Katarina. University of Ljubljana; EsloveniaFil: Davi, Hendrik. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; FranciaFil: Mészáros, Ilona. University of Debrecen. Faculty of Science and Technology. Department of Botany; HungríaFil: Minunno, Francesco. University of Helsinki; FinlandiaFil: Peltoniemi, Mikko. Natural Resources Institute Finland; FinlandiaFil: Robert, Elizabeth. Vrije Unviversiteit Brussel; Bélgica. Royal Museum for Central Africa. Laboratory of Wood Biology and Xylarium; BélgicaFil: Suarez, Maria Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Tognetti, Roberto. Università degli Studi del Molise; ItaliaFil: Martínez Vilalta, Jordi. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Centre de Recerca Ecológica I Aplicacions Forestals; España. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; EspañaEcological Society of America2016-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/104170Cailleret, Maxime; Bigler, Christof; Bugmann, Harald; Camarero, Jesús; Čufar, Katarina; et al.; Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 26; 6; 9-2016; 1827-18411051-07611939-5582CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1890/15-1402.1info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/15-1402.1info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:33:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/104170instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:33:07.411CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data |
title |
Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data |
spellingShingle |
Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data Cailleret, Maxime TREE MORTALITY GROWTH LOGISTIC MODEL TREE RING SAMPLING SURVIVAL |
title_short |
Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data |
title_full |
Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data |
title_fullStr |
Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data |
title_sort |
Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cailleret, Maxime Bigler, Christof Bugmann, Harald Camarero, Jesús Čufar, Katarina Davi, Hendrik Mészáros, Ilona Minunno, Francesco Peltoniemi, Mikko Robert, Elizabeth Suarez, Maria Laura Tognetti, Roberto Martínez Vilalta, Jordi |
author |
Cailleret, Maxime |
author_facet |
Cailleret, Maxime Bigler, Christof Bugmann, Harald Camarero, Jesús Čufar, Katarina Davi, Hendrik Mészáros, Ilona Minunno, Francesco Peltoniemi, Mikko Robert, Elizabeth Suarez, Maria Laura Tognetti, Roberto Martínez Vilalta, Jordi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bigler, Christof Bugmann, Harald Camarero, Jesús Čufar, Katarina Davi, Hendrik Mészáros, Ilona Minunno, Francesco Peltoniemi, Mikko Robert, Elizabeth Suarez, Maria Laura Tognetti, Roberto Martínez Vilalta, Jordi |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
TREE MORTALITY GROWTH LOGISTIC MODEL TREE RING SAMPLING SURVIVAL |
topic |
TREE MORTALITY GROWTH LOGISTIC MODEL TREE RING SAMPLING SURVIVAL |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Tree mortality is a key process shaping forest dynamics. Thus, there is a growing need for indicators of the likelihood of tree death. During the last decades, an increasing number of tree-ring based studies have aimed to derive growth–mortality functions, mostly using logistic models. The results of these studies, however, are difficult to compare and synthesize due to the diversity of approaches used for the sampling strategy (number and characteristics of alive and death observations), the type of explanatory growth variables included (level, trend, etc.), and the length of the time window (number of years preceding the alive/death observation) that maximized the discrimination ability of each growth variable. We assess the implications of key methodological decisions when developing tree-ring based growth–mortality relationships using logistic mixed-effects regression models. As examples, we use published tree-ring datasets from Abies alba (13 different sites), Nothofagus dombeyi (one site), and Quercus petraea (one site). Our approach is based on a constant sampling size and aims at (1) assessing the dependency of growth–mortality relationships on the statistical sampling scheme used, (2) determining the type of explanatory growth variables that should be considered, and (3) identifying the best length of the time window used to calculate them. The performance of tree-ring-based mortality models was reasonably high for all three species (area under the receiving operator characteristics curve, AUC > 0.7). Growth level variables were the most important predictors of mortality probability for two species (A. alba, N. dombeyi), while growth-trend variables need to be considered for Q. petraea. In addition, the length of the time window used to calculate each growth variable was highly uncertain and depended on the sampling scheme, as some growth–mortality relationships varied with tree age. The present study accounts for the main sampling-related biases to determine reliable species-specific growth–mortality relationships. Our results highlight the importance of using a sampling strategy that is consistent with the research question. Moving towards a common methodology for developing reliable growth–mortality relationships is an important step towards improving our understanding of tree mortality across species and its representation in dynamic vegetation models Fil: Cailleret, Maxime. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza Fil: Bigler, Christof. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza Fil: Bugmann, Harald. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; Suiza Fil: Camarero, Jesús. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España Fil: Čufar, Katarina. University of Ljubljana; Eslovenia Fil: Davi, Hendrik. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Francia Fil: Mészáros, Ilona. University of Debrecen. Faculty of Science and Technology. Department of Botany; Hungría Fil: Minunno, Francesco. University of Helsinki; Finlandia Fil: Peltoniemi, Mikko. Natural Resources Institute Finland; Finlandia Fil: Robert, Elizabeth. Vrije Unviversiteit Brussel; Bélgica. Royal Museum for Central Africa. Laboratory of Wood Biology and Xylarium; Bélgica Fil: Suarez, Maria Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina Fil: Tognetti, Roberto. Università degli Studi del Molise; Italia Fil: Martínez Vilalta, Jordi. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Centre de Recerca Ecológica I Aplicacions Forestals; España. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España |
description |
Tree mortality is a key process shaping forest dynamics. Thus, there is a growing need for indicators of the likelihood of tree death. During the last decades, an increasing number of tree-ring based studies have aimed to derive growth–mortality functions, mostly using logistic models. The results of these studies, however, are difficult to compare and synthesize due to the diversity of approaches used for the sampling strategy (number and characteristics of alive and death observations), the type of explanatory growth variables included (level, trend, etc.), and the length of the time window (number of years preceding the alive/death observation) that maximized the discrimination ability of each growth variable. We assess the implications of key methodological decisions when developing tree-ring based growth–mortality relationships using logistic mixed-effects regression models. As examples, we use published tree-ring datasets from Abies alba (13 different sites), Nothofagus dombeyi (one site), and Quercus petraea (one site). Our approach is based on a constant sampling size and aims at (1) assessing the dependency of growth–mortality relationships on the statistical sampling scheme used, (2) determining the type of explanatory growth variables that should be considered, and (3) identifying the best length of the time window used to calculate them. The performance of tree-ring-based mortality models was reasonably high for all three species (area under the receiving operator characteristics curve, AUC > 0.7). Growth level variables were the most important predictors of mortality probability for two species (A. alba, N. dombeyi), while growth-trend variables need to be considered for Q. petraea. In addition, the length of the time window used to calculate each growth variable was highly uncertain and depended on the sampling scheme, as some growth–mortality relationships varied with tree age. The present study accounts for the main sampling-related biases to determine reliable species-specific growth–mortality relationships. Our results highlight the importance of using a sampling strategy that is consistent with the research question. Moving towards a common methodology for developing reliable growth–mortality relationships is an important step towards improving our understanding of tree mortality across species and its representation in dynamic vegetation models |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/104170 Cailleret, Maxime; Bigler, Christof; Bugmann, Harald; Camarero, Jesús; Čufar, Katarina; et al.; Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 26; 6; 9-2016; 1827-1841 1051-0761 1939-5582 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/104170 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cailleret, Maxime; Bigler, Christof; Bugmann, Harald; Camarero, Jesús; Čufar, Katarina; et al.; Towards a common methodology for developing logistic tree mortality models based on ring-width data; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 26; 6; 9-2016; 1827-1841 1051-0761 1939-5582 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1890/15-1402.1 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/15-1402.1 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecological Society of America |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecological Society of America |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613014987210752 |
score |
13.069144 |