The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese

Autores
Tatián, Diego
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This essay does not set forth mainly as a study of the references that might exist within the Spinozian corpus to China, Chinese philosophy and the Chinese people in general (there is only one as far as we know, although very important, towards the end of Chapter III of the Theological-Political Treatise), nor does it focus, as its title could suggest, on the reception and circulation of Spinoza´s philosophy in China and among Chinese philosophers. It has rather two different goals. First ? taking the word ?Chinese? metaphorically as something exotic or exoptic, anything that falls out of sight, unknown and unfamiliar ? to perform a brief survey of what is strange in Spinoza´s thought: Chinese, but also Turkish and Japanese ? although leaving aside the extremely strange, like the amazons mentioned on the last page of the Political Treatise, or the enigmatic ?black and scabrous Brazilian? of the dream narrated in a letter to Pieter Balling. Next, to look into the rich and close connection established in the philosophical debates of the 17th and 18th centuries between the syntagmata ?Chinese philosophy? and ?Spinoza´s philosophy? (where intervened authors like Pierre Bayle, Nicolas Malebranche, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Christian Wolff, and later the writers of the Encyclopédie). These debates originated because of the reports and news arising from the Jesuit missions in China, starting with the texts of Mateo Ricci, who arrived to the Asian country in 1583 in order to do his early missionary work, and in particular from the texts of fathers Niccola Longobardo and Antonio de Santa María Caballero, among others.
Fil: Tatián, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina
Materia
Spinoza
China
Ateísmo
Religión
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/32739
Acceder
id CONICETDig_356b997b3856735b46ec11ff883a0732
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/32739
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the ChineseTatián, DiegoSpinozaChinaAteísmoReligiónhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This essay does not set forth mainly as a study of the references that might exist within the Spinozian corpus to China, Chinese philosophy and the Chinese people in general (there is only one as far as we know, although very important, towards the end of Chapter III of the Theological-Political Treatise), nor does it focus, as its title could suggest, on the reception and circulation of Spinoza´s philosophy in China and among Chinese philosophers. It has rather two different goals. First ? taking the word ?Chinese? metaphorically as something exotic or exoptic, anything that falls out of sight, unknown and unfamiliar ? to perform a brief survey of what is strange in Spinoza´s thought: Chinese, but also Turkish and Japanese ? although leaving aside the extremely strange, like the amazons mentioned on the last page of the Political Treatise, or the enigmatic ?black and scabrous Brazilian? of the dream narrated in a letter to Pieter Balling. Next, to look into the rich and close connection established in the philosophical debates of the 17th and 18th centuries between the syntagmata ?Chinese philosophy? and ?Spinoza´s philosophy? (where intervened authors like Pierre Bayle, Nicolas Malebranche, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Christian Wolff, and later the writers of the Encyclopédie). These debates originated because of the reports and news arising from the Jesuit missions in China, starting with the texts of Mateo Ricci, who arrived to the Asian country in 1583 in order to do his early missionary work, and in particular from the texts of fathers Niccola Longobardo and Antonio de Santa María Caballero, among others.Fil: Tatián, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; ArgentinaTaylor & Francis2014-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/32739The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese; Taylor & Francis; Journal of the British for Phenomenology; 45; 1; 9-2014; 72-830007-1773CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00071773.2014.915645?journalCode=rbsp20info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/00071773.2014.915645info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:53:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/32739instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:53:22.504CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese
title The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese
spellingShingle The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese
Tatián, Diego
Spinoza
China
Ateísmo
Religión
title_short The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese
title_full The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese
title_fullStr The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese
title_full_unstemmed The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese
title_sort The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tatián, Diego
author Tatián, Diego
author_facet Tatián, Diego
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Spinoza
China
Ateísmo
Religión
topic Spinoza
China
Ateísmo
Religión
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This essay does not set forth mainly as a study of the references that might exist within the Spinozian corpus to China, Chinese philosophy and the Chinese people in general (there is only one as far as we know, although very important, towards the end of Chapter III of the Theological-Political Treatise), nor does it focus, as its title could suggest, on the reception and circulation of Spinoza´s philosophy in China and among Chinese philosophers. It has rather two different goals. First ? taking the word ?Chinese? metaphorically as something exotic or exoptic, anything that falls out of sight, unknown and unfamiliar ? to perform a brief survey of what is strange in Spinoza´s thought: Chinese, but also Turkish and Japanese ? although leaving aside the extremely strange, like the amazons mentioned on the last page of the Political Treatise, or the enigmatic ?black and scabrous Brazilian? of the dream narrated in a letter to Pieter Balling. Next, to look into the rich and close connection established in the philosophical debates of the 17th and 18th centuries between the syntagmata ?Chinese philosophy? and ?Spinoza´s philosophy? (where intervened authors like Pierre Bayle, Nicolas Malebranche, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Christian Wolff, and later the writers of the Encyclopédie). These debates originated because of the reports and news arising from the Jesuit missions in China, starting with the texts of Mateo Ricci, who arrived to the Asian country in 1583 in order to do his early missionary work, and in particular from the texts of fathers Niccola Longobardo and Antonio de Santa María Caballero, among others.
Fil: Tatián, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina
description This essay does not set forth mainly as a study of the references that might exist within the Spinozian corpus to China, Chinese philosophy and the Chinese people in general (there is only one as far as we know, although very important, towards the end of Chapter III of the Theological-Political Treatise), nor does it focus, as its title could suggest, on the reception and circulation of Spinoza´s philosophy in China and among Chinese philosophers. It has rather two different goals. First ? taking the word ?Chinese? metaphorically as something exotic or exoptic, anything that falls out of sight, unknown and unfamiliar ? to perform a brief survey of what is strange in Spinoza´s thought: Chinese, but also Turkish and Japanese ? although leaving aside the extremely strange, like the amazons mentioned on the last page of the Political Treatise, or the enigmatic ?black and scabrous Brazilian? of the dream narrated in a letter to Pieter Balling. Next, to look into the rich and close connection established in the philosophical debates of the 17th and 18th centuries between the syntagmata ?Chinese philosophy? and ?Spinoza´s philosophy? (where intervened authors like Pierre Bayle, Nicolas Malebranche, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Christian Wolff, and later the writers of the Encyclopédie). These debates originated because of the reports and news arising from the Jesuit missions in China, starting with the texts of Mateo Ricci, who arrived to the Asian country in 1583 in order to do his early missionary work, and in particular from the texts of fathers Niccola Longobardo and Antonio de Santa María Caballero, among others.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/32739
The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese; Taylor & Francis; Journal of the British for Phenomenology; 45; 1; 9-2014; 72-83
0007-1773
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/32739
identifier_str_mv The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese; Taylor & Francis; Journal of the British for Phenomenology; 45; 1; 9-2014; 72-83
0007-1773
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00071773.2014.915645?journalCode=rbsp20
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/00071773.2014.915645
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269220136550400
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares