Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949
- Autores
- Vita, Leticia Jesica
- Año de publicación
- 2019
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In 1949 Argentina incorporated, for the first time, a catalog of social rights and other provisions of social content breaking the liberal paradigm of the original, 1853, constitutional text. An aspect that characterizes most of the studies on the subject in Argentina is their profound »provinciality«. Both, promoters and detractors of the constitutional amendment, show a strong localized interpretation of the phenomena that led Argentina to adopt a new magna carta by the late ´40s. That is why I propose breaking with those interpretations by offering a transnational analysis of the 1949 constitutional reform as a case study. The global history perspective, in this case, asserts the mission of challenging the strong »methodological nationalism« that characterizes the more traditional studies on peronism and in particular, over the constitutional reform of 1949. Furthermore, not denying that there were several inputs and models that shone their light over the Argentine experience, in this opportunity I will concentrate on the impact of the Weimar constitutional experience in this country. In this specific case focusing on cultural and linguistic translation, because not only the geographical barriers are important, but also the linguistic ones, since, as we will see, the recognition of the scope of the provisions in Weimar´s Constitution will be strongly conditioned by the role played by mediators and translators of that experience, in Argentina.
Fil: Vita, Leticia Jesica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
Constitución de Weimar
Argentina
Peronismo
Reforma constitucional de 1949 - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/175476
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_33b04745c2d6bec2dd760ca4f64db978 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/175476 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949Vita, Leticia JesicaConstitución de WeimarArgentinaPeronismoReforma constitucional de 1949https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In 1949 Argentina incorporated, for the first time, a catalog of social rights and other provisions of social content breaking the liberal paradigm of the original, 1853, constitutional text. An aspect that characterizes most of the studies on the subject in Argentina is their profound »provinciality«. Both, promoters and detractors of the constitutional amendment, show a strong localized interpretation of the phenomena that led Argentina to adopt a new magna carta by the late ´40s. That is why I propose breaking with those interpretations by offering a transnational analysis of the 1949 constitutional reform as a case study. The global history perspective, in this case, asserts the mission of challenging the strong »methodological nationalism« that characterizes the more traditional studies on peronism and in particular, over the constitutional reform of 1949. Furthermore, not denying that there were several inputs and models that shone their light over the Argentine experience, in this opportunity I will concentrate on the impact of the Weimar constitutional experience in this country. In this specific case focusing on cultural and linguistic translation, because not only the geographical barriers are important, but also the linguistic ones, since, as we will see, the recognition of the scope of the provisions in Weimar´s Constitution will be strongly conditioned by the role played by mediators and translators of that experience, in Argentina.Fil: Vita, Leticia Jesica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaMax Planck Institute for European Legal History2019-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/175476Vita, Leticia Jesica; Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949; Max Planck Institute for European Legal History; Rechtsgeschichte: Legal History; 27; 9-2019; 176-1831619-49932195-9617CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7324206.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12946/rg27/176-183info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:53:37Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/175476instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:53:37.952CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949 |
title |
Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949 |
spellingShingle |
Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949 Vita, Leticia Jesica Constitución de Weimar Argentina Peronismo Reforma constitucional de 1949 |
title_short |
Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949 |
title_full |
Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949 |
title_fullStr |
Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949 |
title_sort |
Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949 |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Vita, Leticia Jesica |
author |
Vita, Leticia Jesica |
author_facet |
Vita, Leticia Jesica |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Constitución de Weimar Argentina Peronismo Reforma constitucional de 1949 |
topic |
Constitución de Weimar Argentina Peronismo Reforma constitucional de 1949 |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In 1949 Argentina incorporated, for the first time, a catalog of social rights and other provisions of social content breaking the liberal paradigm of the original, 1853, constitutional text. An aspect that characterizes most of the studies on the subject in Argentina is their profound »provinciality«. Both, promoters and detractors of the constitutional amendment, show a strong localized interpretation of the phenomena that led Argentina to adopt a new magna carta by the late ´40s. That is why I propose breaking with those interpretations by offering a transnational analysis of the 1949 constitutional reform as a case study. The global history perspective, in this case, asserts the mission of challenging the strong »methodological nationalism« that characterizes the more traditional studies on peronism and in particular, over the constitutional reform of 1949. Furthermore, not denying that there were several inputs and models that shone their light over the Argentine experience, in this opportunity I will concentrate on the impact of the Weimar constitutional experience in this country. In this specific case focusing on cultural and linguistic translation, because not only the geographical barriers are important, but also the linguistic ones, since, as we will see, the recognition of the scope of the provisions in Weimar´s Constitution will be strongly conditioned by the role played by mediators and translators of that experience, in Argentina. Fil: Vita, Leticia Jesica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
In 1949 Argentina incorporated, for the first time, a catalog of social rights and other provisions of social content breaking the liberal paradigm of the original, 1853, constitutional text. An aspect that characterizes most of the studies on the subject in Argentina is their profound »provinciality«. Both, promoters and detractors of the constitutional amendment, show a strong localized interpretation of the phenomena that led Argentina to adopt a new magna carta by the late ´40s. That is why I propose breaking with those interpretations by offering a transnational analysis of the 1949 constitutional reform as a case study. The global history perspective, in this case, asserts the mission of challenging the strong »methodological nationalism« that characterizes the more traditional studies on peronism and in particular, over the constitutional reform of 1949. Furthermore, not denying that there were several inputs and models that shone their light over the Argentine experience, in this opportunity I will concentrate on the impact of the Weimar constitutional experience in this country. In this specific case focusing on cultural and linguistic translation, because not only the geographical barriers are important, but also the linguistic ones, since, as we will see, the recognition of the scope of the provisions in Weimar´s Constitution will be strongly conditioned by the role played by mediators and translators of that experience, in Argentina. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/175476 Vita, Leticia Jesica; Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949; Max Planck Institute for European Legal History; Rechtsgeschichte: Legal History; 27; 9-2019; 176-183 1619-4993 2195-9617 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/175476 |
identifier_str_mv |
Vita, Leticia Jesica; Weimar in Argentina: Interpretations of the 1919 German Constitution in the Argentine constitutional revision of 1949; Max Planck Institute for European Legal History; Rechtsgeschichte: Legal History; 27; 9-2019; 176-183 1619-4993 2195-9617 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7324206.pdf info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12946/rg27/176-183 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Max Planck Institute for European Legal History |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Max Planck Institute for European Legal History |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269237977022464 |
score |
13.13397 |