The epistemic and moral role of testimony
- Autores
- Tozzi, María Verónica
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- My aim in this article is to provide a critical-productive appreciation of witness testimony that avoids the false and crooked dichotomies that pervade contemporary philosophy of history and historical theory. My specific, pragmatist approach combines the recent ac-counts of Hayden White about "witness literature" with the "generative-performative" consideration of testimony by martin Kusch. The purpose is to appreciate, in a non-foun-dationalist way, the epistemic and moral role of testimony in the constitution of the representation of the recent past. To achieve this I examine the assumed epistemic and political privilege of the testimonies of survivors of state terrorism from the recent past, and I draw on insights of three of the most relevant survivor witnesses: Primo Levi, Victor Klemperer, and pilar calveiro. The essay tries to avoid both an epistemic and a moral posture based on something like "the privileged victim's perspective," and instead approaches the specific analysis of production and circulation of witness discourse in terms of its contribution to the constitution of the past. That is, it recommends that one look at witness testimony not as an attempt to return to the past but as an action in the present. The result in so doing is to follow some recent results discussed in the new epistemology of witness testimony, which insist that: first, trust in testimony is an irreducible function of the acceptance of knowledge (this means that testimonies should not be treated as secondary sources of knowledge or as parasitical on experience and reason); and second, the production-circulation of testimonies does not function only in the context of justification but is also legitimately constitu-tive of knowledge.
Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina - Materia
-
COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH
HISTORY
MEMORY
PERFORMATIVE
WITNESS LITERATURE - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195356
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_31cf675bbd2f0e80dfc2ac23957d9c1c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195356 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
The epistemic and moral role of testimonyTozzi, María VerónicaCOMMUNITARIAN APPROACHHISTORYMEMORYPERFORMATIVEWITNESS LITERATUREhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6My aim in this article is to provide a critical-productive appreciation of witness testimony that avoids the false and crooked dichotomies that pervade contemporary philosophy of history and historical theory. My specific, pragmatist approach combines the recent ac-counts of Hayden White about "witness literature" with the "generative-performative" consideration of testimony by martin Kusch. The purpose is to appreciate, in a non-foun-dationalist way, the epistemic and moral role of testimony in the constitution of the representation of the recent past. To achieve this I examine the assumed epistemic and political privilege of the testimonies of survivors of state terrorism from the recent past, and I draw on insights of three of the most relevant survivor witnesses: Primo Levi, Victor Klemperer, and pilar calveiro. The essay tries to avoid both an epistemic and a moral posture based on something like "the privileged victim's perspective," and instead approaches the specific analysis of production and circulation of witness discourse in terms of its contribution to the constitution of the past. That is, it recommends that one look at witness testimony not as an attempt to return to the past but as an action in the present. The result in so doing is to follow some recent results discussed in the new epistemology of witness testimony, which insist that: first, trust in testimony is an irreducible function of the acceptance of knowledge (this means that testimonies should not be treated as secondary sources of knowledge or as parasitical on experience and reason); and second, the production-circulation of testimonies does not function only in the context of justification but is also legitimately constitu-tive of knowledge.Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaWiley2012-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/195356Tozzi, María Verónica; The epistemic and moral role of testimony; Wiley; History and Theory; 51; 1; 1-2012; 1-170018-2656CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00609.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00609.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-06T12:12:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195356instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-06 12:12:30.072CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The epistemic and moral role of testimony |
| title |
The epistemic and moral role of testimony |
| spellingShingle |
The epistemic and moral role of testimony Tozzi, María Verónica COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH HISTORY MEMORY PERFORMATIVE WITNESS LITERATURE |
| title_short |
The epistemic and moral role of testimony |
| title_full |
The epistemic and moral role of testimony |
| title_fullStr |
The epistemic and moral role of testimony |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The epistemic and moral role of testimony |
| title_sort |
The epistemic and moral role of testimony |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Tozzi, María Verónica |
| author |
Tozzi, María Verónica |
| author_facet |
Tozzi, María Verónica |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH HISTORY MEMORY PERFORMATIVE WITNESS LITERATURE |
| topic |
COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH HISTORY MEMORY PERFORMATIVE WITNESS LITERATURE |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
My aim in this article is to provide a critical-productive appreciation of witness testimony that avoids the false and crooked dichotomies that pervade contemporary philosophy of history and historical theory. My specific, pragmatist approach combines the recent ac-counts of Hayden White about "witness literature" with the "generative-performative" consideration of testimony by martin Kusch. The purpose is to appreciate, in a non-foun-dationalist way, the epistemic and moral role of testimony in the constitution of the representation of the recent past. To achieve this I examine the assumed epistemic and political privilege of the testimonies of survivors of state terrorism from the recent past, and I draw on insights of three of the most relevant survivor witnesses: Primo Levi, Victor Klemperer, and pilar calveiro. The essay tries to avoid both an epistemic and a moral posture based on something like "the privileged victim's perspective," and instead approaches the specific analysis of production and circulation of witness discourse in terms of its contribution to the constitution of the past. That is, it recommends that one look at witness testimony not as an attempt to return to the past but as an action in the present. The result in so doing is to follow some recent results discussed in the new epistemology of witness testimony, which insist that: first, trust in testimony is an irreducible function of the acceptance of knowledge (this means that testimonies should not be treated as secondary sources of knowledge or as parasitical on experience and reason); and second, the production-circulation of testimonies does not function only in the context of justification but is also legitimately constitu-tive of knowledge. Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina |
| description |
My aim in this article is to provide a critical-productive appreciation of witness testimony that avoids the false and crooked dichotomies that pervade contemporary philosophy of history and historical theory. My specific, pragmatist approach combines the recent ac-counts of Hayden White about "witness literature" with the "generative-performative" consideration of testimony by martin Kusch. The purpose is to appreciate, in a non-foun-dationalist way, the epistemic and moral role of testimony in the constitution of the representation of the recent past. To achieve this I examine the assumed epistemic and political privilege of the testimonies of survivors of state terrorism from the recent past, and I draw on insights of three of the most relevant survivor witnesses: Primo Levi, Victor Klemperer, and pilar calveiro. The essay tries to avoid both an epistemic and a moral posture based on something like "the privileged victim's perspective," and instead approaches the specific analysis of production and circulation of witness discourse in terms of its contribution to the constitution of the past. That is, it recommends that one look at witness testimony not as an attempt to return to the past but as an action in the present. The result in so doing is to follow some recent results discussed in the new epistemology of witness testimony, which insist that: first, trust in testimony is an irreducible function of the acceptance of knowledge (this means that testimonies should not be treated as secondary sources of knowledge or as parasitical on experience and reason); and second, the production-circulation of testimonies does not function only in the context of justification but is also legitimately constitu-tive of knowledge. |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195356 Tozzi, María Verónica; The epistemic and moral role of testimony; Wiley; History and Theory; 51; 1; 1-2012; 1-17 0018-2656 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195356 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Tozzi, María Verónica; The epistemic and moral role of testimony; Wiley; History and Theory; 51; 1; 1-2012; 1-17 0018-2656 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00609.x info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00609.x |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1856402870086139904 |
| score |
13.11174 |