The epistemic and moral role of testimony

Autores
Tozzi, María Verónica
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
My aim in this article is to provide a critical-productive appreciation of witness testimony that avoids the false and crooked dichotomies that pervade contemporary philosophy of history and historical theory. My specific, pragmatist approach combines the recent ac-counts of Hayden White about "witness literature" with the "generative-performative" consideration of testimony by martin Kusch. The purpose is to appreciate, in a non-foun-dationalist way, the epistemic and moral role of testimony in the constitution of the representation of the recent past. To achieve this I examine the assumed epistemic and political privilege of the testimonies of survivors of state terrorism from the recent past, and I draw on insights of three of the most relevant survivor witnesses: Primo Levi, Victor Klemperer, and pilar calveiro. The essay tries to avoid both an epistemic and a moral posture based on something like "the privileged victim's perspective," and instead approaches the specific analysis of production and circulation of witness discourse in terms of its contribution to the constitution of the past. That is, it recommends that one look at witness testimony not as an attempt to return to the past but as an action in the present. The result in so doing is to follow some recent results discussed in the new epistemology of witness testimony, which insist that: first, trust in testimony is an irreducible function of the acceptance of knowledge (this means that testimonies should not be treated as secondary sources of knowledge or as parasitical on experience and reason); and second, the production-circulation of testimonies does not function only in the context of justification but is also legitimately constitu-tive of knowledge.
Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH
HISTORY
MEMORY
PERFORMATIVE
WITNESS LITERATURE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195356

id CONICETDig_31cf675bbd2f0e80dfc2ac23957d9c1c
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195356
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The epistemic and moral role of testimonyTozzi, María VerónicaCOMMUNITARIAN APPROACHHISTORYMEMORYPERFORMATIVEWITNESS LITERATUREhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6My aim in this article is to provide a critical-productive appreciation of witness testimony that avoids the false and crooked dichotomies that pervade contemporary philosophy of history and historical theory. My specific, pragmatist approach combines the recent ac-counts of Hayden White about "witness literature" with the "generative-performative" consideration of testimony by martin Kusch. The purpose is to appreciate, in a non-foun-dationalist way, the epistemic and moral role of testimony in the constitution of the representation of the recent past. To achieve this I examine the assumed epistemic and political privilege of the testimonies of survivors of state terrorism from the recent past, and I draw on insights of three of the most relevant survivor witnesses: Primo Levi, Victor Klemperer, and pilar calveiro. The essay tries to avoid both an epistemic and a moral posture based on something like "the privileged victim's perspective," and instead approaches the specific analysis of production and circulation of witness discourse in terms of its contribution to the constitution of the past. That is, it recommends that one look at witness testimony not as an attempt to return to the past but as an action in the present. The result in so doing is to follow some recent results discussed in the new epistemology of witness testimony, which insist that: first, trust in testimony is an irreducible function of the acceptance of knowledge (this means that testimonies should not be treated as secondary sources of knowledge or as parasitical on experience and reason); and second, the production-circulation of testimonies does not function only in the context of justification but is also legitimately constitu-tive of knowledge.Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaWiley2012-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/195356Tozzi, María Verónica; The epistemic and moral role of testimony; Wiley; History and Theory; 51; 1; 1-2012; 1-170018-2656CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00609.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00609.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-06T12:12:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195356instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-06 12:12:30.072CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The epistemic and moral role of testimony
title The epistemic and moral role of testimony
spellingShingle The epistemic and moral role of testimony
Tozzi, María Verónica
COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH
HISTORY
MEMORY
PERFORMATIVE
WITNESS LITERATURE
title_short The epistemic and moral role of testimony
title_full The epistemic and moral role of testimony
title_fullStr The epistemic and moral role of testimony
title_full_unstemmed The epistemic and moral role of testimony
title_sort The epistemic and moral role of testimony
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tozzi, María Verónica
author Tozzi, María Verónica
author_facet Tozzi, María Verónica
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH
HISTORY
MEMORY
PERFORMATIVE
WITNESS LITERATURE
topic COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH
HISTORY
MEMORY
PERFORMATIVE
WITNESS LITERATURE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv My aim in this article is to provide a critical-productive appreciation of witness testimony that avoids the false and crooked dichotomies that pervade contemporary philosophy of history and historical theory. My specific, pragmatist approach combines the recent ac-counts of Hayden White about "witness literature" with the "generative-performative" consideration of testimony by martin Kusch. The purpose is to appreciate, in a non-foun-dationalist way, the epistemic and moral role of testimony in the constitution of the representation of the recent past. To achieve this I examine the assumed epistemic and political privilege of the testimonies of survivors of state terrorism from the recent past, and I draw on insights of three of the most relevant survivor witnesses: Primo Levi, Victor Klemperer, and pilar calveiro. The essay tries to avoid both an epistemic and a moral posture based on something like "the privileged victim's perspective," and instead approaches the specific analysis of production and circulation of witness discourse in terms of its contribution to the constitution of the past. That is, it recommends that one look at witness testimony not as an attempt to return to the past but as an action in the present. The result in so doing is to follow some recent results discussed in the new epistemology of witness testimony, which insist that: first, trust in testimony is an irreducible function of the acceptance of knowledge (this means that testimonies should not be treated as secondary sources of knowledge or as parasitical on experience and reason); and second, the production-circulation of testimonies does not function only in the context of justification but is also legitimately constitu-tive of knowledge.
Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description My aim in this article is to provide a critical-productive appreciation of witness testimony that avoids the false and crooked dichotomies that pervade contemporary philosophy of history and historical theory. My specific, pragmatist approach combines the recent ac-counts of Hayden White about "witness literature" with the "generative-performative" consideration of testimony by martin Kusch. The purpose is to appreciate, in a non-foun-dationalist way, the epistemic and moral role of testimony in the constitution of the representation of the recent past. To achieve this I examine the assumed epistemic and political privilege of the testimonies of survivors of state terrorism from the recent past, and I draw on insights of three of the most relevant survivor witnesses: Primo Levi, Victor Klemperer, and pilar calveiro. The essay tries to avoid both an epistemic and a moral posture based on something like "the privileged victim's perspective," and instead approaches the specific analysis of production and circulation of witness discourse in terms of its contribution to the constitution of the past. That is, it recommends that one look at witness testimony not as an attempt to return to the past but as an action in the present. The result in so doing is to follow some recent results discussed in the new epistemology of witness testimony, which insist that: first, trust in testimony is an irreducible function of the acceptance of knowledge (this means that testimonies should not be treated as secondary sources of knowledge or as parasitical on experience and reason); and second, the production-circulation of testimonies does not function only in the context of justification but is also legitimately constitu-tive of knowledge.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195356
Tozzi, María Verónica; The epistemic and moral role of testimony; Wiley; History and Theory; 51; 1; 1-2012; 1-17
0018-2656
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195356
identifier_str_mv Tozzi, María Verónica; The epistemic and moral role of testimony; Wiley; History and Theory; 51; 1; 1-2012; 1-17
0018-2656
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00609.x
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00609.x
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1856402870086139904
score 13.11174