Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix

Autores
Guerra, Fernando Andres; Rocher, Adriana Esther; Villacorta Hidalgo, José; Díaz, Lilí; Vighi, Susana; Cardinal, Lucía; Tatti, Silvio; Cúneo, Nicasio; de Prat Gay, Gonzalo; Camporeale, Gabriela; Palaoro, Luis Alberto
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
AIM: p16INK4a and argentophilic nucleolus organizer region (AgNOR) can be used as markers for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) of the uterine cervix. Our objective was to study the predictive value of the AgNOR technique as a progression marker of CIN1 and its correlation with p16INK4A. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One uterine cervix biopsy from each of 75 patients with diagnosis of CIN1 was selected. All of these patients underwent a second biopsy, and these were also used for the study. RESULTS: The second biopsies showed: regression (20 patients), persistent CIN1 (38 patients), progression to CIN2 (10 patients) and progression to CIN3 (seven patients). p16INK4A showed reactivity in 67 of the 75 first CIN1 biopsies: 12 of the 20 cases that cleared the lesions and the 55 cases with persistent or progressive lesions were positive for p16INK4a (specificity: 40%; sensitivity: 100%; positive predictive value [PPV]: 82%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 100%). Samples with AgNOR areas less than 3.0 μ(2) returned in all cases, but patients whose lesions persisted or progressed to CIN2/CIN3, showed AgNOR areas greater than 3.0 μ(2) in 50/55 cases (specificity: 100%; sensitivity: 91%; PPV: 100%; NPV: 80%). CONCLUSIONS: p16INK4a is expressed in a high percentage of returning lesions. AgNOR might be a better marker of proliferation of CIN1 than p16INK4a (PPV = 100%), which means that a value greater than 3.0 μ(2) indicates the persistence or progression of the lesion. As its NPV is 80%, a value of AgNOR area less than 3.0 μ(2) in CIN1 leaves a margin of doubt about the future behavior of the lesion.
Fil: Guerra, Fernando Andres. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Rocher, Adriana Esther. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Villacorta Hidalgo, José. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Díaz, Lilí. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Vighi, Susana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Cardinal, Lucía. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Tatti, Silvio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Cúneo, Nicasio. Hospital de Oncología María Curie; Argentina
Fil: de Prat Gay, Gonzalo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquimicas de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Fundación Instituto Leloir; Argentina
Fil: Camporeale, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquimicas de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Fundación Instituto Leloir; Argentina
Fil: Palaoro, Luis Alberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Materia
Cervical Cancer
Proliferation Marker
P16
Hpv
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/9314

id CONICETDig_2fdcdf1419a83f78ccae9bfdd5830c2f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/9314
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervixGuerra, Fernando AndresRocher, Adriana EstherVillacorta Hidalgo, JoséDíaz, LilíVighi, SusanaCardinal, LucíaTatti, SilvioCúneo, Nicasiode Prat Gay, GonzaloCamporeale, GabrielaPalaoro, Luis AlbertoCervical CancerProliferation MarkerP16Hpvhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3AIM: p16INK4a and argentophilic nucleolus organizer region (AgNOR) can be used as markers for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) of the uterine cervix. Our objective was to study the predictive value of the AgNOR technique as a progression marker of CIN1 and its correlation with p16INK4A. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One uterine cervix biopsy from each of 75 patients with diagnosis of CIN1 was selected. All of these patients underwent a second biopsy, and these were also used for the study. RESULTS: The second biopsies showed: regression (20 patients), persistent CIN1 (38 patients), progression to CIN2 (10 patients) and progression to CIN3 (seven patients). p16INK4A showed reactivity in 67 of the 75 first CIN1 biopsies: 12 of the 20 cases that cleared the lesions and the 55 cases with persistent or progressive lesions were positive for p16INK4a (specificity: 40%; sensitivity: 100%; positive predictive value [PPV]: 82%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 100%). Samples with AgNOR areas less than 3.0 μ(2) returned in all cases, but patients whose lesions persisted or progressed to CIN2/CIN3, showed AgNOR areas greater than 3.0 μ(2) in 50/55 cases (specificity: 100%; sensitivity: 91%; PPV: 100%; NPV: 80%). CONCLUSIONS: p16INK4a is expressed in a high percentage of returning lesions. AgNOR might be a better marker of proliferation of CIN1 than p16INK4a (PPV = 100%), which means that a value greater than 3.0 μ(2) indicates the persistence or progression of the lesion. As its NPV is 80%, a value of AgNOR area less than 3.0 μ(2) in CIN1 leaves a margin of doubt about the future behavior of the lesion.Fil: Guerra, Fernando Andres. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Rocher, Adriana Esther. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Villacorta Hidalgo, José. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Díaz, Lilí. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Vighi, Susana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Cardinal, Lucía. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Tatti, Silvio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Cúneo, Nicasio. Hospital de Oncología María Curie; ArgentinaFil: de Prat Gay, Gonzalo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquimicas de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Fundación Instituto Leloir; ArgentinaFil: Camporeale, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquimicas de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Fundación Instituto Leloir; ArgentinaFil: Palaoro, Luis Alberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaWiley2014-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/9314Guerra, Fernando Andres; Rocher, Adriana Esther; Villacorta Hidalgo, José; Díaz, Lilí; Vighi, Susana; et al.; Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix; Wiley; Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology Research; 40; 6; 6-2014; 1717-17241341-8076enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.12380/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/jog.12380info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:55:34Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/9314instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:55:35.182CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix
title Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix
spellingShingle Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix
Guerra, Fernando Andres
Cervical Cancer
Proliferation Marker
P16
Hpv
title_short Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix
title_full Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix
title_fullStr Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix
title_full_unstemmed Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix
title_sort Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Guerra, Fernando Andres
Rocher, Adriana Esther
Villacorta Hidalgo, José
Díaz, Lilí
Vighi, Susana
Cardinal, Lucía
Tatti, Silvio
Cúneo, Nicasio
de Prat Gay, Gonzalo
Camporeale, Gabriela
Palaoro, Luis Alberto
author Guerra, Fernando Andres
author_facet Guerra, Fernando Andres
Rocher, Adriana Esther
Villacorta Hidalgo, José
Díaz, Lilí
Vighi, Susana
Cardinal, Lucía
Tatti, Silvio
Cúneo, Nicasio
de Prat Gay, Gonzalo
Camporeale, Gabriela
Palaoro, Luis Alberto
author_role author
author2 Rocher, Adriana Esther
Villacorta Hidalgo, José
Díaz, Lilí
Vighi, Susana
Cardinal, Lucía
Tatti, Silvio
Cúneo, Nicasio
de Prat Gay, Gonzalo
Camporeale, Gabriela
Palaoro, Luis Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cervical Cancer
Proliferation Marker
P16
Hpv
topic Cervical Cancer
Proliferation Marker
P16
Hpv
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv AIM: p16INK4a and argentophilic nucleolus organizer region (AgNOR) can be used as markers for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) of the uterine cervix. Our objective was to study the predictive value of the AgNOR technique as a progression marker of CIN1 and its correlation with p16INK4A. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One uterine cervix biopsy from each of 75 patients with diagnosis of CIN1 was selected. All of these patients underwent a second biopsy, and these were also used for the study. RESULTS: The second biopsies showed: regression (20 patients), persistent CIN1 (38 patients), progression to CIN2 (10 patients) and progression to CIN3 (seven patients). p16INK4A showed reactivity in 67 of the 75 first CIN1 biopsies: 12 of the 20 cases that cleared the lesions and the 55 cases with persistent or progressive lesions were positive for p16INK4a (specificity: 40%; sensitivity: 100%; positive predictive value [PPV]: 82%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 100%). Samples with AgNOR areas less than 3.0 μ(2) returned in all cases, but patients whose lesions persisted or progressed to CIN2/CIN3, showed AgNOR areas greater than 3.0 μ(2) in 50/55 cases (specificity: 100%; sensitivity: 91%; PPV: 100%; NPV: 80%). CONCLUSIONS: p16INK4a is expressed in a high percentage of returning lesions. AgNOR might be a better marker of proliferation of CIN1 than p16INK4a (PPV = 100%), which means that a value greater than 3.0 μ(2) indicates the persistence or progression of the lesion. As its NPV is 80%, a value of AgNOR area less than 3.0 μ(2) in CIN1 leaves a margin of doubt about the future behavior of the lesion.
Fil: Guerra, Fernando Andres. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Rocher, Adriana Esther. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Villacorta Hidalgo, José. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Díaz, Lilí. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Vighi, Susana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Cardinal, Lucía. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Tatti, Silvio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Cúneo, Nicasio. Hospital de Oncología María Curie; Argentina
Fil: de Prat Gay, Gonzalo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquimicas de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Fundación Instituto Leloir; Argentina
Fil: Camporeale, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquimicas de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Fundación Instituto Leloir; Argentina
Fil: Palaoro, Luis Alberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
description AIM: p16INK4a and argentophilic nucleolus organizer region (AgNOR) can be used as markers for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) of the uterine cervix. Our objective was to study the predictive value of the AgNOR technique as a progression marker of CIN1 and its correlation with p16INK4A. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One uterine cervix biopsy from each of 75 patients with diagnosis of CIN1 was selected. All of these patients underwent a second biopsy, and these were also used for the study. RESULTS: The second biopsies showed: regression (20 patients), persistent CIN1 (38 patients), progression to CIN2 (10 patients) and progression to CIN3 (seven patients). p16INK4A showed reactivity in 67 of the 75 first CIN1 biopsies: 12 of the 20 cases that cleared the lesions and the 55 cases with persistent or progressive lesions were positive for p16INK4a (specificity: 40%; sensitivity: 100%; positive predictive value [PPV]: 82%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 100%). Samples with AgNOR areas less than 3.0 μ(2) returned in all cases, but patients whose lesions persisted or progressed to CIN2/CIN3, showed AgNOR areas greater than 3.0 μ(2) in 50/55 cases (specificity: 100%; sensitivity: 91%; PPV: 100%; NPV: 80%). CONCLUSIONS: p16INK4a is expressed in a high percentage of returning lesions. AgNOR might be a better marker of proliferation of CIN1 than p16INK4a (PPV = 100%), which means that a value greater than 3.0 μ(2) indicates the persistence or progression of the lesion. As its NPV is 80%, a value of AgNOR area less than 3.0 μ(2) in CIN1 leaves a margin of doubt about the future behavior of the lesion.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9314
Guerra, Fernando Andres; Rocher, Adriana Esther; Villacorta Hidalgo, José; Díaz, Lilí; Vighi, Susana; et al.; Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix; Wiley; Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology Research; 40; 6; 6-2014; 1717-1724
1341-8076
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9314
identifier_str_mv Guerra, Fernando Andres; Rocher, Adriana Esther; Villacorta Hidalgo, José; Díaz, Lilí; Vighi, Susana; et al.; Argentophilic nucleolus organizer region as a proliferation marker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 of the uterine cervix; Wiley; Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology Research; 40; 6; 6-2014; 1717-1724
1341-8076
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.12380/abstract
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/jog.12380
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269353655926784
score 13.13397