The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic

Autores
Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel; Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro; Tajer, Diego
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Adding a transparent truth predicate to a language completely governed by classical logic is not possible. The trouble, as is well-known, comes from paradoxes such as the Liar and Curry. Recently, Cobreros, Egre, Ripley and van Rooij  have put forward an approach based on a non-transitive notion of consequence which is suitable to deal with semantic paradoxes while having a transparent truth predicate together with classical logic. Nevertheless, there are some interesting issues concerning the set of metainferences validated by this logic. In this paper, we show that this logic, once it is adequately understood, is weaker than classical logic. Moreover, the logic is in a way similar to the paraconsistent logic LP.
Fil: Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas - Sadaf; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas - Sadaf; Argentina
Fil: Tajer, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina
Materia
TRANSPARENT TRUTH
STRICT-TOLERANT LOGIC
SEMANTIC PARADOXES
TRANSITIVITY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/109322
Acceder
id CONICETDig_28397b749772e0a5890c3925bfb26830
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/109322
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Logics of Strict-Tolerant LogicRosenblatt, Lucas DanielBarrio, Eduardo AlejandroTajer, DiegoTRANSPARENT TRUTHSTRICT-TOLERANT LOGICSEMANTIC PARADOXESTRANSITIVITYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Adding a transparent truth predicate to a language completely governed by classical logic is not possible. The trouble, as is well-known, comes from paradoxes such as the Liar and Curry. Recently, Cobreros, Egre, Ripley and van Rooij  have put forward an approach based on a non-transitive notion of consequence which is suitable to deal with semantic paradoxes while having a transparent truth predicate together with classical logic. Nevertheless, there are some interesting issues concerning the set of metainferences validated by this logic. In this paper, we show that this logic, once it is adequately understood, is weaker than classical logic. Moreover, the logic is in a way similar to the paraconsistent logic LP.Fil: Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas - Sadaf; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas - Sadaf; ArgentinaFil: Tajer, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; ArgentinaSpringer2014-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/109322Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel; Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro; Tajer, Diego; The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic; Springer; Journal of Philosophical Logic; 44; 5; 12-2014; 551-5710022-36111573-0433CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.springer.com/philosophy/logic+and+philosophy+of+language/journal/10992info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10992-014-9342-6info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:44:04Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/109322instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:44:05.228CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic
title The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic
spellingShingle The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic
Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel
TRANSPARENT TRUTH
STRICT-TOLERANT LOGIC
SEMANTIC PARADOXES
TRANSITIVITY
title_short The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic
title_full The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic
title_fullStr The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic
title_full_unstemmed The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic
title_sort The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel
Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro
Tajer, Diego
author Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel
author_facet Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel
Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro
Tajer, Diego
author_role author
author2 Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro
Tajer, Diego
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv TRANSPARENT TRUTH
STRICT-TOLERANT LOGIC
SEMANTIC PARADOXES
TRANSITIVITY
topic TRANSPARENT TRUTH
STRICT-TOLERANT LOGIC
SEMANTIC PARADOXES
TRANSITIVITY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Adding a transparent truth predicate to a language completely governed by classical logic is not possible. The trouble, as is well-known, comes from paradoxes such as the Liar and Curry. Recently, Cobreros, Egre, Ripley and van Rooij  have put forward an approach based on a non-transitive notion of consequence which is suitable to deal with semantic paradoxes while having a transparent truth predicate together with classical logic. Nevertheless, there are some interesting issues concerning the set of metainferences validated by this logic. In this paper, we show that this logic, once it is adequately understood, is weaker than classical logic. Moreover, the logic is in a way similar to the paraconsistent logic LP.
Fil: Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas - Sadaf; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas - Sadaf; Argentina
Fil: Tajer, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina
description Adding a transparent truth predicate to a language completely governed by classical logic is not possible. The trouble, as is well-known, comes from paradoxes such as the Liar and Curry. Recently, Cobreros, Egre, Ripley and van Rooij  have put forward an approach based on a non-transitive notion of consequence which is suitable to deal with semantic paradoxes while having a transparent truth predicate together with classical logic. Nevertheless, there are some interesting issues concerning the set of metainferences validated by this logic. In this paper, we show that this logic, once it is adequately understood, is weaker than classical logic. Moreover, the logic is in a way similar to the paraconsistent logic LP.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/109322
Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel; Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro; Tajer, Diego; The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic; Springer; Journal of Philosophical Logic; 44; 5; 12-2014; 551-571
0022-3611
1573-0433
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/109322
identifier_str_mv Rosenblatt, Lucas Daniel; Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro; Tajer, Diego; The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic; Springer; Journal of Philosophical Logic; 44; 5; 12-2014; 551-571
0022-3611
1573-0433
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.springer.com/philosophy/logic+and+philosophy+of+language/journal/10992
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10992-014-9342-6
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614477374291968
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares