Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective

Autores
Leani, Lautaro
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The philosophical framework of justice proposed by Nancy Fraser during the 1990s establishes two equally crucial dimensions of justice: redistribution, linked to the allocation of economic goods, and recognition, linked to the assignment of social status. This division makes it possible to distinguish between transformative strategies that intervene in the causes of social injustices and affirmative strategies that focus on their effects. However, the author’s treatment of her notion of “two-dimensional category”, which combines inequalities of redistribution and recognition, has limits for thinking about the functioning of certain systems of social subordination and the situation of certain social groups. In this paper, I will use a queer-crip perspective to argue that both heterocissexism and ableism are two-dimensional categories, since they structure an unequal status system, but also sustain, define, and naturalize the capitalist mode of production and are functional to its distribution of economic goods. This critical review allows us to adapt the Fraserian framework to the current socio-political context.
Fil: Leani, Lautaro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales de América Latina. - Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales de América Latina; Argentina
Materia
HETEROCISSEXISM
ABLEISM
REDISTRIBUTION-RECOGNITION
QUEER-CRIP PERSPECTIVE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/229542

id CONICETDig_27d2cb3ab2dc15cb71629d0645a74ab5
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/229542
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip PerspectiveLeani, LautaroHETEROCISSEXISMABLEISMREDISTRIBUTION-RECOGNITIONQUEER-CRIP PERSPECTIVEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The philosophical framework of justice proposed by Nancy Fraser during the 1990s establishes two equally crucial dimensions of justice: redistribution, linked to the allocation of economic goods, and recognition, linked to the assignment of social status. This division makes it possible to distinguish between transformative strategies that intervene in the causes of social injustices and affirmative strategies that focus on their effects. However, the author’s treatment of her notion of “two-dimensional category”, which combines inequalities of redistribution and recognition, has limits for thinking about the functioning of certain systems of social subordination and the situation of certain social groups. In this paper, I will use a queer-crip perspective to argue that both heterocissexism and ableism are two-dimensional categories, since they structure an unequal status system, but also sustain, define, and naturalize the capitalist mode of production and are functional to its distribution of economic goods. This critical review allows us to adapt the Fraserian framework to the current socio-political context.Fil: Leani, Lautaro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales de América Latina. - Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales de América Latina; ArgentinaMimesis2023-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/229542Leani, Lautaro; Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective; Mimesis; Scenari; 18; 10-2023; 256-2762420-89142785-3020CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://mimesisjournals.com/ojs/index.php/scenari/article/view/3082info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:02:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/229542instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:02:46.986CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective
title Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective
spellingShingle Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective
Leani, Lautaro
HETEROCISSEXISM
ABLEISM
REDISTRIBUTION-RECOGNITION
QUEER-CRIP PERSPECTIVE
title_short Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective
title_full Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective
title_fullStr Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective
title_sort Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Leani, Lautaro
author Leani, Lautaro
author_facet Leani, Lautaro
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv HETEROCISSEXISM
ABLEISM
REDISTRIBUTION-RECOGNITION
QUEER-CRIP PERSPECTIVE
topic HETEROCISSEXISM
ABLEISM
REDISTRIBUTION-RECOGNITION
QUEER-CRIP PERSPECTIVE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The philosophical framework of justice proposed by Nancy Fraser during the 1990s establishes two equally crucial dimensions of justice: redistribution, linked to the allocation of economic goods, and recognition, linked to the assignment of social status. This division makes it possible to distinguish between transformative strategies that intervene in the causes of social injustices and affirmative strategies that focus on their effects. However, the author’s treatment of her notion of “two-dimensional category”, which combines inequalities of redistribution and recognition, has limits for thinking about the functioning of certain systems of social subordination and the situation of certain social groups. In this paper, I will use a queer-crip perspective to argue that both heterocissexism and ableism are two-dimensional categories, since they structure an unequal status system, but also sustain, define, and naturalize the capitalist mode of production and are functional to its distribution of economic goods. This critical review allows us to adapt the Fraserian framework to the current socio-political context.
Fil: Leani, Lautaro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales de América Latina. - Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales de América Latina; Argentina
description The philosophical framework of justice proposed by Nancy Fraser during the 1990s establishes two equally crucial dimensions of justice: redistribution, linked to the allocation of economic goods, and recognition, linked to the assignment of social status. This division makes it possible to distinguish between transformative strategies that intervene in the causes of social injustices and affirmative strategies that focus on their effects. However, the author’s treatment of her notion of “two-dimensional category”, which combines inequalities of redistribution and recognition, has limits for thinking about the functioning of certain systems of social subordination and the situation of certain social groups. In this paper, I will use a queer-crip perspective to argue that both heterocissexism and ableism are two-dimensional categories, since they structure an unequal status system, but also sustain, define, and naturalize the capitalist mode of production and are functional to its distribution of economic goods. This critical review allows us to adapt the Fraserian framework to the current socio-political context.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/229542
Leani, Lautaro; Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective; Mimesis; Scenari; 18; 10-2023; 256-276
2420-8914
2785-3020
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/229542
identifier_str_mv Leani, Lautaro; Thinking Ableism through Heterocissexism.:A Critical Review of Fraser’s Redistribution-Recognition Pair from a Queer-Crip Perspective; Mimesis; Scenari; 18; 10-2023; 256-276
2420-8914
2785-3020
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://mimesisjournals.com/ojs/index.php/scenari/article/view/3082
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Mimesis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Mimesis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269772642779136
score 13.13397