Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group

Autores
Colombo, Laura Marina; Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.; Alvarez, Guadalupe
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Peer response writing groups support faculty in their development as scholarly writers around the globe. Nevertheless, little is known about feedback provision inside these groups. This work analyses written and oral comments in a faculty writing group to determine how feedback progressed as meetings developed. Results indicate that participants shifted from mainly correcting or giving directions to eliciting clarification, confirmation or information. Similarly, orally retaken comments (oral comments that referred to previous written comments) changed from discussing linguistic accuracy issues to centring on the content and cohesion/coherence of the text, with most of the latter prompting exchanges among participants. With continued participation members moved from mainly offering corrections to establishing a dialogue with authors. In writing groups faculty safely engage in peer feedback practices that enrich texts and writers.
Fil: Colombo, Laura Marina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.. Universidad de Cuenca; Ecuador
Fil: Alvarez, Guadalupe. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento; Argentina
Materia
ACADEMICS
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT
ORAL COMMENTS
PEER REVISION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/247371
Acceder
id CONICETDig_2607a27a22b396483de1ece28fd6876d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/247371
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing groupColombo, Laura MarinaRodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.Alvarez, GuadalupeACADEMICSFACULTY DEVELOPMENTORAL COMMENTSPEER REVISIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Peer response writing groups support faculty in their development as scholarly writers around the globe. Nevertheless, little is known about feedback provision inside these groups. This work analyses written and oral comments in a faculty writing group to determine how feedback progressed as meetings developed. Results indicate that participants shifted from mainly correcting or giving directions to eliciting clarification, confirmation or information. Similarly, orally retaken comments (oral comments that referred to previous written comments) changed from discussing linguistic accuracy issues to centring on the content and cohesion/coherence of the text, with most of the latter prompting exchanges among participants. With continued participation members moved from mainly offering corrections to establishing a dialogue with authors. In writing groups faculty safely engage in peer feedback practices that enrich texts and writers.Fil: Colombo, Laura Marina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.. Universidad de Cuenca; EcuadorFil: Alvarez, Guadalupe. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento; ArgentinaBerghahn Journals2024-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/247371Colombo, Laura Marina; Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.; Alvarez, Guadalupe; Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group; Berghahn Journals; Learning and Teaching; 17; 2; 6-2024; 27-461740-58661755-2281CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/latiss/17/2/latiss170203.xmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3167/latiss.2024.170203info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:55:44Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/247371instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:55:44.468CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group
title Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group
spellingShingle Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group
Colombo, Laura Marina
ACADEMICS
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT
ORAL COMMENTS
PEER REVISION
title_short Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group
title_full Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group
title_fullStr Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group
title_full_unstemmed Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group
title_sort Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Colombo, Laura Marina
Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.
Alvarez, Guadalupe
author Colombo, Laura Marina
author_facet Colombo, Laura Marina
Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.
Alvarez, Guadalupe
author_role author
author2 Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.
Alvarez, Guadalupe
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ACADEMICS
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT
ORAL COMMENTS
PEER REVISION
topic ACADEMICS
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT
ORAL COMMENTS
PEER REVISION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Peer response writing groups support faculty in their development as scholarly writers around the globe. Nevertheless, little is known about feedback provision inside these groups. This work analyses written and oral comments in a faculty writing group to determine how feedback progressed as meetings developed. Results indicate that participants shifted from mainly correcting or giving directions to eliciting clarification, confirmation or information. Similarly, orally retaken comments (oral comments that referred to previous written comments) changed from discussing linguistic accuracy issues to centring on the content and cohesion/coherence of the text, with most of the latter prompting exchanges among participants. With continued participation members moved from mainly offering corrections to establishing a dialogue with authors. In writing groups faculty safely engage in peer feedback practices that enrich texts and writers.
Fil: Colombo, Laura Marina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.. Universidad de Cuenca; Ecuador
Fil: Alvarez, Guadalupe. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento; Argentina
description Peer response writing groups support faculty in their development as scholarly writers around the globe. Nevertheless, little is known about feedback provision inside these groups. This work analyses written and oral comments in a faculty writing group to determine how feedback progressed as meetings developed. Results indicate that participants shifted from mainly correcting or giving directions to eliciting clarification, confirmation or information. Similarly, orally retaken comments (oral comments that referred to previous written comments) changed from discussing linguistic accuracy issues to centring on the content and cohesion/coherence of the text, with most of the latter prompting exchanges among participants. With continued participation members moved from mainly offering corrections to establishing a dialogue with authors. In writing groups faculty safely engage in peer feedback practices that enrich texts and writers.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/247371
Colombo, Laura Marina; Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.; Alvarez, Guadalupe; Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group; Berghahn Journals; Learning and Teaching; 17; 2; 6-2024; 27-46
1740-5866
1755-2281
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/247371
identifier_str_mv Colombo, Laura Marina; Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.; Alvarez, Guadalupe; Taking a closer look together: written and oral feedback in a faculty writing group; Berghahn Journals; Learning and Teaching; 17; 2; 6-2024; 27-46
1740-5866
1755-2281
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/latiss/17/2/latiss170203.xml
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3167/latiss.2024.170203
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Berghahn Journals
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Berghahn Journals
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613678520860672
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares