Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method

Autores
Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo; Ceballos, Luis Ramon; Hente, Christian; Roccia, Bruno Antonio; Gebhardt, Cristian Guillermo
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Reliable aerodynamic and aeroelastic simulations of advanced aeronautical/mechanical systems require us to predict flow-induced forces as accurately as possible. Nowadays, computational fluid dynamic techniques are quite popular, but at an overwhelming computational cost. Consequently, methods like the unsteady vortex-lattice method (UVLM) became the workhorses for many simulation environments. Then, numerous UVLM-based codes using diverse numerical schemes, enhanced by several add-ons and implemented following different programming paradigms, were available in the literature. However, there is no set of benchmark cases intended for the systematic verification of those codes relying on the UVLM. Therefore, we provide six fully reproducible benchmark cases that can be used for such an end. We also describe two in-house UVLM-based codes that are well suited for aerodynamic simulations and for being encapsulated as an aerodynamic engine within partitioned aeroelastic simulation schemes. Because both codes follow radically different implementation philosophies, these represent excellent candidates to undergo the series of benchmark cases proposed. The work is completed by providing a valuable dataset and comparison criteria to measure to what extent two or more codes are in agreement. Along this path, for very first time, we use a comparison strategy to contrast free-wake methods based on the Hausdorff distance.
Fil: Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Ceballos, Luis Ramon. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Hente, Christian. Leibniz Universitat Hannover.; Alemania
Fil: Roccia, Bruno Antonio. University Of Bergen. Faculty Of Mathematics And Natural Sciencies; Noruega. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gebhardt, Cristian Guillermo. University Of Bergen. Faculty Of Mathematics And Natural Sciencies; Noruega. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Aerodynamic Characteristics
Vortex Filaments
Software Verification and Validation
Unsteady Aerodynamics
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/226627
Acceder
id CONICETDig_1cfe5b8e26b4bc4f0553f3c5283f10eb
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/226627
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice MethodVerstraete, Marcos LeonardoCeballos, Luis RamonHente, ChristianRoccia, Bruno AntonioGebhardt, Cristian GuillermoAerodynamic CharacteristicsVortex FilamentsSoftware Verification and ValidationUnsteady Aerodynamicshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2Reliable aerodynamic and aeroelastic simulations of advanced aeronautical/mechanical systems require us to predict flow-induced forces as accurately as possible. Nowadays, computational fluid dynamic techniques are quite popular, but at an overwhelming computational cost. Consequently, methods like the unsteady vortex-lattice method (UVLM) became the workhorses for many simulation environments. Then, numerous UVLM-based codes using diverse numerical schemes, enhanced by several add-ons and implemented following different programming paradigms, were available in the literature. However, there is no set of benchmark cases intended for the systematic verification of those codes relying on the UVLM. Therefore, we provide six fully reproducible benchmark cases that can be used for such an end. We also describe two in-house UVLM-based codes that are well suited for aerodynamic simulations and for being encapsulated as an aerodynamic engine within partitioned aeroelastic simulation schemes. Because both codes follow radically different implementation philosophies, these represent excellent candidates to undergo the series of benchmark cases proposed. The work is completed by providing a valuable dataset and comparison criteria to measure to what extent two or more codes are in agreement. Along this path, for very first time, we use a comparison strategy to contrast free-wake methods based on the Hausdorff distance.Fil: Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Ceballos, Luis Ramon. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Hente, Christian. Leibniz Universitat Hannover.; AlemaniaFil: Roccia, Bruno Antonio. University Of Bergen. Faculty Of Mathematics And Natural Sciencies; Noruega. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Gebhardt, Cristian Guillermo. University Of Bergen. Faculty Of Mathematics And Natural Sciencies; Noruega. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaAmer Inst Aeronaut Astronaut2023-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/226627Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo; Ceballos, Luis Ramon; Hente, Christian; Roccia, Bruno Antonio; Gebhardt, Cristian Guillermo; Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method; Amer Inst Aeronaut Astronaut; Journal Of Aerospace Computing Information And Communication; 20; 11; 8-2023; 719-7461940-3151CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2514/1.I011184info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.I011184info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:48:00Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/226627instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:48:00.875CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method
title Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method
spellingShingle Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method
Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo
Aerodynamic Characteristics
Vortex Filaments
Software Verification and Validation
Unsteady Aerodynamics
title_short Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method
title_full Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method
title_fullStr Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method
title_full_unstemmed Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method
title_sort Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo
Ceballos, Luis Ramon
Hente, Christian
Roccia, Bruno Antonio
Gebhardt, Cristian Guillermo
author Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo
author_facet Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo
Ceballos, Luis Ramon
Hente, Christian
Roccia, Bruno Antonio
Gebhardt, Cristian Guillermo
author_role author
author2 Ceballos, Luis Ramon
Hente, Christian
Roccia, Bruno Antonio
Gebhardt, Cristian Guillermo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Aerodynamic Characteristics
Vortex Filaments
Software Verification and Validation
Unsteady Aerodynamics
topic Aerodynamic Characteristics
Vortex Filaments
Software Verification and Validation
Unsteady Aerodynamics
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Reliable aerodynamic and aeroelastic simulations of advanced aeronautical/mechanical systems require us to predict flow-induced forces as accurately as possible. Nowadays, computational fluid dynamic techniques are quite popular, but at an overwhelming computational cost. Consequently, methods like the unsteady vortex-lattice method (UVLM) became the workhorses for many simulation environments. Then, numerous UVLM-based codes using diverse numerical schemes, enhanced by several add-ons and implemented following different programming paradigms, were available in the literature. However, there is no set of benchmark cases intended for the systematic verification of those codes relying on the UVLM. Therefore, we provide six fully reproducible benchmark cases that can be used for such an end. We also describe two in-house UVLM-based codes that are well suited for aerodynamic simulations and for being encapsulated as an aerodynamic engine within partitioned aeroelastic simulation schemes. Because both codes follow radically different implementation philosophies, these represent excellent candidates to undergo the series of benchmark cases proposed. The work is completed by providing a valuable dataset and comparison criteria to measure to what extent two or more codes are in agreement. Along this path, for very first time, we use a comparison strategy to contrast free-wake methods based on the Hausdorff distance.
Fil: Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Ceballos, Luis Ramon. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Hente, Christian. Leibniz Universitat Hannover.; Alemania
Fil: Roccia, Bruno Antonio. University Of Bergen. Faculty Of Mathematics And Natural Sciencies; Noruega. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gebhardt, Cristian Guillermo. University Of Bergen. Faculty Of Mathematics And Natural Sciencies; Noruega. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Reliable aerodynamic and aeroelastic simulations of advanced aeronautical/mechanical systems require us to predict flow-induced forces as accurately as possible. Nowadays, computational fluid dynamic techniques are quite popular, but at an overwhelming computational cost. Consequently, methods like the unsteady vortex-lattice method (UVLM) became the workhorses for many simulation environments. Then, numerous UVLM-based codes using diverse numerical schemes, enhanced by several add-ons and implemented following different programming paradigms, were available in the literature. However, there is no set of benchmark cases intended for the systematic verification of those codes relying on the UVLM. Therefore, we provide six fully reproducible benchmark cases that can be used for such an end. We also describe two in-house UVLM-based codes that are well suited for aerodynamic simulations and for being encapsulated as an aerodynamic engine within partitioned aeroelastic simulation schemes. Because both codes follow radically different implementation philosophies, these represent excellent candidates to undergo the series of benchmark cases proposed. The work is completed by providing a valuable dataset and comparison criteria to measure to what extent two or more codes are in agreement. Along this path, for very first time, we use a comparison strategy to contrast free-wake methods based on the Hausdorff distance.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/226627
Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo; Ceballos, Luis Ramon; Hente, Christian; Roccia, Bruno Antonio; Gebhardt, Cristian Guillermo; Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method; Amer Inst Aeronaut Astronaut; Journal Of Aerospace Computing Information And Communication; 20; 11; 8-2023; 719-746
1940-3151
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/226627
identifier_str_mv Verstraete, Marcos Leonardo; Ceballos, Luis Ramon; Hente, Christian; Roccia, Bruno Antonio; Gebhardt, Cristian Guillermo; Code-to-Code Benchmark for Simulation Tools Based on the Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method; Amer Inst Aeronaut Astronaut; Journal Of Aerospace Computing Information And Communication; 20; 11; 8-2023; 719-746
1940-3151
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2514/1.I011184
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.I011184
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Inst Aeronaut Astronaut
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Inst Aeronaut Astronaut
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268896572211200
score 12.885934

Publicaciones similares