El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino
- Autores
- Ocampo, Fernanda
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The so-called 'intellectus essentiae argument' has constituted one of the resources of some 13th century authors, to establish the 'real distinction' between essence and being in every creature. This argument is also present in Aquinas' De Ente et Essentia, a work in which, the philosopher is believed to have tried to demonstrate the 'real distinction or composition' as well. Now, it is precisely the meaning and scope of this argument regarding the demonstration of the 'real distinction' in Thomas' argumentation that has been object of recent debate among specialists. In this sense, we intend in this article to first expose the argument in the context of the work to which it belongs, then concentrate on the opinions of the different commentators, and finally outline our conclusions based on the interpretations we consider the most accurate.
Fil: Ocampo, Fernanda. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Centro de Estudios de Filosofía Medieval; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
BEING
DE ENTE ET ESSENTIA
ESSENCE
INTELLECTUS ESSENTIAE ARGUMENT
METAPHYSICS
REAL DISTINCTION
THOMAS AQUINAS
THOMISM - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/176845
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_1b674467a2bb33cbcd2cd06da39906d8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/176845 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de AquinoThe debate on the 'Intellectus essentiae argument' and the 'real distinction' between essence and being in the de ente et essentia by Thomas aquinasOcampo, FernandaBEINGDE ENTE ET ESSENTIAESSENCEINTELLECTUS ESSENTIAE ARGUMENTMETAPHYSICSREAL DISTINCTIONTHOMAS AQUINASTHOMISMhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The so-called 'intellectus essentiae argument' has constituted one of the resources of some 13th century authors, to establish the 'real distinction' between essence and being in every creature. This argument is also present in Aquinas' De Ente et Essentia, a work in which, the philosopher is believed to have tried to demonstrate the 'real distinction or composition' as well. Now, it is precisely the meaning and scope of this argument regarding the demonstration of the 'real distinction' in Thomas' argumentation that has been object of recent debate among specialists. In this sense, we intend in this article to first expose the argument in the context of the work to which it belongs, then concentrate on the opinions of the different commentators, and finally outline our conclusions based on the interpretations we consider the most accurate.Fil: Ocampo, Fernanda. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Centro de Estudios de Filosofía Medieval; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaInternational Étienne Gilson Society2018-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/176845Ocampo, Fernanda; El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino; International Étienne Gilson Society; Studia Gilsoniana; 7; 2; 6-2018; 237-2612300-0066CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.gilsonsociety.com/files/237-261-Ocampo.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ 10.26385/SG.070211info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:03:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/176845instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:03:11.785CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino The debate on the 'Intellectus essentiae argument' and the 'real distinction' between essence and being in the de ente et essentia by Thomas aquinas |
title |
El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino |
spellingShingle |
El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino Ocampo, Fernanda BEING DE ENTE ET ESSENTIA ESSENCE INTELLECTUS ESSENTIAE ARGUMENT METAPHYSICS REAL DISTINCTION THOMAS AQUINAS THOMISM |
title_short |
El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino |
title_full |
El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino |
title_fullStr |
El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino |
title_full_unstemmed |
El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino |
title_sort |
El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ocampo, Fernanda |
author |
Ocampo, Fernanda |
author_facet |
Ocampo, Fernanda |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
BEING DE ENTE ET ESSENTIA ESSENCE INTELLECTUS ESSENTIAE ARGUMENT METAPHYSICS REAL DISTINCTION THOMAS AQUINAS THOMISM |
topic |
BEING DE ENTE ET ESSENTIA ESSENCE INTELLECTUS ESSENTIAE ARGUMENT METAPHYSICS REAL DISTINCTION THOMAS AQUINAS THOMISM |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The so-called 'intellectus essentiae argument' has constituted one of the resources of some 13th century authors, to establish the 'real distinction' between essence and being in every creature. This argument is also present in Aquinas' De Ente et Essentia, a work in which, the philosopher is believed to have tried to demonstrate the 'real distinction or composition' as well. Now, it is precisely the meaning and scope of this argument regarding the demonstration of the 'real distinction' in Thomas' argumentation that has been object of recent debate among specialists. In this sense, we intend in this article to first expose the argument in the context of the work to which it belongs, then concentrate on the opinions of the different commentators, and finally outline our conclusions based on the interpretations we consider the most accurate. Fil: Ocampo, Fernanda. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Centro de Estudios de Filosofía Medieval; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
The so-called 'intellectus essentiae argument' has constituted one of the resources of some 13th century authors, to establish the 'real distinction' between essence and being in every creature. This argument is also present in Aquinas' De Ente et Essentia, a work in which, the philosopher is believed to have tried to demonstrate the 'real distinction or composition' as well. Now, it is precisely the meaning and scope of this argument regarding the demonstration of the 'real distinction' in Thomas' argumentation that has been object of recent debate among specialists. In this sense, we intend in this article to first expose the argument in the context of the work to which it belongs, then concentrate on the opinions of the different commentators, and finally outline our conclusions based on the interpretations we consider the most accurate. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/176845 Ocampo, Fernanda; El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino; International Étienne Gilson Society; Studia Gilsoniana; 7; 2; 6-2018; 237-261 2300-0066 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/176845 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ocampo, Fernanda; El debate en torno al 'argumento del intellectus essentiae' y la 'distinción real' entre la esencia y el ser en el 'De ente et essentia' de Tomás de Aquino; International Étienne Gilson Society; Studia Gilsoniana; 7; 2; 6-2018; 237-261 2300-0066 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.gilsonsociety.com/files/237-261-Ocampo.pdf info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ 10.26385/SG.070211 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International Étienne Gilson Society |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International Étienne Gilson Society |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269787257831424 |
score |
13.13397 |