Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation
- Autores
- Lacalle, Rafael G.; Aparicio, Juan Daniel; Artetxe, Unai; Urionabarrenetxea, Erik; Polti, Marta Alejandra; Soto, Manuel; Garbisu, Carlos; Becerril, José M.
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Gentle Remediation Options (GROs), such as biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation, are cost-effective and environmentally-friendly solutions for soils simultaneously polluted with organic and inorganic compounds. This study assessed the individual and combined effectiveness of GROs in recovering the health of a soil artificially polluted with hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] and lindane. A greenhouse experiment was performed using organically-amended vs. non-amended mixed polluted soils. All soils received the following treatments: (i) no treatment; (ii) bioaugmentation with an actinobacteria consortium; (iii) vermiremediation with Eisenia fetida; (iv) phytoremediation with Brassica napus; (v) bioaugmentation + vermiremediation; (vi) bioaugmentation + phytoremediation; and (vii) bioaugmentation + vermiremediation + phytoremediation. Soil health recovery was determined based on Cr(VI) and lindane concentrations, microbial properties and toxicity bioassays with plants and worms. Cr(VI) pollution caused high toxicity, but some GROs were able to partly recover soil health: (i) the organic amendment decreased Cr(VI) concentrations, alleviating toxicity; (ii) the actinobacteria consortium was effective at removing both Cr(VI) and lindane; (iii) B. napus and E. fetida had a positive effect on the removal of pollutants and improved microbial properties. The combination of the organic amendment, B. napus, E. fetida and the actinobacteria consortium was the most effective strategy.
Fil: Lacalle, Rafael G.. Universidad del País Vasco; España
Fil: Aparicio, Juan Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina
Fil: Artetxe, Unai. Universidad del País Vasco; España
Fil: Urionabarrenetxea, Erik. Universidad del País Vasco; España
Fil: Polti, Marta Alejandra. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina
Fil: Soto, Manuel. Universidad del País Vasco; España
Fil: Garbisu, Carlos. Centro de Investigación. Neiker - Tecnalia; España
Fil: Becerril, José M.. Universidad del País Vasco; España - Materia
-
ACTINOBACTERIA
BIOREMEDIATION
BRASSICA NAPUS
CHEMISTRY
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION
ECOTOXICITY
EISENIA FETIDA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
METAL POLLUTION
MICROBIOLOGY
ORGANIC AMENDMENT
PHYTOMANAGEMENT
SOIL BIOLOGY
SOIL CHEMISTRY
SOIL HEALTH
SOIL MICROBIOLOGY
SOIL POLLUTION
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/118685
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_1aa836adc84b6c48d30f1addad677429 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/118685 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediationLacalle, Rafael G.Aparicio, Juan DanielArtetxe, UnaiUrionabarrenetxea, ErikPolti, Marta AlejandraSoto, ManuelGarbisu, CarlosBecerril, José M.ACTINOBACTERIABIOREMEDIATIONBRASSICA NAPUSCHEMISTRYECOLOGICAL RESTORATIONECOTOXICITYEISENIA FETIDAENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRYENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTIONENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCEMETAL POLLUTIONMICROBIOLOGYORGANIC AMENDMENTPHYTOMANAGEMENTSOIL BIOLOGYSOIL CHEMISTRYSOIL HEALTHSOIL MICROBIOLOGYSOIL POLLUTIONSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.8https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2Gentle Remediation Options (GROs), such as biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation, are cost-effective and environmentally-friendly solutions for soils simultaneously polluted with organic and inorganic compounds. This study assessed the individual and combined effectiveness of GROs in recovering the health of a soil artificially polluted with hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] and lindane. A greenhouse experiment was performed using organically-amended vs. non-amended mixed polluted soils. All soils received the following treatments: (i) no treatment; (ii) bioaugmentation with an actinobacteria consortium; (iii) vermiremediation with Eisenia fetida; (iv) phytoremediation with Brassica napus; (v) bioaugmentation + vermiremediation; (vi) bioaugmentation + phytoremediation; and (vii) bioaugmentation + vermiremediation + phytoremediation. Soil health recovery was determined based on Cr(VI) and lindane concentrations, microbial properties and toxicity bioassays with plants and worms. Cr(VI) pollution caused high toxicity, but some GROs were able to partly recover soil health: (i) the organic amendment decreased Cr(VI) concentrations, alleviating toxicity; (ii) the actinobacteria consortium was effective at removing both Cr(VI) and lindane; (iii) B. napus and E. fetida had a positive effect on the removal of pollutants and improved microbial properties. The combination of the organic amendment, B. napus, E. fetida and the actinobacteria consortium was the most effective strategy.Fil: Lacalle, Rafael G.. Universidad del País Vasco; EspañaFil: Aparicio, Juan Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; ArgentinaFil: Artetxe, Unai. Universidad del País Vasco; EspañaFil: Urionabarrenetxea, Erik. Universidad del País Vasco; EspañaFil: Polti, Marta Alejandra. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; ArgentinaFil: Soto, Manuel. Universidad del País Vasco; EspañaFil: Garbisu, Carlos. Centro de Investigación. Neiker - Tecnalia; EspañaFil: Becerril, José M.. Universidad del País Vasco; EspañaElsevier Ltd2020-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/118685Lacalle, Rafael G.; Aparicio, Juan Daniel; Artetxe, Unai; Urionabarrenetxea, Erik; Polti, Marta Alejandra; et al.; Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation; Elsevier Ltd; Heliyon; 6; 8; 8-20202405-8440CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04550info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(20)31394-3?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2405844020313943%3Fshowall%3Dtrueinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:42:37Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/118685instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:42:37.926CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation |
title |
Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation |
spellingShingle |
Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation Lacalle, Rafael G. ACTINOBACTERIA BIOREMEDIATION BRASSICA NAPUS CHEMISTRY ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION ECOTOXICITY EISENIA FETIDA ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE METAL POLLUTION MICROBIOLOGY ORGANIC AMENDMENT PHYTOMANAGEMENT SOIL BIOLOGY SOIL CHEMISTRY SOIL HEALTH SOIL MICROBIOLOGY SOIL POLLUTION SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT |
title_short |
Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation |
title_full |
Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation |
title_fullStr |
Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation |
title_sort |
Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Lacalle, Rafael G. Aparicio, Juan Daniel Artetxe, Unai Urionabarrenetxea, Erik Polti, Marta Alejandra Soto, Manuel Garbisu, Carlos Becerril, José M. |
author |
Lacalle, Rafael G. |
author_facet |
Lacalle, Rafael G. Aparicio, Juan Daniel Artetxe, Unai Urionabarrenetxea, Erik Polti, Marta Alejandra Soto, Manuel Garbisu, Carlos Becerril, José M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aparicio, Juan Daniel Artetxe, Unai Urionabarrenetxea, Erik Polti, Marta Alejandra Soto, Manuel Garbisu, Carlos Becerril, José M. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ACTINOBACTERIA BIOREMEDIATION BRASSICA NAPUS CHEMISTRY ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION ECOTOXICITY EISENIA FETIDA ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE METAL POLLUTION MICROBIOLOGY ORGANIC AMENDMENT PHYTOMANAGEMENT SOIL BIOLOGY SOIL CHEMISTRY SOIL HEALTH SOIL MICROBIOLOGY SOIL POLLUTION SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT |
topic |
ACTINOBACTERIA BIOREMEDIATION BRASSICA NAPUS CHEMISTRY ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION ECOTOXICITY EISENIA FETIDA ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE METAL POLLUTION MICROBIOLOGY ORGANIC AMENDMENT PHYTOMANAGEMENT SOIL BIOLOGY SOIL CHEMISTRY SOIL HEALTH SOIL MICROBIOLOGY SOIL POLLUTION SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.8 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Gentle Remediation Options (GROs), such as biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation, are cost-effective and environmentally-friendly solutions for soils simultaneously polluted with organic and inorganic compounds. This study assessed the individual and combined effectiveness of GROs in recovering the health of a soil artificially polluted with hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] and lindane. A greenhouse experiment was performed using organically-amended vs. non-amended mixed polluted soils. All soils received the following treatments: (i) no treatment; (ii) bioaugmentation with an actinobacteria consortium; (iii) vermiremediation with Eisenia fetida; (iv) phytoremediation with Brassica napus; (v) bioaugmentation + vermiremediation; (vi) bioaugmentation + phytoremediation; and (vii) bioaugmentation + vermiremediation + phytoremediation. Soil health recovery was determined based on Cr(VI) and lindane concentrations, microbial properties and toxicity bioassays with plants and worms. Cr(VI) pollution caused high toxicity, but some GROs were able to partly recover soil health: (i) the organic amendment decreased Cr(VI) concentrations, alleviating toxicity; (ii) the actinobacteria consortium was effective at removing both Cr(VI) and lindane; (iii) B. napus and E. fetida had a positive effect on the removal of pollutants and improved microbial properties. The combination of the organic amendment, B. napus, E. fetida and the actinobacteria consortium was the most effective strategy. Fil: Lacalle, Rafael G.. Universidad del País Vasco; España Fil: Aparicio, Juan Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina Fil: Artetxe, Unai. Universidad del País Vasco; España Fil: Urionabarrenetxea, Erik. Universidad del País Vasco; España Fil: Polti, Marta Alejandra. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos; Argentina Fil: Soto, Manuel. Universidad del País Vasco; España Fil: Garbisu, Carlos. Centro de Investigación. Neiker - Tecnalia; España Fil: Becerril, José M.. Universidad del País Vasco; España |
description |
Gentle Remediation Options (GROs), such as biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation, are cost-effective and environmentally-friendly solutions for soils simultaneously polluted with organic and inorganic compounds. This study assessed the individual and combined effectiveness of GROs in recovering the health of a soil artificially polluted with hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] and lindane. A greenhouse experiment was performed using organically-amended vs. non-amended mixed polluted soils. All soils received the following treatments: (i) no treatment; (ii) bioaugmentation with an actinobacteria consortium; (iii) vermiremediation with Eisenia fetida; (iv) phytoremediation with Brassica napus; (v) bioaugmentation + vermiremediation; (vi) bioaugmentation + phytoremediation; and (vii) bioaugmentation + vermiremediation + phytoremediation. Soil health recovery was determined based on Cr(VI) and lindane concentrations, microbial properties and toxicity bioassays with plants and worms. Cr(VI) pollution caused high toxicity, but some GROs were able to partly recover soil health: (i) the organic amendment decreased Cr(VI) concentrations, alleviating toxicity; (ii) the actinobacteria consortium was effective at removing both Cr(VI) and lindane; (iii) B. napus and E. fetida had a positive effect on the removal of pollutants and improved microbial properties. The combination of the organic amendment, B. napus, E. fetida and the actinobacteria consortium was the most effective strategy. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/118685 Lacalle, Rafael G.; Aparicio, Juan Daniel; Artetxe, Unai; Urionabarrenetxea, Erik; Polti, Marta Alejandra; et al.; Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation; Elsevier Ltd; Heliyon; 6; 8; 8-2020 2405-8440 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/118685 |
identifier_str_mv |
Lacalle, Rafael G.; Aparicio, Juan Daniel; Artetxe, Unai; Urionabarrenetxea, Erik; Polti, Marta Alejandra; et al.; Gentle remediation options for soil with mixed chromium (VI) and lindane pollution: biostimulation, bioaugmentation, phytoremediation and vermiremediation; Elsevier Ltd; Heliyon; 6; 8; 8-2020 2405-8440 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04550 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(20)31394-3?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2405844020313943%3Fshowall%3Dtrue |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614459234975744 |
score |
13.070432 |