Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandem...

Autores
Camargo, Andrés; Casiraghi, Leandro Pablo; Vargas, Rafael; Trujillo, Martha
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background:Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) represents a significant public health burden. Growing evidence suggests that psychological resilience (PR) may act as a protective factor against the development of PTSD. Trauma type may also influence the relationship between PR and PTSD. This meta-analytic study aims to assess the strength of this relationship by focusing on research conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic to avoid confounding effects introduced by the pandemic’s unique and widespread stressors.MethodsA comprehensive literature search for case–control studies published between 2008 and 2019 was performed. Studies conducted after 2019 were excluded to maintain methodological consistency and avoid the pandemic’s effects. Heterogeneity and sampling bias analyses were conducted, followed by pooled effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also included to investigate the effects of trauma type and age on the relationship between PR and PTSD.ResultsThirteen studies were selected for the analysis (n = 5689). The overall effect of the relationship between PR and PTSD was statistically significant (p < 0.001), with the robustness and stability of the results corroborated. Subgroup analyses showed a differential effect based on trauma type and age (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe results support the hypothesis that lower PR is associated with higher susceptibility to PTSD. Additionally, trauma type and age were found to be significant factors influencing this relationship. Our study’s cross-sectional design and the variability in the data reported by the studies limited the conclusions. Future research should aim to further explore these findings and investigate potential long-term effects of different trauma types.
Fil: Camargo, Andrés. Universidad Antonio Nariño; Colombia
Fil: Casiraghi, Leandro Pablo. Universidad de San Andrés. Escuela de Educación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Vargas, Rafael. Universidad Militar Nueva Granada; Colombia
Fil: Trujillo, Martha. Universidad Antonio Nariño; Colombia
Materia
ptsd
resilience
meta-analysis
COVID-19
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/266403
Acceder
id CONICETDig_190e98ed7096d79ec01641a9f875f0b3
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/266403
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemicCamargo, AndrésCasiraghi, Leandro PabloVargas, RafaelTrujillo, Marthaptsdresiliencemeta-analysisCOVID-19https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Background:Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) represents a significant public health burden. Growing evidence suggests that psychological resilience (PR) may act as a protective factor against the development of PTSD. Trauma type may also influence the relationship between PR and PTSD. This meta-analytic study aims to assess the strength of this relationship by focusing on research conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic to avoid confounding effects introduced by the pandemic’s unique and widespread stressors.MethodsA comprehensive literature search for case–control studies published between 2008 and 2019 was performed. Studies conducted after 2019 were excluded to maintain methodological consistency and avoid the pandemic’s effects. Heterogeneity and sampling bias analyses were conducted, followed by pooled effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also included to investigate the effects of trauma type and age on the relationship between PR and PTSD.ResultsThirteen studies were selected for the analysis (n = 5689). The overall effect of the relationship between PR and PTSD was statistically significant (p < 0.001), with the robustness and stability of the results corroborated. Subgroup analyses showed a differential effect based on trauma type and age (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe results support the hypothesis that lower PR is associated with higher susceptibility to PTSD. Additionally, trauma type and age were found to be significant factors influencing this relationship. Our study’s cross-sectional design and the variability in the data reported by the studies limited the conclusions. Future research should aim to further explore these findings and investigate potential long-term effects of different trauma types.Fil: Camargo, Andrés. Universidad Antonio Nariño; ColombiaFil: Casiraghi, Leandro Pablo. Universidad de San Andrés. Escuela de Educación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Vargas, Rafael. Universidad Militar Nueva Granada; ColombiaFil: Trujillo, Martha. Universidad Antonio Nariño; ColombiaSpringer2025-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/266403Camargo, Andrés; Casiraghi, Leandro Pablo; Vargas, Rafael; Trujillo, Martha; Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic; Springer; Middle East Current Psychiatry; 32; 1; 5-2025; 1-122090-5416CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://mecp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43045-025-00528-8info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s43045-025-00528-8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:32:13Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/266403instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:32:13.977CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic
title Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic
spellingShingle Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic
Camargo, Andrés
ptsd
resilience
meta-analysis
COVID-19
title_short Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Camargo, Andrés
Casiraghi, Leandro Pablo
Vargas, Rafael
Trujillo, Martha
author Camargo, Andrés
author_facet Camargo, Andrés
Casiraghi, Leandro Pablo
Vargas, Rafael
Trujillo, Martha
author_role author
author2 Casiraghi, Leandro Pablo
Vargas, Rafael
Trujillo, Martha
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ptsd
resilience
meta-analysis
COVID-19
topic ptsd
resilience
meta-analysis
COVID-19
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background:Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) represents a significant public health burden. Growing evidence suggests that psychological resilience (PR) may act as a protective factor against the development of PTSD. Trauma type may also influence the relationship between PR and PTSD. This meta-analytic study aims to assess the strength of this relationship by focusing on research conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic to avoid confounding effects introduced by the pandemic’s unique and widespread stressors.MethodsA comprehensive literature search for case–control studies published between 2008 and 2019 was performed. Studies conducted after 2019 were excluded to maintain methodological consistency and avoid the pandemic’s effects. Heterogeneity and sampling bias analyses were conducted, followed by pooled effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also included to investigate the effects of trauma type and age on the relationship between PR and PTSD.ResultsThirteen studies were selected for the analysis (n = 5689). The overall effect of the relationship between PR and PTSD was statistically significant (p < 0.001), with the robustness and stability of the results corroborated. Subgroup analyses showed a differential effect based on trauma type and age (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe results support the hypothesis that lower PR is associated with higher susceptibility to PTSD. Additionally, trauma type and age were found to be significant factors influencing this relationship. Our study’s cross-sectional design and the variability in the data reported by the studies limited the conclusions. Future research should aim to further explore these findings and investigate potential long-term effects of different trauma types.
Fil: Camargo, Andrés. Universidad Antonio Nariño; Colombia
Fil: Casiraghi, Leandro Pablo. Universidad de San Andrés. Escuela de Educación; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Vargas, Rafael. Universidad Militar Nueva Granada; Colombia
Fil: Trujillo, Martha. Universidad Antonio Nariño; Colombia
description Background:Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) represents a significant public health burden. Growing evidence suggests that psychological resilience (PR) may act as a protective factor against the development of PTSD. Trauma type may also influence the relationship between PR and PTSD. This meta-analytic study aims to assess the strength of this relationship by focusing on research conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic to avoid confounding effects introduced by the pandemic’s unique and widespread stressors.MethodsA comprehensive literature search for case–control studies published between 2008 and 2019 was performed. Studies conducted after 2019 were excluded to maintain methodological consistency and avoid the pandemic’s effects. Heterogeneity and sampling bias analyses were conducted, followed by pooled effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also included to investigate the effects of trauma type and age on the relationship between PR and PTSD.ResultsThirteen studies were selected for the analysis (n = 5689). The overall effect of the relationship between PR and PTSD was statistically significant (p < 0.001), with the robustness and stability of the results corroborated. Subgroup analyses showed a differential effect based on trauma type and age (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe results support the hypothesis that lower PR is associated with higher susceptibility to PTSD. Additionally, trauma type and age were found to be significant factors influencing this relationship. Our study’s cross-sectional design and the variability in the data reported by the studies limited the conclusions. Future research should aim to further explore these findings and investigate potential long-term effects of different trauma types.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/266403
Camargo, Andrés; Casiraghi, Leandro Pablo; Vargas, Rafael; Trujillo, Martha; Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic; Springer; Middle East Current Psychiatry; 32; 1; 5-2025; 1-12
2090-5416
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/266403
identifier_str_mv Camargo, Andrés; Casiraghi, Leandro Pablo; Vargas, Rafael; Trujillo, Martha; Psychological resilience and post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of intentional and unintentional trauma before the COVID-19 pandemic; Springer; Middle East Current Psychiatry; 32; 1; 5-2025; 1-12
2090-5416
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://mecp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43045-025-00528-8
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s43045-025-00528-8
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614335455821824
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares