Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska

Autores
Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz; Mamo, Martha; Schacht, Walter; McCallister, Dennis; Sutton, Pamela
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
As a precautionary principle, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit establishes that the primary pollutant in concrete grinding residue (CGR) is its alkalinity and restricts CGR roadside discharge to 11 Mg ha-1 or the agronomic liming rate, whichever is lower. We evaluated the effect of CGR application on roadside soil chemical properties, existing vegetation, and rainfall runoff. Five CGR rates (0, 11, 22, 45, and 90 dry Mg ha-1) were tested on roadsides slopes at two different locations in eastern Nebraska. Vegetation, soil, and runoff characteristics were evaluated before CGR application and 30 d and 1 yr after CGR application. Soil pH of control plots averaged 8.3 and 8.5 for each site respectively, across depths and slope positions, thus not requiring any liming for agronomic purposes. Soil electrical conductivity (EC, 1:1) averages of control plots were 0.79 and 1.24 dS m-1 across depths and slope positions. In the short term (30 d) the highest CGR application affected the 0- to 7.5-cm soil depth by increasing soil extractable Ca (21 and 25% for each site, respectively), soil pH (0.2, south site), and soil EC (0.2 dS m-1) compared with the control. However, these changes in soil did not persist 1 yr after CGR application. The pH buffering capacity of soil prevented post-CGR-application pH from exceeding 8.9, even at the highest application rate. Application of CGR did not produce any differences in biomass production, botanical composition, and runoff characteristics at either site. From our study, CGR up to ~90 dry Mg ha-1-about the amount produced during diamond grinding operations-can be one-time applied to roadside soils of similar characteristics on already established vegetation.
Fil: Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina
Fil: Mamo, Martha. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Schacht, Walter. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: McCallister, Dennis. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sutton, Pamela. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Materia
Concrete Grinding Residue Application
Soil pollution
Vegetation response
Runoff
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/98856
Acceder
id CONICETDig_114e35ae16b37cad022c1f0856465e77
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/98856
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraskaWingeyer, Ana BeatrizMamo, MarthaSchacht, WalterMcCallister, DennisSutton, PamelaConcrete Grinding Residue ApplicationSoil pollutionVegetation responseRunoffhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4As a precautionary principle, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit establishes that the primary pollutant in concrete grinding residue (CGR) is its alkalinity and restricts CGR roadside discharge to 11 Mg ha-1 or the agronomic liming rate, whichever is lower. We evaluated the effect of CGR application on roadside soil chemical properties, existing vegetation, and rainfall runoff. Five CGR rates (0, 11, 22, 45, and 90 dry Mg ha-1) were tested on roadsides slopes at two different locations in eastern Nebraska. Vegetation, soil, and runoff characteristics were evaluated before CGR application and 30 d and 1 yr after CGR application. Soil pH of control plots averaged 8.3 and 8.5 for each site respectively, across depths and slope positions, thus not requiring any liming for agronomic purposes. Soil electrical conductivity (EC, 1:1) averages of control plots were 0.79 and 1.24 dS m-1 across depths and slope positions. In the short term (30 d) the highest CGR application affected the 0- to 7.5-cm soil depth by increasing soil extractable Ca (21 and 25% for each site, respectively), soil pH (0.2, south site), and soil EC (0.2 dS m-1) compared with the control. However, these changes in soil did not persist 1 yr after CGR application. The pH buffering capacity of soil prevented post-CGR-application pH from exceeding 8.9, even at the highest application rate. Application of CGR did not produce any differences in biomass production, botanical composition, and runoff characteristics at either site. From our study, CGR up to ~90 dry Mg ha-1-about the amount produced during diamond grinding operations-can be one-time applied to roadside soils of similar characteristics on already established vegetation.Fil: Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; ArgentinaFil: Mamo, Martha. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosFil: Schacht, Walter. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosFil: McCallister, Dennis. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosFil: Sutton, Pamela. University of Nebraska; Estados UnidosAmerican Society of Agronomy2018-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/98856Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz; Mamo, Martha; Schacht, Walter; McCallister, Dennis; Sutton, Pamela; Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska; American Society of Agronomy; Journal of Environmental Quality; 47; 3; 5-2018; 554-5610047-2425CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/jeq/abstracts/47/3/554info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2134/jeq2017.11.0459info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:06:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/98856instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:06:25.658CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska
title Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska
spellingShingle Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska
Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz
Concrete Grinding Residue Application
Soil pollution
Vegetation response
Runoff
title_short Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska
title_full Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska
title_fullStr Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska
title_full_unstemmed Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska
title_sort Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz
Mamo, Martha
Schacht, Walter
McCallister, Dennis
Sutton, Pamela
author Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz
author_facet Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz
Mamo, Martha
Schacht, Walter
McCallister, Dennis
Sutton, Pamela
author_role author
author2 Mamo, Martha
Schacht, Walter
McCallister, Dennis
Sutton, Pamela
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Concrete Grinding Residue Application
Soil pollution
Vegetation response
Runoff
topic Concrete Grinding Residue Application
Soil pollution
Vegetation response
Runoff
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv As a precautionary principle, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit establishes that the primary pollutant in concrete grinding residue (CGR) is its alkalinity and restricts CGR roadside discharge to 11 Mg ha-1 or the agronomic liming rate, whichever is lower. We evaluated the effect of CGR application on roadside soil chemical properties, existing vegetation, and rainfall runoff. Five CGR rates (0, 11, 22, 45, and 90 dry Mg ha-1) were tested on roadsides slopes at two different locations in eastern Nebraska. Vegetation, soil, and runoff characteristics were evaluated before CGR application and 30 d and 1 yr after CGR application. Soil pH of control plots averaged 8.3 and 8.5 for each site respectively, across depths and slope positions, thus not requiring any liming for agronomic purposes. Soil electrical conductivity (EC, 1:1) averages of control plots were 0.79 and 1.24 dS m-1 across depths and slope positions. In the short term (30 d) the highest CGR application affected the 0- to 7.5-cm soil depth by increasing soil extractable Ca (21 and 25% for each site, respectively), soil pH (0.2, south site), and soil EC (0.2 dS m-1) compared with the control. However, these changes in soil did not persist 1 yr after CGR application. The pH buffering capacity of soil prevented post-CGR-application pH from exceeding 8.9, even at the highest application rate. Application of CGR did not produce any differences in biomass production, botanical composition, and runoff characteristics at either site. From our study, CGR up to ~90 dry Mg ha-1-about the amount produced during diamond grinding operations-can be one-time applied to roadside soils of similar characteristics on already established vegetation.
Fil: Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina
Fil: Mamo, Martha. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Schacht, Walter. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: McCallister, Dennis. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sutton, Pamela. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
description As a precautionary principle, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit establishes that the primary pollutant in concrete grinding residue (CGR) is its alkalinity and restricts CGR roadside discharge to 11 Mg ha-1 or the agronomic liming rate, whichever is lower. We evaluated the effect of CGR application on roadside soil chemical properties, existing vegetation, and rainfall runoff. Five CGR rates (0, 11, 22, 45, and 90 dry Mg ha-1) were tested on roadsides slopes at two different locations in eastern Nebraska. Vegetation, soil, and runoff characteristics were evaluated before CGR application and 30 d and 1 yr after CGR application. Soil pH of control plots averaged 8.3 and 8.5 for each site respectively, across depths and slope positions, thus not requiring any liming for agronomic purposes. Soil electrical conductivity (EC, 1:1) averages of control plots were 0.79 and 1.24 dS m-1 across depths and slope positions. In the short term (30 d) the highest CGR application affected the 0- to 7.5-cm soil depth by increasing soil extractable Ca (21 and 25% for each site, respectively), soil pH (0.2, south site), and soil EC (0.2 dS m-1) compared with the control. However, these changes in soil did not persist 1 yr after CGR application. The pH buffering capacity of soil prevented post-CGR-application pH from exceeding 8.9, even at the highest application rate. Application of CGR did not produce any differences in biomass production, botanical composition, and runoff characteristics at either site. From our study, CGR up to ~90 dry Mg ha-1-about the amount produced during diamond grinding operations-can be one-time applied to roadside soils of similar characteristics on already established vegetation.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/98856
Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz; Mamo, Martha; Schacht, Walter; McCallister, Dennis; Sutton, Pamela; Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska; American Society of Agronomy; Journal of Environmental Quality; 47; 3; 5-2018; 554-561
0047-2425
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/98856
identifier_str_mv Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz; Mamo, Martha; Schacht, Walter; McCallister, Dennis; Sutton, Pamela; Vegetation and soil responses to concrete grinding residue application on highway roadsides of eastern nebraska; American Society of Agronomy; Journal of Environmental Quality; 47; 3; 5-2018; 554-561
0047-2425
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/jeq/abstracts/47/3/554
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2134/jeq2017.11.0459
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Society of Agronomy
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Society of Agronomy
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846781362226331648
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares