Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment

Autores
Venerus, Leonardo Ariel; Irigoyen, Alejo Joaquin; Parma, Ana Maria
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Several flexible methods for estimating tag loss rates through mark-resight data have been developed recently. They allow evaluation of different tag shedding modalities and relax the usual assumption of independence between the loss of tags made in classical double-tagging methods. Two conditions limit the applicability of these methods: (1) tagged individuals must have permanent marks so that they can still be identified after losing their tags, and (2) a large number of observations is required to obtain precise estimates. Here we evaluate the performance of alternative estimators of tag shedding rates when these conditions are not met, a situation that is very common in mark-resight experiments on reef fishes. We simulated resighting data using a simple exponential model of tag shedding under different scenarios created by varying the probabilities of fish detection and fish emigration from the reef, and the tagging schedule. The model was conditioned on actual data from a short-term double-tagging study conducted on the Argentine sandperch Pseudopercis semifasciata(Cuvier 1829) in rocky reefs of northern Patagonia. We tested eight estimation procedures: three variants of an individual-based method, two based on a binomial likelihood function for exact or pooled times-at-liberty data, and three regression methods. Although the individual-based approach produced unbiased and most precise estimates when individuals that had lost both tags were identifiable, it performed poorly in the absence of permanent tags. In contrast, conditional methods, which do not require identification of individuals that have lost both tags, were more robust, providing unbiased and precise estimates. The pros and cons of the different methods for analyzing small-scale mark-resight experiments are discussed.
Fil: Venerus, Leonardo Ariel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Irigoyen, Alejo Joaquin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Parma, Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Materia
Tag Loss Estimation Methods
Pseudopercis Semifasciata
Rocky Reef Fish
Small-Scale Tagging Studies
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5341

id CONICETDig_10669adcb057bd248e8752d0d4f7c330
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5341
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experimentVenerus, Leonardo ArielIrigoyen, Alejo JoaquinParma, Ana MariaTag Loss Estimation MethodsPseudopercis SemifasciataRocky Reef FishSmall-Scale Tagging Studieshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Several flexible methods for estimating tag loss rates through mark-resight data have been developed recently. They allow evaluation of different tag shedding modalities and relax the usual assumption of independence between the loss of tags made in classical double-tagging methods. Two conditions limit the applicability of these methods: (1) tagged individuals must have permanent marks so that they can still be identified after losing their tags, and (2) a large number of observations is required to obtain precise estimates. Here we evaluate the performance of alternative estimators of tag shedding rates when these conditions are not met, a situation that is very common in mark-resight experiments on reef fishes. We simulated resighting data using a simple exponential model of tag shedding under different scenarios created by varying the probabilities of fish detection and fish emigration from the reef, and the tagging schedule. The model was conditioned on actual data from a short-term double-tagging study conducted on the Argentine sandperch Pseudopercis semifasciata(Cuvier 1829) in rocky reefs of northern Patagonia. We tested eight estimation procedures: three variants of an individual-based method, two based on a binomial likelihood function for exact or pooled times-at-liberty data, and three regression methods. Although the individual-based approach produced unbiased and most precise estimates when individuals that had lost both tags were identifiable, it performed poorly in the absence of permanent tags. In contrast, conditional methods, which do not require identification of individuals that have lost both tags, were more robust, providing unbiased and precise estimates. The pros and cons of the different methods for analyzing small-scale mark-resight experiments are discussed.Fil: Venerus, Leonardo Ariel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Irigoyen, Alejo Joaquin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Parma, Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaElsevier2013-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/5341Venerus, Leonardo Ariel; Irigoyen, Alejo Joaquin; Parma, Ana Maria; Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment; Elsevier; Fisheries Research; 140; 1-2013; 133-1480165-7836enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783613000039info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.12.015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:35:27Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5341instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:35:27.324CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment
title Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment
spellingShingle Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment
Venerus, Leonardo Ariel
Tag Loss Estimation Methods
Pseudopercis Semifasciata
Rocky Reef Fish
Small-Scale Tagging Studies
title_short Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment
title_full Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment
title_fullStr Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment
title_sort Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Venerus, Leonardo Ariel
Irigoyen, Alejo Joaquin
Parma, Ana Maria
author Venerus, Leonardo Ariel
author_facet Venerus, Leonardo Ariel
Irigoyen, Alejo Joaquin
Parma, Ana Maria
author_role author
author2 Irigoyen, Alejo Joaquin
Parma, Ana Maria
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Tag Loss Estimation Methods
Pseudopercis Semifasciata
Rocky Reef Fish
Small-Scale Tagging Studies
topic Tag Loss Estimation Methods
Pseudopercis Semifasciata
Rocky Reef Fish
Small-Scale Tagging Studies
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Several flexible methods for estimating tag loss rates through mark-resight data have been developed recently. They allow evaluation of different tag shedding modalities and relax the usual assumption of independence between the loss of tags made in classical double-tagging methods. Two conditions limit the applicability of these methods: (1) tagged individuals must have permanent marks so that they can still be identified after losing their tags, and (2) a large number of observations is required to obtain precise estimates. Here we evaluate the performance of alternative estimators of tag shedding rates when these conditions are not met, a situation that is very common in mark-resight experiments on reef fishes. We simulated resighting data using a simple exponential model of tag shedding under different scenarios created by varying the probabilities of fish detection and fish emigration from the reef, and the tagging schedule. The model was conditioned on actual data from a short-term double-tagging study conducted on the Argentine sandperch Pseudopercis semifasciata(Cuvier 1829) in rocky reefs of northern Patagonia. We tested eight estimation procedures: three variants of an individual-based method, two based on a binomial likelihood function for exact or pooled times-at-liberty data, and three regression methods. Although the individual-based approach produced unbiased and most precise estimates when individuals that had lost both tags were identifiable, it performed poorly in the absence of permanent tags. In contrast, conditional methods, which do not require identification of individuals that have lost both tags, were more robust, providing unbiased and precise estimates. The pros and cons of the different methods for analyzing small-scale mark-resight experiments are discussed.
Fil: Venerus, Leonardo Ariel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Irigoyen, Alejo Joaquin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Parma, Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
description Several flexible methods for estimating tag loss rates through mark-resight data have been developed recently. They allow evaluation of different tag shedding modalities and relax the usual assumption of independence between the loss of tags made in classical double-tagging methods. Two conditions limit the applicability of these methods: (1) tagged individuals must have permanent marks so that they can still be identified after losing their tags, and (2) a large number of observations is required to obtain precise estimates. Here we evaluate the performance of alternative estimators of tag shedding rates when these conditions are not met, a situation that is very common in mark-resight experiments on reef fishes. We simulated resighting data using a simple exponential model of tag shedding under different scenarios created by varying the probabilities of fish detection and fish emigration from the reef, and the tagging schedule. The model was conditioned on actual data from a short-term double-tagging study conducted on the Argentine sandperch Pseudopercis semifasciata(Cuvier 1829) in rocky reefs of northern Patagonia. We tested eight estimation procedures: three variants of an individual-based method, two based on a binomial likelihood function for exact or pooled times-at-liberty data, and three regression methods. Although the individual-based approach produced unbiased and most precise estimates when individuals that had lost both tags were identifiable, it performed poorly in the absence of permanent tags. In contrast, conditional methods, which do not require identification of individuals that have lost both tags, were more robust, providing unbiased and precise estimates. The pros and cons of the different methods for analyzing small-scale mark-resight experiments are discussed.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/5341
Venerus, Leonardo Ariel; Irigoyen, Alejo Joaquin; Parma, Ana Maria; Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment; Elsevier; Fisheries Research; 140; 1-2013; 133-148
0165-7836
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/5341
identifier_str_mv Venerus, Leonardo Ariel; Irigoyen, Alejo Joaquin; Parma, Ana Maria; Assessment of biases in the estimation of tag shedding rates through a mark-resight experiment; Elsevier; Fisheries Research; 140; 1-2013; 133-148
0165-7836
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783613000039
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.12.015
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613104481075200
score 13.070432