Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology

Autores
Burgos, Lucrecia María; Alves de Lima, Alberto Enrique; Parodi, Maria Josefina; Costabel, Juan Pablo; Ganiele, María de Las Nieves; Durante, Eduardo Héctor; Arceo, Maria Dolores; Gelpi, Ricardo Jorge
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Introduction: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) model can be useful to evaluate non-cognitive domains and guide the selection process in medical residency programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and acceptability of the MMI model for the selection of residents in a cardiology residency program. Methods: We conducted an observational and prospective study. It was performed in a tertiary-care center specialized in cardiology and included candidates for the cardiology residency program in March 2018. Ten stations were developed to evaluate different non-cognitive domains. Reliability was evaluated by the generalizability G coefficient. Candidates and interviewers were surveyed to evaluate the acceptability of the MMI model. Results: Nine faculty members were trained and 22 candidates were evaluated. The G study showed a relative G coefficient between 0.56 and 0.73, according to the design. 91% of the candidates stated that they preferred MMI over other types of interviews as a selection method for admission to the residency program, and all the interviewers considered they had enough time to evaluate the candidates and their strengths as future residents. Conclusion: The MMI is a reliable model to evaluate candidates for a residency program in cardiology with high acceptability among residents and observers.
Fil: Burgos, Lucrecia María. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Alves de Lima, Alberto Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Parodi, Maria Josefina. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Costabel, Juan Pablo. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Ganiele, María de Las Nieves. Instituto Universidad Escuela de Medicina del Hospital Italiano; Argentina
Fil: Durante, Eduardo Héctor. Instituto Universidad Escuela de Medicina del Hospital Italiano; Argentina
Fil: Arceo, Maria Dolores. Instituto Universidad Escuela de Medicina del Hospital Italiano; Argentina
Fil: Gelpi, Ricardo Jorge. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
CARDIOLOGY
INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY
MEDICAL EDUCATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/173267
Acceder
id CONICETDig_0cf258eebdc675390aff38d9a52a632a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/173267
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiologyBurgos, Lucrecia MaríaAlves de Lima, Alberto EnriqueParodi, Maria JosefinaCostabel, Juan PabloGaniele, María de Las NievesDurante, Eduardo HéctorArceo, Maria DoloresGelpi, Ricardo JorgeCARDIOLOGYINTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCYMEDICAL EDUCATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Introduction: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) model can be useful to evaluate non-cognitive domains and guide the selection process in medical residency programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and acceptability of the MMI model for the selection of residents in a cardiology residency program. Methods: We conducted an observational and prospective study. It was performed in a tertiary-care center specialized in cardiology and included candidates for the cardiology residency program in March 2018. Ten stations were developed to evaluate different non-cognitive domains. Reliability was evaluated by the generalizability G coefficient. Candidates and interviewers were surveyed to evaluate the acceptability of the MMI model. Results: Nine faculty members were trained and 22 candidates were evaluated. The G study showed a relative G coefficient between 0.56 and 0.73, according to the design. 91% of the candidates stated that they preferred MMI over other types of interviews as a selection method for admission to the residency program, and all the interviewers considered they had enough time to evaluate the candidates and their strengths as future residents. Conclusion: The MMI is a reliable model to evaluate candidates for a residency program in cardiology with high acceptability among residents and observers.Fil: Burgos, Lucrecia María. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Alves de Lima, Alberto Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Parodi, Maria Josefina. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Costabel, Juan Pablo. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Ganiele, María de Las Nieves. Instituto Universidad Escuela de Medicina del Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Durante, Eduardo Héctor. Instituto Universidad Escuela de Medicina del Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Arceo, Maria Dolores. Instituto Universidad Escuela de Medicina del Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Gelpi, Ricardo Jorge. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaShiraz University of Medical Sciences2020-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/173267Burgos, Lucrecia María; Alves de Lima, Alberto Enrique; Parodi, Maria Josefina; Costabel, Juan Pablo; Ganiele, María de Las Nieves; et al.; Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology; Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism; 8; 1; 1-2020; 25-312322-2220CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://jamp.sums.ac.ir/article_45979.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:35:14Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/173267instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:35:14.826CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
spellingShingle Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
Burgos, Lucrecia María
CARDIOLOGY
INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY
MEDICAL EDUCATION
title_short Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title_full Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title_fullStr Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
title_sort Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Burgos, Lucrecia María
Alves de Lima, Alberto Enrique
Parodi, Maria Josefina
Costabel, Juan Pablo
Ganiele, María de Las Nieves
Durante, Eduardo Héctor
Arceo, Maria Dolores
Gelpi, Ricardo Jorge
author Burgos, Lucrecia María
author_facet Burgos, Lucrecia María
Alves de Lima, Alberto Enrique
Parodi, Maria Josefina
Costabel, Juan Pablo
Ganiele, María de Las Nieves
Durante, Eduardo Héctor
Arceo, Maria Dolores
Gelpi, Ricardo Jorge
author_role author
author2 Alves de Lima, Alberto Enrique
Parodi, Maria Josefina
Costabel, Juan Pablo
Ganiele, María de Las Nieves
Durante, Eduardo Héctor
Arceo, Maria Dolores
Gelpi, Ricardo Jorge
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CARDIOLOGY
INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY
MEDICAL EDUCATION
topic CARDIOLOGY
INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY
MEDICAL EDUCATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Introduction: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) model can be useful to evaluate non-cognitive domains and guide the selection process in medical residency programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and acceptability of the MMI model for the selection of residents in a cardiology residency program. Methods: We conducted an observational and prospective study. It was performed in a tertiary-care center specialized in cardiology and included candidates for the cardiology residency program in March 2018. Ten stations were developed to evaluate different non-cognitive domains. Reliability was evaluated by the generalizability G coefficient. Candidates and interviewers were surveyed to evaluate the acceptability of the MMI model. Results: Nine faculty members were trained and 22 candidates were evaluated. The G study showed a relative G coefficient between 0.56 and 0.73, according to the design. 91% of the candidates stated that they preferred MMI over other types of interviews as a selection method for admission to the residency program, and all the interviewers considered they had enough time to evaluate the candidates and their strengths as future residents. Conclusion: The MMI is a reliable model to evaluate candidates for a residency program in cardiology with high acceptability among residents and observers.
Fil: Burgos, Lucrecia María. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Alves de Lima, Alberto Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Parodi, Maria Josefina. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Costabel, Juan Pablo. Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Ganiele, María de Las Nieves. Instituto Universidad Escuela de Medicina del Hospital Italiano; Argentina
Fil: Durante, Eduardo Héctor. Instituto Universidad Escuela de Medicina del Hospital Italiano; Argentina
Fil: Arceo, Maria Dolores. Instituto Universidad Escuela de Medicina del Hospital Italiano; Argentina
Fil: Gelpi, Ricardo Jorge. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description Introduction: The multiple mini-interview (MMI) model can be useful to evaluate non-cognitive domains and guide the selection process in medical residency programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and acceptability of the MMI model for the selection of residents in a cardiology residency program. Methods: We conducted an observational and prospective study. It was performed in a tertiary-care center specialized in cardiology and included candidates for the cardiology residency program in March 2018. Ten stations were developed to evaluate different non-cognitive domains. Reliability was evaluated by the generalizability G coefficient. Candidates and interviewers were surveyed to evaluate the acceptability of the MMI model. Results: Nine faculty members were trained and 22 candidates were evaluated. The G study showed a relative G coefficient between 0.56 and 0.73, according to the design. 91% of the candidates stated that they preferred MMI over other types of interviews as a selection method for admission to the residency program, and all the interviewers considered they had enough time to evaluate the candidates and their strengths as future residents. Conclusion: The MMI is a reliable model to evaluate candidates for a residency program in cardiology with high acceptability among residents and observers.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/173267
Burgos, Lucrecia María; Alves de Lima, Alberto Enrique; Parodi, Maria Josefina; Costabel, Juan Pablo; Ganiele, María de Las Nieves; et al.; Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology; Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism; 8; 1; 1-2020; 25-31
2322-2220
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/173267
identifier_str_mv Burgos, Lucrecia María; Alves de Lima, Alberto Enrique; Parodi, Maria Josefina; Costabel, Juan Pablo; Ganiele, María de Las Nieves; et al.; Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology; Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism; 8; 1; 1-2020; 25-31
2322-2220
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://jamp.sums.ac.ir/article_45979.html
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614369968652288
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares