Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures

Autores
Nahuelhual, Laura; Laterra, Pedro; Villarino, Sebastián Horacio; Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique; Carmona, Alejandra; Jaramillo, Amerindia; Barral, María Paula; Burgos, Noelia
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The literature on ecosystem services mapping presents a diversity of procedures whose consistency might question the reliability of maps for decision-making. This study aims at analyzing the correspondence between the purpose of maps (e.g. land use planning) and the procedures used for mapping (e.g. benefit transfer, ecological transfer). Fifty scientific studies published between 2005 and 2012 were selected and analyzed according to 19 variables, applying independence tests over contingency tables, ANOVA and regression analysis. The results show that most studies declared a decision-making purpose (82%), which in 50% of the cases, was land use planning. Only few relationships were found between variables selected to describe the purpose of the maps and those selected to describe the mapping procedures. Thus for example, maps aimed at supporting land use planning did not include any level of stakeholder participation or scenario analysis, as it would have been expected given this purpose. Likewise, maps were based on either economic value or biophysical transfers, regardless of the spatial and temporal scales of mapping. This generally weak relation between map´s purposes with the used procedures could explain the still restricted incidence of ES on decision-making by limiting the transmission, comparison and synthesis of results.
Fil: Nahuelhual, Laura. Universidad de Chile; Chile. Fundación Centro de los Bosques Nativos; Chile
Fil: Laterra, Pedro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Villarino, Sebastián Horacio. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Carmona, Alejandra. Universidad de Chile; Chile
Fil: Jaramillo, Amerindia. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile
Fil: Barral, María Paula. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Burgos, Noelia. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile
Materia
Ecosystem Services Mapping
Cascade Model
Decision-Making
Ecosystem Services Framework
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46347

id CONICETDig_5dedaf0b16d5162562414636ec0f3f3a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46347
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and proceduresNahuelhual, LauraLaterra, PedroVillarino, Sebastián HoracioMastrangelo, Matias EnriqueCarmona, AlejandraJaramillo, AmerindiaBarral, María PaulaBurgos, NoeliaEcosystem Services MappingCascade ModelDecision-MakingEcosystem Services Frameworkhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The literature on ecosystem services mapping presents a diversity of procedures whose consistency might question the reliability of maps for decision-making. This study aims at analyzing the correspondence between the purpose of maps (e.g. land use planning) and the procedures used for mapping (e.g. benefit transfer, ecological transfer). Fifty scientific studies published between 2005 and 2012 were selected and analyzed according to 19 variables, applying independence tests over contingency tables, ANOVA and regression analysis. The results show that most studies declared a decision-making purpose (82%), which in 50% of the cases, was land use planning. Only few relationships were found between variables selected to describe the purpose of the maps and those selected to describe the mapping procedures. Thus for example, maps aimed at supporting land use planning did not include any level of stakeholder participation or scenario analysis, as it would have been expected given this purpose. Likewise, maps were based on either economic value or biophysical transfers, regardless of the spatial and temporal scales of mapping. This generally weak relation between map´s purposes with the used procedures could explain the still restricted incidence of ES on decision-making by limiting the transmission, comparison and synthesis of results.Fil: Nahuelhual, Laura. Universidad de Chile; Chile. Fundación Centro de los Bosques Nativos; ChileFil: Laterra, Pedro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Villarino, Sebastián Horacio. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Carmona, Alejandra. Universidad de Chile; ChileFil: Jaramillo, Amerindia. Universidad Austral de Chile; ChileFil: Barral, María Paula. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Burgos, Noelia. Universidad Austral de Chile; ChileElsevier2015-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/46347Nahuelhual, Laura; Laterra, Pedro; Villarino, Sebastián Horacio; Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique; Carmona, Alejandra; et al.; Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures; Elsevier; Ecosystem Services; 13; 6-2015; 162-1722212-0416CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615000340info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:36:03Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/46347instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:36:04.261CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures
title Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures
spellingShingle Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures
Nahuelhual, Laura
Ecosystem Services Mapping
Cascade Model
Decision-Making
Ecosystem Services Framework
title_short Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures
title_full Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures
title_fullStr Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures
title_full_unstemmed Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures
title_sort Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Nahuelhual, Laura
Laterra, Pedro
Villarino, Sebastián Horacio
Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique
Carmona, Alejandra
Jaramillo, Amerindia
Barral, María Paula
Burgos, Noelia
author Nahuelhual, Laura
author_facet Nahuelhual, Laura
Laterra, Pedro
Villarino, Sebastián Horacio
Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique
Carmona, Alejandra
Jaramillo, Amerindia
Barral, María Paula
Burgos, Noelia
author_role author
author2 Laterra, Pedro
Villarino, Sebastián Horacio
Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique
Carmona, Alejandra
Jaramillo, Amerindia
Barral, María Paula
Burgos, Noelia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ecosystem Services Mapping
Cascade Model
Decision-Making
Ecosystem Services Framework
topic Ecosystem Services Mapping
Cascade Model
Decision-Making
Ecosystem Services Framework
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The literature on ecosystem services mapping presents a diversity of procedures whose consistency might question the reliability of maps for decision-making. This study aims at analyzing the correspondence between the purpose of maps (e.g. land use planning) and the procedures used for mapping (e.g. benefit transfer, ecological transfer). Fifty scientific studies published between 2005 and 2012 were selected and analyzed according to 19 variables, applying independence tests over contingency tables, ANOVA and regression analysis. The results show that most studies declared a decision-making purpose (82%), which in 50% of the cases, was land use planning. Only few relationships were found between variables selected to describe the purpose of the maps and those selected to describe the mapping procedures. Thus for example, maps aimed at supporting land use planning did not include any level of stakeholder participation or scenario analysis, as it would have been expected given this purpose. Likewise, maps were based on either economic value or biophysical transfers, regardless of the spatial and temporal scales of mapping. This generally weak relation between map´s purposes with the used procedures could explain the still restricted incidence of ES on decision-making by limiting the transmission, comparison and synthesis of results.
Fil: Nahuelhual, Laura. Universidad de Chile; Chile. Fundación Centro de los Bosques Nativos; Chile
Fil: Laterra, Pedro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Villarino, Sebastián Horacio. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Carmona, Alejandra. Universidad de Chile; Chile
Fil: Jaramillo, Amerindia. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile
Fil: Barral, María Paula. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Burgos, Noelia. Universidad Austral de Chile; Chile
description The literature on ecosystem services mapping presents a diversity of procedures whose consistency might question the reliability of maps for decision-making. This study aims at analyzing the correspondence between the purpose of maps (e.g. land use planning) and the procedures used for mapping (e.g. benefit transfer, ecological transfer). Fifty scientific studies published between 2005 and 2012 were selected and analyzed according to 19 variables, applying independence tests over contingency tables, ANOVA and regression analysis. The results show that most studies declared a decision-making purpose (82%), which in 50% of the cases, was land use planning. Only few relationships were found between variables selected to describe the purpose of the maps and those selected to describe the mapping procedures. Thus for example, maps aimed at supporting land use planning did not include any level of stakeholder participation or scenario analysis, as it would have been expected given this purpose. Likewise, maps were based on either economic value or biophysical transfers, regardless of the spatial and temporal scales of mapping. This generally weak relation between map´s purposes with the used procedures could explain the still restricted incidence of ES on decision-making by limiting the transmission, comparison and synthesis of results.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/46347
Nahuelhual, Laura; Laterra, Pedro; Villarino, Sebastián Horacio; Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique; Carmona, Alejandra; et al.; Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures; Elsevier; Ecosystem Services; 13; 6-2015; 162-172
2212-0416
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/46347
identifier_str_mv Nahuelhual, Laura; Laterra, Pedro; Villarino, Sebastián Horacio; Mastrangelo, Matias Enrique; Carmona, Alejandra; et al.; Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures; Elsevier; Ecosystem Services; 13; 6-2015; 162-172
2212-0416
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615000340
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.005
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613128252293120
score 13.070432