Decision making during the psychological refractory period
- Autores
- Zylberberg, A.; Ouellette, B.; Sigman, M.; Roelfsema, P.R.
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In spite of its massively parallel architecture [1], the human brain is fundamentally limited if required to perform two tasks at the same time [2, 3]. This limitation can be studied with the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, where two stimuli that require speeded responses occur in close succession [4]. Interference generally takes the form of a delay in the time to respond to the second stimulus [5]. Previous studies suggested that sensory decisions require the accumulation of sensory evidence [6, 7] and that the PRP reflects the inability to form more than one decision at a time [4, 8]. In the present study, we used a psychophysical reverse-correlation technique [9, 10] to measure the time-course of evidence accumulation during the PRP. We found that the accumulation of evidence could occur during the PRP albeit with a reduced efficiency, which implies that multiple decision processes can occur in parallel in the human brain. In addition to the reduced efficiency of evidence accumulation, our results uncover an additional delay in the routing of the decision to motor structures during the PRP, which implies that the process of sensory decision making is separable from the preparation of a motor response [11-13]. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Fil:Sigman, M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. - Fuente
- Curr. Biol. 2012;22(19):1795-1799
- Materia
-
article
decision making
hearing
human
human experiment
physiology
psychological refractory period
Auditory Perception
Decision Making
Humans
Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation
Refractory Period, Psychological - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
- OAI Identificador
- paperaa:paper_09609822_v22_n19_p1795_Zylberberg
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
BDUBAFCEN_f381deaaad30ec2cc2046f673c0ae5af |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
paperaa:paper_09609822_v22_n19_p1795_Zylberberg |
network_acronym_str |
BDUBAFCEN |
repository_id_str |
1896 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) |
spelling |
Decision making during the psychological refractory periodZylberberg, A.Ouellette, B.Sigman, M.Roelfsema, P.R.articledecision makinghearinghumanhuman experimentphysiologypsychological refractory periodAuditory PerceptionDecision MakingHumansNontherapeutic Human ExperimentationRefractory Period, PsychologicalIn spite of its massively parallel architecture [1], the human brain is fundamentally limited if required to perform two tasks at the same time [2, 3]. This limitation can be studied with the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, where two stimuli that require speeded responses occur in close succession [4]. Interference generally takes the form of a delay in the time to respond to the second stimulus [5]. Previous studies suggested that sensory decisions require the accumulation of sensory evidence [6, 7] and that the PRP reflects the inability to form more than one decision at a time [4, 8]. In the present study, we used a psychophysical reverse-correlation technique [9, 10] to measure the time-course of evidence accumulation during the PRP. We found that the accumulation of evidence could occur during the PRP albeit with a reduced efficiency, which implies that multiple decision processes can occur in parallel in the human brain. In addition to the reduced efficiency of evidence accumulation, our results uncover an additional delay in the routing of the decision to motor structures during the PRP, which implies that the process of sensory decision making is separable from the preparation of a motor response [11-13]. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Fil:Sigman, M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.2012info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09609822_v22_n19_p1795_ZylberbergCurr. Biol. 2012;22(19):1795-1799reponame:Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)instname:Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturalesinstacron:UBA-FCENenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar2025-10-16T09:30:16Zpaperaa:paper_09609822_v22_n19_p1795_ZylberbergInstitucionalhttps://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttps://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/cgi-bin/oaiserver.cgiana@bl.fcen.uba.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:18962025-10-16 09:30:17.789Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) - Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturalesfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Decision making during the psychological refractory period |
title |
Decision making during the psychological refractory period |
spellingShingle |
Decision making during the psychological refractory period Zylberberg, A. article decision making hearing human human experiment physiology psychological refractory period Auditory Perception Decision Making Humans Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation Refractory Period, Psychological |
title_short |
Decision making during the psychological refractory period |
title_full |
Decision making during the psychological refractory period |
title_fullStr |
Decision making during the psychological refractory period |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decision making during the psychological refractory period |
title_sort |
Decision making during the psychological refractory period |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Zylberberg, A. Ouellette, B. Sigman, M. Roelfsema, P.R. |
author |
Zylberberg, A. |
author_facet |
Zylberberg, A. Ouellette, B. Sigman, M. Roelfsema, P.R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ouellette, B. Sigman, M. Roelfsema, P.R. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
article decision making hearing human human experiment physiology psychological refractory period Auditory Perception Decision Making Humans Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation Refractory Period, Psychological |
topic |
article decision making hearing human human experiment physiology psychological refractory period Auditory Perception Decision Making Humans Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation Refractory Period, Psychological |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In spite of its massively parallel architecture [1], the human brain is fundamentally limited if required to perform two tasks at the same time [2, 3]. This limitation can be studied with the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, where two stimuli that require speeded responses occur in close succession [4]. Interference generally takes the form of a delay in the time to respond to the second stimulus [5]. Previous studies suggested that sensory decisions require the accumulation of sensory evidence [6, 7] and that the PRP reflects the inability to form more than one decision at a time [4, 8]. In the present study, we used a psychophysical reverse-correlation technique [9, 10] to measure the time-course of evidence accumulation during the PRP. We found that the accumulation of evidence could occur during the PRP albeit with a reduced efficiency, which implies that multiple decision processes can occur in parallel in the human brain. In addition to the reduced efficiency of evidence accumulation, our results uncover an additional delay in the routing of the decision to motor structures during the PRP, which implies that the process of sensory decision making is separable from the preparation of a motor response [11-13]. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Fil:Sigman, M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. |
description |
In spite of its massively parallel architecture [1], the human brain is fundamentally limited if required to perform two tasks at the same time [2, 3]. This limitation can be studied with the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, where two stimuli that require speeded responses occur in close succession [4]. Interference generally takes the form of a delay in the time to respond to the second stimulus [5]. Previous studies suggested that sensory decisions require the accumulation of sensory evidence [6, 7] and that the PRP reflects the inability to form more than one decision at a time [4, 8]. In the present study, we used a psychophysical reverse-correlation technique [9, 10] to measure the time-course of evidence accumulation during the PRP. We found that the accumulation of evidence could occur during the PRP albeit with a reduced efficiency, which implies that multiple decision processes can occur in parallel in the human brain. In addition to the reduced efficiency of evidence accumulation, our results uncover an additional delay in the routing of the decision to motor structures during the PRP, which implies that the process of sensory decision making is separable from the preparation of a motor response [11-13]. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09609822_v22_n19_p1795_Zylberberg |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09609822_v22_n19_p1795_Zylberberg |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Curr. Biol. 2012;22(19):1795-1799 reponame:Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) instname:Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales instacron:UBA-FCEN |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales |
instacron_str |
UBA-FCEN |
institution |
UBA-FCEN |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) - Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ana@bl.fcen.uba.ar |
_version_ |
1846142848628424704 |
score |
12.712165 |