A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period
- Autores
- Marti, Sébastien; Sigman, Mariano; Dehaene, Stanislas
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Doing two things at once is difficult. When two tasks have to be performed within a short interval, the second is sharply delayed, an effect called the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP). Similarly, when two successive visual targets are briefly flashed, people may fail to detect the second target (Attentional Blink or AB). Although AB and PRP are typically studied in very different paradigms, a recent detailed neuromimetic model suggests that both might arise from the same serial stage during which stimuli gain access to consciousness and, as a result, can be arbitrarily routed to any other appropriate processor. Here, in agreement with this model, we demonstrate that AB and PRP can be obtained on alternate trials of the same cross-modal paradigm and result from limitations in the same brain mechanisms. We asked participants to respond as fast as possible to an auditory target T1 and then to a visual target T2 embedded in a series of distractors, while brain activity was recorded with magneto-encephalography (MEG). For identical stimuli, we observed a mixture of blinked trials, where T2 was entirely missed, and PRP trials, where T2 processing was delayed. MEG recordings showed that PRP and blinked trials underwent identical sensory processing in visual occipito-temporal cortices, even including the non-conscious separation of targets from distractors. However, late activations in frontal cortex (> 350 ms), strongly influenced by the speed of task-1 execution, were delayed in PRP trials and absent in blinked trials. Our findings suggest that PRP and AB arise from similar cortical stages, can occur with the same exact stimuli, and are merely distinguished by trial-by-trial fluctuations in task processing. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.
Fil: Marti, Sébastien. Inserm; Francia. NeuroSpin Center; Francia
Fil: Sigman, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Dehaene, Stanislas. Inserm; Francia. NeuroSpin Center; Francia. Collège de France; Francia. Université de Paris XI; Francia - Materia
-
Attention
Attentional Blink
Consciousness
Dual-Task
Magnetoencephalography
Psychological Refractory Period - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56976
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_d8c0b449f4768eb86579dc3518fa46cc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56976 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory periodMarti, SébastienSigman, MarianoDehaene, StanislasAttentionAttentional BlinkConsciousnessDual-TaskMagnetoencephalographyPsychological Refractory Periodhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Doing two things at once is difficult. When two tasks have to be performed within a short interval, the second is sharply delayed, an effect called the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP). Similarly, when two successive visual targets are briefly flashed, people may fail to detect the second target (Attentional Blink or AB). Although AB and PRP are typically studied in very different paradigms, a recent detailed neuromimetic model suggests that both might arise from the same serial stage during which stimuli gain access to consciousness and, as a result, can be arbitrarily routed to any other appropriate processor. Here, in agreement with this model, we demonstrate that AB and PRP can be obtained on alternate trials of the same cross-modal paradigm and result from limitations in the same brain mechanisms. We asked participants to respond as fast as possible to an auditory target T1 and then to a visual target T2 embedded in a series of distractors, while brain activity was recorded with magneto-encephalography (MEG). For identical stimuli, we observed a mixture of blinked trials, where T2 was entirely missed, and PRP trials, where T2 processing was delayed. MEG recordings showed that PRP and blinked trials underwent identical sensory processing in visual occipito-temporal cortices, even including the non-conscious separation of targets from distractors. However, late activations in frontal cortex (> 350 ms), strongly influenced by the speed of task-1 execution, were delayed in PRP trials and absent in blinked trials. Our findings suggest that PRP and AB arise from similar cortical stages, can occur with the same exact stimuli, and are merely distinguished by trial-by-trial fluctuations in task processing. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.Fil: Marti, Sébastien. Inserm; Francia. NeuroSpin Center; FranciaFil: Sigman, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Dehaene, Stanislas. Inserm; Francia. NeuroSpin Center; Francia. Collège de France; Francia. Université de Paris XI; FranciaAcademic Press Inc Elsevier Science2012-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/56976Marti, Sébastien; Sigman, Mariano; Dehaene, Stanislas; A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period; Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science; Journal Neuroimag; 59; 3; 2-2012; 2883-28981053-8119CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.063info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811911011372info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:04:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56976instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:04:07.417CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period |
title |
A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period |
spellingShingle |
A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period Marti, Sébastien Attention Attentional Blink Consciousness Dual-Task Magnetoencephalography Psychological Refractory Period |
title_short |
A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period |
title_full |
A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period |
title_fullStr |
A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period |
title_full_unstemmed |
A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period |
title_sort |
A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Marti, Sébastien Sigman, Mariano Dehaene, Stanislas |
author |
Marti, Sébastien |
author_facet |
Marti, Sébastien Sigman, Mariano Dehaene, Stanislas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sigman, Mariano Dehaene, Stanislas |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Attention Attentional Blink Consciousness Dual-Task Magnetoencephalography Psychological Refractory Period |
topic |
Attention Attentional Blink Consciousness Dual-Task Magnetoencephalography Psychological Refractory Period |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Doing two things at once is difficult. When two tasks have to be performed within a short interval, the second is sharply delayed, an effect called the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP). Similarly, when two successive visual targets are briefly flashed, people may fail to detect the second target (Attentional Blink or AB). Although AB and PRP are typically studied in very different paradigms, a recent detailed neuromimetic model suggests that both might arise from the same serial stage during which stimuli gain access to consciousness and, as a result, can be arbitrarily routed to any other appropriate processor. Here, in agreement with this model, we demonstrate that AB and PRP can be obtained on alternate trials of the same cross-modal paradigm and result from limitations in the same brain mechanisms. We asked participants to respond as fast as possible to an auditory target T1 and then to a visual target T2 embedded in a series of distractors, while brain activity was recorded with magneto-encephalography (MEG). For identical stimuli, we observed a mixture of blinked trials, where T2 was entirely missed, and PRP trials, where T2 processing was delayed. MEG recordings showed that PRP and blinked trials underwent identical sensory processing in visual occipito-temporal cortices, even including the non-conscious separation of targets from distractors. However, late activations in frontal cortex (> 350 ms), strongly influenced by the speed of task-1 execution, were delayed in PRP trials and absent in blinked trials. Our findings suggest that PRP and AB arise from similar cortical stages, can occur with the same exact stimuli, and are merely distinguished by trial-by-trial fluctuations in task processing. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Fil: Marti, Sébastien. Inserm; Francia. NeuroSpin Center; Francia Fil: Sigman, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Dehaene, Stanislas. Inserm; Francia. NeuroSpin Center; Francia. Collège de France; Francia. Université de Paris XI; Francia |
description |
Doing two things at once is difficult. When two tasks have to be performed within a short interval, the second is sharply delayed, an effect called the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP). Similarly, when two successive visual targets are briefly flashed, people may fail to detect the second target (Attentional Blink or AB). Although AB and PRP are typically studied in very different paradigms, a recent detailed neuromimetic model suggests that both might arise from the same serial stage during which stimuli gain access to consciousness and, as a result, can be arbitrarily routed to any other appropriate processor. Here, in agreement with this model, we demonstrate that AB and PRP can be obtained on alternate trials of the same cross-modal paradigm and result from limitations in the same brain mechanisms. We asked participants to respond as fast as possible to an auditory target T1 and then to a visual target T2 embedded in a series of distractors, while brain activity was recorded with magneto-encephalography (MEG). For identical stimuli, we observed a mixture of blinked trials, where T2 was entirely missed, and PRP trials, where T2 processing was delayed. MEG recordings showed that PRP and blinked trials underwent identical sensory processing in visual occipito-temporal cortices, even including the non-conscious separation of targets from distractors. However, late activations in frontal cortex (> 350 ms), strongly influenced by the speed of task-1 execution, were delayed in PRP trials and absent in blinked trials. Our findings suggest that PRP and AB arise from similar cortical stages, can occur with the same exact stimuli, and are merely distinguished by trial-by-trial fluctuations in task processing. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/56976 Marti, Sébastien; Sigman, Mariano; Dehaene, Stanislas; A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period; Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science; Journal Neuroimag; 59; 3; 2-2012; 2883-2898 1053-8119 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/56976 |
identifier_str_mv |
Marti, Sébastien; Sigman, Mariano; Dehaene, Stanislas; A shared cortical bottleneck underlying attentional blink and psychological refractory period; Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science; Journal Neuroimag; 59; 3; 2-2012; 2883-2898 1053-8119 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.063 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811911011372 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269838091747328 |
score |
13.13397 |