Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?

Autores
Démoulin, P.; Dasso, S.; Janvier, M.
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Context. Magnetic clouds (MCs) are a subset of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). One property of MCs is the presence of a magnetic flux rope. Is the difference between ICMEs with and without MCs intrinsic or rather due to an observational bias? Aims. As the spacecraft has no relationship with the MC trajectory, the frequency distribution of MCs versus the spacecraft distance to the MCs' axis is expected to be approximately flat. However, Lepping & Wu (2010, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1539) confirmed that it is a strongly decreasing function of the estimated impact parameter. Is a flux rope more frequently undetected for larger impact parameter? Methods. In order to answer the questions above, we explore the parameter space of flux rope models, especially the aspect ratio, boundary shape, and current distribution. The proposed models are analyzed as MCs by fitting a circular linear force-free field to the magnetic field computed along simulated crossings. Results. We find that the distribution of the twist within the flux rope and the non-detection due to too low field rotation angle or magnitude only weakly affect the expected frequency distribution of MCs versus impact parameter. However, the estimated impact parameter is increasingly biased to lower values as the flux rope cross section is more elongated orthogonally to the crossing trajectory. The observed distribution of MCs is a natural consequence of a flux rope cross section flattened on average by a factor 2 to 3 depending on the magnetic twist profile. However, the faster MCs at 1 AU, with V > 550 km s-1, present an almost uniform distribution of MCs vs. impact parameter, which is consistent with round-shaped flux ropes, in contrast with the slower ones. Conclusions. We conclude that the sampling of MCs at various distances from the axis does not significantly affect their detection. The large part of ICMEs without MCs could be due to a too strict criteria for MCs or to the fact that these ICMEs are encountered outside their flux rope or near the leg region, or they do not contain a flux rope. © 2013 ESO.
Fil:Dasso, S. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
Fuente
Astron. Astrophys. 2013;550
Materia
Magnetic fields
Solar-terrestrial relations
Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
Sun: heliosphere
Affect detection
Boundary shapes
Current distribution
Decreasing functions
Flux rope model
Flux ropes
Force free fields
Frequency distributions
Heliospheres
Impact-parameter
Interplanetary coronal mass ejections
Large parts
Low field
Magnetic clouds
Magnetic flux ropes
Natural consequences
Non-detection
Parameter spaces
Rotation angles
Solar-terrestrial relations
Spacecraft trajectories
Sun: coronal mass ejection
Uniform distribution
Aspect ratio
Computer simulation
Magnetic fields
Magnetic flux
Planetary surface analysis
Spacecraft
Trajectories
Parameter estimation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar
Repositorio
Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
OAI Identificador
paperaa:paper_00046361_v550_n_p_Demoulin

id BDUBAFCEN_363cf19a13062d1b5302522768c20376
oai_identifier_str paperaa:paper_00046361_v550_n_p_Demoulin
network_acronym_str BDUBAFCEN
repository_id_str 1896
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
spelling Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?Démoulin, P.Dasso, S.Janvier, M.Magnetic fieldsSolar-terrestrial relationsSun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs)Sun: heliosphereAffect detectionBoundary shapesCurrent distributionDecreasing functionsFlux rope modelFlux ropesForce free fieldsFrequency distributionsHeliospheresImpact-parameterInterplanetary coronal mass ejectionsLarge partsLow fieldMagnetic cloudsMagnetic flux ropesNatural consequencesNon-detectionParameter spacesRotation anglesSolar-terrestrial relationsSpacecraft trajectoriesSun: coronal mass ejectionUniform distributionAspect ratioComputer simulationMagnetic fieldsMagnetic fluxPlanetary surface analysisSpacecraftTrajectoriesParameter estimationContext. Magnetic clouds (MCs) are a subset of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). One property of MCs is the presence of a magnetic flux rope. Is the difference between ICMEs with and without MCs intrinsic or rather due to an observational bias? Aims. As the spacecraft has no relationship with the MC trajectory, the frequency distribution of MCs versus the spacecraft distance to the MCs' axis is expected to be approximately flat. However, Lepping & Wu (2010, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1539) confirmed that it is a strongly decreasing function of the estimated impact parameter. Is a flux rope more frequently undetected for larger impact parameter? Methods. In order to answer the questions above, we explore the parameter space of flux rope models, especially the aspect ratio, boundary shape, and current distribution. The proposed models are analyzed as MCs by fitting a circular linear force-free field to the magnetic field computed along simulated crossings. Results. We find that the distribution of the twist within the flux rope and the non-detection due to too low field rotation angle or magnitude only weakly affect the expected frequency distribution of MCs versus impact parameter. However, the estimated impact parameter is increasingly biased to lower values as the flux rope cross section is more elongated orthogonally to the crossing trajectory. The observed distribution of MCs is a natural consequence of a flux rope cross section flattened on average by a factor 2 to 3 depending on the magnetic twist profile. However, the faster MCs at 1 AU, with V > 550 km s-1, present an almost uniform distribution of MCs vs. impact parameter, which is consistent with round-shaped flux ropes, in contrast with the slower ones. Conclusions. We conclude that the sampling of MCs at various distances from the axis does not significantly affect their detection. The large part of ICMEs without MCs could be due to a too strict criteria for MCs or to the fact that these ICMEs are encountered outside their flux rope or near the leg region, or they do not contain a flux rope. © 2013 ESO.Fil:Dasso, S. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.2013info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00046361_v550_n_p_DemoulinAstron. Astrophys. 2013;550reponame:Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)instname:Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturalesinstacron:UBA-FCENenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar2025-09-29T13:43:06Zpaperaa:paper_00046361_v550_n_p_DemoulinInstitucionalhttps://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttps://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/cgi-bin/oaiserver.cgiana@bl.fcen.uba.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:18962025-09-29 13:43:07.527Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) - Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturalesfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?
title Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?
spellingShingle Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?
Démoulin, P.
Magnetic fields
Solar-terrestrial relations
Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
Sun: heliosphere
Affect detection
Boundary shapes
Current distribution
Decreasing functions
Flux rope model
Flux ropes
Force free fields
Frequency distributions
Heliospheres
Impact-parameter
Interplanetary coronal mass ejections
Large parts
Low field
Magnetic clouds
Magnetic flux ropes
Natural consequences
Non-detection
Parameter spaces
Rotation angles
Solar-terrestrial relations
Spacecraft trajectories
Sun: coronal mass ejection
Uniform distribution
Aspect ratio
Computer simulation
Magnetic fields
Magnetic flux
Planetary surface analysis
Spacecraft
Trajectories
Parameter estimation
title_short Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?
title_full Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?
title_fullStr Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?
title_full_unstemmed Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?
title_sort Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Démoulin, P.
Dasso, S.
Janvier, M.
author Démoulin, P.
author_facet Démoulin, P.
Dasso, S.
Janvier, M.
author_role author
author2 Dasso, S.
Janvier, M.
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Magnetic fields
Solar-terrestrial relations
Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
Sun: heliosphere
Affect detection
Boundary shapes
Current distribution
Decreasing functions
Flux rope model
Flux ropes
Force free fields
Frequency distributions
Heliospheres
Impact-parameter
Interplanetary coronal mass ejections
Large parts
Low field
Magnetic clouds
Magnetic flux ropes
Natural consequences
Non-detection
Parameter spaces
Rotation angles
Solar-terrestrial relations
Spacecraft trajectories
Sun: coronal mass ejection
Uniform distribution
Aspect ratio
Computer simulation
Magnetic fields
Magnetic flux
Planetary surface analysis
Spacecraft
Trajectories
Parameter estimation
topic Magnetic fields
Solar-terrestrial relations
Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
Sun: heliosphere
Affect detection
Boundary shapes
Current distribution
Decreasing functions
Flux rope model
Flux ropes
Force free fields
Frequency distributions
Heliospheres
Impact-parameter
Interplanetary coronal mass ejections
Large parts
Low field
Magnetic clouds
Magnetic flux ropes
Natural consequences
Non-detection
Parameter spaces
Rotation angles
Solar-terrestrial relations
Spacecraft trajectories
Sun: coronal mass ejection
Uniform distribution
Aspect ratio
Computer simulation
Magnetic fields
Magnetic flux
Planetary surface analysis
Spacecraft
Trajectories
Parameter estimation
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Context. Magnetic clouds (MCs) are a subset of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). One property of MCs is the presence of a magnetic flux rope. Is the difference between ICMEs with and without MCs intrinsic or rather due to an observational bias? Aims. As the spacecraft has no relationship with the MC trajectory, the frequency distribution of MCs versus the spacecraft distance to the MCs' axis is expected to be approximately flat. However, Lepping & Wu (2010, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1539) confirmed that it is a strongly decreasing function of the estimated impact parameter. Is a flux rope more frequently undetected for larger impact parameter? Methods. In order to answer the questions above, we explore the parameter space of flux rope models, especially the aspect ratio, boundary shape, and current distribution. The proposed models are analyzed as MCs by fitting a circular linear force-free field to the magnetic field computed along simulated crossings. Results. We find that the distribution of the twist within the flux rope and the non-detection due to too low field rotation angle or magnitude only weakly affect the expected frequency distribution of MCs versus impact parameter. However, the estimated impact parameter is increasingly biased to lower values as the flux rope cross section is more elongated orthogonally to the crossing trajectory. The observed distribution of MCs is a natural consequence of a flux rope cross section flattened on average by a factor 2 to 3 depending on the magnetic twist profile. However, the faster MCs at 1 AU, with V > 550 km s-1, present an almost uniform distribution of MCs vs. impact parameter, which is consistent with round-shaped flux ropes, in contrast with the slower ones. Conclusions. We conclude that the sampling of MCs at various distances from the axis does not significantly affect their detection. The large part of ICMEs without MCs could be due to a too strict criteria for MCs or to the fact that these ICMEs are encountered outside their flux rope or near the leg region, or they do not contain a flux rope. © 2013 ESO.
Fil:Dasso, S. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
description Context. Magnetic clouds (MCs) are a subset of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). One property of MCs is the presence of a magnetic flux rope. Is the difference between ICMEs with and without MCs intrinsic or rather due to an observational bias? Aims. As the spacecraft has no relationship with the MC trajectory, the frequency distribution of MCs versus the spacecraft distance to the MCs' axis is expected to be approximately flat. However, Lepping & Wu (2010, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1539) confirmed that it is a strongly decreasing function of the estimated impact parameter. Is a flux rope more frequently undetected for larger impact parameter? Methods. In order to answer the questions above, we explore the parameter space of flux rope models, especially the aspect ratio, boundary shape, and current distribution. The proposed models are analyzed as MCs by fitting a circular linear force-free field to the magnetic field computed along simulated crossings. Results. We find that the distribution of the twist within the flux rope and the non-detection due to too low field rotation angle or magnitude only weakly affect the expected frequency distribution of MCs versus impact parameter. However, the estimated impact parameter is increasingly biased to lower values as the flux rope cross section is more elongated orthogonally to the crossing trajectory. The observed distribution of MCs is a natural consequence of a flux rope cross section flattened on average by a factor 2 to 3 depending on the magnetic twist profile. However, the faster MCs at 1 AU, with V > 550 km s-1, present an almost uniform distribution of MCs vs. impact parameter, which is consistent with round-shaped flux ropes, in contrast with the slower ones. Conclusions. We conclude that the sampling of MCs at various distances from the axis does not significantly affect their detection. The large part of ICMEs without MCs could be due to a too strict criteria for MCs or to the fact that these ICMEs are encountered outside their flux rope or near the leg region, or they do not contain a flux rope. © 2013 ESO.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00046361_v550_n_p_Demoulin
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00046361_v550_n_p_Demoulin
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Astron. Astrophys. 2013;550
reponame:Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
instname:Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
instacron:UBA-FCEN
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
collection Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
instacron_str UBA-FCEN
institution UBA-FCEN
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) - Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ana@bl.fcen.uba.ar
_version_ 1844618739816857600
score 13.070432