Achievements, needs and prospects of updating the standards, theories and models of the Earth's rotation

Autores
Ferrándiz, J. M.; Escapa, A.; Karbon, M.; Belda, S.; Baenas, T.; Huang, C. L.; Liu, J. C.
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Over the last decade, the IAU and the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) have organised successive Joint Working Groups (JWGs) to improve the theories and models of the Earth's rotation. Their reports revealed inconsistencies and obsolescence of the standard theories and models, and some of underlying concepts, and led to the 2019 IAG and 2021 IAU Resolutions encouraging their improvement in terms of accuracy, consistency, and better adaptation to present knowledge of the actual Earth. The current IAU/IAG JWG on Consistent Improvement of Earth's Rotation Theory (CIERT) is addressing this problem with a particular focus on the theories of precession and nutation (PN). Improving consistency requires that all components of theories and analyses of observational data refer to and use identical reference frames, basic and ancillary Earth models and parameters. In contrast, these in the official PN theories are over 20 years old and do not meet the current standards. Worse, the three main components of these theories are inconsistent with each other regarding underlying geophysical models, free Earth oscillation modes, and some fundamental parameters: e.g. the dynamical ellipticity in IAU2006 is a linear function of time, while in IAU2000 it is a constant whose value needs updating; moreover, the planetary nutations are still a rigid-Earth solution, unlike the lunisolar ones. This presentation reports on the main achievements of several JWG members and their advantages and limitations, focusing on those more consistent and capable of drastically reducing the unexplained variance of the determined celestial pole offsets in the short term.
Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas
Materia
Ciencias Astronómicas
Precession and nutation theory
Earth rotation models
Celestial pole offsets (CPO)
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/191971

id SEDICI_cc9eef762401dc732c447d18bbbc1b42
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/191971
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Achievements, needs and prospects of updating the standards, theories and models of the Earth's rotationFerrándiz, J. M.Escapa, A.Karbon, M.Belda, S.Baenas, T.Huang, C. L.Liu, J. C.Ciencias AstronómicasPrecession and nutation theoryEarth rotation modelsCelestial pole offsets (CPO)Over the last decade, the IAU and the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) have organised successive Joint Working Groups (JWGs) to improve the theories and models of the Earth's rotation. Their reports revealed inconsistencies and obsolescence of the standard theories and models, and some of underlying concepts, and led to the 2019 IAG and 2021 IAU Resolutions encouraging their improvement in terms of accuracy, consistency, and better adaptation to present knowledge of the actual Earth. The current IAU/IAG JWG on Consistent Improvement of Earth's Rotation Theory (CIERT) is addressing this problem with a particular focus on the theories of precession and nutation (PN). Improving consistency requires that all components of theories and analyses of observational data refer to and use identical reference frames, basic and ancillary Earth models and parameters. In contrast, these in the official PN theories are over 20 years old and do not meet the current standards. Worse, the three main components of these theories are inconsistent with each other regarding underlying geophysical models, free Earth oscillation modes, and some fundamental parameters: e.g. the dynamical ellipticity in IAU2006 is a linear function of time, while in IAU2000 it is a constant whose value needs updating; moreover, the planetary nutations are still a rigid-Earth solution, unlike the lunisolar ones. This presentation reports on the main achievements of several JWG members and their advantages and limitations, focusing on those more consistent and capable of drastically reducing the unexplained variance of the determined celestial pole offsets in the short term.Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas2025-08info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResumenhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf21-22http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/191971enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/reference/url/https://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/190232info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2026-04-23T11:55:40Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/191971Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292026-04-23 11:55:40.858SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Achievements, needs and prospects of updating the standards, theories and models of the Earth's rotation
title Achievements, needs and prospects of updating the standards, theories and models of the Earth's rotation
spellingShingle Achievements, needs and prospects of updating the standards, theories and models of the Earth's rotation
Ferrándiz, J. M.
Ciencias Astronómicas
Precession and nutation theory
Earth rotation models
Celestial pole offsets (CPO)
title_short Achievements, needs and prospects of updating the standards, theories and models of the Earth's rotation
title_full Achievements, needs and prospects of updating the standards, theories and models of the Earth's rotation
title_fullStr Achievements, needs and prospects of updating the standards, theories and models of the Earth's rotation
title_full_unstemmed Achievements, needs and prospects of updating the standards, theories and models of the Earth's rotation
title_sort Achievements, needs and prospects of updating the standards, theories and models of the Earth's rotation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ferrándiz, J. M.
Escapa, A.
Karbon, M.
Belda, S.
Baenas, T.
Huang, C. L.
Liu, J. C.
author Ferrándiz, J. M.
author_facet Ferrándiz, J. M.
Escapa, A.
Karbon, M.
Belda, S.
Baenas, T.
Huang, C. L.
Liu, J. C.
author_role author
author2 Escapa, A.
Karbon, M.
Belda, S.
Baenas, T.
Huang, C. L.
Liu, J. C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Astronómicas
Precession and nutation theory
Earth rotation models
Celestial pole offsets (CPO)
topic Ciencias Astronómicas
Precession and nutation theory
Earth rotation models
Celestial pole offsets (CPO)
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Over the last decade, the IAU and the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) have organised successive Joint Working Groups (JWGs) to improve the theories and models of the Earth's rotation. Their reports revealed inconsistencies and obsolescence of the standard theories and models, and some of underlying concepts, and led to the 2019 IAG and 2021 IAU Resolutions encouraging their improvement in terms of accuracy, consistency, and better adaptation to present knowledge of the actual Earth. The current IAU/IAG JWG on Consistent Improvement of Earth's Rotation Theory (CIERT) is addressing this problem with a particular focus on the theories of precession and nutation (PN). Improving consistency requires that all components of theories and analyses of observational data refer to and use identical reference frames, basic and ancillary Earth models and parameters. In contrast, these in the official PN theories are over 20 years old and do not meet the current standards. Worse, the three main components of these theories are inconsistent with each other regarding underlying geophysical models, free Earth oscillation modes, and some fundamental parameters: e.g. the dynamical ellipticity in IAU2006 is a linear function of time, while in IAU2000 it is a constant whose value needs updating; moreover, the planetary nutations are still a rigid-Earth solution, unlike the lunisolar ones. This presentation reports on the main achievements of several JWG members and their advantages and limitations, focusing on those more consistent and capable of drastically reducing the unexplained variance of the determined celestial pole offsets in the short term.
Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas
description Over the last decade, the IAU and the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) have organised successive Joint Working Groups (JWGs) to improve the theories and models of the Earth's rotation. Their reports revealed inconsistencies and obsolescence of the standard theories and models, and some of underlying concepts, and led to the 2019 IAG and 2021 IAU Resolutions encouraging their improvement in terms of accuracy, consistency, and better adaptation to present knowledge of the actual Earth. The current IAU/IAG JWG on Consistent Improvement of Earth's Rotation Theory (CIERT) is addressing this problem with a particular focus on the theories of precession and nutation (PN). Improving consistency requires that all components of theories and analyses of observational data refer to and use identical reference frames, basic and ancillary Earth models and parameters. In contrast, these in the official PN theories are over 20 years old and do not meet the current standards. Worse, the three main components of these theories are inconsistent with each other regarding underlying geophysical models, free Earth oscillation modes, and some fundamental parameters: e.g. the dynamical ellipticity in IAU2006 is a linear function of time, while in IAU2000 it is a constant whose value needs updating; moreover, the planetary nutations are still a rigid-Earth solution, unlike the lunisolar ones. This presentation reports on the main achievements of several JWG members and their advantages and limitations, focusing on those more consistent and capable of drastically reducing the unexplained variance of the determined celestial pole offsets in the short term.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Resumen
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/191971
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/191971
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/url/https://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/190232
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
21-22
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1863367881332359168
score 13.05261