Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy

Autores
Budán, Paola D.; Rosenzvaig, Federico; Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Argumentation has contributed to the formalization of a reasoning model, similar to the human reasoning. In general, argumentation can be associated with the interaction of reasons in favour and against certain conclusions, so as to determine what conclusions are acceptable. A way of arguing in which the way in which the arguments are constructed, is Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP); this is a formalism that combines logic programming and defeasible argumentation. This work focuses on the strengthening of the reasoning process, identifying partial connections or determinations between knowledge pieces. Through these relations, it is possible to increase the justi cations and foundations that support a particular recommendation, by an analogy process.
XV Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes
Red de Universidades con Carreras de Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
argumentation
defeasible logic programming
determination
analogy
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/42423
Acceder
id SEDICI_c81e7e06e63ff1a339240beb834a6dd8
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/42423
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Recommender system based on argumentation by analogyBudán, Paola D.Rosenzvaig, FedericoBudán, Maximiliano Celmo DavidSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias Informáticasargumentationdefeasible logic programmingdeterminationanalogyArgumentation has contributed to the formalization of a reasoning model, similar to the human reasoning. In general, argumentation can be associated with the interaction of reasons in favour and against certain conclusions, so as to determine what conclusions are acceptable. A way of arguing in which the way in which the arguments are constructed, is Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP); this is a formalism that combines logic programming and defeasible argumentation. This work focuses on the strengthening of the reasoning process, identifying partial connections or determinations between knowledge pieces. Through these relations, it is possible to increase the justi cations and foundations that support a particular recommendation, by an analogy process.XV Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas InteligentesRed de Universidades con Carreras de Informática (RedUNCI)2014-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/42423enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:34:10Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/42423Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:34:10.27SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy
title Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy
spellingShingle Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy
Budán, Paola D.
Ciencias Informáticas
argumentation
defeasible logic programming
determination
analogy
title_short Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy
title_full Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy
title_fullStr Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy
title_full_unstemmed Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy
title_sort Recommender system based on argumentation by analogy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Budán, Paola D.
Rosenzvaig, Federico
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author Budán, Paola D.
author_facet Budán, Paola D.
Rosenzvaig, Federico
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Rosenzvaig, Federico
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
argumentation
defeasible logic programming
determination
analogy
topic Ciencias Informáticas
argumentation
defeasible logic programming
determination
analogy
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Argumentation has contributed to the formalization of a reasoning model, similar to the human reasoning. In general, argumentation can be associated with the interaction of reasons in favour and against certain conclusions, so as to determine what conclusions are acceptable. A way of arguing in which the way in which the arguments are constructed, is Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP); this is a formalism that combines logic programming and defeasible argumentation. This work focuses on the strengthening of the reasoning process, identifying partial connections or determinations between knowledge pieces. Through these relations, it is possible to increase the justi cations and foundations that support a particular recommendation, by an analogy process.
XV Workshop de Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes
Red de Universidades con Carreras de Informática (RedUNCI)
description Argumentation has contributed to the formalization of a reasoning model, similar to the human reasoning. In general, argumentation can be associated with the interaction of reasons in favour and against certain conclusions, so as to determine what conclusions are acceptable. A way of arguing in which the way in which the arguments are constructed, is Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP); this is a formalism that combines logic programming and defeasible argumentation. This work focuses on the strengthening of the reasoning process, identifying partial connections or determinations between knowledge pieces. Through these relations, it is possible to increase the justi cations and foundations that support a particular recommendation, by an analogy process.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/42423
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/42423
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842260190860148736
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares