Parallel defeasible argumentation
- Autores
- García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
- Año de publicación
- 2000
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Implicitly exploitable parallelism for Logic Programming has received ample attention. Defeasible Argutmentation is specially apt for this optimizing technique. Defeasible Logic Programming (DLP), which is based on a defeasible argumentation formalism, could take full advantage of this type of parallel evaluation to improve the computational response of its proof procedure. In a defeasible argumentation formalism, a conclusion q is accepted only when the argument A that supports q becomes a justification. To decide if an argument A is a justification a dialectical analysis is performed. This analysis considers arguments and counter-arguments. DLP extends conventional Logic Programming, capturing common sense reasoning features, and providing a knowledge representation language for defeasible argumentation. Since DLP is an extension of Logic Programming, the different types of parallelism studied for Logic Programming could be applied. We propose new sources of parallelism that can be implicitly exploited in the defeasible argumentation formalism implemented through DLP. Both the argumentation process and the dialectical analysis benefit from exploiting those sources of parallelism.
Facultad de Informática - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
Logic programming
Parallel programming
Distributed Artificial Intelligence
defeasible reasoning; argumentation; parallel logic programming - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/9387
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_d9556f18979abee3a0f93924aedabe53 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/9387 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Parallel defeasible argumentationGarcía, Alejandro JavierSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias InformáticasLogic programmingParallel programmingDistributed Artificial Intelligencedefeasible reasoning; argumentation; parallel logic programmingImplicitly exploitable parallelism for Logic Programming has received ample attention. Defeasible Argutmentation is specially apt for this optimizing technique. Defeasible Logic Programming (DLP), which is based on a defeasible argumentation formalism, could take full advantage of this type of parallel evaluation to improve the computational response of its proof procedure. In a defeasible argumentation formalism, a conclusion q is accepted only when the argument A that supports q becomes a justification. To decide if an argument A is a justification a dialectical analysis is performed. This analysis considers arguments and counter-arguments. DLP extends conventional Logic Programming, capturing common sense reasoning features, and providing a knowledge representation language for defeasible argumentation. Since DLP is an extension of Logic Programming, the different types of parallelism studied for Logic Programming could be applied. We propose new sources of parallelism that can be implicitly exploited in the defeasible argumentation formalism implemented through DLP. Both the argumentation process and the dialectical analysis benefit from exploiting those sources of parallelism.Facultad de Informática2000info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/9387enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journal.info.unlp.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/2015/papers_02/parallel.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1666-6038info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:23:29Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/9387Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:23:30.092SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Parallel defeasible argumentation |
title |
Parallel defeasible argumentation |
spellingShingle |
Parallel defeasible argumentation García, Alejandro Javier Ciencias Informáticas Logic programming Parallel programming Distributed Artificial Intelligence defeasible reasoning; argumentation; parallel logic programming |
title_short |
Parallel defeasible argumentation |
title_full |
Parallel defeasible argumentation |
title_fullStr |
Parallel defeasible argumentation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Parallel defeasible argumentation |
title_sort |
Parallel defeasible argumentation |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author |
García, Alejandro Javier |
author_facet |
García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas Logic programming Parallel programming Distributed Artificial Intelligence defeasible reasoning; argumentation; parallel logic programming |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Logic programming Parallel programming Distributed Artificial Intelligence defeasible reasoning; argumentation; parallel logic programming |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Implicitly exploitable parallelism for Logic Programming has received ample attention. Defeasible Argutmentation is specially apt for this optimizing technique. Defeasible Logic Programming (DLP), which is based on a defeasible argumentation formalism, could take full advantage of this type of parallel evaluation to improve the computational response of its proof procedure. In a defeasible argumentation formalism, a conclusion q is accepted only when the argument A that supports q becomes a justification. To decide if an argument A is a justification a dialectical analysis is performed. This analysis considers arguments and counter-arguments. DLP extends conventional Logic Programming, capturing common sense reasoning features, and providing a knowledge representation language for defeasible argumentation. Since DLP is an extension of Logic Programming, the different types of parallelism studied for Logic Programming could be applied. We propose new sources of parallelism that can be implicitly exploited in the defeasible argumentation formalism implemented through DLP. Both the argumentation process and the dialectical analysis benefit from exploiting those sources of parallelism. Facultad de Informática |
description |
Implicitly exploitable parallelism for Logic Programming has received ample attention. Defeasible Argutmentation is specially apt for this optimizing technique. Defeasible Logic Programming (DLP), which is based on a defeasible argumentation formalism, could take full advantage of this type of parallel evaluation to improve the computational response of its proof procedure. In a defeasible argumentation formalism, a conclusion q is accepted only when the argument A that supports q becomes a justification. To decide if an argument A is a justification a dialectical analysis is performed. This analysis considers arguments and counter-arguments. DLP extends conventional Logic Programming, capturing common sense reasoning features, and providing a knowledge representation language for defeasible argumentation. Since DLP is an extension of Logic Programming, the different types of parallelism studied for Logic Programming could be applied. We propose new sources of parallelism that can be implicitly exploited in the defeasible argumentation formalism implemented through DLP. Both the argumentation process and the dialectical analysis benefit from exploiting those sources of parallelism. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2000 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articulo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/9387 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/9387 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journal.info.unlp.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/2015/papers_02/parallel.pdf info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1666-6038 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1842260059912929280 |
score |
13.13397 |