Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation properties
- Autores
- Chesñevar, Carlos Iván; Dix, Jurgen; Stolzenburg, Frieder; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
- Año de publicación
- 2000
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- This paper relates the Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) framework and its semantics SEMneLP to more classical logic programming frameworks. In DeLP we distinguish between strict and defeasible rules, combining default and strict negation. In contrast to this, in normal logic programming (NLP), there is one negation nut, interpreted as a kind of negation-as-failure, which introduces defeasibility. Various semantics have been defined for NLP, notably the well-founded semantics WFS. In this paper we consider the transformation properties for NLP introduced by Brass et al. adapted within the DeLP framework. We show which transformation properties are satisfied, identifying the aspects in which NLP and DeLP differ. We contend that transformation rules presented in this paper can help to gain a better understanding of the relationship of DeLP semantics with respect to more traditional logic programming approaches. As a byproduct we get that DeLP is a proper extension of NLP
Área: Informática Teórica - Inteligencia Artificial - Lenguajes - Compiladores
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
Logic Programming
Nonmonotonic reasoning and belief revision - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23660
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_c1b0e89aa69d68acefab9267ce0792a2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23660 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation propertiesChesñevar, Carlos IvánDix, JurgenStolzenburg, FriederSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias InformáticasLogic ProgrammingNonmonotonic reasoning and belief revisionThis paper relates the Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) framework and its semantics SEMneLP to more classical logic programming frameworks. In DeLP we distinguish between strict and defeasible rules, combining default and strict negation. In contrast to this, in normal logic programming (NLP), there is one negation nut, interpreted as a kind of negation-as-failure, which introduces defeasibility. Various semantics have been defined for NLP, notably the well-founded semantics WFS. In this paper we consider the transformation properties for NLP introduced by Brass et al. adapted within the DeLP framework. We show which transformation properties are satisfied, identifying the aspects in which NLP and DeLP differ. We contend that transformation rules presented in this paper can help to gain a better understanding of the relationship of DeLP semantics with respect to more traditional logic programming approaches. As a byproduct we get that DeLP is a proper extension of NLPÁrea: Informática Teórica - Inteligencia Artificial - Lenguajes - CompiladoresRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2000-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23660enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T10:55:31Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23660Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 10:55:31.833SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation properties |
title |
Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation properties |
spellingShingle |
Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation properties Chesñevar, Carlos Iván Ciencias Informáticas Logic Programming Nonmonotonic reasoning and belief revision |
title_short |
Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation properties |
title_full |
Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation properties |
title_fullStr |
Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation properties |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation properties |
title_sort |
Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation properties |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván Dix, Jurgen Stolzenburg, Frieder Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author |
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván |
author_facet |
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván Dix, Jurgen Stolzenburg, Frieder Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dix, Jurgen Stolzenburg, Frieder Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas Logic Programming Nonmonotonic reasoning and belief revision |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Logic Programming Nonmonotonic reasoning and belief revision |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This paper relates the Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) framework and its semantics SEMneLP to more classical logic programming frameworks. In DeLP we distinguish between strict and defeasible rules, combining default and strict negation. In contrast to this, in normal logic programming (NLP), there is one negation nut, interpreted as a kind of negation-as-failure, which introduces defeasibility. Various semantics have been defined for NLP, notably the well-founded semantics WFS. In this paper we consider the transformation properties for NLP introduced by Brass et al. adapted within the DeLP framework. We show which transformation properties are satisfied, identifying the aspects in which NLP and DeLP differ. We contend that transformation rules presented in this paper can help to gain a better understanding of the relationship of DeLP semantics with respect to more traditional logic programming approaches. As a byproduct we get that DeLP is a proper extension of NLP Área: Informática Teórica - Inteligencia Artificial - Lenguajes - Compiladores Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
description |
This paper relates the Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) framework and its semantics SEMneLP to more classical logic programming frameworks. In DeLP we distinguish between strict and defeasible rules, combining default and strict negation. In contrast to this, in normal logic programming (NLP), there is one negation nut, interpreted as a kind of negation-as-failure, which introduces defeasibility. Various semantics have been defined for NLP, notably the well-founded semantics WFS. In this paper we consider the transformation properties for NLP introduced by Brass et al. adapted within the DeLP framework. We show which transformation properties are satisfied, identifying the aspects in which NLP and DeLP differ. We contend that transformation rules presented in this paper can help to gain a better understanding of the relationship of DeLP semantics with respect to more traditional logic programming approaches. As a byproduct we get that DeLP is a proper extension of NLP |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2000-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23660 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23660 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844615814836125696 |
score |
13.070432 |