Niveles actuales de aproximación de la sistemática no morfológica

Autores
Cei, José Miguel Alfredo María
Año de publicación
1969
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The author recalls that non morphological systematics already began at the dawn of the century with Nuttall’s discoveries in the field of serology. From then on, biochemistry provided a -wide array of fields and methods which made a major part of the New Systematics. However, the New Systematics is not ‘ ‘antimorphological ” but merely “anti-typological”. The electrophoresis is one of the most useful techniques. Methods have been devised for different taxonomic levels. Some proved class characters and others revealed population specificities. As a by-product, some interesting ecological correlations has been also discovered: high rates of albumine in terrestrial animals for instance. Chromatography also yielded very important results, for instance in the comparative study of the skin poisons of the Amphibians. Finally, the author cites the precipitine tests as used by Boyden and his collaborators. Amongst the most striking results in this line of investigation, are the suggestion that Phiyllomedusa is actually more closely related to Bufo than to Hyla, the confirmation of a Ceratophryid “cluster” with the additional hint that Odontophrynus does not belong to it. Here again, the method can be accurate enough to detect intcr-populational differences.
Material digitalizado en SEDICI gracias a la colaboración del Dr. Jorge Williams (FCNM-UNLP).
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo
Materia
Zoología
Taxonomía animal
Electroforesis
Cromatografía
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/86231

id SEDICI_9f2a1387c5515d8c0c0a2733c2150ca5
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/86231
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Niveles actuales de aproximación de la sistemática no morfológicaActual approximation levels in non morphologic systematicsCei, José Miguel Alfredo MaríaZoologíaTaxonomía animalElectroforesisCromatografíaThe author recalls that non morphological systematics already began at the dawn of the century with Nuttall’s discoveries in the field of serology. From then on, biochemistry provided a -wide array of fields and methods which made a major part of the New Systematics. However, the New Systematics is not ‘ ‘antimorphological ” but merely “anti-typological”. The electrophoresis is one of the most useful techniques. Methods have been devised for different taxonomic levels. Some proved class characters and others revealed population specificities. As a by-product, some interesting ecological correlations has been also discovered: high rates of albumine in terrestrial animals for instance. Chromatography also yielded very important results, for instance in the comparative study of the skin poisons of the Amphibians. Finally, the author cites the precipitine tests as used by Boyden and his collaborators. Amongst the most striking results in this line of investigation, are the suggestion that Phiyllomedusa is actually more closely related to Bufo than to Hyla, the confirmation of a Ceratophryid “cluster” with the additional hint that Odontophrynus does not belong to it. Here again, the method can be accurate enough to detect intcr-populational differences.Material digitalizado en SEDICI gracias a la colaboración del Dr. Jorge Williams (FCNM-UNLP).Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo1969info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf293-308http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/86231spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-12-23T11:19:18Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/86231Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-12-23 11:19:18.977SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Niveles actuales de aproximación de la sistemática no morfológica
Actual approximation levels in non morphologic systematics
title Niveles actuales de aproximación de la sistemática no morfológica
spellingShingle Niveles actuales de aproximación de la sistemática no morfológica
Cei, José Miguel Alfredo María
Zoología
Taxonomía animal
Electroforesis
Cromatografía
title_short Niveles actuales de aproximación de la sistemática no morfológica
title_full Niveles actuales de aproximación de la sistemática no morfológica
title_fullStr Niveles actuales de aproximación de la sistemática no morfológica
title_full_unstemmed Niveles actuales de aproximación de la sistemática no morfológica
title_sort Niveles actuales de aproximación de la sistemática no morfológica
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cei, José Miguel Alfredo María
author Cei, José Miguel Alfredo María
author_facet Cei, José Miguel Alfredo María
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Zoología
Taxonomía animal
Electroforesis
Cromatografía
topic Zoología
Taxonomía animal
Electroforesis
Cromatografía
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The author recalls that non morphological systematics already began at the dawn of the century with Nuttall’s discoveries in the field of serology. From then on, biochemistry provided a -wide array of fields and methods which made a major part of the New Systematics. However, the New Systematics is not ‘ ‘antimorphological ” but merely “anti-typological”. The electrophoresis is one of the most useful techniques. Methods have been devised for different taxonomic levels. Some proved class characters and others revealed population specificities. As a by-product, some interesting ecological correlations has been also discovered: high rates of albumine in terrestrial animals for instance. Chromatography also yielded very important results, for instance in the comparative study of the skin poisons of the Amphibians. Finally, the author cites the precipitine tests as used by Boyden and his collaborators. Amongst the most striking results in this line of investigation, are the suggestion that Phiyllomedusa is actually more closely related to Bufo than to Hyla, the confirmation of a Ceratophryid “cluster” with the additional hint that Odontophrynus does not belong to it. Here again, the method can be accurate enough to detect intcr-populational differences.
Material digitalizado en SEDICI gracias a la colaboración del Dr. Jorge Williams (FCNM-UNLP).
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo
description The author recalls that non morphological systematics already began at the dawn of the century with Nuttall’s discoveries in the field of serology. From then on, biochemistry provided a -wide array of fields and methods which made a major part of the New Systematics. However, the New Systematics is not ‘ ‘antimorphological ” but merely “anti-typological”. The electrophoresis is one of the most useful techniques. Methods have been devised for different taxonomic levels. Some proved class characters and others revealed population specificities. As a by-product, some interesting ecological correlations has been also discovered: high rates of albumine in terrestrial animals for instance. Chromatography also yielded very important results, for instance in the comparative study of the skin poisons of the Amphibians. Finally, the author cites the precipitine tests as used by Boyden and his collaborators. Amongst the most striking results in this line of investigation, are the suggestion that Phiyllomedusa is actually more closely related to Bufo than to Hyla, the confirmation of a Ceratophryid “cluster” with the additional hint that Odontophrynus does not belong to it. Here again, the method can be accurate enough to detect intcr-populational differences.
publishDate 1969
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1969
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/86231
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/86231
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
293-308
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1852334197193048064
score 12.952241