Mechanical and thermal shock behavior of refractory materials for glass feeders

Autores
Rendtorff Birrer, Nicolás Maximiliano; Aglietti, Esteban Fausto
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Refractory materials of the Al2O3–SiO2–ZrO2 system are widely used in glass industry in forehearth, distributors, feeders, and as expendable materials as they are known to have good thermal shock properties. They are commonly subject to thermal stress during installation. Once installed, the service life is then determined mainly by the corrosion characteristics. In this work three refractories were studied to observe and correlate mechanical properties with thermal shock behavior. The materials and their principal crystalline phases are:AM(Alumina–Mullite 35),Am(Alumina–Mullite 10), and AZ (Alumina–Zircon). All the materials have similar open porosity and pore size distribution. The mechanical characterization comprises: fracture toughness (KIC), fracture initiation energy (γNBT) and work of fracture (γWOF). The dynamic elastic modulus E of the composites was measured by the excitation technique. The water quenching method was used for the experimental evaluation of the thermal shock resistance (TSR). Thermal cycles with different quenching temperature gradients ∆T were applied and a cyclic water quenching was used for the thermal fatigue resistance (TFR) assessment. The TSR behavior was evaluated by measuring the decrease in E/E0 ratio where E0 and E are the dynamic elastic modulus before and after one quenching, respectively. The strength (modulus of rupture, MOR) of materials before and after the TSR test was also measured. The AM material showed the highest E, f (MOR) and KIC values. The elastic modulus remained relatively high (near 80%) up to a ∆T of 500 ◦C for the three samples. AM showed a higher reduction of E and MOR than Am and AZ. Considering the retained MOR and E with ∆T, Am and AZ have a similar behavior. Theoretical TS parameters (R, R''' and RST) were calculated for the refractories. The parameters considering crack initiation (R = theoretical∆Tc) are very similar but their value differs considerably to those Tc observed experimentally. This fact can be explained if we consider that the microstructure of refractory materials initially has defects and microcracks. The R''' parameters are the same for all materials. For our materials the RST parameter reflected the TSR damage. The best TSR and TFR of AZ followed by Am are due to the microcracks size and their distribution in the microstructure of the materials. In AM refractory the high content and great grain size of Mullite produce the appearance of greater cracks than in the other materials. The usage of these materials in glass service indicates that the AM material has a low TSR resistance.
Centro de Tecnología de Recursos Minerales y Cerámica
Materia
Química
Refractories
Fracture properties
Thermal shock
Alumina
Mullite
Zircon
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/164066

id SEDICI_9ce38f1e219870d8ac515c06997f822a
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/164066
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Mechanical and thermal shock behavior of refractory materials for glass feedersRendtorff Birrer, Nicolás MaximilianoAglietti, Esteban FaustoQuímicaRefractoriesFracture propertiesThermal shockAluminaMulliteZirconRefractory materials of the Al2O3–SiO2–ZrO2 system are widely used in glass industry in forehearth, distributors, feeders, and as expendable materials as they are known to have good thermal shock properties. They are commonly subject to thermal stress during installation. Once installed, the service life is then determined mainly by the corrosion characteristics. In this work three refractories were studied to observe and correlate mechanical properties with thermal shock behavior. The materials and their principal crystalline phases are:AM(Alumina–Mullite 35),Am(Alumina–Mullite 10), and AZ (Alumina–Zircon). All the materials have similar open porosity and pore size distribution. The mechanical characterization comprises: fracture toughness (KIC), fracture initiation energy (γNBT) and work of fracture (γWOF). The dynamic elastic modulus E of the composites was measured by the excitation technique. The water quenching method was used for the experimental evaluation of the thermal shock resistance (TSR). Thermal cycles with different quenching temperature gradients ∆T were applied and a cyclic water quenching was used for the thermal fatigue resistance (TFR) assessment. The TSR behavior was evaluated by measuring the decrease in E/E0 ratio where E0 and E are the dynamic elastic modulus before and after one quenching, respectively. The strength (modulus of rupture, MOR) of materials before and after the TSR test was also measured. The AM material showed the highest E, f (MOR) and KIC values. The elastic modulus remained relatively high (near 80%) up to a ∆T of 500 ◦C for the three samples. AM showed a higher reduction of E and MOR than Am and AZ. Considering the retained MOR and E with ∆T, Am and AZ have a similar behavior. Theoretical TS parameters (R, R''' and RST) were calculated for the refractories. The parameters considering crack initiation (R = theoretical∆Tc) are very similar but their value differs considerably to those Tc observed experimentally. This fact can be explained if we consider that the microstructure of refractory materials initially has defects and microcracks. The R''' parameters are the same for all materials. For our materials the RST parameter reflected the TSR damage. The best TSR and TFR of AZ followed by Am are due to the microcracks size and their distribution in the microstructure of the materials. In AM refractory the high content and great grain size of Mullite produce the appearance of greater cracks than in the other materials. The usage of these materials in glass service indicates that the AM material has a low TSR resistance.Centro de Tecnología de Recursos Minerales y Cerámica2010info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf3840-3847http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/164066enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0921-5093info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.053info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:43:11Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/164066Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:43:11.372SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mechanical and thermal shock behavior of refractory materials for glass feeders
title Mechanical and thermal shock behavior of refractory materials for glass feeders
spellingShingle Mechanical and thermal shock behavior of refractory materials for glass feeders
Rendtorff Birrer, Nicolás Maximiliano
Química
Refractories
Fracture properties
Thermal shock
Alumina
Mullite
Zircon
title_short Mechanical and thermal shock behavior of refractory materials for glass feeders
title_full Mechanical and thermal shock behavior of refractory materials for glass feeders
title_fullStr Mechanical and thermal shock behavior of refractory materials for glass feeders
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical and thermal shock behavior of refractory materials for glass feeders
title_sort Mechanical and thermal shock behavior of refractory materials for glass feeders
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rendtorff Birrer, Nicolás Maximiliano
Aglietti, Esteban Fausto
author Rendtorff Birrer, Nicolás Maximiliano
author_facet Rendtorff Birrer, Nicolás Maximiliano
Aglietti, Esteban Fausto
author_role author
author2 Aglietti, Esteban Fausto
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Química
Refractories
Fracture properties
Thermal shock
Alumina
Mullite
Zircon
topic Química
Refractories
Fracture properties
Thermal shock
Alumina
Mullite
Zircon
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Refractory materials of the Al2O3–SiO2–ZrO2 system are widely used in glass industry in forehearth, distributors, feeders, and as expendable materials as they are known to have good thermal shock properties. They are commonly subject to thermal stress during installation. Once installed, the service life is then determined mainly by the corrosion characteristics. In this work three refractories were studied to observe and correlate mechanical properties with thermal shock behavior. The materials and their principal crystalline phases are:AM(Alumina–Mullite 35),Am(Alumina–Mullite 10), and AZ (Alumina–Zircon). All the materials have similar open porosity and pore size distribution. The mechanical characterization comprises: fracture toughness (KIC), fracture initiation energy (γNBT) and work of fracture (γWOF). The dynamic elastic modulus E of the composites was measured by the excitation technique. The water quenching method was used for the experimental evaluation of the thermal shock resistance (TSR). Thermal cycles with different quenching temperature gradients ∆T were applied and a cyclic water quenching was used for the thermal fatigue resistance (TFR) assessment. The TSR behavior was evaluated by measuring the decrease in E/E0 ratio where E0 and E are the dynamic elastic modulus before and after one quenching, respectively. The strength (modulus of rupture, MOR) of materials before and after the TSR test was also measured. The AM material showed the highest E, f (MOR) and KIC values. The elastic modulus remained relatively high (near 80%) up to a ∆T of 500 ◦C for the three samples. AM showed a higher reduction of E and MOR than Am and AZ. Considering the retained MOR and E with ∆T, Am and AZ have a similar behavior. Theoretical TS parameters (R, R''' and RST) were calculated for the refractories. The parameters considering crack initiation (R = theoretical∆Tc) are very similar but their value differs considerably to those Tc observed experimentally. This fact can be explained if we consider that the microstructure of refractory materials initially has defects and microcracks. The R''' parameters are the same for all materials. For our materials the RST parameter reflected the TSR damage. The best TSR and TFR of AZ followed by Am are due to the microcracks size and their distribution in the microstructure of the materials. In AM refractory the high content and great grain size of Mullite produce the appearance of greater cracks than in the other materials. The usage of these materials in glass service indicates that the AM material has a low TSR resistance.
Centro de Tecnología de Recursos Minerales y Cerámica
description Refractory materials of the Al2O3–SiO2–ZrO2 system are widely used in glass industry in forehearth, distributors, feeders, and as expendable materials as they are known to have good thermal shock properties. They are commonly subject to thermal stress during installation. Once installed, the service life is then determined mainly by the corrosion characteristics. In this work three refractories were studied to observe and correlate mechanical properties with thermal shock behavior. The materials and their principal crystalline phases are:AM(Alumina–Mullite 35),Am(Alumina–Mullite 10), and AZ (Alumina–Zircon). All the materials have similar open porosity and pore size distribution. The mechanical characterization comprises: fracture toughness (KIC), fracture initiation energy (γNBT) and work of fracture (γWOF). The dynamic elastic modulus E of the composites was measured by the excitation technique. The water quenching method was used for the experimental evaluation of the thermal shock resistance (TSR). Thermal cycles with different quenching temperature gradients ∆T were applied and a cyclic water quenching was used for the thermal fatigue resistance (TFR) assessment. The TSR behavior was evaluated by measuring the decrease in E/E0 ratio where E0 and E are the dynamic elastic modulus before and after one quenching, respectively. The strength (modulus of rupture, MOR) of materials before and after the TSR test was also measured. The AM material showed the highest E, f (MOR) and KIC values. The elastic modulus remained relatively high (near 80%) up to a ∆T of 500 ◦C for the three samples. AM showed a higher reduction of E and MOR than Am and AZ. Considering the retained MOR and E with ∆T, Am and AZ have a similar behavior. Theoretical TS parameters (R, R''' and RST) were calculated for the refractories. The parameters considering crack initiation (R = theoretical∆Tc) are very similar but their value differs considerably to those Tc observed experimentally. This fact can be explained if we consider that the microstructure of refractory materials initially has defects and microcracks. The R''' parameters are the same for all materials. For our materials the RST parameter reflected the TSR damage. The best TSR and TFR of AZ followed by Am are due to the microcracks size and their distribution in the microstructure of the materials. In AM refractory the high content and great grain size of Mullite produce the appearance of greater cracks than in the other materials. The usage of these materials in glass service indicates that the AM material has a low TSR resistance.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/164066
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/164066
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0921-5093
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.053
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
3840-3847
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616300889899008
score 13.070432