Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Autores
López‑Moreno, Miguel; Viviani Rossi, Eugenio; López‑Gil, José Francisco; Marrero‑Fernández, Paula; Roldán‑Ruiz, Alberto; Bertotti, Gabriele
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations. Methods: The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases—MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus—were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment. Results: Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, − 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, − 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, − 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes.
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas
Materia
Ciencias Médicas
plant-based diets
athletic performance
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/182119

id SEDICI_9b9e14c28a17e3a4c51845ab15fbb9c8
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/182119
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsLópez‑Moreno, MiguelViviani Rossi, EugenioLópez‑Gil, José FranciscoMarrero‑Fernández, PaulaRoldán‑Ruiz, AlbertoBertotti, GabrieleCiencias Médicasplant-based dietsathletic performanceBackground: The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations. Methods: The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases—MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus—were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment. Results: Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, − 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, − 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, − 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes.Facultad de Ciencias Médicas2025-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/182119enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2198-9761info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s40798-025-00852-7info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:49:43Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/182119Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:49:44.092SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
spellingShingle Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
López‑Moreno, Miguel
Ciencias Médicas
plant-based diets
athletic performance
title_short Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv López‑Moreno, Miguel
Viviani Rossi, Eugenio
López‑Gil, José Francisco
Marrero‑Fernández, Paula
Roldán‑Ruiz, Alberto
Bertotti, Gabriele
author López‑Moreno, Miguel
author_facet López‑Moreno, Miguel
Viviani Rossi, Eugenio
López‑Gil, José Francisco
Marrero‑Fernández, Paula
Roldán‑Ruiz, Alberto
Bertotti, Gabriele
author_role author
author2 Viviani Rossi, Eugenio
López‑Gil, José Francisco
Marrero‑Fernández, Paula
Roldán‑Ruiz, Alberto
Bertotti, Gabriele
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Médicas
plant-based diets
athletic performance
topic Ciencias Médicas
plant-based diets
athletic performance
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations. Methods: The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases—MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus—were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment. Results: Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, − 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, − 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, − 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes.
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas
description Background: The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations. Methods: The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases—MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus—were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment. Results: Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, − 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, − 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, − 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/182119
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/182119
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2198-9761
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s40798-025-00852-7
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616357482594304
score 13.069144