Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- Autores
- López‑Moreno, Miguel; Viviani Rossi, Eugenio; López‑Gil, José Francisco; Marrero‑Fernández, Paula; Roldán‑Ruiz, Alberto; Bertotti, Gabriele
- Año de publicación
- 2025
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Background: The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations. Methods: The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases—MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus—were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment. Results: Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, − 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, − 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, − 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes.
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas - Materia
-
Ciencias Médicas
plant-based diets
athletic performance - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/182119
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_9b9e14c28a17e3a4c51845ab15fbb9c8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/182119 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsLópez‑Moreno, MiguelViviani Rossi, EugenioLópez‑Gil, José FranciscoMarrero‑Fernández, PaulaRoldán‑Ruiz, AlbertoBertotti, GabrieleCiencias Médicasplant-based dietsathletic performanceBackground: The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations. Methods: The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases—MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus—were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment. Results: Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, − 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, − 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, − 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes.Facultad de Ciencias Médicas2025-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/182119enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2198-9761info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s40798-025-00852-7info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:49:43Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/182119Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:49:44.092SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title |
Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
spellingShingle |
Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials López‑Moreno, Miguel Ciencias Médicas plant-based diets athletic performance |
title_short |
Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full |
Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr |
Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort |
Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
López‑Moreno, Miguel Viviani Rossi, Eugenio López‑Gil, José Francisco Marrero‑Fernández, Paula Roldán‑Ruiz, Alberto Bertotti, Gabriele |
author |
López‑Moreno, Miguel |
author_facet |
López‑Moreno, Miguel Viviani Rossi, Eugenio López‑Gil, José Francisco Marrero‑Fernández, Paula Roldán‑Ruiz, Alberto Bertotti, Gabriele |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Viviani Rossi, Eugenio López‑Gil, José Francisco Marrero‑Fernández, Paula Roldán‑Ruiz, Alberto Bertotti, Gabriele |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Médicas plant-based diets athletic performance |
topic |
Ciencias Médicas plant-based diets athletic performance |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Background: The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations. Methods: The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases—MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus—were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment. Results: Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, − 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, − 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, − 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas |
description |
Background: The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations. Methods: The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases—MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus—were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment. Results: Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, − 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, − 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, − 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes. |
publishDate |
2025 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articulo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/182119 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/182119 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2198-9761 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s40798-025-00852-7 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844616357482594304 |
score |
13.069144 |