From Computer Integrated Manufacturing to Cloud Manufacturing

Autores
Zeballos, Luis; Quiroga, Oscar
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Until not much time ago, Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) was considered as a key philosophy to increase the capability and quality of production, increase the ability to produce according to the diverse customer requirements, as well as decrease of delivery times, while retaining the revenues in a highly competitive global market. However, in the last two decades, the CIM philosophy has lost importance. With the advent of communications and application developments to promote the interaction of different actors in manufacturing enterprises, other philosophies have emerged. One of them is Cloud Manufacturing (CM) that is supported by the latest advances in communications, computing and applications developments. According to Wu et al. (2013) CM is "a customer-centric manufacturing model that exploits on-demand access to a shared collection of diversified and distributed manufacturing resources to form temporary, reconfigurable production lines which enhance efficiency, reduce product lifecycle costs, and allow for optimal resource loading in response to variable-demand customer generated tasking". This paper analyses similarities and differences between the concepts of CIM and CM. In addition, the work shows the current state of the concepts and their potential and limitations for the future.
Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Cloud Manufacturing
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/66268
Acceder
id SEDICI_9663f16c8ba2f60f5d41e036cc5ceea2
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/66268
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling From Computer Integrated Manufacturing to Cloud ManufacturingZeballos, LuisQuiroga, OscarCiencias InformáticasComputer Integrated ManufacturingCloud ManufacturingUntil not much time ago, Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) was considered as a key philosophy to increase the capability and quality of production, increase the ability to produce according to the diverse customer requirements, as well as decrease of delivery times, while retaining the revenues in a highly competitive global market. However, in the last two decades, the CIM philosophy has lost importance. With the advent of communications and application developments to promote the interaction of different actors in manufacturing enterprises, other philosophies have emerged. One of them is Cloud Manufacturing (CM) that is supported by the latest advances in communications, computing and applications developments. According to Wu et al. (2013) CM is "a customer-centric manufacturing model that exploits on-demand access to a shared collection of diversified and distributed manufacturing resources to form temporary, reconfigurable production lines which enhance efficiency, reduce product lifecycle costs, and allow for optimal resource loading in response to variable-demand customer generated tasking". This paper analyses similarities and differences between the concepts of CIM and CM. In addition, the work shows the current state of the concepts and their potential and limitations for the future.Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa2017-09info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf174-185http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/66268enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.clei2017-46jaiio.sadio.org.ar/sites/default/files/Mem/SII/sii-16.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2451-7542info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-10T12:12:41Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/66268Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-10 12:12:41.453SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From Computer Integrated Manufacturing to Cloud Manufacturing
title From Computer Integrated Manufacturing to Cloud Manufacturing
spellingShingle From Computer Integrated Manufacturing to Cloud Manufacturing
Zeballos, Luis
Ciencias Informáticas
Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Cloud Manufacturing
title_short From Computer Integrated Manufacturing to Cloud Manufacturing
title_full From Computer Integrated Manufacturing to Cloud Manufacturing
title_fullStr From Computer Integrated Manufacturing to Cloud Manufacturing
title_full_unstemmed From Computer Integrated Manufacturing to Cloud Manufacturing
title_sort From Computer Integrated Manufacturing to Cloud Manufacturing
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zeballos, Luis
Quiroga, Oscar
author Zeballos, Luis
author_facet Zeballos, Luis
Quiroga, Oscar
author_role author
author2 Quiroga, Oscar
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Cloud Manufacturing
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Cloud Manufacturing
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Until not much time ago, Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) was considered as a key philosophy to increase the capability and quality of production, increase the ability to produce according to the diverse customer requirements, as well as decrease of delivery times, while retaining the revenues in a highly competitive global market. However, in the last two decades, the CIM philosophy has lost importance. With the advent of communications and application developments to promote the interaction of different actors in manufacturing enterprises, other philosophies have emerged. One of them is Cloud Manufacturing (CM) that is supported by the latest advances in communications, computing and applications developments. According to Wu et al. (2013) CM is "a customer-centric manufacturing model that exploits on-demand access to a shared collection of diversified and distributed manufacturing resources to form temporary, reconfigurable production lines which enhance efficiency, reduce product lifecycle costs, and allow for optimal resource loading in response to variable-demand customer generated tasking". This paper analyses similarities and differences between the concepts of CIM and CM. In addition, the work shows the current state of the concepts and their potential and limitations for the future.
Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa
description Until not much time ago, Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) was considered as a key philosophy to increase the capability and quality of production, increase the ability to produce according to the diverse customer requirements, as well as decrease of delivery times, while retaining the revenues in a highly competitive global market. However, in the last two decades, the CIM philosophy has lost importance. With the advent of communications and application developments to promote the interaction of different actors in manufacturing enterprises, other philosophies have emerged. One of them is Cloud Manufacturing (CM) that is supported by the latest advances in communications, computing and applications developments. According to Wu et al. (2013) CM is "a customer-centric manufacturing model that exploits on-demand access to a shared collection of diversified and distributed manufacturing resources to form temporary, reconfigurable production lines which enhance efficiency, reduce product lifecycle costs, and allow for optimal resource loading in response to variable-demand customer generated tasking". This paper analyses similarities and differences between the concepts of CIM and CM. In addition, the work shows the current state of the concepts and their potential and limitations for the future.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/66268
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/66268
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.clei2017-46jaiio.sadio.org.ar/sites/default/files/Mem/SII/sii-16.pdf
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2451-7542
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
174-185
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842904051193217024
score 12.993085

Publicaciones similares