Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination

Autores
Tocho, Claudia Noemí; Sideris, Michael G.; Font de Affolter, Graciela
Año de publicación
2002
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Three different topographic reduction methods in geoid determination were investigated. The first method is the classical Helmert second method of condensation yielding the geoid, the second is the Residual Terrain Model (RTM) method yielding the quasigeoid and the third is the Rudzki inversion method. The different types of indirect effects (indirect effect on gravity and indirect effect on geoid) in Helmert's method were also investigated. All three methods use the remove-restore technique and the EGM96 geopotential model as the reference gravity field. A mountainous area, ranging from 32°S to 42°S in latitude and 72°W to 68°W in longitude, was chosen as test area. The area was selected due to its high topography, with a maximum height of 6795 meters and a mean height of 1188 meters, and due to the existence of GPS/leveling points in three different networks. The topography in the test area is-represented by a digital terrain model (DTM) with a grid spacing of 1 km x 1 km. Another test was carried out in a flat area with denser data coverage. The external accuracy of the three gravimetric geoids was evaluated by comparing them to undulations derived from GPS/leveling.
En el siguiente trabajo se investigan tres métodos diferentes de reducciones gravimétricas para la determinación práctica del geoide gravimétrico: el clásico segundo método de condensación de Helmert, el modelo residual de terreno y el método de inversión de Rudzki. Los tres métodos utilizan la técnica remover-restaurar y el modelo de geopotencial EGM96. Fueron seleccionadas dos áreas, una en una zona montañosa de alta topografía con una altura máxima de 6795 metros y una altura promedio de 1188 metros y otra en una zona plana con cobertura más densa. La topografía está representada por un modelo digital de terreno con un espaciamiento de grillado de un kilómetro por un kilómetro. La evaluación externa del geoide gravimétrico se realiza comparándolo con ondulaciones obtenidas a partir de puntos GPS sobre nivelación.
Asociación Argentina de Geofísicos y Geodestas
Materia
Geofísica
Helmert
RTM
Rudzki
Geoid
Quasigeoid
Direct terrain effects
Indirect effects
Geoide
Casi geoide
Efectos directos sobre el terreno
Efectos indirectos
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/139999

id SEDICI_94fed9ca8c3b0cb72f3d2eb24675d8ab
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/139999
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determinationTocho, Claudia NoemíSideris, Michael G.Font de Affolter, GracielaGeofísicaHelmertRTMRudzkiGeoidQuasigeoidDirect terrain effectsIndirect effectsGeoideCasi geoideEfectos directos sobre el terrenoEfectos indirectosThree different topographic reduction methods in geoid determination were investigated. The first method is the classical Helmert second method of condensation yielding the geoid, the second is the Residual Terrain Model (RTM) method yielding the quasigeoid and the third is the Rudzki inversion method. The different types of indirect effects (indirect effect on gravity and indirect effect on geoid) in Helmert's method were also investigated. All three methods use the remove-restore technique and the EGM96 geopotential model as the reference gravity field. A mountainous area, ranging from 32°S to 42°S in latitude and 72°W to 68°W in longitude, was chosen as test area. The area was selected due to its high topography, with a maximum height of 6795 meters and a mean height of 1188 meters, and due to the existence of GPS/leveling points in three different networks. The topography in the test area is-represented by a digital terrain model (DTM) with a grid spacing of 1 km x 1 km. Another test was carried out in a flat area with denser data coverage. The external accuracy of the three gravimetric geoids was evaluated by comparing them to undulations derived from GPS/leveling.En el siguiente trabajo se investigan tres métodos diferentes de reducciones gravimétricas para la determinación práctica del geoide gravimétrico: el clásico segundo método de condensación de Helmert, el modelo residual de terreno y el método de inversión de Rudzki. Los tres métodos utilizan la técnica remover-restaurar y el modelo de geopotencial EGM96. Fueron seleccionadas dos áreas, una en una zona montañosa de alta topografía con una altura máxima de 6795 metros y una altura promedio de 1188 metros y otra en una zona plana con cobertura más densa. La topografía está representada por un modelo digital de terreno con un espaciamiento de grillado de un kilómetro por un kilómetro. La evaluación externa del geoide gravimétrico se realiza comparándolo con ondulaciones obtenidas a partir de puntos GPS sobre nivelación.Asociación Argentina de Geofísicos y Geodestas2002info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf73-78http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/139999enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0326-7237info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:35:34Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/139999Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:35:34.18SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination
title Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination
spellingShingle Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination
Tocho, Claudia Noemí
Geofísica
Helmert
RTM
Rudzki
Geoid
Quasigeoid
Direct terrain effects
Indirect effects
Geoide
Casi geoide
Efectos directos sobre el terreno
Efectos indirectos
title_short Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination
title_full Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination
title_fullStr Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination
title_full_unstemmed Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination
title_sort Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tocho, Claudia Noemí
Sideris, Michael G.
Font de Affolter, Graciela
author Tocho, Claudia Noemí
author_facet Tocho, Claudia Noemí
Sideris, Michael G.
Font de Affolter, Graciela
author_role author
author2 Sideris, Michael G.
Font de Affolter, Graciela
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Geofísica
Helmert
RTM
Rudzki
Geoid
Quasigeoid
Direct terrain effects
Indirect effects
Geoide
Casi geoide
Efectos directos sobre el terreno
Efectos indirectos
topic Geofísica
Helmert
RTM
Rudzki
Geoid
Quasigeoid
Direct terrain effects
Indirect effects
Geoide
Casi geoide
Efectos directos sobre el terreno
Efectos indirectos
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Three different topographic reduction methods in geoid determination were investigated. The first method is the classical Helmert second method of condensation yielding the geoid, the second is the Residual Terrain Model (RTM) method yielding the quasigeoid and the third is the Rudzki inversion method. The different types of indirect effects (indirect effect on gravity and indirect effect on geoid) in Helmert's method were also investigated. All three methods use the remove-restore technique and the EGM96 geopotential model as the reference gravity field. A mountainous area, ranging from 32°S to 42°S in latitude and 72°W to 68°W in longitude, was chosen as test area. The area was selected due to its high topography, with a maximum height of 6795 meters and a mean height of 1188 meters, and due to the existence of GPS/leveling points in three different networks. The topography in the test area is-represented by a digital terrain model (DTM) with a grid spacing of 1 km x 1 km. Another test was carried out in a flat area with denser data coverage. The external accuracy of the three gravimetric geoids was evaluated by comparing them to undulations derived from GPS/leveling.
En el siguiente trabajo se investigan tres métodos diferentes de reducciones gravimétricas para la determinación práctica del geoide gravimétrico: el clásico segundo método de condensación de Helmert, el modelo residual de terreno y el método de inversión de Rudzki. Los tres métodos utilizan la técnica remover-restaurar y el modelo de geopotencial EGM96. Fueron seleccionadas dos áreas, una en una zona montañosa de alta topografía con una altura máxima de 6795 metros y una altura promedio de 1188 metros y otra en una zona plana con cobertura más densa. La topografía está representada por un modelo digital de terreno con un espaciamiento de grillado de un kilómetro por un kilómetro. La evaluación externa del geoide gravimétrico se realiza comparándolo con ondulaciones obtenidas a partir de puntos GPS sobre nivelación.
Asociación Argentina de Geofísicos y Geodestas
description Three different topographic reduction methods in geoid determination were investigated. The first method is the classical Helmert second method of condensation yielding the geoid, the second is the Residual Terrain Model (RTM) method yielding the quasigeoid and the third is the Rudzki inversion method. The different types of indirect effects (indirect effect on gravity and indirect effect on geoid) in Helmert's method were also investigated. All three methods use the remove-restore technique and the EGM96 geopotential model as the reference gravity field. A mountainous area, ranging from 32°S to 42°S in latitude and 72°W to 68°W in longitude, was chosen as test area. The area was selected due to its high topography, with a maximum height of 6795 meters and a mean height of 1188 meters, and due to the existence of GPS/leveling points in three different networks. The topography in the test area is-represented by a digital terrain model (DTM) with a grid spacing of 1 km x 1 km. Another test was carried out in a flat area with denser data coverage. The external accuracy of the three gravimetric geoids was evaluated by comparing them to undulations derived from GPS/leveling.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/139999
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/139999
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0326-7237
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
73-78
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616234331537408
score 13.070432