Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination
- Autores
- Tocho, Claudia Noemí; Sideris, Michael G.; Font de Affolter, Graciela
- Año de publicación
- 2002
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Three different topographic reduction methods in geoid determination were investigated. The first method is the classical Helmert second method of condensation yielding the geoid, the second is the Residual Terrain Model (RTM) method yielding the quasigeoid and the third is the Rudzki inversion method. The different types of indirect effects (indirect effect on gravity and indirect effect on geoid) in Helmert's method were also investigated. All three methods use the remove-restore technique and the EGM96 geopotential model as the reference gravity field. A mountainous area, ranging from 32°S to 42°S in latitude and 72°W to 68°W in longitude, was chosen as test area. The area was selected due to its high topography, with a maximum height of 6795 meters and a mean height of 1188 meters, and due to the existence of GPS/leveling points in three different networks. The topography in the test area is-represented by a digital terrain model (DTM) with a grid spacing of 1 km x 1 km. Another test was carried out in a flat area with denser data coverage. The external accuracy of the three gravimetric geoids was evaluated by comparing them to undulations derived from GPS/leveling.
En el siguiente trabajo se investigan tres métodos diferentes de reducciones gravimétricas para la determinación práctica del geoide gravimétrico: el clásico segundo método de condensación de Helmert, el modelo residual de terreno y el método de inversión de Rudzki. Los tres métodos utilizan la técnica remover-restaurar y el modelo de geopotencial EGM96. Fueron seleccionadas dos áreas, una en una zona montañosa de alta topografía con una altura máxima de 6795 metros y una altura promedio de 1188 metros y otra en una zona plana con cobertura más densa. La topografía está representada por un modelo digital de terreno con un espaciamiento de grillado de un kilómetro por un kilómetro. La evaluación externa del geoide gravimétrico se realiza comparándolo con ondulaciones obtenidas a partir de puntos GPS sobre nivelación.
Asociación Argentina de Geofísicos y Geodestas - Materia
-
Geofísica
Helmert
RTM
Rudzki
Geoid
Quasigeoid
Direct terrain effects
Indirect effects
Geoide
Casi geoide
Efectos directos sobre el terreno
Efectos indirectos - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/139999
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_94fed9ca8c3b0cb72f3d2eb24675d8ab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/139999 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determinationTocho, Claudia NoemíSideris, Michael G.Font de Affolter, GracielaGeofísicaHelmertRTMRudzkiGeoidQuasigeoidDirect terrain effectsIndirect effectsGeoideCasi geoideEfectos directos sobre el terrenoEfectos indirectosThree different topographic reduction methods in geoid determination were investigated. The first method is the classical Helmert second method of condensation yielding the geoid, the second is the Residual Terrain Model (RTM) method yielding the quasigeoid and the third is the Rudzki inversion method. The different types of indirect effects (indirect effect on gravity and indirect effect on geoid) in Helmert's method were also investigated. All three methods use the remove-restore technique and the EGM96 geopotential model as the reference gravity field. A mountainous area, ranging from 32°S to 42°S in latitude and 72°W to 68°W in longitude, was chosen as test area. The area was selected due to its high topography, with a maximum height of 6795 meters and a mean height of 1188 meters, and due to the existence of GPS/leveling points in three different networks. The topography in the test area is-represented by a digital terrain model (DTM) with a grid spacing of 1 km x 1 km. Another test was carried out in a flat area with denser data coverage. The external accuracy of the three gravimetric geoids was evaluated by comparing them to undulations derived from GPS/leveling.En el siguiente trabajo se investigan tres métodos diferentes de reducciones gravimétricas para la determinación práctica del geoide gravimétrico: el clásico segundo método de condensación de Helmert, el modelo residual de terreno y el método de inversión de Rudzki. Los tres métodos utilizan la técnica remover-restaurar y el modelo de geopotencial EGM96. Fueron seleccionadas dos áreas, una en una zona montañosa de alta topografía con una altura máxima de 6795 metros y una altura promedio de 1188 metros y otra en una zona plana con cobertura más densa. La topografía está representada por un modelo digital de terreno con un espaciamiento de grillado de un kilómetro por un kilómetro. La evaluación externa del geoide gravimétrico se realiza comparándolo con ondulaciones obtenidas a partir de puntos GPS sobre nivelación.Asociación Argentina de Geofísicos y Geodestas2002info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf73-78http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/139999enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0326-7237info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:35:34Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/139999Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:35:34.18SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination |
title |
Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination |
spellingShingle |
Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination Tocho, Claudia Noemí Geofísica Helmert RTM Rudzki Geoid Quasigeoid Direct terrain effects Indirect effects Geoide Casi geoide Efectos directos sobre el terreno Efectos indirectos |
title_short |
Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination |
title_full |
Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination |
title_fullStr |
Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination |
title_full_unstemmed |
Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination |
title_sort |
Different topographic reduction methods in practical gravimetric geoid determination |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Tocho, Claudia Noemí Sideris, Michael G. Font de Affolter, Graciela |
author |
Tocho, Claudia Noemí |
author_facet |
Tocho, Claudia Noemí Sideris, Michael G. Font de Affolter, Graciela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sideris, Michael G. Font de Affolter, Graciela |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Geofísica Helmert RTM Rudzki Geoid Quasigeoid Direct terrain effects Indirect effects Geoide Casi geoide Efectos directos sobre el terreno Efectos indirectos |
topic |
Geofísica Helmert RTM Rudzki Geoid Quasigeoid Direct terrain effects Indirect effects Geoide Casi geoide Efectos directos sobre el terreno Efectos indirectos |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Three different topographic reduction methods in geoid determination were investigated. The first method is the classical Helmert second method of condensation yielding the geoid, the second is the Residual Terrain Model (RTM) method yielding the quasigeoid and the third is the Rudzki inversion method. The different types of indirect effects (indirect effect on gravity and indirect effect on geoid) in Helmert's method were also investigated. All three methods use the remove-restore technique and the EGM96 geopotential model as the reference gravity field. A mountainous area, ranging from 32°S to 42°S in latitude and 72°W to 68°W in longitude, was chosen as test area. The area was selected due to its high topography, with a maximum height of 6795 meters and a mean height of 1188 meters, and due to the existence of GPS/leveling points in three different networks. The topography in the test area is-represented by a digital terrain model (DTM) with a grid spacing of 1 km x 1 km. Another test was carried out in a flat area with denser data coverage. The external accuracy of the three gravimetric geoids was evaluated by comparing them to undulations derived from GPS/leveling. En el siguiente trabajo se investigan tres métodos diferentes de reducciones gravimétricas para la determinación práctica del geoide gravimétrico: el clásico segundo método de condensación de Helmert, el modelo residual de terreno y el método de inversión de Rudzki. Los tres métodos utilizan la técnica remover-restaurar y el modelo de geopotencial EGM96. Fueron seleccionadas dos áreas, una en una zona montañosa de alta topografía con una altura máxima de 6795 metros y una altura promedio de 1188 metros y otra en una zona plana con cobertura más densa. La topografía está representada por un modelo digital de terreno con un espaciamiento de grillado de un kilómetro por un kilómetro. La evaluación externa del geoide gravimétrico se realiza comparándolo con ondulaciones obtenidas a partir de puntos GPS sobre nivelación. Asociación Argentina de Geofísicos y Geodestas |
description |
Three different topographic reduction methods in geoid determination were investigated. The first method is the classical Helmert second method of condensation yielding the geoid, the second is the Residual Terrain Model (RTM) method yielding the quasigeoid and the third is the Rudzki inversion method. The different types of indirect effects (indirect effect on gravity and indirect effect on geoid) in Helmert's method were also investigated. All three methods use the remove-restore technique and the EGM96 geopotential model as the reference gravity field. A mountainous area, ranging from 32°S to 42°S in latitude and 72°W to 68°W in longitude, was chosen as test area. The area was selected due to its high topography, with a maximum height of 6795 meters and a mean height of 1188 meters, and due to the existence of GPS/leveling points in three different networks. The topography in the test area is-represented by a digital terrain model (DTM) with a grid spacing of 1 km x 1 km. Another test was carried out in a flat area with denser data coverage. The external accuracy of the three gravimetric geoids was evaluated by comparing them to undulations derived from GPS/leveling. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articulo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/139999 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/139999 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0326-7237 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 73-78 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844616234331537408 |
score |
13.070432 |