A study on the ability of support vector regression and neural networks to forecast basic time series patterns
- Autores
- Crone, Sven F.; Weber, Richard; Guajardo, José
- Año de publicación
- 2006
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Recently, novel learning algorithms such as Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Neural Networks (NN) have received increasing attention in forecasting and time series prediction, offering attractive theoretical properties and successful applications in several real world problem domains. Commonly, time series are composed of the combination of regular and irregular patterns such as trends and cycles, seasonal variations, level shifts, outliers or pulses and structural breaks, among others. Conventional parametric statistical methods are capable of forecasting a particular combination of patterns through ex ante selection of an adequate model form and specific data preprocessing. Thus, the capability of semi-parametric methods from computational intelligence to predict basic time series patterns without model selection and preprocessing is of particular relevance in evaluating their contribution to forecasting. This paper proposes an empirical comparison between NN and SVR models using radial basis function (RBF) and linear kernel functions, by analyzing their predictive power on five artificial time series: stationary, additive seasonality, linear trend, linear trend with additive seasonality, and linear trend with multiplicative seasonality. Results obtained show that RBF SVR models have problems in extrapolating trends, while NN and linear SVR models without data preprocessing provide robust accuracy across all patterns and clearly outperform the commonly used RBF SVR on trended time series.
IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice - Neural Nets
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
learning algorithms
comparison
Radial Basis Functions (RBF)
Neural nets
Algorithms - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23879
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_88edfea4138cb5128f3719126930cd27 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23879 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
A study on the ability of support vector regression and neural networks to forecast basic time series patternsCrone, Sven F.Weber, RichardGuajardo, JoséCiencias Informáticaslearning algorithmscomparisonRadial Basis Functions (RBF)Neural netsAlgorithmsRecently, novel learning algorithms such as Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Neural Networks (NN) have received increasing attention in forecasting and time series prediction, offering attractive theoretical properties and successful applications in several real world problem domains. Commonly, time series are composed of the combination of regular and irregular patterns such as trends and cycles, seasonal variations, level shifts, outliers or pulses and structural breaks, among others. Conventional parametric statistical methods are capable of forecasting a particular combination of patterns through ex ante selection of an adequate model form and specific data preprocessing. Thus, the capability of semi-parametric methods from computational intelligence to predict basic time series patterns without model selection and preprocessing is of particular relevance in evaluating their contribution to forecasting. This paper proposes an empirical comparison between NN and SVR models using radial basis function (RBF) and linear kernel functions, by analyzing their predictive power on five artificial time series: stationary, additive seasonality, linear trend, linear trend with additive seasonality, and linear trend with multiplicative seasonality. Results obtained show that RBF SVR models have problems in extrapolating trends, while NN and linear SVR models without data preprocessing provide robust accuracy across all patterns and clearly outperform the commonly used RBF SVR on trended time series.IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice - Neural NetsRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2006-08info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23879enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/0-387-34654-6info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T10:55:40Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23879Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 10:55:40.384SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A study on the ability of support vector regression and neural networks to forecast basic time series patterns |
title |
A study on the ability of support vector regression and neural networks to forecast basic time series patterns |
spellingShingle |
A study on the ability of support vector regression and neural networks to forecast basic time series patterns Crone, Sven F. Ciencias Informáticas learning algorithms comparison Radial Basis Functions (RBF) Neural nets Algorithms |
title_short |
A study on the ability of support vector regression and neural networks to forecast basic time series patterns |
title_full |
A study on the ability of support vector regression and neural networks to forecast basic time series patterns |
title_fullStr |
A study on the ability of support vector regression and neural networks to forecast basic time series patterns |
title_full_unstemmed |
A study on the ability of support vector regression and neural networks to forecast basic time series patterns |
title_sort |
A study on the ability of support vector regression and neural networks to forecast basic time series patterns |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Crone, Sven F. Weber, Richard Guajardo, José |
author |
Crone, Sven F. |
author_facet |
Crone, Sven F. Weber, Richard Guajardo, José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Weber, Richard Guajardo, José |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas learning algorithms comparison Radial Basis Functions (RBF) Neural nets Algorithms |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas learning algorithms comparison Radial Basis Functions (RBF) Neural nets Algorithms |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Recently, novel learning algorithms such as Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Neural Networks (NN) have received increasing attention in forecasting and time series prediction, offering attractive theoretical properties and successful applications in several real world problem domains. Commonly, time series are composed of the combination of regular and irregular patterns such as trends and cycles, seasonal variations, level shifts, outliers or pulses and structural breaks, among others. Conventional parametric statistical methods are capable of forecasting a particular combination of patterns through ex ante selection of an adequate model form and specific data preprocessing. Thus, the capability of semi-parametric methods from computational intelligence to predict basic time series patterns without model selection and preprocessing is of particular relevance in evaluating their contribution to forecasting. This paper proposes an empirical comparison between NN and SVR models using radial basis function (RBF) and linear kernel functions, by analyzing their predictive power on five artificial time series: stationary, additive seasonality, linear trend, linear trend with additive seasonality, and linear trend with multiplicative seasonality. Results obtained show that RBF SVR models have problems in extrapolating trends, while NN and linear SVR models without data preprocessing provide robust accuracy across all patterns and clearly outperform the commonly used RBF SVR on trended time series. IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice - Neural Nets Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
description |
Recently, novel learning algorithms such as Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Neural Networks (NN) have received increasing attention in forecasting and time series prediction, offering attractive theoretical properties and successful applications in several real world problem domains. Commonly, time series are composed of the combination of regular and irregular patterns such as trends and cycles, seasonal variations, level shifts, outliers or pulses and structural breaks, among others. Conventional parametric statistical methods are capable of forecasting a particular combination of patterns through ex ante selection of an adequate model form and specific data preprocessing. Thus, the capability of semi-parametric methods from computational intelligence to predict basic time series patterns without model selection and preprocessing is of particular relevance in evaluating their contribution to forecasting. This paper proposes an empirical comparison between NN and SVR models using radial basis function (RBF) and linear kernel functions, by analyzing their predictive power on five artificial time series: stationary, additive seasonality, linear trend, linear trend with additive seasonality, and linear trend with multiplicative seasonality. Results obtained show that RBF SVR models have problems in extrapolating trends, while NN and linear SVR models without data preprocessing provide robust accuracy across all patterns and clearly outperform the commonly used RBF SVR on trended time series. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23879 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23879 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/0-387-34654-6 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844615815756775424 |
score |
13.070432 |