Multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agent
- Autores
- Sosa Toranzo, Cecilia; Errecalde, Marcelo Luis; Ferretti, Edgardo
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The BDI model, as a practical reasoning architecture aims at making decisions about what to do based on cognitives notions as beliefs, desires and intentions. However, during the decision making process, BDI agents also have to make background decisions like choosing what intention to achieve next from a set of possibly con icting desires; which plan to execute from among the plans that satisfy a given intention; and whether is necessary or not to reconsider current intentions. With this aim, in this work, we present an abstract framework which integrates a Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming approach to decision making in the inner decision processes within BDI agents.
XIV Workshop agentes y sistemas inteligentes.
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
Informática
Logic Programming
Decision problems
argumentation
possibilistic defeasible logic programming
agreement technologies
multi-criteria decision making - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/31430
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_55ab9ca209bb1d480c41216e412e0712 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/31430 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agentSosa Toranzo, CeciliaErrecalde, Marcelo LuisFerretti, EdgardoCiencias InformáticasInformáticaLogic ProgrammingDecision problemsargumentationpossibilistic defeasible logic programmingagreement technologiesmulti-criteria decision makingThe BDI model, as a practical reasoning architecture aims at making decisions about what to do based on cognitives notions as beliefs, desires and intentions. However, during the decision making process, BDI agents also have to make background decisions like choosing what intention to achieve next from a set of possibly con icting desires; which plan to execute from among the plans that satisfy a given intention; and whether is necessary or not to reconsider current intentions. With this aim, in this work, we present an abstract framework which integrates a Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming approach to decision making in the inner decision processes within BDI agents.XIV Workshop agentes y sistemas inteligentes.Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2013-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/31430enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:30:42Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/31430Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:30:43.118SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agent |
title |
Multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agent |
spellingShingle |
Multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agent Sosa Toranzo, Cecilia Ciencias Informáticas Informática Logic Programming Decision problems argumentation possibilistic defeasible logic programming agreement technologies multi-criteria decision making |
title_short |
Multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agent |
title_full |
Multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agent |
title_fullStr |
Multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agent |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agent |
title_sort |
Multi-criteria argumentation-based decision making within a BDI agent |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Sosa Toranzo, Cecilia Errecalde, Marcelo Luis Ferretti, Edgardo |
author |
Sosa Toranzo, Cecilia |
author_facet |
Sosa Toranzo, Cecilia Errecalde, Marcelo Luis Ferretti, Edgardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Errecalde, Marcelo Luis Ferretti, Edgardo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas Informática Logic Programming Decision problems argumentation possibilistic defeasible logic programming agreement technologies multi-criteria decision making |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Informática Logic Programming Decision problems argumentation possibilistic defeasible logic programming agreement technologies multi-criteria decision making |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The BDI model, as a practical reasoning architecture aims at making decisions about what to do based on cognitives notions as beliefs, desires and intentions. However, during the decision making process, BDI agents also have to make background decisions like choosing what intention to achieve next from a set of possibly con icting desires; which plan to execute from among the plans that satisfy a given intention; and whether is necessary or not to reconsider current intentions. With this aim, in this work, we present an abstract framework which integrates a Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming approach to decision making in the inner decision processes within BDI agents. XIV Workshop agentes y sistemas inteligentes. Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
description |
The BDI model, as a practical reasoning architecture aims at making decisions about what to do based on cognitives notions as beliefs, desires and intentions. However, during the decision making process, BDI agents also have to make background decisions like choosing what intention to achieve next from a set of possibly con icting desires; which plan to execute from among the plans that satisfy a given intention; and whether is necessary or not to reconsider current intentions. With this aim, in this work, we present an abstract framework which integrates a Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming approach to decision making in the inner decision processes within BDI agents. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/31430 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/31430 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1842260150484729856 |
score |
13.13397 |